Who Needs Hijabs! Well Said, Indonesia’s Former First Lady!

---

Indonesia’s Former First Lady, the widow of Gus Dur, who was forced out of office years ago, for reasons which are still debated but certainly included his commitment to religious liberty.

.

He often spoke out, as when he took issue with fanatical Ramadan fasters who couldn’t handle the challenge to their spiritual discipline posed by the sight of non-fasters enjoying a simple meal.

———–

• 

‘If we fasting Muslims want respect, let us also respect those who aren’t fasting.’ 

Such a contrast to savage bigots…

….like these FPI brutes in Makassar, attacking innocent vendors for providing meals for non-fasters!

===

….has been agreeably maintaining her late husband’s tradition of talking sense.

A VERY Good Muslim Lady Breakfasts in Java! 

Sinta Nuriyah Wahid

Islamist ‘Scholars’ say ‘Bigot Mayor Knows Best!’ Ex-First Lady Speaks Out For Liberty

Indeed, she has never stopped doing do.

And she was at it again last week!

Do all Muslims have to wear the hijab? Not really. If we interpret the verse in the Koran correctly,” said Sinta.

https://muslim.okezone.com/read/2020/01/16/614/2153762/begini-pendapat-istri-gus-dur-soal-jilbab

We have in the past, and no doubt will again in the future, made it known that only the most narrow-minded sexist sectarians here want to impose scarfing and other mediaeval garb on Indonesia’s lovely  womenfolk. 

=====

‘Fathers and husbands, their private parts are YOUR responsibility’

000000000000000000000000000000

—

Both at home and abroad, people who know what’s what have said there’s no obligation involved. 

‘An Archaic Tribal Rag’ – Wise UK Muslim Imam Says ‘Ban the Burqa!’ 

It’s on the BBC! Bag-Head Bans Do Not Infringe Religious Liberty! 

Fiery Islamists – ‘Head-Scarves NOT a Big Issue!’ 

 

Fight CAIR's Sectarian Triumphalist Law-Suit!

 I was reading an interesting Gatestone article about how weak-kneed Western big businesses like Nike have been courting the sectarian market..  https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/11482/islam-oppression-women and was contemplating what a pack of pinko creeps it is that run Nike, as noted last year…

=

Take A Hike, Nike – Boycott The Kneelers’ Boot-Lickers! 

…when what pops up in my inbox but an appeal from America.

CAIR files complaint against Dillards for allegedly not hiring a woman who demanded to wear a hijab on the sales floor.  Please send your email to encourage Dillards to stand its ground.   Click here to send your email to encourage Dillards’ officials to stand their ground against CAIR. The Council on American Islamic Relations filed a complaint against Dillards with the Texas Workforce Commission for allegedly declining to hire a Muslim woman who insisted on wearing her hijab on the sales floor. A local news media report gives the details WFAA ABC News in Dallas Texas issued a report but whatever the details, it’s clear the plaintiff is as arrogant as they come. “This is my identity,” she said. Okay, but if her entirely self-declared identity means she doesn’t get a job in a company where she was told clearly no head-scarfing was permitted by the company, tough! Everyone knows that Muslim women are NOT required to wear them at all. 00000000000000000000 ‘An Archaic Tribal Rag’ – Wise UK Muslim Imam Says ‘Ban the Burqa!’  It’s on the BBC! Bag-Head Bans Do Not Infringe Religious Liberty!  Fiery Islamists – ‘Head-Scarves NOT a Big Issue!’  oooooooo ooooooo Here in Indonesia, even our staunchly Muslim First Lady declines to cover her head… …except when attending prayers and other religious observances. Those who go about everywhere in hijabs (what we here call jilbabs)  are merely showing off their sectarian allegiance, a form of Islamic triumphalism, which may be OK in some benighted lands but is a needless affectation in normal societies. I obviously wouldn’t ban head-scarves, which are fine for women facing windy days… = ==== …but all day and every day, NO WAY! It’s just sad to see such sights. If you move to civilised countries, better to fit in, and leave your backward baggage back home. ——- Millions of Americans believe the hijab exemplifies Islamist oppression towards women that is commanded by Sharia law and fatwas.  To read more at Floridafamily.org regarding the oppressive nature of the hijab click here. Florida Family Association has prepared an email for you to send to encourage Dillards’ officials to stand their ground. To send your email, please click the following link, enter your name and email address then click the “Send Your Message” button. You may also edit the subject or message text if you wish. Click here to send your email to encourage Dillards’ officials to stand their ground against CAIR. Contact information: William Dillard, CEO bill.dillard@dillards.com Brant Musgrave, President of Stores brant.musgrave@dillards.com

Offensive London Hijab ‘Victim’ Should Apologise NOW!

Much ado about a woman in a jilbab ( which is what we in Indonesia call the hijab) being told to remove it by a Mcdonald’s security guard.

I find his action surprising, because a head-scarf is not an uncommon thing for women in Britain to wear.

====

=

Whilst burka bag-heads should of course be excluded from as many places as possible, not least every civilised country, a hijab is a mere head-scarf, and in no way a security risk.

=

=

Would the security man bar HM Elizabeth, By the Grace of God, Defender of the Faith, from entering the Golden Arches?

The man seems to have made a mistake, obviously, but for reasons not yet obvious.

Nevertheless, his face has been plastered all over the media, he’s been suspended and the local idiot council is pondering a licensing witch-hunt against every Mcdonalds in their borough….

/

/

…wittering that they will also rally more people and companies to sign up to its anti-hate crime pledge.

Hate-crime?

Grow up, for God’s sake!

AND the vengeful scarfy – who is desperate not to identify herself and whom the media are obliging by hiding exactly what she looked like when the incident occurred – is also ranting that-

 ‘It’s not enough.’ 

“If you want to dress modestly, you should have the right to dress modestly and it shouldn’t be politicised,” said the 19-year-old.    http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-london-42242272

Ignore the leftist councillors’ blatantly politicised witch-hunt plotting.

Focus on what that ‘victim’-bint said about….

MODESTY!

It’s NOT about ‘modesty!‘

=

Who would refuse entry to this honey?

=

It’s about head-scarfing.

To equate head-scarfing with ‘modesty‘ is to insult every normal British woman, Muslim, Christian or whatever. It’s a grossly offensive assertion to suggest that, if a girl goes out with her God-given crowning glory uncovered, she’s somehow being immodest.

The whiner bint is talking obnoxious tommy-rot.

As to the babbling rabble of ‘Londoners’ demonstrating at the Mcdonalds, where were they when that ignoramus Tesco employee…

‘He pointed at the ham and wine in my basket and said “I can’t serve you that because I’m fasting. When I told him he should be serving customers not turning them away he still refused telling me to go to the self-service. I was furious.’

Tesco Covers for Bigot Staff After Sectarian Snub to Shopper!

…refused to do his job and invoked sectarian bigotry as an excuse.

Those shrills in Holloway Road have a legal right to protest, but it would be a welcome sign that they are genuinely interested in religious tolerance…

=======

• 

• …if they simultaneously made it clear that in a free society, women, Muslim or not, are absolutely free to wear AND NOT to wear scarves, and that it is downright obnoxious to suggest that the absence of a scarf indicates an absence of ‘modesty.’

• That teenage shrill should be told to make a public appearance and APOLOGISE!

Iran – Contemptible Swedish Cows Crawl To Shariah Sexists

Joke.

Sick joke

But sadly, not ‘fake news.’

=========

=====

More like Fake Feminists, these contemptible Swedish cows abasing themselves in shariah scarves before the tyrannical sexist regime in Tehran.

These pathetic pukes, an official ministerial delegation, simpered into the ayatollahs’ despotism and cast aside their usual clothing that might suggest Western concepts of sex equality.

They make a mockery of themselves, their country and all the left-lib babble about women’s rights.

======================

• 
• ============

• As CFP noted, and as we must concur, so much for Stockholm’s promise to promote “a gender equality perspective” internationally, and to adopt a “feminist foreign policy” in which “equality between women and men is a fundamental aim.”
• http://canadafreepress.com/article/walk-of-shame-swedens-first-feminist-government-don-hijabs-in-iran
• I can count five of the hypocrites in the photo above. That means their backward bearded host – to whom shariah ‘law’ affords the right to marry four of them, would, were he single, need to disappoint at least one.
• ===
• 

This debauched old devil obviously cheated – more than four?

=

Nor will she be consoled by any equal reciprocal right to go pub-crawling in Tehran in search of four jihadist jerks dim-witted enough to marry a sour Swedish feminist.

Shariah ‘Law’ is totally unfair and discriminatory against women, who DON”T have any similar rights to those enjoyed by over-sexed males. 

Italian Head-Scarf Whiner’s Legal Jihad – Court Caves In!

Another whining bint, in Italy this time, coining it in on the basis of the lie that Muslim women have to wear head-shrouds.

Hard to keep count of the number of times we’ve addressed this issue..

00000000000000000000

‘An Archaic Tribal Rag’ – Wise UK Muslim Imam Says ‘Ban the Burqa!’ 

It’s on the BBC! Bag-Head Bans Do Not Infringe Religious Liberty! 

Fiery Islamists – ‘Head-Scarves NOT a Big Issue!’ 

ooooooooooooooo

… but that’s a few links to previous posts.

And in this case, it’s even more absurd, this arrogant baggie applying for a job as an SPG, a sales promotion girl handing out leaflets to interest people in a product featured in a shoe fair in Milan. 

We here in 90% Muslim Jakarta who attend expos etc. do so, at least in some cases, to enjoy looking at the SPGs.

——-

SPGs taking a well-earned rest at Jakarta Fair

Jakarta Expos – iFMAC, Sofa Parts, Beauties and Similar Delights 

They are clearly selected for their visual appeal.

So the last thing you’d want spreading the good news for your company is a self-righteous drab unwilling to display even her hair. It seems the whiner is a university student, so presumably smart enough to know this…

———–

————

… but smarter still to put the squeeze on the company.,

After sending a photo of herself wearing the headscarf, the company asked if she would be willing to remove it, to which she responded ‘no’, explaining that she wore it for religious reasons.

Because of this, Evolution declined to send her application to its client. In court, the company argued that it selects applicants on the basis of “aesthetics and image” and that its clients “would never be so flexible.”

Quite right too!

The woman, who was born in Italy to Egyptian parents, then sued for discrimination based on religion and gender. A court in Lodi, Lombardy, rejected the case, arguing that the applicant for the role also had to conform with the employer’s “image” requirements.

With which anyone with a non-bigot brain would agree. Image is what promotion is all about.

—————

 All rise, for the verdict!

—————–

But Italian appeal court judges don’t seem to know what appeals to the normal public, or are addicted to appeasement of primitives. 

The Milan appeals court overturned this decision, ordering the company to pay the woman €500 in damages.   http://www.thelocal.it/20160506/italian-firm-was-wrong-to-refuse-to-hire-hijab-wearing

Pathetic. If she wants to wear a scarf, okay, she should be left in peace  to hide her crowning glory – it’s not a burka, after all, which should be outlawed.

But by the same token, she should understand that she’s in a civilised country where such sectarian affectations are not admired, and certainly not seen as a lure for whatever she’s on about.

No to Appeasement – Boycott Air France

How low can their standards fall?

————-

—————–

I refer to Air France and its craven management, who have ORDERED flight attendants into the scarf of second-class citizenship prescribed by the backward shariah regime in Tehran.

And BON CHANCE to the girls, who say they will refuse to fly to the Iranian capital when the airline resumes the service later this month.

The airline bosses’s attempt to justify their merde almost had me thinking this was April Fool’s Day all over again.  

——

• 

• “Tolerance and respect for the customs of the countries we serve are part of the values of our company,” a spokesman said.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2016/04/02/air-france-stewardesses-mutiny-over-order-to-wear-headscarves/

The country they’re talking about is the very antithesis of ‘tolerance and respect,’ ESPECIALLY for women.

I hope these ladies get some support from the French Minister of Women’s Rights, Laurence Rossignol, who correctly said last month that women who wear veils or Islamic headscarves, she said, were like “negroes who supported slavery.’

————

http://foreignpolicy.com/2016/03/30/french-womens-rights-minister-women-who-cover-hair-are-like-negroes-who-supported-slavery/

Wise words, though we shouldn’t blame those in cess-pool societies like the Ayatollahs’ Iran, where brutal punishments await women who defy the sexist diktat. Or indeed many defenceless young women in other countries bullied by bigot male kin..

But as for rance – let’s not let these courageous mamselles stand alone.

Contact Air France and TELL them to sod off. If they don’t back down…

Air France – Air France portal sites www.airfrance.com/

Air France USA Official site – www.airfrance.us/

.Air France ® – Flights to Paris www.airfrance.co.uk/

BOYCOTT the collaborationist SOBs.”

At Brussels Memorial Site, Hate-Hag Shreds Israel Flag!

Just letting you know in case you missed it, this video of a vile bescarved creature, stalking among the field of flags in Brussels, where everyone else had come to remember the victims of Islamist evil…

…………

 

http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=175_1458783064

…watch the malevolent brute as she carefully grabs a small Israeli flag and tears it to shreds.

Will Belgian authorities boot the bitch out of Belgium, or do they prefer to fool around trying to alleviate the brute’s ‘alienation?’

It’s ‘Immoral’ For Girls To Look Like Girls – Asinine Ayatollahs!

———————–

Khomeini may be toasting merrily in the fires of Hell, but the shadow of his evil intolerance still darkens the skies of Iran.

A very attractive young woman named Sadaf Taherian has sparked outrage in her home country after publishing pictures of herself not wearing the compulsory Islamic headdress.

=

=

Sadaf did so in protest at strict Iranian laws requiring women to wear them in public.

That’s shariah, folks, bringing hate, fear and misery to a community somewhere near you. Before anybody starts on about my comments, please note that many decent Muslims find this sort of nastiness just as abhorrent as I do, both here in Indonesia and in Western countries.

For example, in Canada, where Tarek Fateh exemplified civilised values when he famously said, referring to the acceptability of Killer Khadr’s re-settlement…

.—————-

Tarek  A Muslim Voice of Reason – Khadr May Return, IF………!!!! 

 

“First of all, he must renounce jihad and the application of jihad and sharia law. …”

Witch-Hunt In America – Against A Muslim Patriot! 

Just clarifying.

Now back to Sadaf Versus the Sad Sacks…

–

–

..Iran’s shariah freaks are sad sacks, after all, sad inadequates who  just can’t handle women who look like women and like to look like women.

In fact, it’s simply women they have a problem with!

================

We unfortunately have Dark Agers of that sort here in Indonesia, IslamoNazi Gauleiter – “Women Already Have Limitations, Let Alone Non-Muslims!”  but their pathetic outlook is held in contempt by most normal Indonesians of all creeds…

—

—

…except alas in Aceh Province, a deplorable dump – as most of you already know‘Immoral Activities – Sitting in Coffee Shops Laughing and Talking…’ 

oooooooo

But in Iran, for forty long wretched years, such imbecility has dictated every aspect of society. Hence the furious reaction from Iran’s ministry of culture which branded her ‘immoral’ in state media and banned her from acting.

The very idea of a shariah regime operating a ‘ministry of culture’ is laughable. Again, that’s amply demonstrated by their cultural counter-attack! 

Iranian officials have even Photoshopped the hijab back onto her pictures, according to reports.

What a puerile pack of primitive prigs. And vindictive – they have reportedly vowed to revoke Ms Taherian’s work licence in an angry television broadcast.Iranian actress is branded ‘immoral’ by state.

Meanwhile Obama thinks these morons are trustworthy partners for peace?

Furqan Fanatics! Oz Jihadists Shut Down – Now Show ‘Em The Door!

Well, glad tidings from somewhere west of Melbourne, with the closure of what the press politely describe as a  controversial Islamic study centre and bookshop.

The same press report reminds us that Al Furqan was attended by several men charged with terrorism-related offences over an alleged Anzac Day murder plot, so news of its demise is even more welcome as that special day dawns.

Better still is the reason its malignant management gave for its closure – “constant harassment!” 

Actually, decent Australians might feel more like lodging complaints about insufficient harassment, given that the centre’s Bosnian-born leader, Harun Mehicevic, repeatedly has called for jihad in online video clips and been the subject of police and security agency surveillance, but has never been charged.

–

 Boot This B——d Back to Bosnia!

WHY?

The best way to handle pignoramuses who call for jihad is detention, until deportation, in the absence of a much needed death penalty, can be arranged. 

It has been the subject of ASIO surveillance ever since it was opened…,http://www.theaustralian.com.au/in-depth/terror/melbournes-al-furqan-islamic-centre-a-key-focus-for-asio/s….and in fact it should never have been opened at all. The local authority, the City of Greater Dandenong, initially refused the plans but knuckled under after sectarian pressure. .

Which takes us back a little while, to the shaming of the same city authorities when their appeasement policies were once more exposed to public scorn. 

The asses who run Greater Dandenong were busily asking non-Islamic women to wear hijabs in a ‘social experiment’ to increase awareness and education.   

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3032357/This-doesn-t-encourage-integration-encourages-separateness-Local-council-slammed-asking-non-Muslim-women-wear-hijabs-raise-awareness-combat-Islamophobia.html

The obvious question is why weren’t Islamic women asked to join in the spirit of the ‘social experiment’ by discarding their hijabs to increase awareness and education?

Happily, sensible Aussies denounced the moronic move. Institute of Public Affairs executive director John Roskam said ‘This doesn’t encourage integration, this encourages separateness…
ooooooooooooooooooooooooo

But there’s a much more important question!

–

–

When are all the numbskull pinkos going to get it into their heads that Muslim women are perfectly at liberty to dress like their non-Muslim colleagues and neighbours.

They are NOT obliged to shroud their heads! 

‘An Archaic Tribal Rag’ – Wise UK Muslim Imam Says ‘Ban the Burqa!’ 

It’s on the BBC! Bag-Head Bans Do Not Infringe Religious Liberty! 

Fiery Islamists – ‘Head-Scarves NOT a Big Issue!’ 

Here in Jakarta, I am every day surrounded by Muslim women – well, not right now; I’m just outa bed and neither shaved nor showered yet! – and the majority of them do NOT wear head-scarves; they are mostly proud of their beautiful glossy black hair and show no reluctance to let it be admired in the shops, on the buses and everywhere else.

0

0

One might hope people who decide to emigrate to a modern Western country would understand they really ought to leave behind backward habits and adapt to the normal standards of their chosen homeland.

It’s not just scarfing, of course. Some backward brutes believe a woman’s status is similar to that of a domestic animal – note this report from Pakistan – 

Muhammad Siddique was arrested for immolating his wife Shabana Bibi because she left the house without his permission, police reported on Sunday.

It was learnt that when she returned, she was heavily beaten by Siddique and his father.

Information gathered from Bibi’s brother, Muhammad Azam showed that she was doused with fuel and burnt severely to death.

http://www.360nobs.com/2015/04/pakistani-muslim-honor-burns-wife-to-death-for-leaving-home-without-permission-graphic-image/

How many such swine have managed to gain entry to Oz? How many women are bullied into scarfing by sectarian husbands or fathers?

Any wife or daughter should feel free safely to ignore such domestic despotism. They can cover their pretty hair if THEY feel like it – equally, they can remove their head-scarves in good conscience.

But if they don’t, it is hardly appropriate for any bunch of dimwit dorks like those in Dandenong to call for Australian women to adapt to a recalcitrant minority. 

Abbott To Wear Penis-Sheath On Next PNG Visit?

An unlikely event, but entirely reasonable, given Julie Bishop’s disgusting appeasement of the savages who misrule Iran.

–               –————————————————————-

Civilised countries, their elected leaders, should set examples, not act the fool in order to kow-tow to the cruel ayatollahs!

No offence, by the way, to Papuans.

Even their customs, backward no doubt in many Western eyes, are infinitely more civilised than the retrograde rules imposed by the theocratic thugs who hold Iran in servitude.

• 

• And the women of Iran in a worse condition, sexist servitude!

=============================

Small wonder a chorus of disapproval has swollen to a crescendo of condemnation.

Iranian political journalist Masih Alinejad  –  “you were not brave enough to challenge the compulsory hijab rules yet. We hope you will soon. You may say you were respecting Iran’s culture but compulsory hijab is not part of our culture…” 

 Australian-Iranian woman Moji Joon  – “quite disappointed Ms Bishop did not use her political position, to make a stance for her fellow females.”

Jeanie Mac – “The moral support this would have given the women in Iran who are protesting the wearing of compulsory hijab could have been huge. Instead it leaves a bitter taste in the mouth that she cares so little for women’s liberation and human rights.”

http://www.news.com.au/finance/work/julie-bishop-slammed-online-for-wearing-headscarf-during-official-talks-in-iran/

Even Obama’s wife didn’t lower herself to this degrading level when she visited the Saudi cess-pool.

Bint Bishop deserves contempt for donning the scarf of subjugation.

She shames Australia.