Tagged: impartiality Toggle Comment Threads | Keyboard Shortcuts

  • ross1948 00:33 on March 1, 2016 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , , , , impartiality, , , , ,   

    AirAsia’s Malaysian Joins Europhile “In”-Crowd – Go Fly Yourself, Tony! 


    Last month we expressed our scorn for the plutocratic elite aligning themselves with Cameron’s craven sell-out to Brussels, what Better Off Out rather neatly describes as the inelegant sight of a self-serving elite closing ranks.  http://www.betteroffout.net/pro-eu-businesses-letter-the-times/

    They add the interesting information that the big business endorsement was circulated by a civil servant at Number 10, which tells you plenty about the politicisation of the once-upon-a-time admirably impartial UK Civil Service.


    Sonny Leong CBE

    Leong, director of “Left Foot Forward, a political blog for progressives!”


    One name on the list is that of Sonny Leong, Chief executive, Civil Service College.

    And what do they do? – – Using the latest skills and methods we aim to help shape the public sector in the UK and abroad, and beyond.   http://www.civilservicecollege.org.uk/about-us.aspx

    Very reassuring!

    But for those Brits resident here in Jakarta, and there are a lot, it’s something of a surprise to note that AirAsia is one of the companies named.

    Their big boss, Tony Fernandes, is a Malaysian.


    Tony Fernandes.jpg


    In March 2012, Tony Fernandes served on the International Advisory Board of Global March to Jerusalem, which aims to “mobilize the international community in solidarity with Palestinians and to protect Jerusalem   https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tony_Fernandes


    I am currently considering two major trips this year. I used AirAsia only recently, for a couple of trips, home and away, but after doing that little bit of research, I’m damn sure I won’t be using them again.

    Better to pay a bit extra than contribute to the profits of an airline whose multi-millionaire magnate foreign owner wants to keep Britannia subject to those Brussels Commissars and who takes a one-sided ‘solidarity’ stance in the Middle East . 


  • ross1948 22:32 on January 12, 2016 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , broadcasting, , debate boycott, , , impartiality, ,   

    Debate With AfD Patriots? Red/Green Comrades Bottle Out! 

    Although the AfD is currently hovering around 10% in German polls, chances are it will rise and rise after the horrendous news of sex crimes by Mama Stasi’s migrants finally got out, despite the establishment media’s cover-ups.



    Their growing threat to the collaborationist elite is confirmed by both the far-left Greens and the Socialist SPD’s chicken-sh+t refusal to face them live on TV.

    Odd, how these arrogant pinko creeps say the patriots are clueless and without a logical leg to stand on – easy to rip apart their arguments, then, surely?

    But given the opportunity to expose AfD’s alleged shortcomings in open, cut-and-thrust debate?


    They shudder and shrink back from confrontation.


    Jorg Meuthen


    • Even from such a cheery-looking sort as Jorg Meuten, AfD’s man in the southern federal state of Baden Wurttemberg!

    I hitched through there in my student years.

    It’s a nice place, lots of beautiful Black Forest scenery, but with several important cities, too, which may well have been afflicted recently by crimmigrant savagery of the sort seen in Koln.


    • hands off
    • ————
    • Certainly the citizens in B-W are well aware of the menace Merkel’s phoney refugees’ pose to their wives and daughters, which is why AfD, as the only pro-German party, is likely to do well in the state elections exactly one month hence. 


    If Jorg Meuthen, AfD’s Baden-Württemberg state spokesman, is invited to the March round-table by Südwestrundfunk (SWR – the state broadcasting network), the Green Party state premier, Winfried Kretschmann (Green) and his deputy Nils Schmid (SPD) will stay away….


    …SPD and the Greens want – in spite of the refugee crisis and although the AfD are at eight percent in the opinion polls – to avoid public “showcase discussion” with the AFD, if possible at all events.




    Craven Kretschmann, above, and Spineless Schmid, below




    “We won’t appear with the AFD on the podium,” said the SPD state chairman Nils Schmid, “because that’s a party that despises freedom and democracy and rejects our system.”

    If AfD are truly so indefensible, why cower so cravenly when there’s a chance to challenge them?

    But who says they despise democracy, or freedom?

    That’s rich from a comrade of those Red Nazi SPD authoritarians we posted on just a week ago, who want the state media (and presumably all media) to censor the only real opposition party in the country.  

    And one would hope every German patriot rejects the system.


    • As currently constituted, it’s a system that favours undesirable aliens over honest citizens,that is sustained by a pack of dishonest media hacks and a police force infested with liars, increasingly exposed for bare-faced suppression of facts on the rapacious savages imported by the political in-crowd.
    • A system well worth rejecting!

    Now we read that the SWR is puzzling over how to handle the anti-democratic boycott.  http://www.tagesspiegel.de/politik/debatte-um-tv-runde-in-baden-wuerttemberg-mit-der-afd-nicht-zu-diskutieren-ist-unsouveraen/12808960.html


    That report says the SWR faces a dilemma. But it also reminds us they have an obligation to afford all parties a fair hearing.

    There’s no dilemma – and no excuse for cancelling the debate.

    Just make sure all parties get an invitation.


    …empty chairs topped by dunces’ caps, maybe with yellow stripes blazoned across them, should be displayed prominently, to highlight Greens and SPD ignorance of democratic principles  –  and their political cowardice.

    The AfD should then proceed – with any other fair-play parties that attend – to present their policies and answer questions.

    No doubt outside the studio the Un-German Antifa hoodlum mob would shrill and shrill – but they’d have no rational grounds for complaint.


  • ross1948 17:14 on February 20, 2015 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , impartiality, integrity, , , Ruth Ginsburg,   

    Get Pro-‘Gay’ Ginsburg OFF the Case! Sign the Petition! 

    In her 1993 confirmation hearing, Ginsburg steadfastly refused to respond to questions put to her by elected officials about any her views on issues that might come before the court, citing the ethical obligations of a judge to maintain both the fact and the appearance of impartiality.

    She specifically responded to a question about sexual orientation by saying: “I cannot say one word on that subject that would not violate what I said had to be my rule about no hints, no forecasts, no previews. “


    Justice Ruth Ginsburg


    And yet, now Justice Ginsburg apparently feels that presiding over same-sex ‘weddings’ and speaking openly about how she believes the American people are ready for the Court to recognize a constitutional right allowing same-sex couples to marry….


    This arrogant old woman formerly worked for the ACLU, so nobody should expect pro-American opinions from her corner of the Supreme Court.

    • aclu2si

    But that’s not the issue at present. 

    A justice who performs same-sex ‘weddings’ and comments openly about how America is supposedly ready to accept same-sex ‘marriage’ when a case on the very subject is pending before the court is anything but impartial.




    Her blatant pre-hearing bias on pervert ‘weddings’ makes it imperative, if she has any sense of personal or professional honour, to recuse herself from the case.

    That’s why our readers in the USA should sign up to the NOM petition seeking exactly that. 

    Here’s the link with the details.  https://actright.com/petition/140?ref=EB150218EANT

Compose new post
Next post/Next comment
Previous post/Previous comment
Show/Hide comments
Go to top
Go to login
Show/Hide help
shift + esc
%d bloggers like this: