It’s impossible, I am sorry to say, to feel sorry for Amber Rudd.
.

Awful Amber Rudd
…
As Home Secretary, she behaved disgracefully, allowing young alien brutes of military age to barge into Britain as ‘unaccompanied minors’ – she refused point-blank to subject the hulking crimmigrants to simple painless age-checks.
…

Little kiddies imported into UK by Rudd
……
Why?
Only she knows for sure, but she has been a rancid liberal for as long as she’s been in politics.
Until that Windrush episode upset her ideological soul-mates!
Now she has been ‘no-platformed’ by a pack of pinko bints at Oxford University.

..
That phrase is the dilletante left-liberal version of the thuggery preferred by the storm-troops of Red Nazi Antifa…
.

..
…not violent, like the Antifa louts are violent, but displaying the same intolerant mind-set, totalitarian really, nonetheless.
Obviously it’s deplorable, and Rudd’s daughter, a nonentity named Florence Gill, is angry on her mummy’s behalf:
“ I don’t care if you disagree with her. Its fucking rude This is NOT how women should treat each other.”
https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2020/mar/06/amber-rudd-hits-out-at-rude-oxford-students-after-talk-cancelled
Which demonstrates very clearly that Mummy did a poor job of bringing up her daughter.

While people ( including Yours Truly) often use bad language to vent emotions…
(as last month, when part of the cornice on my ceiling fell on top of me while I was drinking morning coffee – NB, I didn’t spill a drop!)
…people who were raised to be civil do NOT use such words where anyone and everyone can read or hear them.
Only foul-mouths do that.
ooooo
Liberals do little to defend free speech when patriots get hammered, ‘No-Platformed’ by pig-ignorant students.
Some of the worst censorship laws, indeed, have been passed with the support of ‘conservative’ liberals like Rudd.
But boy-oh-boy, the liberal elite sure rally round each other when it happens to one of their own!
A number of former politicians also came to Rudd’s defence.
Responding to Gill, the former chancellor of the exchequer George Osborne tweeted: “Don’t worry about your mum – ‘no platforming’ one of the most senior female politicians of our generation at an International Women’s Day event just makes the Oxford students involved look stupid & small-minded, the very opposite of what that great university stands for. Their loss.”
So it’s ‘stupid’ if it’s done to a ‘senior female politician’ – but did Osborne make his voice heard…
…when Franklin Graham was banned?
The former Labour deputy leader Tom Watson posted: “If you’re trying to silence Amber Rudd you really are being anti-democratic.”
But if you try to silence other people with other points of view…? Are you then less ‘anti-democratic?’
The former Conservative and Liberal Democrat MP Sarah Wollaston tweeted: “No platforming of @AmberRuddUK by Oxford is absurd & worrying. Why are universities allowing ideological fringes to crush freedom of speech in our centres of excellence?”
Good question?
But did Wollaston ask about freedom of speech when Katy Hopkin’s Twitter account was suppressed last month?
Did Awful Amber speak up…
…when a distiinguished MP of her own party was purged for saying what he thought about perversion?
For a longer and more detailed look at ‘No Platform,’ here’s an excellent article from spiked.com –
Like this:
Like Loading...
Barb Cassain 22:45 on October 3, 2021 Permalink |
Core value of free speech?
And that’s her talking when she has censored the Russian Navalny’s voice and done all she can to censor everybody in the world who disputes the Fauci-WHO side of the Covid argument.
She has to be laughed off her You Tube platform
LikeLike