Tagged: hogwash Toggle Comment Threads | Keyboard Shortcuts

  • ross1948 09:43 on June 25, 2019 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: exclusionary, , hogwash, Winking   

    Total W-nkers? More Guardian Garbage! 

    Sometimes I wonder what I’d do without The Guardian. It’s not just the way they come up with ‘shock-horror’ stories about the ‘far-right’ increasing its power and influence.

    These almost always do not involve real ‘far-right’ forces but just patriotic resistance parties like AfD or Salvini’s Lega.

    Or the Law and Justice Party in Poland.

    Such reports are exhilirating.


    Brussels Wants War? Send YOUR Solidarity ToPoland Today! 

    They inspire me to urge readers to send messages of support to those resistance heroes named.

    Other times the Guardian promotes genuinely disturbed left fanaticism, glaring intolerance like that of Nick Cohen…

    Guardian Jackboot Bigot Calls Brexit Brits “Thugs!=

    Guardian’s Nick ‘Storm-Troop’ Cohen.

    Guardian Bigot- “Don’t Even Acknowledge Patriot Point Of View!” 

    …which allows me to illustrate the real danger to democracy,

    But now and then a gem of pure, incandescent idiocy pops out of its pages, like this –

    When the Trumps came to tea, the Duchess of Cornwall winked, and people were amused.



    But is such an exclusionary gesture still OK?

    ‘OK’  with whom? You? Me? Pinko journos?

    Who in their right mind would write hundreds of words asking such a stupid question?

    The guy who puts his arm round his girl-friend’s waist, the girl who takes her boy-friend’s hand, both are making ‘exclusionary’ gestures.

    They are making it clear whose proximity they prefer!

    What’s wrong with that?

    Every country that requires arrivals from abroad to show passports and visas is making an ‘exclusionary’ gesture.

    Who wants undesirable aliens in the homeland!

    What’s wrong with that?

    People and peoples have every right to be ‘exclusionary’ – that’s perfectly…


    Tons of normal folk everywhere are sick and tired of enforced ‘inclusivity,’ that instructs them to be open to all sorts of persons with whom they certainly don’t feel at ease.

    Yet, while we can forgive the guy writing in the Guardian who has written a detective story about a villain who winks at, then kills, selected victims  – he is of course keen to have much public discussion on the subject of winking –  how about this rubbish?

    ‘…a wink today stands out as a flashback to monochrome England, such as when you see someone smoking a pipe...’


    What the Hell does ‘monochrome England’ mean?


    If something as simple as winking could rid the UK of the multicultural blight, millions of eye-lids would be flapping daily!

    And what about of people like….


    Camilla Duchess of Cornwall winks at the press during Donald Trump state visit at Clarence House 3/07/19

    ..”…the Duchess of Cornwall performed (if that is the right word) a wink. Why? We outsiders don’t know, and we are not meant to know.”  So? Is a private joke now outlawed?

    …Dr. Peter Collet, an ‘Oxford psychologist,’ who opines that –

    “A wink is all about collusion, and collusion is about exclusion…” Therefore, the wink, in his opinion, is anachronistic..

    Let’s all go out tomorrow and get some exclusionary winking done! However, be careful where you do it!

    • Aleck Pimm 12:36 on June 25, 2019 Permalink | Reply

      The Guardian is a far-left newspaper so we expect far-left content.
      That’s a given but rubbish about ‘exclusionary winking’ is just an insult to the intelligence of ALL readers.


    • Cammie Ramsay 14:08 on June 25, 2019 Permalink | Reply

      You are fun to read when you follow tangents like this but still get the message across.
      It’s not where you wink but at whom. On public transport, a mis-directed wink might have a tranny following you home!


  • ross1948 17:48 on December 17, 2018 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: bull by the horns, hogwash,   

    Enjoy A Laugh For Advent! 



    Hard to believe that the far-left loonies of PETA, whom we’ve deplored at least once here…

    Fur Coats for Crimmigants? Don’t Give To PETA

    …have been demanding that old sayings and common-place turns of phrase be revised to bow to their odd-ball obsession with animal ‘rights!’

    Here’s one example –



    “Take the bull by the horns” must be changed to “take the flower by the thorns!”


    I was tempted to append my usual little pictorial comment on this…




    ..but then realised that such an illustration might result in porcine ‘hurt feelings.’

    But then again, on reflection, it seems to me that the average  pig is made of sterner stuff than the sort of whining weasels who forever bleat about being ‘offended.’


    Now I’ve wounded all those thin-skinned weasels…

    Plush White Sheep with I Love Weasel T-shirt (first name/surname/nickname)

    ..and bleating sheep out there!


    • Jim in Jakarta 01:32 on December 18, 2018 Permalink | Reply

      Very subtle, Ross.
      Probably too subtle for the easily offendeds, who are mostly stupid, to figure out and take offence.


    • Gregor Turner 08:50 on December 18, 2018 Permalink | Reply

      I get it.
      i like it.


    • Keith Milner 13:38 on December 18, 2018 Permalink | Reply

      I dont think pigs are protected by Australia’s anti-free speech laws, unless they are ‘gay’ of course.


Compose new post
Next post/Next comment
Previous post/Previous comment
Show/Hide comments
Go to top
Go to login
Show/Hide help
shift + esc
%d bloggers like this: