Home Sweet Home? Not When Evil Sexists Hold The Keys!

Pity poor 32-year-old Shohreh Bayat, stuck in Vladivostok, where the Women’s World Chess Championship was taking place!

………

‘She now feels unsafe to return to Iran, where women can be arrested for violating strict Islamic dress code.’

Although she says the ‘incriminating’ photo was taken while she was preparing to don her ayatollah-dictated scarf of subservience, “despite disagreeing with the rule…”

.

..

…she faces a real risk of persecution by the evil regime in Tehran, an evil encouraged in its intolerant iniquity by collaborateuses like Australia’s Julie Bishop…

======

Australian Foreign Minister Julie Bishop holds a press conference with her Iranian counterpart Mohammad Javad Zarif following a meeting in Tehran on April 18, 2015.

====

…and notorious appeasement freaks like the Brussels Empire’s apparatchik, Red Fed Mogherini…

===

While she shakes the hands of these men, she thinks of the nine-year-old girls who are “legally” forced into marriage with the consent of the government?

https://de.gatestoneinstitute.org/10912/feministinnen-dschihadisten

===
….and those immensely ‘liberated’ and ‘feminist’ Swedes grovelling to shariah too, remember?

All those prominent, influential women should have stood up bravely with the warm wind of Tehran blowing their God-given hair hither and thither – and, were they not such unattractive wenches, bare-mid-riffed and clad in mini-skirts!

=

  Iran – Contemptible Swedish Cows Crawl To Shariah Sexists 

=======

Back to the Iranian chess lady’s courageous assertion, which –

‘It’s against my beliefs. People should have the right to choose the way they want to dress, it should not be forced…’

– makes it highly likely that the grotesque delusionary (un-elected, the old despot claims he’s responsible only to God Almighty!) dictator there will have her punished if she dares to go home.

Regime change is urgently required. A referendum giving the people of Iran at least three options –

a – continuation of the existing evil edifice

b – restoration of the monarchy, modelled on the democratic European kings and queens we all know

or

c  – a secular democratic republic of some sort.

Judging from the royalist slogans heard from anti-ayatollah pro-testers over the past year…

…I’d say the exiled Reza Shah would have a good chance of winning back his father’s throne.

Wouldn’t that be a great day!

 

Toronto’s Little Liar? Demand A Full Investigation!

=======

A nasty little bint seeks publicity (and promotion of the ‘Islamophobia’ hogwash) by spinning a Toronto tale, all about how some mean guy cut her hijab.

Only drawback to this ripping yarn?

It was a pack of lies!

=

[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[

A look at her backward, bag-head mom explains how badly this kid’s been brought up!

• 

=

But when her lies are exposed, instead of a trip to the woodshed, she gets back-up from The Turd!

—–

Beelzebub. Father of Lies?

=====

It would be easy to rail against The Turd, and against pathetic parenting and, of more general concern, against this primitive family’s exploitation of a wretchedly brought up child’s mendacity to promote the wearisome shariah-freak victimhood narrative!

But I’m tired!

Jakarta traffic today has worn me down.

So instead I offer my readers around the world an admirable article from the Toronto Sun!

Here’s a taster of the refreshingly healthy and normal Canadian sentiments contained therein.

…people are unfortunately assaulted daily in this country and the overly political response to this one implied that assaulting a girl in a hijab was somehow worse and more deserving of censure than assaulting one without… Hijab hoax girl, family owe Canadians an apology

WELL SAID!

And better still, the key question is asked of Toronto Police.

Khawlah Noman is an 11-year-old, so would not be charged. But what did her mother know? Watching the girl’s video statement again, the girl’s words look well-prepared. It must be asked, given what we now know: Was she coached?

Who will organise a petition to demand a full investigation?

=====

Or would any such organiser face charges of ‘Islamophobia?’

Offensive London Hijab ‘Victim’ Should Apologise NOW!

Much ado about a woman in a jilbab ( which is what we in Indonesia call the hijab) being told to remove it by a Mcdonald’s security guard.

I find his action surprising, because a head-scarf is not an uncommon thing for women in Britain to wear.

====

=

Whilst burka bag-heads should of course be excluded from as many places as possible, not least every civilised country, a hijab is a mere head-scarf, and in no way a security risk.

=

=

Would the security man bar HM Elizabeth, By the Grace of God, Defender of the Faith, from entering the Golden Arches?

The man seems to have made a mistake, obviously, but for reasons not yet obvious.

Nevertheless, his face has been plastered all over the media, he’s been suspended and the local idiot council is pondering a licensing witch-hunt against every Mcdonalds in their borough….

/

/

…wittering that they will also rally more people and companies to sign up to its anti-hate crime pledge.

Hate-crime?

Grow up, for God’s sake!

AND the vengeful scarfy – who is desperate not to identify herself and whom the media are obliging by hiding exactly what she looked like when the incident occurred – is also ranting that-

 ‘It’s not enough.’ 

“If you want to dress modestly, you should have the right to dress modestly and it shouldn’t be politicised,” said the 19-year-old.    http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-london-42242272

Ignore the leftist councillors’ blatantly politicised witch-hunt plotting.

Focus on what that ‘victim’-bint said about….

MODESTY!

It’s NOT about ‘modesty!‘

=

Who would refuse entry to this honey?

=

It’s about head-scarfing.

To equate head-scarfing with ‘modesty‘ is to insult every normal British woman, Muslim, Christian or whatever. It’s a grossly offensive assertion to suggest that, if a girl goes out with her God-given crowning glory uncovered, she’s somehow being immodest.

The whiner bint is talking obnoxious tommy-rot.

As to the babbling rabble of ‘Londoners’ demonstrating at the Mcdonalds, where were they when that ignoramus Tesco employee…

‘He pointed at the ham and wine in my basket and said “I can’t serve you that because I’m fasting. When I told him he should be serving customers not turning them away he still refused telling me to go to the self-service. I was furious.’

Tesco Covers for Bigot Staff After Sectarian Snub to Shopper!

…refused to do his job and invoked sectarian bigotry as an excuse.

Those shrills in Holloway Road have a legal right to protest, but it would be a welcome sign that they are genuinely interested in religious tolerance…

=======

• 

• …if they simultaneously made it clear that in a free society, women, Muslim or not, are absolutely free to wear AND NOT to wear scarves, and that it is downright obnoxious to suggest that the absence of a scarf indicates an absence of ‘modesty.’

• That teenage shrill should be told to make a public appearance and APOLOGISE!

Dundee Dames Don Shariah Scarf! But NO Reciprocity?

I heard echoes of Ottawa Brave Muslim Women and ‘Ottawa Hijab Day!’ when I read that the multiculters in Dundee recently set up a stall in the city centre and invited passers-by to wear the traditional Muslim veil and walk around for a bit before sharing their experience and opinions afterwards.

https://www.eveningtelegraph.co.uk/2016/03/18/video-dundonians-try-hijab-city-centre-experiment/

How delightful.

Just one question – did they also invite scarved women to take off their sexist head-gear and walk around for a bit before sharing their experience and opinions afterwards.

Hardly!

——–

————-

Multiculting is a one-way street.

Oh, and why not that rarely addressed second question!

Did they also give out leaflets explaining that there’s no requirement for Muslim women to wear these hijabs? 

Sexist shariah anti-women poster- ‘Fathers and husbands, their naughty bits are your responsibility!’

00000000000000000000

‘An Archaic Tribal Rag’ – Wise UK Muslim Imam Says ‘Ban the Burqa!’ 

It’s on the BBC! Bag-Head Bans Do Not Infringe Religious Liberty! 

Fiery Islamists – ‘Head-Scarves NOT a Big Issue!’ 

ooooooooooooooo

Maybe they should conduct a confidential survey of be-scarved women, asking if they cover their heads because of bullying fathers, husbands or brothers.

After all, there’s no religious reason for them to do so.

Ban The Burqa – Vote in This Misleading Poll!

Sad to see an Ahmadiyah woman defending the offensive burqa. Ahmadis here in Indonesia have suffered dreadfully at the hands of Islamist bigots.

Victim of Islamist Murder Mob Gets Six Months in the Slammer 

Yet here we read of an Ahmadi woman in Britain scolding UKIP MEP Paul Nuttall after he called for women to cast aside the shroud of subjugation to mark International Women’s Day. Her comment –  the standard of basic Hijab requires a Muslim woman to cover her head, hair and chin. It is not essential for the face to be covered.”

• 

• And here’s me thinking I’ve been living in the largest Muslim majority country in the world, Indonesia, where if I go out for a walk later, most of the women I’ll see WON’T be wearing a scarf and most of those who do certainly don’t hide their chins! 

So if it’s not essential, why’s she fussing about getting rid of the mask!?

But maybe I’m biased – are these folks?

00000000000000000000

‘An Archaic Tribal Rag’ – Wise UK Muslim Imam Says ‘Ban the Burqa!’ 

It’s on the BBC! Bag-Head Bans Do Not Infringe Religious Liberty! 

Fiery Islamists – ‘Head-Scarves NOT a Big Issue!’ 

ooooooooooooooo

The Liverpool Echo Lorna Hughes’s bias is clear from the get-go, the snide aside about how Nuttall said that “the majority in this country” favoured a ban on face coverings – but did not say which survey produced the findings.

This hackette’s just too lazy to check surveys for herself. Most if not all polls DO support his assertion that most Brits want to ban the burqa. Here’s one example

–

YouGov | Most still want to ban the burka in Britain

But the poll the leftist newspaper tags on (at the end of Hughes’ scribbling) itself makes no mention of the burqa at all!

Is Paul Nuttall right to tell women what to do?

• YES
• NO

As if he’s telling them to do somersaults round the city hall!

Take a moment and vote YES, which means you share the UKIP man’s view that –

“We live in dangerous times when security is all important and it is vital that people’s faces can be seen.

• 

• “And just as importantly we live in a civilised liberal society and why should women be anonymised in this way? All free thinking women should be supporting a ban on full face coverings in public buildings.”  http://www.liverpoolecho.co.uk/news/liverpool-news/international-womens-day-ukip-politician-11004439

It’s ‘Immoral’ For Girls To Look Like Girls – Asinine Ayatollahs!

———————–

Khomeini may be toasting merrily in the fires of Hell, but the shadow of his evil intolerance still darkens the skies of Iran.

A very attractive young woman named Sadaf Taherian has sparked outrage in her home country after publishing pictures of herself not wearing the compulsory Islamic headdress.

=

=

Sadaf did so in protest at strict Iranian laws requiring women to wear them in public.

That’s shariah, folks, bringing hate, fear and misery to a community somewhere near you. Before anybody starts on about my comments, please note that many decent Muslims find this sort of nastiness just as abhorrent as I do, both here in Indonesia and in Western countries.

For example, in Canada, where Tarek Fateh exemplified civilised values when he famously said, referring to the acceptability of Killer Khadr’s re-settlement…

.—————-

Tarek  A Muslim Voice of Reason – Khadr May Return, IF………!!!! 

 

“First of all, he must renounce jihad and the application of jihad and sharia law. …”

Witch-Hunt In America – Against A Muslim Patriot! 

Just clarifying.

Now back to Sadaf Versus the Sad Sacks…

–

–

..Iran’s shariah freaks are sad sacks, after all, sad inadequates who  just can’t handle women who look like women and like to look like women.

In fact, it’s simply women they have a problem with!

================

We unfortunately have Dark Agers of that sort here in Indonesia, IslamoNazi Gauleiter – “Women Already Have Limitations, Let Alone Non-Muslims!”  but their pathetic outlook is held in contempt by most normal Indonesians of all creeds…

—

—

…except alas in Aceh Province, a deplorable dump – as most of you already know‘Immoral Activities – Sitting in Coffee Shops Laughing and Talking…’ 

oooooooo

But in Iran, for forty long wretched years, such imbecility has dictated every aspect of society. Hence the furious reaction from Iran’s ministry of culture which branded her ‘immoral’ in state media and banned her from acting.

The very idea of a shariah regime operating a ‘ministry of culture’ is laughable. Again, that’s amply demonstrated by their cultural counter-attack! 

Iranian officials have even Photoshopped the hijab back onto her pictures, according to reports.

What a puerile pack of primitive prigs. And vindictive – they have reportedly vowed to revoke Ms Taherian’s work licence in an angry television broadcast.Iranian actress is branded ‘immoral’ by state.

Meanwhile Obama thinks these morons are trustworthy partners for peace?

What Hijab Debate? Canada’s Tameera, Nadia and Alysha Mohamed Lead Topless March!

Heck, and here’s me idling about in the Jakarta sunshine yesterday, when, had I but known, a fast flight Friday might have borne me to Ontario in time for this intriguing event.

–

 His Imperial Majesty Kaiser Wilhelm II

–

I doubt the Kitchener Waterloo area has seen such excitement since my cousin, with many other loyalists, chucked the Kaiser’s bust into the river in 1914!

But the bust is still the issue, or rather lots of them, of arguable quality, judging from the photo in the report. 

http://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-33750417

====================================================

‘Hundreds of topless women joined the march,’ says the BBC, but who are the lucky men in the parade?

=========================================

Hundreds of Canadian woman joined a topless protest march after three sisters were allegedly stopped by police for cycling without shirts. Saturday’s “Bare with us” march took place in Waterloo, Ontario.

I’ll bet my old buddy who worked in Jakarta for years before returning to the Dominion will have found an excuse to visit rels in the vicinity.

But the childish issue about which these show-off gals are demonstrating is much less interesting than the names of the three chief protagonists of their cause. 

“They are boobs not bombs, chill out” and “Nudity isn’t sexual.”

• 

Ayisha – an admirable antidote to Islamophobia!

—————————

The three sisters, Tameera, Nadia and Alysha Mohamed, say that they took their shirts off because it was a hot summer day.

Now, far be it from me to jump to conclusions. That is to risk pinko squeals of ‘Islamophobia,’ after all, the penultimate sin in modern Canada (the ultimate being the equally absurd ‘homophobia!’)

• 

• But do their names indicate these up-front agitators are Muslim?

If so, I applaud them, not because I think it is especially commendable to stride about with waggling mammaries, but because it will upset the uptight imams who get into a lather at even a glimpse of glossy locks or even – shock/horror – thigh!

And if bras are to be cast aside, the shariah head-shrouds known in the West as hijabs will not be far behind, en route to the trash-can of Canadian history…

 

PS

Apparently free-swinging public bonzers have been legal since 1991, when a  court ruled there was “nothing degrading or dehumanising” about such a display.

• 

• If being unclad, or by logical deduction, clad, in a manner that’s degrading or dehumanising” is the litmus test for permissiblity, then how come burkas have not long since been outlawed?

Just asking!

Wadu! Bintang Seksi Zaskia Gotik ‘Tinggalkan Dangdut…?’

OMG!

A lovely day, pleased to be at home to receive an ever-welcome visitor, then as darkness was falling, I wandered round to my warteg, where I devoured my usual plateful of delights, tempe, pare, telor puyuh…

===============================

• 
• ———————————

• Then, when I settled up, little Yuni gave me the bad news – malam terakhir, Pak! … Their last night open till after Idul Fitri! And Idul Fitri is next weekend, and then they will be another week before they’ll make their way back to Jakarta from their little country kampung.

Wrestling with this catastrophic revelation, I wandered off to Alfamart, got my cigs for tomorrow, then headed home.

Now, just as we enter this final week of Ramadan, another, less expected, bolt from the blue, in the delightful form of Zaskia Gotik, one of the sexiest dangdut songstresses in the Indonesian archipelago…

She’s dropped dangdut!

————————————

 ooooooooooooooooo

And not only has she adopted pop mode instead, but she’s using it on a RELIGION-themed album!

Tempo.com reports that Zaskia is releasing a compilation album titled ‘Rama-dan Cinta,’ including two seasonal ditties, Ramadan and My Love for Allah.

Bikin Album Religi, Zaskia Gotik Tinggalkan Dangdut | Tempo …

oooooooooooooo

======

Always discomfited to hear of a hot girl possibly turning into a goody-two-shoes, I nevertheless draw solace from a previous post on this gorgeous gal, dated…when was it, oh, yeah, RAMADAN, two years ago. 

She had asserted her interest in getting scarfed up. However, because of her work as a dangdut singer, which demanded that she sway and dress sexily, Zaskia pleaded that she dare not do so. If obliged to do so, Zaskia was afraid that later she’d be subject to amok-run by the FPI.

“Wow, hijab? Yeah, how I work, singing like this and rocking…how do I try that if wearing a hijab? If I’m then over-run by FPI (Islamic Defenders Front) how about that?”  said Zaskia  (17/07/2013) Sexy Dangdut Star Won’t Go Baggie – Fears Amok IslamoNazis! 

ooooooooooooooooooooooooo

=======

I complimented her then on her common sense, and am not too concerned now, because the report goes on to add that her reason for not singing dangdut but pop is simply because Zaskia wants to show that she can. In addition, the pop genre is deemed more suitable to accompany the song.

pppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppp

——————

Sounds to me that she’ll be back on the dangdut circuit soon enough – you’re best at what you’re good at, right?

That’s why I like partying!

====

Tomorrow, the foraging begins, trying to locate a warteg that will stay open during the holidays. Otherwise, desperate measures – home-cooking!

Gotta be versatile, like Zaskia! 

 Oya, and here’s a YouTube of her performing. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZQw9X5C49d8

Don’t skip the crazy ad that precedes it.

Enjoy!

Furqan Fanatics! Oz Jihadists Shut Down – Now Show ‘Em The Door!

Well, glad tidings from somewhere west of Melbourne, with the closure of what the press politely describe as a  controversial Islamic study centre and bookshop.

The same press report reminds us that Al Furqan was attended by several men charged with terrorism-related offences over an alleged Anzac Day murder plot, so news of its demise is even more welcome as that special day dawns.

Better still is the reason its malignant management gave for its closure – “constant harassment!” 

Actually, decent Australians might feel more like lodging complaints about insufficient harassment, given that the centre’s Bosnian-born leader, Harun Mehicevic, repeatedly has called for jihad in online video clips and been the subject of police and security agency surveillance, but has never been charged.

–

 Boot This B——d Back to Bosnia!

WHY?

The best way to handle pignoramuses who call for jihad is detention, until deportation, in the absence of a much needed death penalty, can be arranged. 

It has been the subject of ASIO surveillance ever since it was opened…,http://www.theaustralian.com.au/in-depth/terror/melbournes-al-furqan-islamic-centre-a-key-focus-for-asio/s….and in fact it should never have been opened at all. The local authority, the City of Greater Dandenong, initially refused the plans but knuckled under after sectarian pressure. .

Which takes us back a little while, to the shaming of the same city authorities when their appeasement policies were once more exposed to public scorn. 

The asses who run Greater Dandenong were busily asking non-Islamic women to wear hijabs in a ‘social experiment’ to increase awareness and education.   

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3032357/This-doesn-t-encourage-integration-encourages-separateness-Local-council-slammed-asking-non-Muslim-women-wear-hijabs-raise-awareness-combat-Islamophobia.html

The obvious question is why weren’t Islamic women asked to join in the spirit of the ‘social experiment’ by discarding their hijabs to increase awareness and education?

Happily, sensible Aussies denounced the moronic move. Institute of Public Affairs executive director John Roskam said ‘This doesn’t encourage integration, this encourages separateness…
ooooooooooooooooooooooooo

But there’s a much more important question!

–

–

When are all the numbskull pinkos going to get it into their heads that Muslim women are perfectly at liberty to dress like their non-Muslim colleagues and neighbours.

They are NOT obliged to shroud their heads! 

‘An Archaic Tribal Rag’ – Wise UK Muslim Imam Says ‘Ban the Burqa!’ 

It’s on the BBC! Bag-Head Bans Do Not Infringe Religious Liberty! 

Fiery Islamists – ‘Head-Scarves NOT a Big Issue!’ 

Here in Jakarta, I am every day surrounded by Muslim women – well, not right now; I’m just outa bed and neither shaved nor showered yet! – and the majority of them do NOT wear head-scarves; they are mostly proud of their beautiful glossy black hair and show no reluctance to let it be admired in the shops, on the buses and everywhere else.

0

0

One might hope people who decide to emigrate to a modern Western country would understand they really ought to leave behind backward habits and adapt to the normal standards of their chosen homeland.

It’s not just scarfing, of course. Some backward brutes believe a woman’s status is similar to that of a domestic animal – note this report from Pakistan – 

Muhammad Siddique was arrested for immolating his wife Shabana Bibi because she left the house without his permission, police reported on Sunday.

It was learnt that when she returned, she was heavily beaten by Siddique and his father.

Information gathered from Bibi’s brother, Muhammad Azam showed that she was doused with fuel and burnt severely to death.

http://www.360nobs.com/2015/04/pakistani-muslim-honor-burns-wife-to-death-for-leaving-home-without-permission-graphic-image/

How many such swine have managed to gain entry to Oz? How many women are bullied into scarfing by sectarian husbands or fathers?

Any wife or daughter should feel free safely to ignore such domestic despotism. They can cover their pretty hair if THEY feel like it – equally, they can remove their head-scarves in good conscience.

But if they don’t, it is hardly appropriate for any bunch of dimwit dorks like those in Dandenong to call for Australian women to adapt to a recalcitrant minority. 

Putri Indonesia – “Arf, Arf, Scarf, Scarf” – Intolerant Islamists ‘Bark’ At Beauty!

Just ready to relax on the sofa for watching TV, a most eye-catching show, featuring the choice of Miss Indonesia. 

Look at the Chairwoman of the Miss Indonesia Organization, below –

——————-

Liliana Tanoesoedibjo

——

A pretty lady? Understatement, I suppose, but there are so many here in Indonesia. 

But she has become the target of Islamist loudmouths, accused of ‘not caring about the nation’s morality.’  Rather than morality, I tend to think it’s Liliana’s perceptive description of misogynistic ranters as ‘barking dogs‘ that got right up the rabid noses.

http://atjehpost.co/articles/read/21244/Sebut-Anjing-Menggonggong-FPI-Aceh-Kecam-Pernyataan-Liliana-Tanoe

ooooooooooooooooooooooo

———

And how about Ratna Nurlia Alfiandini, one of the causes of the benighted white-shirt gang’s indignation.

Ain’t she lovely?

Ratna was a contestant, Aceh’s representative in the Miss Indonesia contest, and here’s the current one, Jeyskia Ayunda Sembiring.

=======

• 

—

Beautiful, indeed, but not atypical of women here, long black glossy hair, leggy lissom figure – many of the lovelies I see behind supermarket cashiers’ counters could well be entrants too. 

But the two girls above were chosen to represent Aceh, and that has not gone down well with the sectarian bigots who infest that sorry place.

Aceh is the only part of Indonesia where shariah law is enforced, and best avoided by civilised human beings.

–

The Sharia Hell of Aceh!

–

And while there are degrees of fanaticism among shariah’s supporters, it’s probably fair to say that the FPI ( self-styled ‘Defenders of Islam’) are as bad as it gets.

So needless to say, they’re incensed that there’s a participant from there in the contest. 

And they’re playing on the fact that, although Ratna and Jeyskia are of Acehnese stock, they were born elsewhere in Indonesia. It’s a bit like if Taffy and Morwen Rhys move from Cardiff to London and have a daughter who grows up to be a beauty, she could be picked as Miss Wales.

Arguable, I suppose, but none of the fuss would likely have erupted if the two Miss Aceh gals had not competed without shrouding their good looks in the scarf of subjugation. 

Tengku Mustafa Husen Woyla, FPI’s spokesman in Aceh, is beside himself. Liliana is shameless and has no business ethics – that’s his riposte to her ‘canine’ comment.

———————-

•  Mustafa Woyla, of FPI Aceh
• ———————————————————————

• But on the  girls? Woyla had best not open a chocolate factory, because he’s not very sweet.
• He’s clever in his way, however, trying to dress up his sexism in feminist lingo, ‘exploitation of women’ etc.
• But we know from his Jakarta comrade what they really think of sex equality.  

  • IslamoNazi Gauleiter – “Women Already Have Limitations, Let Alone Non-Muslims!” 

   “Aceh has nothing to lose in the absence of representation…If you appreciate Islamic Aceh values adopted by the majority of the people of Aceh,” he said  “the people of Aceh are proud of the exclusion of Acehnese women from the immoral event.”

IMMORAL?

Yeah, that’s what he said!  The hatred of beauty among Islamists was well-documented when Miss World came here not long ago.

————- 

IslamoNazis Slur Miss World Girls – ‘Whore Contest!’ 

And now this nasty wants to drag delightful ladies into court!

“FPI urges the Aceh government to prosecute the illegal contestants who have tarnished the good name of the Veranda of Mecca. This is a serious problem. If there is no response, we (FPI) will take legal action to sue the organizers and contestants on behalf of Aceh…”

But what really rankles, seemingly, is that Jeyskia has gone on record with the undoubtedly true statement that women in Aceh are not identical with the scarf.

Well, hell, of course they’re not. If they were, the backward bigots wouldn’t need a shariah goon-squad to back up their oppressive war on women.

–

Wilayatul Hisbah, the shariah goon-squad

–

They wouldn’t need to send trucks around the towns to harass and detain women who dress like women rather than like sacks of Idaho potatoes.

Of course Wolya’s not on his own in this offensive chattering. 

Vice Chairman of the MPU Aceh, Tgk H Faisal Ali, is also in a stew. The MPU represents ‘scholars’ up there. Another of their clique got into our blog a few years ago…

Aceh’s Mad Mullah – ‘Dancing is EVIL – It Involves Body Movements!’ 

..,so no surprise they are on the sectarian band-wagon. But what about the NU, supposedly the biggest ‘moderate’ Muslim organisation in Indonesia. 

Chairman of the Nahdlatul Ulama (NU) Aceh – ‘the appearance of women referred to as Miss Aceh in the event did not reflect that Aceh applies Sharia law..“Therefore, we assume, the relevant participation in Miss Indonesia has made a defamation of Aceh, which is nicknamed the Veranda of Mecca…,” he said. http://aceh.tribunnews.com/2015/02/18/ulama-minta-gubernur-panggil-miss-aceh

Most ‘moderate’ – but then he and the MPU spokesman are one and the same person!

Actually, chronic kill-joyism among ‘scholars’ in Indonesia isn’t confined to Aceh. The same sort of stuff and nonsense can be heard in Jakarta…

———————-

• 
• Welya Safiri of the state-sponsored MUI – I reckon I prefer Jeyskia!
• ———————-

• She added that the Aceh model is a good example…most importantly, wearing the hijab must meet three conditions. That it’s Shariah compliant, conceals the genitals and SHOWS NO CURVES  (RRA emphasis)  https://rossrightangle.wordpress.com/2013/11/20/scholars-on-scarfs-must-be-shariah-compliant-hide-genitals-show-no-curves/

 …but at least it’s not provincial law here. Earlier today, I timed my lunch at the warteg to coincide with office-workers’ noontide break. Not ONE  of the dozen or so pretty young ladies there was bescarved!

Inevitably, the provincial regime itself is aboard the Good Ship Shariah too. 

—————————

• 
• ————-

• Head of Public Relations Aceh district secretary Dr Mahyuzar in Banda Aceh on Monday that …the appearance of Jeyskia, who does not wear a scarf, does not reflect the culture and is inconsistent with the application of Islamic law in Aceh…she “is not a representation of the people of Aceh,” said Mahyuzar.

http://www.tempo.co/read/news/2015/02/17/219643022/Aceh-Sesalkan-Jeyskia-Ikut-Kontes-Putri-Indonesia

 So what is a ‘representation of the people of Aceh?’

Islamist Inquisition in Aceh – ” Minority Religious Creed ‘Worse Than Tsunami!’ “

Not Fasting – How About A Whipping? Aceh Slips Deeper Into Barbarism 

Islamist Mayor – We Know Where You Live! Submit to Indoctrination OR ELSE! 

=============

Right -time to switch on the show.

No genitals, of that I’m quite certain, but LOTS of lovely curves!