Tagged: Islamist bigots Toggle Comment Threads | Keyboard Shortcuts

  • ross1948 08:52 on October 7, 2016 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , , Islamist bigots, , Muslim Malay illegitimacy, , vice areas   

    Too Many Bastards? Let’s Try More Flogging! 


    The Sharia Hell of Aceh!

    The Sharia Hell of Aceh!

    ———————-

    We have all too often brought the barbarism of Aceh to your notice. Cowardly masked brutes whipping little girls ( guiltless of anything that might offend normal people) before a salivating throng of nasty bigots.

    Sadly, it’s not just in Indonesia’s only shariah-ruled province that such foul spectacles are regarded as acceptable.  

    We’ve mentioned before how the state-sponsored MUI, the council of so-called ‘scholars,’ adheres to similarly primitive thinking.

    ===========

    Syamsul Maarif,  General Secretary of the Indonesian Ulema Council (MUI) Jakarta — If the act of adultery is by a married person, then stoning is the sentence, while if unmarried, then it’s whipping,” he said.
     http://www.suarapembaruan.com/home/mui-dukung-pelaku-kumpul-kebo-dipidanakan/32705.

    0000000

    But today we offer a new view, looking across the Straits of Malacca, to where the most backward elements in Malaysian society are riding high, yet paradoxically concerned to reduce the number of bastards in their country. 

    • Hasil gambar untuk straits of malacca map

    You might think some ‘Islamophobe’ nut-job had made up this stuff!

    But, no, ISMA’s Aminuddin Yahaya is deadly serious, all worked up because more than 150,000 illegitimate kids were born in Malaysia between 2013 and 2015, and he, asserts, most of them were born to “Malay-Muslim women.

    Mind you, despite his anguish he can still do math.

    “If we take this and we do it exponentially, it means 10 years from now, we will have not less than 500,000 illegitimate children!” 

    Aminuddin imputes an immense level of immorality to his co-religionists, telling us that, of those active in ‘vice areas,’ 80 per cent are the young generation, Malay Muslims, because they are not afraid.

    00000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000

    Aminuddin argued that the current maximum penalties that Shariah courts could impose were too light and would not successfully deter Muslims from repeating their offences. — Picture by Yusof Mat Isa

    000000000000

    So making these wayward wenches afraid is what’s required?

    He reckons so, and he reckons that current shariah options are inadequate to instil sufficient terror into young girls’ hearts.

    acehcamb

    Aceh again – but those fanatic creeps want it worse in Malaysia

    .————

    “Six months’ jail, who is afraid? But how would it be if we said 100 lashes, 20 years’ jail? They will certainly think twice,” he said.

    You can read all this frothing Islamist’s insights into the causes of illegitimacy and the means of preventing it on the link.

    But despite one’s immediate inclination to scoff, laugh it off as rabid raving, there’s a serious effort under way to plunge Malaysia into a sectarian Dark Age.

    The fanatic party, PAS, is this month trying to amend the Syariah Courts (Criminal Jurisdiction) Act 1965, to remove the limits Aminuddin deplores.

    malaysia-truly-asia-300x271

    arabia

    —————

    And the report reminds us that two years ago in Kelantan State, plans were announced to empower the Shariah courts to try Muslims for serious crimes ― such as premarital sex punishable by 100 lashes and adultery punishable by death.

    Oh, and don’t forget amputations!

     
    • Linawati 05:19 on October 8, 2016 Permalink | Reply

      Please tell all the people who read your blog that most people in Indonesia are shamed by Aceh where they never whip all the corrupt politicians there only the poor people, for shariah crimes that are not crimes at all.

      Like

  • ross1948 20:13 on May 11, 2016 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , , Islamist bigots, Manchester Police, , , Umer Khan   

    Ranter? Whiner? Are There TWO Umer Khans in Manchester? 


    A Muslim Police Chief Inspector for Greater Manchester has indicated that, according to his understanding, “Freedom of speech does not mean freedom of offending culture, religion or tradition.” http://www.breitbart.com/london/2016/05/09/muslim-police-chief-says-offending-culture-religion-tradition-not-protected-free-speech/.

    Chief Inspector Umer Khan, or any cop who holds such views, is clearly unfit to hold any position in the police of any country that is not an Islamic Republic.


    Muslim Police

    • ————
    • His outlook appears to resemble that of the Islamist fanatics here in Indonesia, who regard it as a punishable offence to mock religion (esp. their religion!)’- a Dark Age belief.

    As for culture, any culture which countenances ‘honour killings,’ polygamy, child marriage, and FGM deserves to be mocked, and people who endorse such rubbish deserve to be offended, often.

    Umer Khan’s now saying he didn’t mean what he said.


    But whilst researching, we found another Umer Khan, also of Manchester Police, who looks rather like the man in the news this week.

    ——-

    Disappointed: Sgt Umer Khan
    The 2009 whiner Khan
    =

    But this report dates back to 2008, and it’s about a whining SERGEANT Umer Khan…an Asian police officer has lost his case for racial discrimination against Greater Manchester Police.

    Sgt Umer Khan, 35, claimed he was prevented from becoming an inspector because of his race. The case was dismissed after a five-day tribunal hearing in Manchester….

    And here’a curious section of the news report  –

    Sgt Khan had checked the force computer for information about his brother who was a suspect in an honour killing, the hearing was told.

    http://www.manchestereveningnews.co.uk/news/greater-manchester-news/race-row-cop-loses-job-924136

    It may be that Chief Inspector Umer Khan is NOT the same person as Sergeant Umer Khan. Maybe it’s a common name in Pakistani circles in Northern England. But it’s odd, two men of similar appearance, mouthy gits from what we read. 

    The 2009 whinge resulted in the then Chief Constable saying it was  disappointing that Sgt Khan felt it necessary to take his grievances to a tribunal but we have always felt that his allegations were unfair and unfounded.

    This has now been confirmed by the decision of the tribunal.

    Perhaps Mancunian readers can check this out?

     
  • ross1948 16:22 on April 6, 2016 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , Basel, , , , Islamist bigots, Juerg Lauener, , , , , , Therwil   

    Swiss School Panders To Sectarian Brats! 


    Among my various jaunts around Jakarta this week was a visit to the northern part of town, where I hung out for part of the afternoon with a nice bunch of Indonesians, pleasant young adults, men and women of all creeds.

    I didn’t ask them about their religion but some of the ladies were bescarfed and several popped out for prayers.

    • i-love-jkt
    • ———–
    • None of them showed the slightest reluctance to shake my hand when we met, nor when we parted. Indonesians are polite, as a rule.

    So we may assume that the arrogant little bigots mentioned in the RT report below are just that- obnoxious fanatical toe-rags.

    Their offensive incivility is saddening, but what’s much more infuriating is the sicko appeasement mentality of the Swiss school administration that panders to their discourtesy.

     

    Die Sek Therwil.

    :——————

    A school in Switzerland says its Muslim pupils will no longer have to shake hands with female teachers following a controversial ruling.

    Two male Muslim students said they did not want to shake hands with women as it was against their religion.

    Discourteous little dorks need a clip round the ear..

    —–

    sexism

    ———–

    Decent Muslims in Switzerland are speaking up against them. 

    There was no reference in the Koran justifying a refusal to shake a woman teacher’s hand, said the Swiss Federation of Islamic Organisations. Saida Keller-Messahli of the Forum for Progressive Islam urged the Swiss not to give in to extremist demands.     http://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-35967349

    Men and women shake hands here every day, in this 90% Muslim archipelago, the largest Muslim country in the world. There have been a few backward bints who wrap something round their hands when they are introduced to me
    But in all my many years here, I’d say less than half-a-dozen – and one of them was a pathetic Canadian ‘convert’ chick who’d clearly married a rabid zealot, a primitive…
    b5300-retardalert
    …like this other lot in Switzerland –  the smaller Islamic Central Council of Switzerland said that a handshake between men and women was prohibited. 

    The school’s located in northern Switzerland, a place called Therwil, near the big city of Basel ( many spell it Basle, but that’s the French way, and the city and canton are in the German-speaking part of the country, so I use theirs)

    The brats concerned are mid-teens, who should have been told to smarten up and recognise that they live in a civilised country – shape up or face expulsion.

    ————

     Lauener

    0000000000000

    Instead, their infantile insistence that Islam does not permit any physical contact between members of the opposite sex, unless it is with family members…   https://www.rt.com/news/338488-muslim-school-women-switzerland/persuaded the school principal, a man named Juerg Lauener,to  opt for appeasement, thus encouraging their anti-social recalcitrance.

    Simonetta Sommaruga

    • Naturally, decent Swiss are outraged.
    • Justice Minister Simonetta Sommaruga sums it up –“shaking hands is part of our culture.”

    Christoph Eymann, of the Swiss Conference of Cantonal Ministers of Education, also reminded the school that  “We cannot tolerate that women in the public service are treated differently from men.”

    But the spineless local authority in Therwil has bottled out of its duty to see that schools teach children basic responsibilities of citizenship in a civilised country (aka good manners) 

    They “will not intervene as [it] is the responsibility of the school to set the rules,” said their spokesman – actually, disgracefully, spokeswoman –  Monika Wyss, whose council thereby betrays all Swiss women.

    PS

    The beleaguered school has tried to find a compromise, by deciding that the two pupils should not greet either men or women with a handshake.

    That’s just a bad joke, a mockery of school discipline. If these two young nasties think fanatic Islamist dogma is okay, one is tempted to suggest that fanatic Islamist penalties should be considered to quell their insolence.

    ————–

    Indonesia Sharia Law Shariah law in Aceh

    ——

    But better they just be sent packing. Juerg Lauener should be sent with them, The school would be much improved if all three were removed permanently from its premises! 

     

     
  • ross1948 11:39 on March 8, 2016 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: Ahmadiya, , , Islamist bigots, , , , , , ,   

    Ban The Burqa – Vote in This Misleading Poll! 


    Sad to see an Ahmadiyah woman defending the offensive burqa. Ahmadis here in Indonesia have suffered dreadfully at the hands of Islamist bigots.

    Victim of Islamist Murder Mob Gets Six Months in the Slammer 

    Yet here we read of an Ahmadi woman in Britain scolding UKIP MEP Paul Nuttall after he called for women to cast aside the shroud of subjugation to mark International Women’s Day. Her comment –  the standard of basic Hijab requires a Muslim woman to cover her head, hair and chin. It is not essential for the face to be covered.”

    • And here’s me thinking I’ve been living in the largest Muslim majority country in the world, Indonesia, where if I go out for a walk later, most of the women I’ll see WON’T be wearing a scarf and most of those who do certainly don’t hide their chins! 

    So if it’s not essential, why’s she fussing about getting rid of the mask!?

    But maybe I’m biased – are these folks?

    00000000000000000000

    ‘An Archaic Tribal Rag’ – Wise UK Muslim Imam Says ‘Ban the Burqa!’ 

    It’s on the BBC! Bag-Head Bans Do Not Infringe Religious Liberty! 

    Fiery Islamists – ‘Head-Scarves NOT a Big Issue!’ 

    ooooooooooooooo

    The Liverpool Echo Lorna Hughes’s bias is clear from the get-go, the snide aside about how Nuttall said that “the majority in this country” favoured a ban on face coverings – but did not say which survey produced the findings.

    This hackette’s just too lazy to check surveys for herself. Most if not all polls DO support his assertion that most Brits want to ban the burqa. Here’s one example

    Hasil gambar untuk most british want burka ban

    YouGov | Most still want to ban the burka in Britain

    But the poll the leftist newspaper tags on (at the end of Hughes’ scribbling) itself makes no mention of the burqa at all!

    Is Paul Nuttall right to tell women what to do?

    As if he’s telling them to do somersaults round the city hall!

    Take a moment and vote YES, which means you share the UKIP man’s view that –

    “We live in dangerous times when security is all important and it is vital that people’s faces can be seen.

    • burqa
     
    • Pam Trevelyan 22:18 on March 8, 2016 Permalink | Reply

      I have just voted. We’re winning, but it’s close!

      Like

c
Compose new post
j
Next post/Next comment
k
Previous post/Previous comment
r
Reply
e
Edit
o
Show/Hide comments
t
Go to top
l
Go to login
h
Show/Hide help
shift + esc
Cancel
%d bloggers like this: