Colorado Collabo Court Stomps Christian Baker!

Colorado’s rancid reputation took another downward spiral last week… …when the state’s Court of Appeals judges kicked a Christian in the teeth, siding with a transfreak agitator, against the valiant baker Jack Phillips, of whom we have written before. Absurdly, the judge-jerks refused to overturn a lower court decision… .. …demanding he ‘bake a cake celebrating someone’s “gender transition.” Jack’s great victory at the Supreme Court in 2018, when he turned away a pair of queers who wanted him to bake a “wedding cake,” seems to have made him a target… . A Glorious Victory Over The Gaystapo …for every kind of deviant activist. One must hope he can take this new gaystapo witch-hunt to the Supreme Court… …and once more triumph over evil. For more details.  READ

Colorado Freakery – New Bake-A-Cake Witch-Hunt!

..

We covered the case of the Christian baker Jack Phillips, who won a famous victory at the U.S.Supreme Court, after a pair of whining queers went even further uptight than usual…

.

A Glorious Victory Over The Gaystapo

…

…when Phillips refused on grounds of principle to bake a cake for their so-called ‘gay’ so-called  ‘wedding.’

But another gaystapo witch-hunter quickly got into top gear.

.

…

This time the excuse is that the baker declined to bake a ‘transition’ cake for a trans-freak!

I won’t provide its name, but if you want more info, use the link.

What is interesting, though, is that it’s not the tax-payers of Colorado whose money is being splurged on the latest bout of anti-Christian witch-hunting.

.

.

After due consideration, the ‘agency’ that collaborated with the pervert pair evidently left the tranny to do its own thing!

Maybe the flunkeys have learned their lesson.

But it’s still no fun for the honest baker to face more harassment for being a Christian.

Read all about it here-

TARGETED: Christian Baker Sued AGAIN, This Time Over Transgender Cake

..

A Glorious Victory Over The Gaystapo!

What a knock-out victory for liberty!

America’s Supreme Court has UPHELD the right of Christians not to be bullied by queer agitators and state inquisitors…

.

….in a famous case we have looked at more than once.

=

…Jack Phillips, the Christian baker involved, had gone out of his way NOT to affront homos. He is perfectly willing to sell them any of the confectionaries he makes…

=

…he does not discriminate in his business and would happily sell gay customers any other cakes on offer in his bakery….

…EXCEPT wedding cakes, because his Christian creed asserts that homo-marriage is not marriage at all, and that he has a constitutional right to stand by his religious beliefs.

Justice Kennedy And ‘An Affront’ To ‘The Angries!’ 

===========

I need not give all the details of this wise ruling – they’re here, in the PJ Media link, and I hope your day is as brightened as mine was when I read them.   ,

https://pjmedia.com/trending/breaking-supreme-court-rules-in-favor-of-colorado-baker-in-gay-wedding-cake-case/

So a great result in the USA -though there are other similar cases yet to be decided!

Yet decent people in The Old Country are still waiting to see if Britannia is still the Mother of the Free.

Or whether evil may triumph…

Freedom On Trial, As Belfast ‘Cake Case’ Continues… 

…the Supreme Court in Belfast has yet to release an opinion on a lower court ruling that found the owners of a bakery discriminated against a gay activist for refusing to bake a cake with the slogan “Support Gay Marriage.”

.https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-44361162

Justice Kennedy And ‘An Affront’ To ‘The Angries!’

The case we featured yesterday is now under way in the USA’s highest court…

Big Day in DC, But It’s Aussies Should Pay Attention! 

…and Justice Anthony Kennedy is said to be the SCOTUS ‘swing’ vote on the issue.

=

=

Kennedy ‘wrote the 2015 decision making same-sex marriage legal,’ so he evidently sees nothing bizarre about equating normal couples with ‘men’ who enjoy having oral and anal ‘sex’ with other ‘men.’

So I suppose it’s only to be expected that he came out with the peculiar concern that displaying a sign outside a storefront that says a business doesn’t serve same-sex weddings would be an affront to the gay community.   https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2017/dec/5/anthony-kennedy-likely-swing-case-same-sex-wedding/

Big deal!

What is really bizarre, surely, is that decent Americans find themselves before the court on the question of whether they may choose to express their perfectly natural distaste for maladjusted ‘gays.’

Used to be a nice word, ‘gay,’ meaning cheerful, but it’s been hi-jacked by homos who seem, for the most part, to be rarely cheerful, more steeped in vicious snarling anger against decent folk.

=

=

Much better, surely, if we refer to them accurately as  ‘The Angries!’

Actually, Jack Phillips, the Christian baker involved, had gone out of his way NOT to affront homos. He is perfectly willing to sell them any of the confectionaries he makes…

=

…he does not discriminate in his business and would happily sell gay customers any other cakes on offer in his bakery….

…EXCEPT wedding cakes, because his Christian creed asserts that homo-marriage is not marriage at all, and that he has a constitutional right to stand by his religious beliefs.

The queers who caused all the trouble could have gone to any baker in Colorado, or anywhere in the USA, and there are plenty of bakers who would sell tem what they need to celebrate their un-natural union.

But the gaystapo agenda revels in trouble-making, determined to bludgeon down critics, so the ‘affronted’ pair minced off to a pack of state-funded sticky-beaks…

=

=

…and lo, in the home of the brave and the land of the free, Colorado’s Civil Rights Commission ordered him to bake cakes for everyone, regardless of their sexual orientation.

We must now wait a year, so it seems, for a ruling.

It’s a measure of what’s wrong with America that any discussion on religious liberty needs to take more than five minutes.

The justices should tell the whining ‘gays’ to shimmy off !

Big Day in DC, But It’s Aussies Should Pay Attention!

As Australia settles down to watch MPs debate how much or how little freedom will remain to them after the ballot result which exalted a buggers’ menage to parity of esteem with marriage, we hear squeals from the pro-homo camp…

=

=

…angry at decent parliamentarians who dare suggest that religious liberty should be a factor in commercial transactions.

Naturally, The Guardian hosts one such shrill, and almost inevitably, it’s a far-left academic named Anja Hilkemeijer, a lecturer in law at the University of Tasmania…

=

=

…who gleefully tells us that such a factor is an outrage. Clamp-downs are regarded already, in Australia and elsewhere, as a legitimate and proportionate limitation on the right to freedom of religion.

=

=

For example, courts have rejected the argument that religious freedom justifies discrimination against LGBTQI people in relation to commercial accommodation…as well as the selling of cakes.

The eagerness of the gaystapo lobby to poison children’s minds gets a mention too, in the leftist lawyer’s approving reminder that a Canadian court also held that for parents to opt out of the content of state education would be inconsistent with human rights values that favour “inclusivity, equality and multiculturalism.”

https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2017/nov/22/after-the-yes-vote-lets-not-remove-one-inequality-and-replace-it-with-another

How sickening.

And how many people warned that the triumphal advance of perversion as a human right in Oz would lead to ferocious onslaughts on freedom and on parents’ rights!?!

Hikmejer’s hogwash rolls on and on, but those few quotes are enough to prove my assertion that the case in Washington, before the United States Supreme Court today, should be of vital interest to decent folks in Aussie.

 

Only in the gaystapo moral vacuum, I suppose, is it deemed rational to exclude conscience from commerce.

=

=

Hence it should be of interest to Aussies what the US wing of that gaystapo has been doing to Christians there.

As AFA says, the case of Colorado cake shop owner Jack Phillips will be argued before the U.S. Supreme Court on December 5. This case has huge ramifications for religious liberty.

You can read about this critical case here.

We’ve covered this previously, and hope fervently that Jack the Baker wins.
And we hope that Aussies are gearing up for similar battles, which are surely imminent.

At least Pro-Homo Anja is worried that last year, the Australian Christian Lobby established the Australian Human Rights Alliance (AHLA) precisely for this purpose.

The AHLA is already running a number of cases on behalf of conservative Christians, including challenges to anti-discrimination law on the basis of the implied freedom of political communication and the religious freedom provision in the Tasmanian constitution.