Did Scots Cops AGAIN Abet Pro-Crimmigrant Mob?

Two vans arrive outside an Edinburgh address. Despatched by the Home Office, they’re out to round up illegal aliens.

But a leftist mob is quickly summoned by local pro-crimmigrant trouble-makers.

Sound familiar?

Something of an action replay, surely, of that nauseating episode a year or more ago…

Glasgow Cops Appease Pro-Crimmigrant Mob

Sturgeonistan, Where Cops Collaborate With Crimmigrants? 

…when Police Scotland disgracefully sided with the scum instead of breaking up the rabble and helping get the illegals detained.

The Edinburgh cops have issued a typically uninformative statement but I doubt law-abiding Scots pay much attention to ‘their’ bold gendarmes.

After what we have had to report about….

Police Scotland, Lawless And Reckless! 

, “Police Scotland said that they would log rapes as being carried out by a woman if the accused person insists, even if they have not legally changed gender.”   https://nypost.com/2021/12/13/j-k-rowling-slams-cops-for-letting-rape-suspects-id-as-women

As you see  Scots cops talk rot!

But what about the Home Office?

If the Edinburgh constabulary indeed failed to support enforcement of immigration law, you’d expect Priti Patel to speak up and denounce such slackery.

Instead, we got this astounding exercise in ambivalence!

A Home Office spokesperson said:

“It is unacceptable for people to attempt to block legitimate actions of law enforcement as they work to remove those with no right to live or work in the UK.”Through our Nationality and Borders Act we are taking steps to fix the broken system to make it fair to those in genuine need and firm on those who seek to abuse it. An operation was carried out in Edinburgh today and to suggest that protesters had an impact on the outcome is wrong.”

What kind of gibbering nonsense is that?

The HO staff were seen to leave empty-handed, between lines of police…

.

…mocked by abusive anti-social leftists.

..

No sign of any corralled crimmigrants! Of course those street-reds had an ‘impact’  – they thwarted the capture of undesirable aliens.

So what’s Priti’s piffle statement meant to mean?

Kick The Scum Out! If Only To Annoy Their BBC Fans!

The BBC hit a new low today, a sympathetic interview with the simpering snarly sister of two low-lifes…

……

…
 Freya Valie Roberts..one of the twins’ sisters, said she was “disgusted, upset and insulted” when she heard they were being threatened with deportation.

…

….both with convictions for GBH.

That’s grievous bodily harm.

A very serious level of assault.

The BBC could have used police mug-shots, but instead chose to portray these vicious hoodlums as playful lads!

…

Darrell and Darren Roberts
…

No interviews with their victims, of course!

It’s the Tax Funded Propaganda Channel!

The filthy savages are said to be due for deportation.

Or so it’s said – disturbingly, Priti Patel’s Home Office seems reluctant to get on with it!

…the BBC has seen a notice sent to one of the men that indicates the Home Office does intend to pursue deportation….

 

.

.

They are not British, so it’s time the poor folks of Dominica and Grenada, in the West Indies, get to put up with the dirty thugs.

They have never been there, but that’s tough.

The local authority, in Ealing, London, says the scum had no interest in becoming British – thank God, I hear you say!

They grew up in Britain and never took to civilised life, so why not kick ‘em out!

.

.

Frankly, it would be better to put them down, or rather string them up – they are worthless swine, after all!

Sadly that’s not an option!

Had the BBC interviewed most decent British people, or just a representative sample thereof, surely there would be resounding cheers at the prospect of vile vermin getting the boot!

You can read the entire TFPC report via the link below, and have a laugh at their lawyer’s peculiar rant  – and at his photo!

Last word to that sob-sister!

“If they’re going to deport my brothers, I mean there are 11 of us in total, they could pick and deport any one of us,” she said.https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-london-53357889

 

Now there’s a dashed fine idea!

Unleashing Illegals? Home Office Needs Its Head Read!

So!

‘It is unclear whether an initiative due to be announced on Monday to house homeless people in empty hotels will include destitute migrants or only British street homeless people. The latter have access to housing and other benefits, the former do not…’

Who do you think should have ‘access to housing and other benefits?’

That paragraph above is taken from a Guardian article focused NOT on legal immigrants, who have been accepted into British society, but on crimmigrants…

.

…
…illegals, or as the left media chilidhishly continues to misrepresent them, the ‘undocumented!’

And according to the same report, these illegals number no less, and quite possibly more, than A MILLION!

We keep reading of a shortage of masks, shortage of beds, all manner of insufficiencies.

Is Britain Discriminating Against REAL Refugees?

• Christmas is over, but those who celebrated, as I did, should pay attention to this.

• Once more, I am picking up on the excellent Gatestone, a source which never seems to run out of shocking material…

• =

• 

• =

• When it comes to offering asylum, the UK “appears to discriminate in favour of Muslims” instead of Christians. Statistics seemed to confirm this allegation: “out of 4,850 Syrian refugees accepted for resettlement by the Home Office in 2017, only eleven were Christian….” — Barnabas Fund, November 2, 2017.

• 
• =

• …and once more I do them the courtesy of quoting only the quotes they offer, in order to draw British readers’ attention to the shocking state of affairs in the administration –

• ====
• 
• =====

• – and in particular in the Home Office – which is run by Priti Patel – where the anti-Christian discrimination has been identified by that Barnabas Fund, an irreproachably reputable organisation.

• And here’s another source from the Gatestone website which confirms the dire plight of Christian Arabs.

  • “You have this absurd situation where the scheme is set up to help Syrian refugees and the people most in need, Christians who have been ‘genocided,’ they can’t even get into the U.N. camps to get the food. If you enter and say I am a Christian or convert, the Muslim U.N. guards will block you [from] getting in… and even threaten you…” — Paul Diamond, British Human Rights Lawyer, CBN News, December 4, 2019.

  • =
  • 

• Surely among the new crop of Tory MPs there are some brave spirits who will raise this issue in the House of Commons and demand of Ms. Patel and Mr. Johnson that an effective investigation is undertaken to see if there are as many rats scuttling around the Home Office as there are in the Foreign Office.

• It certainly seems to be an issue pursued already in the Upper House!

• Lord George Carey is suing the UK Home Office for allegedly being “institutionally biased” against Christian refugees and therefore complicit in what he calls “the steady crucifixion of Middle East Christians.”

  UN, UK Treating Persecuted Christians as “Enemies”

 

Of 1373 Channel Crimmigrants In 2019, How Many Still In UK?

So the latest total is 1373!

That’s the nunber of parasitic aliens reported to have made their illicit way to British shores, this year alone, by crossing the  English Channel.

More accurately., that’s just the ones the authorities are prepared to admit knowing about.

It’s a total on the rise. OK, Bojo, Out Of 725 Illegals, How Many Have You Booted?

And as likely as not, the real number is higher.

Yet for all the tough talk from Priti Patel, the new Home Secretary, her  responsible (?) minions, apparently, have been bringing these crimmigrants ashore instead of forcing them back.

All have been medically checked and taken to immigration officials for questioning, the Home Office said.

Medically checked?

More tax-payers’ money down the drain, paying for doctors, nurses and no doubt free medicines too.

And I bet they remain on British soil even as I type this.

It’s no excuse to say their ‘asylum’ claims need to be examined.

The swine are coming from France for pity’s sakes. The only people who might be in need of refuge from injustice in France are French patriots like those brave young Identitarians…

Free The Gap Three – And Can The Pro-Crimmigrant Judge-Jerks! 

…and Marine Le Pen…

Le Lubianka? Patriot Faces Soviet-Style Psychiatric Interrogation! 

…..

As for the alien undesirables, if their excuse for leaving their own (admittedly often cess-poolish) homelands were a search for a civilised country to live in, then they made it….

.

……

…but of course they are mostly lying skunks.

They know British handouts are yummier, so here they come!

….

It comes five days after Border Force intercepted what is thought to be the highest number of migrants in a single day amid warnings the closure of a French camp could prompt a spike in Channel crossings.

https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-kent-49707720

 

ISD Exposed Again – Will Priti Patel Stop Funding Anti-Boris Sticky-Beaks?

We wrote about this gang some months ago, when one of their flunkeys fired a few cheap shots at the excellent Herr Kickl, Austria’s then Interior Minister…

Guardian Hack Kicks Kickl – Guess Who Funds Her Network? 

• https://www.isdglobal.org/isdapproach/

• ..ISD fosters strategic partnerships across governments, academia, civil society and the private sector to develop policy and operational programmes to respond to the threat of extremism. We also work closely with leading players in the media and technology sector to help achieve impact on a global scale.

…and while the supranationalist meddling which characterises the ‘Institute for Strategic Dialogue’ is appalling, what was much more shocking was the huge amount of cash pouring into the agitprop outfit.

And where it comes from!

The Independent insists on describing ISD as a ‘think-tank,’ but my preference for the term ‘propaganda pump’ was confirmed last week by a woman named Chloe Colliver.

….

cc@isdglobal.org

….

She’s the boss of ISD’s ‘digital research unit,’ and she lashed out at British PM Johnson for telling it like it is.

Bojo’s sin, in Comrade Chloe’s eyes, is to defined the Remainer’s legislative coup as a “surrender bill…”

…

….worse, says the ISD bint, was that Johnson was ‘positioning himself as enacting the “will of the people.”

Since the people voted for Brexit and Johnson says ( and, one hopes, means it) that he wants to achieve Brexit, what’s Comrade Chloe cavilling about?

Aaah!

She reckons the PM was “calling successfully to a nationalist interpretation of the Brexit debate.”

…….

…

If Brexit is not a nationalist issue, what the hell is it?

Taking back control from the Brussels Commissars is not just some fiddly thing about regulating fishing or checks at harbours and airports, important though these may well be.

..

..

It’s about flags and passports and freedom, the very stuff of national pride.

Now the liberals, lefts and the far-lefts and the separatists find all that sort of thing abhorrent.

We all understand that.

…

….

But this ISD rat-pack are funded by governments and banks and big biz and like to present themselves as professional ‘experts.’

‘Experts’ like Chloe Colliver, who positively shudders at how “it seems very purposeful to me and it really harks back to the Second World War nostalgia in this debate, which plays powerfully to the far right and nationalist groups.”

Sorry, Comrade Chloe, but it ‘plays powerfully’ to millions who voted for Brexit, but of course this condescending ‘expert’ thinks all those common people are thick as pig-sh-t!

“They don’t understand the mechanisms and decisions being made on their behalf….”

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/brexit-protests-london-riots-unrest-far-right-boris-johnson-no-deal-a9095161.html

…..

The 17 million, who had had enough of ‘decisions made on their behalf’ and in 2016 made the decision THEMSELVES, were just so dim-witted!

Just sod off, Your Arrogance!

But there’s a better way than irate ‘sod offs’ to put these elitists in their place.

Cut off the cash!

Britain currently has a Home Secretary named Priti Patel.

We know that the IDS gets funding from all sorts of sources, including the European Union…

..

…and Soros’s ‘Open Society’ meddlers…

….AND

….British tax-payers’ money via the UK Home Office.

Priti Patel has a patriotic reputation and was appointed by Boris Johnson.

….

…

Might it not be a prudent, responsible and patriotic act on her part to stop her ministry’s funding of an ‘NGO’ whose minions so flagrantly launch outrageous propaganda missiles against the Prime Minister?

Check out who funds them!

ISD benefits from a wide range of financial support from philanthropic donors, private companies and governments.

Curtin University, Australia
George Washington University
Harvard Berkman Klein Center for the Internet and Society
Victoria University
Yale University

Private Sector

Ark Jammers
Facebook
Google
Twitter
Jigsaw
Love Frankie
M&C Saatchi
Microsoft

Foundations

Asia Foundation
British Council
Carnegie Corporation NY
Eranda Foundation
Gen Next Foundation
Open Society Foundations
Robert Bosch Stiftung
Vodafone Foundation

………..

Governments & Intergovernmental Organisations

Australian Department for Home AffairsDanish Ministry of Foreign Affairs
Danish Ministry of Immigration and Integration
Department of Premier & Cabinet, Victoria, Australia
Dutch Ministry for Foreign Affairs
Dutch Ministry of the Interior
European Commission
Finnish Interior Ministry
German Federal Agency for Civic Engagement
Global Counterterrorism Forum (GCTF)
Norwegian Ministry of Justice and Public Security
Norwegian Ministry of Foreign Affairs
OSCE
Public Safety Canada
Swedish Ministry of Justice
Swedish Ministry of Integration
UK Home Office
UK Foreign Office
US State Department

 

“Repeal Good Character Requirement For UK Citizenship!” Seriously?

• Yes, seriously!

• That’s what this pinko outfit is demanding!

• ===
• =

 

• “Ultimately it’s necessary to repeal the good character statutory requirement in relation to those registering their citizenship because all the evidence suggests that it is racially discriminatory and affects vulnerable BME children and adults disproportionately.”
• https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2019/jan/15/updated-uk-child-citizenship-good-character-test-still-poor-say-campaigners

(NB – BME is the current pinko-speak for ‘coloured’)

• What a slur!

• Think about what she’s saying, this arrogant uppity from a ‘charity’ to which the Home Office of the UK government is a contributor https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Runnymede_Trust –

• 

• How come the UK Government has been dishing out British tax-payers’ money to a brazenly political agitprop outfit?

• =

• If you or I were to suggest that non-white people, of any age or origin, were ‘disproportionately’ lacking in good character, all Hell would break loose.

• Her statement can and should be deemed offensive by people of good character of all ethnicities.

• =
• 

• The Guardian breathlessly tells us that hundreds of children, some as young as 10, who were born or who grew up in the UK were having their applications for British citizenship denied on the basis of convictions for crimes such as petty theft.

• 

  Bloody good thing too.

• Lawless brats grow up to be big bad scumbags, and so should not be granted the privilege of citizenship. Far better to send them packing, so some other country, the one they belong in, can handle their dishonest predispostions. .

• Britain, unfortunately, due to ever-weaker standards of discipline both within the home  – Fresh call for smacking to be outlawed in the home – and in schools, where Eurogroveller John Major outlawed proper punishments years ago…

• =

• 

• ..

• …has plenty of British brats who need to be dealt with.

• No need to hang onto anti-socials who aren’t British!

• =

• 

• =

• Yet – the very same Home Office that has been funding this outfit has already begun caving in to the rants  of the Runnymede ratpack  reportedly in receipt of largesse from the public purse.

• Instructions have been issued to take into account “the child’s age and particular circumstances and any mitigating factors such as their ability to understand the consequences of their actions.”

• 
• =

• What about a question more important than whether the dirty little thieves understood that the consequences of stealing other people’s property…

• =
• 
• =

• ….might include a boot on their criminal backsides that sends them back where they belong?

• A MUCH better question, to ask each other, dear readers, is –

• When you were ten years old, did YOU understand that thieving was wrong?

• I did.

  • What child of ten does not understand that stealing is wrong? 

  .

May Sells Out, Again, This Time On Crimmigrants!

No Brit patriot has forgotten Amber’s Army of fake-refugees, the burly young men imported as ‘unaccompanied minors’ by Theresa May’s then Home Secretary, Remainer Rudd.

=

 

What a Calais Cur ‘child’ looks like, according to T May!

Arrest Amber Rudd? Calais Crimmigrant “Age Checks Not Carried Out! “ 

…

No serious vetting, not even any honest attempt to take the basic step of getting proof positive that they actually were ‘children’ – not even by the absurd definition of child-age as defined by May’s masters in Brussels.

Now we read that, rather than defend one of the few promising initiatives that emerged from the current UK Government, May has ordered her bureaucrats to stand down,

The Home Office has abandoned a controversial “hostile environment” scheme using NHS data to track down patients believed to be breaching immigration rules.

==========

In the face of a legal challenge brought by the Migrants’ Rights Network, a memorandum of understanding between the Department of Health, NHS Digital and the Home Office is being scrapped.

Like, who the Hell is the ‘Migrants Rights Network?’ Legal migrants may well have ‘rights,’ but illegals should have no rights at all, except the right to feel the door slam shut on every parasite butt…

….

…as they get kicked out of the country.

In fact, this is simply a further climb-down in the phoney campaign May likes us to think she’s been running to cut the huge number of crimmigrants that infest the country.

According to the Guardian’s gloat (report) May had ALREADY u-turned on much of the plan originally announced, and instead of tackling the fundamental issue, illegal immigration, she crawled to the left-liberal pro-crimmigrant lobby by promising to limit its use to tracing those being considered for deportation because they had committed a serious crime.

=

 

=

And of course it goes without saying that the left-liberal lobby refuses to recognise violation of British frontiers as anything like a serious crime.

…

May’s climb-down exposes the shameful truth, that she agrees with them.

As we read on through the gloating Guardian report, we almost have to laugh at the addled arguments adduced by the Enemy Within when the original constructive plan was revealed, from the usual suspects –

 ‘protests from health and civil liberties organisations, which said it was an invasion of patient confidentiality, discriminated against non-British patients and could deter people from seeking medical help for themselves or their children.

When the hunt is on for criminals, rubbish about ‘patient confidentiality’ should be disregarded. Especially when we read that it’s merely ‘non-clinical information including patients’ last known address.‘

…

….

How dare bureaucrats NOT show willing to help nail illegals by handing over such minimal but still useful information on wanted no-goods’ whereabouts?

………

And it goes without saying that the British National Health Service should ‘discriminate’ – in favour of British people.

And as for ‘deterring people from seeking help?’

If they are illegals, they can turn themselves in for deportation and while in custody…

..

..

….awaiting the boot on the backside they deserve, the prison doctor will no doubt see to them.

May is a gutless creature.

Her government, your government, if you are a Brit, finances both the Home Office and ‘NHS Digital’ with your taxes, and she has the undeniable right  – and duty  – to tell them to cooperate against crimmigrants.

But she has allowed the pin-striped pinkos running NHS Digital to ‘completely withdraw from the data-sharing ..’

.

Who’s the boss?

She should crack the whip and tell them straight, share all data or get lost – find new jobs.

Instead her two subordinate bureaucracies are haggling over how best to devise a ’memorandum of understanding that narrows the scope of information sought.’

Pathetic

No wonder pro-crimmigrants are exulting at May’s miserable surrender, with leftist lawyer Lara ten Caten (what kind of name is that, anyway?) ranting about ‘forcing people to choose between self-medicating and detention and possible deportation.’

And she’s a LAWyer?

If a rapist on the run needs medical attention for scratches on his face, he can ‘self-medicate’ or surrender and face the consequences of his crime.

If a violent robber has been wounded in the commission of a bank heist, he may ‘self-medicate’ or turn himself in and get medical care behind bars.

Same should go for those guilty of the serious offence of violating British borders!

Even lousy leftist lawyers should tell lawless aliens to obey the law!

 

“This stand-down by the government is a huge victory for everyone who believes we should be able to access healthcare safely – and particularly for doctors and nurses who had become complicit in the government’s hostile environment against their will. This triumph shows that if we stand up to xenophobic policies, we can and will dismantle them.”

.

A Home Office spokesperson said: “We continue to work with NHS Digital on a new memorandum of understanding to enable us to make requests for non-medical information about those

Home Office scraps scheme that used NHS data to track migrants

 

Vindaloo Boo-Hoo! It’s ‘Unfair’ To Enforce UK Law?

Immigration officers visited Tayyabs on 25 August, “acting on intelligence”, according to the Home Office.

=

They arrested six Pakistani nationals, five of whom were detained ahead of removal from the UK, while a sixth was required to report regularly to immigration authorities.

https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2017/sep/09/uk-curry-house-owners-say-immigration-raids-unfair

So no less than five illegals scooped up in one raid on one London curry resto in one day?

Not bad, most of us would say.

=

=

But not all of us say that.

Curry house immigration raids ‘unfair’, say restaurant owners

I declare an interest.

I like curry.

Last evening last week I enjoyed a very large helping of excellent curry in Kemang, South Jakarta, in one of the many eateries (and drinkeries!) where British and other expats go to seek that succulent cuisine that originates from the Indian Sub-Continent.

=

Rock on,Tommy!

=

But the fact that lots of Brits like to eat lots of spicy Asian food should be irrelevant to the enforcement of British immigration laws.

It’s not as if that one hot-spot in  the UK is a one-off.

Other raids have resulted in arrests and heavy fines this year on restaurants as far apart as Kent and North Yorkshire, and the permanent closure recently of one in Twickenham.

So it’s a nationwide problem?

Then there’s nothing remotely ‘unfair’ about raids that result in the detention and deportation of illegals.

…

…

What is glaringly unfair is the restaurateurs’ evidently common practice of flouting the law.

If fish n chip shops were perceived to be operating with similar disregard for legality, no doubt they’d be targetted as well.

I have no time for that most unappetising individual, Home Secretary Amber Rudd…

=====

Arrest Amber Rudd? Calais Crimmigrant “Age Checks Not Carried Out! “ 

…but the case for action quoted from the statement statement issued by her Ministry is irrefutable.

Using illegal labour is not victimless. It cheats the taxpayer, undercuts honest businesses and cheats legitimate jobseekers of employment opportunities.

We are happy to work with businesses to ensure the right pre-employment checks are carried out, but we take robust action against employers who deliberately flout the rules…

Indeed!

=

=

All these whining employers have to do to avoid trouble is recruit staff who are entitled to live and work in the United Kingdom!

THAT’S FAIR!

 

,

ISIS Evil Is Inexcusable – No Entry For Jihadist Vixens!

I see from ‘Your Brexit…’  http://yourbrexit.co.uk/news/british-girl-who-fled-the-uk-to-join-isis-slammed-on-facebook/ 

…that the Home Office has reportedly shown unusually sound judgement by depriving a turncoat bint of her citizenship, after she scuttled off to join the ISIS rape-gang.

==

Aqsa Mahmood is thought to be one of the 150 people that have had their British citizenship removed by the Home Office because of suspected involvement with ISIS.

==

There’s something of a debate on their Facebook page (which, having been fatwa-ed by Facebook for posting a video of the 2011 Cikeusik Pogrom in Indonesia…

===============

•    
  

  Facebook’s Status – Enemy Within – Exposed Again!

• …I cannot join!) about whether the vixen should be excluded from the realm or allowed back to face criminal charges.

• In my opinion, she should never be permitted into the UK – simply because there’s no death penalty there.

• If she gets back to Britain, she might be prosecuted, or not.

• She might be convicted, or not.

• She might be sentenced to a trifling few years, then be out spreading her vile sectarian ideology once again!

• =
• 

=

• Or she might get appropriate time behind bars, life, in other words, which would cost UK tax-payers many thousands of pounds.

=

=

She deserves to be hanged. lf that option’s not on the table, then what possible benefit can it bring to Britain to bring her back?

I hope you’ll join in the Facebook debate.

Or comment here.