If the Edinburgh constabulary indeed failed to support enforcement of immigration law, you’d expect Priti Patel to speak up and denounce such slackery.
Instead, we got this astounding exercise in ambivalence!
A Home Office spokesperson said:
“It is unacceptable for people to attempt to block legitimate actions of law enforcement as they work to remove those with no right to live or work in the UK.”Through our Nationality and Borders Act we are taking steps to fix the broken system to make it fair to those in genuine need and firm on those who seek to abuse it. An operation was carried out in Edinburgh today and to suggest that protesters had an impact on the outcome is wrong.”
What kind of gibbering nonsense is that?
The HO staff were seen to leave empty-handed, between lines of police…
.
…mocked by abusive anti-social leftists.
..
No sign of any corralled crimmigrants! Of course those street-reds had an ‘impact’ – they thwarted the capture of undesirable aliens.
The BBC hit a new low today, a sympathetic interview with the simpering snarly sister of two low-lifes…
……
… Freya Valie Roberts..one of the twins’ sisters, said she was “disgusted, upset and insulted” when she heard they were being threatened with deportation.
…
….both with convictions for GBH.
That’s grievous bodily harm.
A very serious level of assault.
The BBC could have used police mug-shots, but instead chose to portray these vicious hoodlums as playful lads!
…
Darrell and Darren Roberts
…
No interviews with their victims, of course!
It’s the Tax Funded Propaganda Channel!
The filthy savages are said to be due for deportation.
Or so it’s said – disturbingly, Priti Patel’s Home Office seems reluctant to get on with it!
…the BBC has seen a notice sent to one of the men that indicates the Home Office does intend to pursue deportation….
.
.
They are not British, so it’s time the poor folks of Dominica and Grenada, in the West Indies, get to put up with the dirty thugs.
They have never been there, but that’s tough.
The local authority, in Ealing, London, says the scum had no interest in becoming British – thank God, I hear you say!
They grew up in Britain and never took to civilised life, so why not kick ‘em out!
.
.
Frankly, it would be better to put them down, or rather string them up – they are worthless swine, after all!
Sadly that’s not an option!
Had the BBC interviewed most decent British people, or just a representative sample thereof, surely there would be resounding cheers at the prospect of vile vermin getting the boot!
You can read the entire TFPC report via the link below, and have a laugh at their lawyer’s peculiar rant – and at his photo!
Damn that woman.
If her brute siblings never could be bothered to take out citizenship, might it be the rest of them really could be deportable.
I read the whole TFPC ( BBC!) story and she never once expressed any regret about the crimes they committed.
GBH is what you say it is, extremely violent attack on people.
Britain would be better off without them!
Sorry, I had to remove your insults. If you wish to be rude, you need to provide rational justification.
If you don’t wish to identify yourself, why would I waste time replying?
Aaah, I’ll reply just a little.
Yes, like most people I hate marxism, both the Red China variety, and the cultural marxist variety which characterises BLM and RNA ( red nazi antifa)
Their level of vandalism and violence is such that I could, had I more time, vastly top up the amount of anti-marxism I offer readers.
However, despite the Chinese Virus’ effects on normal life, I rather enjoy my free time.
Blogging against evil is obviously worthwhile, but I have too many other fun things to do, most days, to devote more than a few hours of my day goading uptight lefties.
Have a nice weekend!
I am always delightfully impressed how you cover so many issues,Ross, four or five a day sometimes.
You also don’t just say that you hate the very nefarious persons and causes you name but you give examples of their very uncivilised or dangerous designs.
Most importantly, you give out good ideas on how to hit back.
Unlike BLM or the Antifa nazi gangs, you don’t organise violent assaults on people you disagree with.
The Left are the Haters.
Should ‘decent blokes’ not get more upset about the hate expressed by means of arson, looting, thuggery and riotous vandalism, the really objectionable hate that BLM has spread around America and other countries?
I can’t speak for everyone who comments here but most of us express honest hate for bad oeople who hate our way of life and our countries
‘It is unclear whether an initiative due to be announced on Monday to house homeless people in empty hotels will include destitute migrants or only British street homeless people. The latter have access to housing and other benefits, the former do not…’
Who do you think should have ‘access to housing and other benefits?’
That paragraph above is taken from a Guardian article focused NOT on legal immigrants, who have been accepted into British society, but on crimmigrants…
.
…
…illegals, or as the left media chilidhishly continues to misrepresent them, the ‘undocumented!’
And according to the same report, these illegals number no less, and quite possibly more, than A MILLION!
We keep reading of a shortage of masks, shortage of beds, all manner of insufficiencies.
……
Priti Patel is still new in her job as Home Secretary, but there’s an urgent need for her to knock heads together among her underlings.
Why?
Because the ‘Home Office does not have comprehensive records of the whereabouts of undocumented migrants in the UK….’
For God’s Sake – if they’re illegals, they should be corralled in detention camps, being processed for deportation!
Then the Home Office would have instant access to the crimmigrants’ whereabouts!
Common Sense!
But what most Brits surely think is bitterly opposed by the Common Enemy!
We covered this phenomenon recently, and since then we have learned that only 900 crimmigrants are detained, and no less than 300 have just been unleashed to roam among honest British citizens.
And again this week we have another leftist ‘charity’ leader ‘RAPAR’s chair of trustees, Dr Rhetta Moran’ telling us the crimmigrants should be made to feel at ease, ‘without fear of being locked up.’
RAPAR, fyi, is the ‘Refugee and Asylum Participatory Action Research.’
There is indeed a concerted effort by the Left to exploit the crisis…
….as noted several times already this month.
If illegal aliens don’t want to be locked up, let ‘em get on board a plane for home!
Lachie Simpson
12:22 on March 27, 2020 Permalink
| Reply
Turn them loose? That’s insane.
If keeping them locked up is problematic, send them home!
These illegals were not asked to move into someone else’s country. They are assuredly not welcome.
If they now find themselves in difficulties, they should leave.
Cheaper for tax-payers to cover the cost of their transport home than keep them in ‘free’ accommodation with three meals a day, and free medical services and all other costs.
And do they really get ‘pocket money?’ That’s offensive!
Christmas is over, but those who celebrated, as I did, should pay attention to this.
Once more, I am picking up on the excellent Gatestone, a source which never seems to run out of shocking material…
=
=
When it comes to offering asylum, the UK “appears to discriminate in favour of Muslims” instead of Christians. Statistics seemed to confirm this allegation: “out of 4,850 Syrian refugees accepted for resettlement by the Home Office in 2017, only eleven were Christian….” — Barnabas Fund, November 2, 2017.
=
…and once more I do them the courtesy of quoting only the quotes they offer, in order to draw British readers’ attention to the shocking state of affairs in the administration –
====
=====
– and in particular in the Home Office – which is run by Priti Patel – where the anti-Christian discrimination has been identified by that Barnabas Fund, an irreproachably reputable organisation.
And here’s another source from the Gatestone website which confirms the dire plight of Christian Arabs.
“You have this absurd situation where the scheme is set up to help Syrian refugees and the people most in need, Christians who have been ‘genocided,’ they can’t even get into the U.N. camps to get the food. If you enter and say I am a Christian or convert, the Muslim U.N. guards will block you [from] getting in… and even threaten you…” — Paul Diamond, British Human Rights Lawyer, CBN News, December 4, 2019.
=
Surely among the new crop of Tory MPs there are some brave spirits who will raise this issue in the House of Commons and demand of Ms. Patel and Mr. Johnson that an effective investigation is undertaken to see if there are as many rats scuttling around the Home Office as there are in the Foreign Office.
It certainly seems to be an issue pursued already in the Upper House!
Lord George Carey is suing the UK Home Office for allegedly being “institutionally biased” against Christian refugees and therefore complicit in what he calls “the steady crucifixion of Middle East Christians.”
Yet for all the tough talk from Priti Patel, the new Home Secretary, her responsible (?) minions, apparently, have been bringing these crimmigrants ashore instead of forcing them back.
All have been medically checked and taken to immigration officials for questioning, the Home Office said.
Medically checked?
More tax-payers’ money down the drain, paying for doctors, nurses and no doubt free medicines too.
And I bet they remain on British soil even as I type this.
It’s no excuse to say their ‘asylum’ claims need to be examined.
The swine are coming from France for pity’s sakes. The only people who might be in need of refuge from injustice in France are French patriots like those brave young Identitarians…
As for the alien undesirables, if their excuse for leaving their own (admittedly often cess-poolish) homelands were a search for a civilised country to live in, then they made it….
.
……
…but of course they are mostly lying skunks.
They know British handouts are yummier, so here they come!
….
It comes five days after Border Force intercepted what is thought to be the highest number of migrants in a single day amid warnings the closure of a French camp could prompt a spike in Channel crossings.
Very true, the French state will do little to bring these wild illegal migrants under control.
Even although at the same time it will do very many unjustices to its own people if they are patriotic.
Macron and his complaisant courts must be resisted.
We wrote about this gang some months ago, when one of their flunkeys fired a few cheap shots at the excellent Herr Kickl, Austria’s then Interior Minister…
..ISD fosters strategic partnerships across governments, academia, civil society and the private sector to develop policy and operational programmes to respond to the threat of extremism. We also work closely with leading players in the media and technology sector to help achieve impact on a global scale.
…and while the supranationalist meddling which characterises the ‘Institute for Strategic Dialogue’ is appalling, what was much more shocking was the huge amount of cash pouring into the agitprop outfit.
And where it comes from!
The Independent insists on describing ISD as a ‘think-tank,’ but my preference for the term ‘propaganda pump’ was confirmed last week by a woman named Chloe Colliver.
She’s the boss of ISD’s ‘digital research unit,’ and she lashed out at British PM Johnson for telling it like it is.
Bojo’s sin, in Comrade Chloe’s eyes, is to defined the Remainer’s legislative coup as a “surrender bill…”
…
….worse, says the ISD bint, was that Johnson was ‘positioning himself as enacting the “will of the people.”
Since the people voted for Brexit and Johnson says ( and, one hopes, means it) that he wants to achieve Brexit, what’s Comrade Chloe cavilling about?
Aaah!
She reckons the PM was “calling successfully to a nationalist interpretation of the Brexit debate.”
…….
…
If Brexit is not a nationalist issue, what the hell is it?
Taking back control from the Brussels Commissars is not just some fiddly thing about regulating fishing or checks at harbours and airports, important though these may well be.
..
..
It’s about flags and passports and freedom, the very stuff of national pride.
Now the liberals, lefts and the far-lefts and the separatists find all that sort of thing abhorrent.
We all understand that.
…
….
But this ISD rat-pack are funded by governments and banks and big biz and like to present themselves as professional ‘experts.’
‘Experts’ like Chloe Colliver, who positively shudders at how “it seems very purposeful to me and it really harks back to the Second World War nostalgia in this debate, which plays powerfully to the far right and nationalist groups.”
Sorry, Comrade Chloe, but it ‘plays powerfully’ to millions who voted for Brexit, but of course this condescending ‘expert’ thinks all those common people are thick as pig-sh-t!
“They don’t understand the mechanisms and decisions being made on their behalf….”
The 17 million, who had had enough of ‘decisions made on their behalf’ and in 2016 made the decision THEMSELVES, were just so dim-witted!
Just sod off, Your Arrogance!
But there’s a better way than irate ‘sod offs’ to put these elitists in their place.
Cut off the cash!
Britain currently has a Home Secretary named Priti Patel.
We know that the IDS gets funding from all sorts of sources, including the European Union…
..
…and Soros’s ‘Open Society’ meddlers…
….AND
….British tax-payers’ money via the UK Home Office.
Priti Patel has a patriotic reputation and was appointed by Boris Johnson.
….
…
Might it not be a prudent, responsible and patriotic act on her part to stop her ministry’s funding of an ‘NGO’ whose minions so flagrantly launch outrageous propaganda missiles against the Prime Minister?
Check out who funds them!
ISD benefits from a wide range of financial support from philanthropic donors, private companies and governments.
Petra Malley
23:23 on September 7, 2019 Permalink
| Reply
Another ‘charity,’ is it?
The far left War On Want was reported but it has not lost its charitable status, so we must hope at least Ms.Patel will put her foot down.
“Ultimately it’s necessary to repeal the good character statutory requirement in relation to those registering their citizenship because all the evidence suggests that it is racially discriminatory and affects vulnerable BME children and adults disproportionately.”
How come the UK Government has been dishing out British tax-payers’ money to a brazenly political agitprop outfit?
=
If you or I were to suggest that non-white people, of any age or origin, were ‘disproportionately’ lacking in good character, all Hell would break loose.
Her statement can and should be deemed offensive by people of good character of all ethnicities.
=
The Guardian breathlessly tells us that hundreds of children, some as young as 10, who were born or who grew up in the UK were having their applications for British citizenship denied on the basis of convictions for crimes such as petty theft.
Bloody good thing too.
Lawless brats grow up to be big bad scumbags, and so should not be granted the privilege of citizenship. Far better to send them packing, so some other country, the one they belong in, can handle their dishonest predispostions. .
Britain, unfortunately, due to ever-weaker standards of discipline both within the home – Fresh call for smacking to be outlawed in the home – and in schools, where Eurogroveller John Major outlawed proper punishments years ago…
=
..
…has plenty of British brats who need to be dealt with.
No need to hang onto anti-socials who aren’t British!
=
=
Yet – the very same Home Office that has been funding this outfit has already begun caving in to the rants of the Runnymede ratpack reportedly in receipt of largesse from the public purse.
Instructions have been issued to take into account “the child’s age and particular circumstances and any mitigating factors such as their ability to understand the consequences of their actions.”
=
What about a question more important than whether the dirty little thieves understood that the consequences of stealing other people’s property…
=
=
….might include a boot on their criminal backsides that sends them back where they belong?
A MUCH better question, to ask each other, dear readers, is –
When you were ten years old, did YOU understand that thieving was wrong?
I did.
What child of ten does not understand that stealing is wrong?
That would be unbelievable, a number of years ago, but now?
If these thieving brats deserve citizenship, then it’s not of the United Kingdom.
Maybe their parents are criminals too,so why not get rid of the whole criminal clan?
You expected anything else from the Home Office?
I know little enough about the present Home Secretary, but before her we had Amber Rudd and before that we had Theresa May.
All of them far too soft on illegals.
We Americans have this problem too, even with Trump in. The White House the federal government is handing out our money to extreme left ‘community’gangs for ‘urban’ projects.
Why is the UK Home Office involved in financing organizations that campaign against the government that is in charge of the UK Home Office?
If the Communist Party or the Antifa Nazi is want to campaign against government policies, that is their right.
But why the Home Office? It’s part of the government, right?
Or is my understanding of the UK government not good enough?
Keith Milner
08:27 on January 18, 2019 Permalink
| Reply
Why would anyone not want a good character test for citizenship?
Why would anyone want known thieves to be allowed to stay in the country?
These Runnymede people need theur heads read.
Edward Lamont
21:42 on January 19, 2019 Permalink
| Reply
Rudd, as you say, Vicki, had May’s full support when those military age adults were brought unvetted into Britain from Calais.
Rudd,like all of us,could see they weren’t child-migrants but refused to admit it and in fact abetted their lies by refusing to carry out simple dental checks.
If she had done her duty, and the Home Secretary’s mainduty is to ensure we can live safe and without internal threats, she would surely have found what the Austrians just learned,that 40% of those migrants were liars. https://www.breitbart.com/europe/2019/01/19/austria-four-ten-underage-migrants-lied-age-2017/
No Brit patriot has forgotten Amber’s Army of fake-refugees, the burly young men imported as ‘unaccompanied minors’ by Theresa May’s then Home Secretary, Remainer Rudd.
=
What a Calais Cur ‘child’ looks like, according to T May!
No serious vetting, not even any honest attempt to take the basic step of getting proof positive that they actually were ‘children’ – not even by the absurd definition of child-age as defined by May’s masters in Brussels.
Now we read that, rather than defend one of the few promising initiatives that emerged from the current UK Government, May has ordered her bureaucrats to stand down,
The Home Office has abandoned a controversial “hostile environment” scheme using NHS data to track down patients believed to be breaching immigration rules.
==========
In the face of a legal challenge brought by the Migrants’ Rights Network, a memorandum of understanding between the Department of Health, NHS Digital and the Home Office is being scrapped.
When the hunt is on for criminals, rubbish about ‘patient confidentiality’ should be disregarded. Especially when we read that it’s merely ‘non-clinical information including patients’ last known address.‘
…
….
How dare bureaucrats NOT show willing to help nail illegals by handing over such minimal but still useful information on wanted no-goods’ whereabouts?
………
And it goes without saying that the British National Health Service should ‘discriminate’ – in favour of British people.
And as for ‘deterring people from seeking help?’
If they are illegals, they can turn themselves in for deportation and while in custody…
..
..
….awaiting the boot on the backside they deserve, the prison doctor will no doubt see to them.
May is a gutless creature.
Her government, your government, if you are a Brit, finances both the Home Office and ‘NHS Digital’ with your taxes, and she has the undeniable right – and duty – to tell them to cooperate against crimmigrants.
But she has allowed the pin-striped pinkos running NHS Digital to ‘completely withdraw from the data-sharing ..’
.
Who’s the boss?
She should crack the whip and tell them straight, share all data or get lost – find new jobs.
Instead her two subordinate bureaucracies are haggling over how best to devise a ’memorandum of understanding that narrows the scope of information sought.’
Pathetic
No wonder pro-crimmigrants are exulting at May’s miserable surrender, with leftist lawyer Lara ten Caten (what kind of name is that, anyway?) ranting about ‘forcing people to choose between self-medicating and detention and possible deportation.’
And she’s a LAWyer?
If a rapist on the run needs medical attention for scratches on his face, he can ‘self-medicate’ or surrender and face the consequences of his crime.
If a violent robber has been wounded in the commission of a bank heist, he may ‘self-medicate’ or turn himself in and get medical care behind bars.
Same should go for those guilty of the serious offence of violating British borders!
Even lousy leftist lawyers should tell lawless aliens to obey the law!
“This stand-down by the government is a huge victory for everyone who believes we should be able to access healthcare safely – and particularly for doctors and nurses who had become complicit in the government’s hostile environment against their will. This triumph shows that if we stand up to xenophobic policies, we can and will dismantle them.”
.
A Home Office spokesperson said: “We continue to work with NHS Digital on a new memorandum of understanding to enable us to make requests for non-medical information about those
If anyone had any doubts that May is a waste of space, on immigration as much as Brexit, there’s fresh evidence in how she’s brought that Amber Rudd back into her government.
It was Rudd who brought all those illegal and undoubtedly adult ‘unaccompanied children’ in to curry favour with Macron.
You covered her terrible decision not to carry out any age checks and so did other bigger media but May did nothing to bring Rudd into line.
Now the two of them will be working in harness again to hurt our country.
Immigration officers visited Tayyabs on 25 August, “acting on intelligence”, according to the Home Office.
=
They arrested six Pakistani nationals, five of whom were detained ahead of removal from the UK, while a sixth was required to report regularly to immigration authorities.
So no less than five illegals scooped up in one raid on one London curry resto in one day?
Not bad, most of us would say.
=
=
But not all of us say that.
Curry house immigration raids ‘unfair’, say restaurant owners
I declare an interest.
I like curry.
Last evening last week I enjoyed a very large helping of excellent curry in Kemang, South Jakarta, in one of the many eateries (and drinkeries!) where British and other expats go to seek that succulent cuisine that originates from the Indian Sub-Continent.
=
Rock on,Tommy!
=
But the fact that lots of Brits like to eat lots of spicy Asian food should be irrelevant to the enforcement of British immigration laws.
It’s not as if that one hot-spot in the UK is a one-off.
Other raids have resulted in arrests and heavy fines this year on restaurants as far apart as Kent and North Yorkshire, and the permanent closure recently of one in Twickenham.
So it’s a nationwide problem?
Then there’s nothing remotely ‘unfair’ about raids that result in the detention and deportation of illegals.
…
…
What is glaringly unfair is the restaurateurs’ evidently common practice of flouting the law.
If fish n chip shops were perceived to be operating with similar disregard for legality, no doubt they’d be targetted as well.
I have no time for that most unappetising individual, Home Secretary Amber Rudd…
…but the case for action quoted from the statement statement issued by her Ministry is irrefutable.
Using illegal labour is not victimless. It cheats the taxpayer, undercuts honest businesses and cheats legitimate jobseekers of employment opportunities.
We are happy to work with businesses to ensure the right pre-employment checks are carried out, but we take robust action against employers who deliberately flout the rules…
Indeed!
=
=
All these whining employers have to do to avoid trouble is recruit staff who are entitled to live and work in the United Kingdom!
…that the Home Office has reportedly shown unusually sound judgement by depriving a turncoat bint of her citizenship, after she scuttled off to join the ISIS rape-gang.
==
Aqsa Mahmood is thought to be one of the 150 people that have had their British citizenship removed by the Home Office because of suspected involvement with ISIS.
==
There’s something of a debate on their Facebook page (which, having been fatwa-ed by Facebook for posting a video of the 2011 Cikeusik Pogrom in Indonesia…
Open and shut case, mate, because we have no chance of getting capital punishment back for those who need it, not with May and Corbyn as alternative PMs.
Until we do, then you are spot on, keep them out!
Why not send a lot more to join them.
I think the Yazidis and Kurd freedom fighters might have a short and sweet way of dealing with those grooming gangs in Rotherham and our other English cities
Tam Birnie 21:12 on May 6, 2022 Permalink |
Those ‘police’ will serve Sturgeon fsithfully if she gets her Scottish Socialist Republic
LikeLike
Malcolm Johns 21:51 on May 6, 2022 Permalink |
Thanks for this.
So many Scots are so fed up with the way the police are now enforcing the woke/left agenda.
LikeLike