Tell HSBC & NatWest – No Freako Pro-Nouns!

So a bunch of bankers ( think English rhyming slang!) are going to ‘put pronouns on staff name badges?’

More sicko appeasement of militant maladjusts!

But reading on, we find that the plan to kow-tow to freaks is not yet a done deal.

NatWest and HSBC….

…

HSBC Is Funding The Enemy Within!. ..now, why is the latter’s behaviour no great surprise?

—-

…are only ‘considering’ this woko-loco ‘bid to appear more inclusive to transgender workers and customers… ‘

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/business/2021/11/14/high-street-banks-put-pronouns-staff-name-badges

Which means that the public, and especially people with bank accounts…

.

.

…can get to work and bombard the putative perpetrators.

Email the banksters!

https://www.hsbc.co.uk/contact/

https://www.natwest.com/support-centre/contact-us.html

Protest!

Read The Book! Witch-Hunt By Tranny-Fan Egg-Heads!

Just an ad for a book which helps explain…

=

=

….how the evil gaystapo witch-hunters operate in academia.

00000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000

Can you imagine what it’s like being involved in a national controversy?

Can you imagine being accused of creating a “toxic climate,” “targeting trans folks,” and “spreading transphobia?”

Well, in 2017 that’s exactly what happened to Lindsay Shepherd, then a 22-year-old graduate student and teaching assistant at Wilfrid Laurier University in Ontario.

=

You may recall Lindsay from national headlines after she secretly recorded her disciplinary meeting and released the audio to the media — a recording that helped Lindsay stave off university censorship.

The academic-activist cabal was upset with Lindsay because she played a five-minute clip that featured Jordan Peterson discussing pronouns in her classroom and then led a neutral, open conversation on the topic. 

Lindsay was brought into a disciplinary meeting where two professors and a diversity office bureaucrat berated and attacked her.

And now, Lindsay’s released her tell-all memoir about her entire fight for freedom in her new book, Diversity & Exclusion: Confronting the Campus Free Speech Crisis.

You can order the book right now by clicking here.

Tax-Funded UK Pravda Mangles English Grammar To Please ‘Trans’ Maladjusts!

Recently you may have noticed a higher than usual incidence of typos and even layout errors here.

My fault entirely, distracted by kittens who will soon be starting to walk…

=

…and by the absence of my usual visitor/helper, currently – temporarily – in the Javanese hinterland.

However, I don’t make huge grammatical errors, and if I did, I’d fix them and apologise.

Not so UK Pravda which presented the millions of Brits coerced into paying large license fees to fund its propaganda cr-p…

=

=

…with a long screed about the UK Census….

==========================================.

Inclusion of a question on gender for the first time in the UK census has been welcomed as a “good first step” by some in the transgender community.

.The voluntary question in the 2021 survey reads: “Is the gender you identify with the same as your sex registered at birth?”

People over 16 can tick yes or no and specify their gender identity.

The Office for National Statistics, which will run the census on 21 March, said the details were clearly needed. THAT’s very strange….

…and surely discriminatory! 

Why is there no question asking if any lame-brains imagine they are elks?

=====================================

….and that long BBC screed is distinguished by DELIBERATE grammar errors…

Owen Hurcum says the inclusion of the question is a “token gesture” but “at least a single step in the right direction”

Owen Hurcum, 23, is a tranny, and so maladjusted that it doesn’t call itself ‘he‘ OR ‘she’  but ‘THEY!’

=

There’s a photo of the tranny-mare in the article, but it is nauseating, so I’m just inserting the cartoon above!

===

Incredibly, it’s also the mayor-elect of Bangor, in Wales, so I suppose the dorks who elected it will address it as ‘Your Honours,‘ plural, in obeisance to the wretch’s delusionary self-perceptions, to which the sickos at the BBC pander.

Get this, referring to ONE person!!

‘They said they would fill in the form to say non-binary…'”

I think it is great that we can finally put our real genders on the census,” they said.

‘THEY?’  It’s one person speaking!

LOOK HERE, UK Pravda.

That poor thing in Bangor can prattle about itself in the plural if it must, but BBC hacks are NOT entitled to indulge its delusions by calling it ‘they!‘

BBC draws its undeservedly vast income from British tax-payers…

=

–

…the overwhelming majority of whom would be bemused and baffled by anyone, male or female, who expects to be called ‘they.’

Whichever degenerate Beeb-Hack edited the article, here – 

https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-wales-55721123

– needs to be suspended, at least, and told, when suspension is over, to rewrite the offensive ‘plural drivel’ into correct English.

The BBC has a statutory duty to report the truth, not propaganda, so a tranny man who purports to be a woman should be referred to as a man.

And ‘HE’ should under no circumstances be described as ‘THEY….’

=

–

…because, bluntly, such lying is unacceptable!

Yet the BBC elsewhere – https://www.bbc.com/news/newsbeat-49754930  –  tries to legitimise its repulsive mangling of the English language, which, it claims, is now to be defined by freak-show HQ, which of course is oblivious to realities…

.

===

….for which it substitutes this hogwash, below….

Gender-neutral pronouns are defined by the LGBT Resource Centre as providing an identity for a singular person who does not identify as he/him or she/her. …Now, in English, the word “they” is used as a gender-neutral singular pronoun

…ignoring the fact that IN NORMAL PEOPLE’S ENGLISH’ ‘they‘ is a plural word.

But BBC prefers to take its cue from the queer minority.

So is anybody in the Jellyfish Johnson government going to tell the BBC to get its act together and be truthful?

=

.

It is, after all, that government, which still calls itself ‘conservative….’

….which has to approve the format of the Census!

So Jellyfish and his cabal are hardly likely to tell UK Pravda to stop pushing its woke-weasel ideology down Britannia’s throat.

 

Just Call Sam Smith ‘IT!’

One can only feel sorry for the person called Sam Smith, of whom I’ve never heard till today but is apparently a singer.

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2019/09/14/sam-smith-asks-called-theythem-coming-non-binary/

He looks like a he, more or less…

=

==========

…but has now issued a pronoun ultimatum, requiring people to call him ‘them,’ because he lacks the self-confidence to decide if he’s male or female.

He could go to the nearest toilet for a pee.

That ought to clarify the dilemma.

=

=

If Sam is male, he’s a he.

If he, unlikely, is a female, call him ‘she.’

If Sam is neither, it’s “IT!”

Not ‘them,’  unless IT’s beside itself…

===

…with indignation at the ridicule it’s bound to get from normal people.

=========

Why am I wasting time over this sad maladjusted man?

Because the BBC has featured the ‘story’ on every hourly news bulletin so far today.

They have had at least two mincing ninnies pontificating on how ‘respect’ obliges us to bow to the whims of aberrants.

Not ‘respect,’ mincers.

The appropriate emotion is pity, and, while one does sometimes feel sorry for such specimens, such pity does not justify queering the English language.

=

Especially not by the tax-funded BBC, merely to boost its (their?) gaystapo credentials.

Toronto Prof And Scots Tory Targetted By Language Vandals

One of my least favourite UK politicians is the current Leader of the Scottish Conservatives.

Not so much because she’s a lesbian – as we see in Germany’s AFD, a lesbian can be patriotic and talk sense – but because the Scottish woman is essentially a liberal, not a conservative at all.

=

Davidson

=

Yet today I must speak up in her defence, after some drivel made its way onto The Independent’s pages this month, from a very weird individual, named Yas Necati, attacking Davidson because, for all her wayward views, she can still talk like a normal person. –

Ruth Davidson’s solution to the current mess that is our Government is that the party needs to “get over its current nervous breakdown” – and I quote word for word – “and man up a little bit.”

http://www.independent.co.uk/voices/conservative-party-conference-ruth-davidson-man-up-nervous-breakdown-sexist-ableist–

 So what’s wrong with that, I hear readers echoing my response! A point of view about her party, not one we might agree with, but phrased in terms everyone can follow.

WRONG!

Nutjob Necati goes at once into hyper-shrill mode.

…hailed “feminist” and “liberal” Conservative Davidson has managed to be both sexist and ableist in one neat little sentence…

What’s the uptight wacko on about?

Oh, it’s ‘Man Up!’

…I guess Davidson’s solution to those struggling with child benefit, coming to terms with being sexually assaulted or at risk of being deported might just be to “man up” as well?

Good grief.

So a phrase the meaning of which is effective in communication, is perfectly clear, and which is in common use throughout the English-speaking world. must be abhorred because some abnormal would prefer us to say ‘Person Up!’ – as if by using the normal-talk phrase we are affronting women?

BTW, I don’t use ‘abnormal’ lightly to describe Nutjob Necati. A paragraph about her/his/its/their background is attached by The Independent, viz.

Yas Necati is an apprentice at The Independent and the London Evening Standard. They previously worked as a campaigner… 

 WHAT?    ‘is?’  ‘they?’  ‘a?’

Something far wrong there – singular verbs and a plural subject? A suggestion of split personality? Schizo? Who knows?

But it gets even more demented, a deranged shrill shriek against Davidson for – wait for it…

…her reference to the Conservative Party having a “nervous breakdown.”

I don’t even really know where to start with this. Is she implying that mentally illness makes you incompetent? Is she saying that in order to get over mental health issues we all need to simply “man up”? Is she suggesting that someone having a nervous breakdown is unfit to continue with their job?

I don’t know if Davidson is implying or suggesting any of those things, but given what we know about nervous breakdowns…

—

…Nervous (or mental) breakdown is a term used to describe  a period of intense mental distress. During this period, you’re unable to function in your everyday life…. 

https://www.healthline.com/health/mental-health/nervous-breakdown#overview1

….they probably DO impair competence!

So at least suspension from one’s work duties might well be a sensible step to take if a nervous breakdown is under way.

The way far-left sexual misfits are trying to force us into their own bizarre PC vocabulary is of course not unique to this ‘person.’ ( I’d say man or woman but that’s impossible, because I don’t  – and possibly it doesn’t! – know!)

We have the scandalous situation at Toronto University, where a perfectly competent professor faces possible dismissal because he won’t be bullied by transgender freaks into using ‘gender-neutral’ pronouns.

======

Professor Peterson

‘I’m not going to cede linguistic territory to postmodernist neo-Marxists’ 

=======

Under a new law  (Bill C-16) in Turdostan, cretinous Canadian college bosses may indeed be entitled to fire Professor Jordan Peterson, but to his great credit he’s not budging.

Jordan Peterson and the transgender wars

But back to Nutjob, whose final paragraphs expose the essential purpose behind its ranting against Ruth Davidson.  .

…I suppose she feels she can say whatever she wants, because she’s a woman and she’s queer, and therefore in her eyes she’s not like those other party members.

OMG.

=

Ms Davidson DARES to think that she can say whatever she wants?

Not in Necati’s Gaystapoid Brave New World, she can’t!

PS

Needless to say, I was intrigued that such an alien life-form exists, and evidently flourishes, in the UK media.

A look at Yaz Necati’s previous yammerings seemed in order, and I found another example, also in The Independent, in which it complains bitterly that in a Google ad, there is a gay nuclear family. No queer people of colour, no drag kings, no polyamorous relationships. 

http://www.independent.co.uk/voices/gender-non-binary-stereotypes-advertising-lgbtq-asa-capitalism-radical-coca-cola-google-a7848521.html

God forbid!

How distressing for freakos around the world!