Tagged: Liz Truss Toggle Comment Threads | Keyboard Shortcuts

  • ross1948 19:00 on July 23, 2022 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , Liz Truss,   

    Judge Truss By The Company She Keeps? 


    Just took a look at UK Pravda’s NewsNight…

    BBC Gives ‘Criminal Damage’ Fan A Platform 

    …. but prior to that, I saw their news bulletin…

    BBC World News 5.15pm, Jakarta time

    ….and who’s getting interviewed but Julian Knight MP, said to be a big fan of Liz Truss.

    Calling Solihull Tories! De-Select Julian Knight! 

    Yes, the very same fellow we noticed a while ago, a keen collabo with the self-pitying creep we call the Cricket Whiner.

    .

    Official portrait of Julian Knight MP crop 2.jpg

    Julian Knight MP…ex-BBC, and a Remainer,  whose complicity when leftists were bullying a man for talking plain English made me suggest he should be deselected by his local party!

    Colourful Language And Clarke’s Resignation!

    It may well be that Sunak too has dodgy characters campaigning for him to lead what’s left of the Tory Party, but honestly, knowing what we know about Ms Truss..

    .

    • The funding revelations come despite the charity’s value for money being called into question by Liz Truss, who urged departments to quit its diversity training programme
    •  Stonewall has received £1.25 million in taxpayer-funded grants in the past 18 months, with the Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office as its largest donor….  We Must Distrust Liz Truss

    00000000000000

    …with nasty Knight rooting for her, can any real conservatives be relaxed about Liz?

     
  • ross1948 18:50 on July 18, 2022 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , Liz Truss, , , tom tugendhat mp,   

    BBC’s PM-Fave? ‘Rising Above…The Mud-Slinging?’ 


    Whichever UK Pravda dork was bleating the narrative at 5 20pm today ( Jakarta time) he cast aside….

    …all pretence of impartiality, defining the questions each Tory leadership candidate was allowed to ask his or her rivals as the ‘Mud-Slinging got even messier…’

    .

    .

    …which was simply untrue.

    Kemi Badenoch’s question was so unexciting I’ve already forgotten it….

    ????????

    …while Rishi Sunak’s to Liz Truss..

    Which do you regret more, having been a Remainer or a Liberal Democrat?

    .

    • The funding revelations come despite the charity’s value for money being called into question by Liz Truss, who urged departments to quit its diversity training programme
    •  Stonewall has received £1.25 million in taxpayer-funded grants in the past 18 months, with the Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office as its largest donor….  We Must Distrust Liz Truss

    0000

    …was entirely fair.

    But the BBC’s intended PM-elect….

    0000

    …The Mordaunt Monster, was given an instant free pass!

    We viewers were TOLD by the geezer  (Ben Wright, or Something) behind the cameras that the tranny-fan blonde was all for…

    ….wait for it…

    ‘…Rising Above…

    …the mean men and women around her.

    That merely confirms that the BBC loves her pro-freak position….

    “Trans men are men and trans women are women..”

    … .

    ..more than its hates Tories in general.

    You may say that I have been harsh to many, if not most, Tories over the years, and that’s true.

    .

    .

    But unlike UK Pravda’s rat-pack, I don’t draw a hefty ( or any) salary courtesy of unwilling Brits.

    PS

    If you are wondering why I only mention four of them by name, it’s because the fifth is such an unimpressive goody-two-shoes!

     
  • ross1948 17:35 on July 14, 2022 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , Liz Truss, , rightwing, , Rob Watson BBC,   

    ‘Further Right?’ BBC Defines Pro-Freak Tories! 


    The UK Pravda mind-set was made manifestly plain when three Tory leadership candidates, Rishi Sunak, Liz Truss and Penny Mordaunt were subjected to comparison…

    .

    ..

    …early evening, 6.45pm, 13/7, Jakarta time, by the ‘BBC World News political correspondent,’ Rob Watson…

    ..

    ..

    …his own political centre of gravity glaringly flood-lit by his astounding assertion that Sunak was ‘Right’ but the two women named above were ‘Further Right.’

    Frankly  I have never thought much about Sunak’s place on the left-right spectrum.

    I tend not to think about Sunak at all, as he’s a man who does sums, and sums are boring.

    Money, how it’s raised….

    … how it’s handled, is not, to me, a key measure of conservative commitment.

    If money’s wasted, as so much is wasted on so-called ‘public broadcasting…’

    .

    .

    …then of course I call out profligates and villains.

    But on real conservative values, Sunak has never – as far as I have seen reported –  raised his voice in protest against the gaystapo agenda.

    At the same time, he has never been exposed as being up to his neck in collaboration…

    ….unlike Truss…

    .

    • The funding revelations come despite the charity’s value for money being called into question by Liz Truss, who urged departments to quit its diversity training programme
    •  Stonewall has received £1.25 million in taxpayer-funded grants in the past 18 months, with the Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office as its largest donor….

    We Must Distrust Liz Truss

    Liz Truss’s department revealed as LGBT+ group’s largest donor, funding more than half the amount throughout 2020-21

    …and Mordaunt…

    After Bojo’s Fairy Circle? BBC’s Favoured Heir!

    …..both of whom are thus proven pro-maladjust politicians.

    Yet Comrade Watson tells us that they are both ‘Further to the Right‘ than Rishi?

    Pull the other one!

    .

    ..

    Nor, BTW, was the tea-time howler in any way a howler.

    It clearly was and is the BBC political correspondent’s take on these Tories’ stance…

     

    ..for he confirmed his view again at 10.30pm, curiously adding that Mordaunt’s yelping solidarity with freaks…

    (aka ‘trans rights’ in BBC English!)

    …was an aspect of her political persona that she was now seeming to ‘row back on…‘ – much as we noted in another segment of the pro-maladjust media…

    ….only yesterday.

    Mordaunt is not that far behind Sunak in the first MP ballot result.

    If it’s whittled down to a final fight between them, the final choice goes to the grass-roots members, who are said to be pro-Mordaunt.

    Lord knows I’m no fan of Sunak, but those grass-roots Tories need to be made aware of Mordaunt’s record of obeisance to sexual misfits.

    If they then put her in power as PM, time to abandon all hope…

    .

    .

    …of that party recapturing its soul.

      .

     
  • ross1948 18:50 on July 12, 2022 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: Liz Truss, ,   

    Truss ‘Generally Voted In Favour’ Of Gaystapo Agenda! 


    Around 5pm last Saturday, UK Pravda aka BBC World News, had Mark Harper MP on, to boost ex-Chancellor Sunak’s entry into the Tory leadership race.

    ‘He has the right values’ we heard.

    But does he?

    Certainly, he has not gone out of his way to show he has the wrong values, which Liz Truss has.

    I say that, not based on any ‘rightwing’ source, but on the maladjusts’ own media, Pink News! 

    Much like Truss, Raab has generally voted in favour of advancing gay, lesbian and bisexual rights. He was one of many Tory MPs who voted in favour of same-sex marriage in 2013.

    However, Raab has declined to run for his party’s leadership, whereas Truss is desperately doing so.

    She is pro-homo.

    • The funding revelations come despite the charity’s value for money being called into question by Liz Truss, who urged departments to quit its diversity training programme

    Stonewall gets £1.2m in taxpayer cash as Foreign Office accused of ‘propping up’ charity..

    Stonewall has received £1.25 million in taxpayer-funded grants in the past 18 months, with the Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office as its largest donor….

    We Must Distrust Liz Truss! 

    Liz Truss’s department revealed as LGBT+ group’s largest donor, funding more than half the amount throughout 2020-21

    She needs to be stopped.

    Yet today, all of a sudden, on UK Pravda again, we had Rees-Mogg and Ms. Dorries, endorsing this Truss!

    So much for their ‘rightwing’ credentials, but Dorries?

    She u-turned on homo-weddings , publicly grovelling….

    Another Patelian U-Turner? Don’t Trust Dorries

    ….and Rees-Mogg hasn’t exactly distinguished himself either.

    His shabby rebuke to Ken Maginnis, for calling a queer a queer, we deplored a year or more ago….

    https://rossrightangle.wordpress.com/2020/01/10/ress-mogg-shames-himself-his-party-and-his-government/

    …so let true conservatives rally round leadership candidates who make no bones about their conservatism.

    We have noted Suella Braverman’s wise words, and there’s also Kemi Badenoch, whom we’ll look at tomorrow.

     

    But the worst of all remains Mordaunt!

    The more one reads about that woman, the more appalled one becomes.

    Jayne Ozanne, an LGBTQ+ rights activist who previously sat on the government’s LGBT Advisory Panel, told PinkNews in April that Mordaunt is “the only person” who can successfully rebuild the party’s relations with the LGBTQ+ community as the next Tory leader.

    She has shown herself to be fully committed to the LGBTQ+ community and has consistently delivered on her promises,” Ozanne said. https://www.pinknews.co.uk/2022/07/07/next-prime-minister-tory-leader-lgbtq/

     

     
  • ross1948 23:50 on May 5, 2022 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: anti-brexit 'civil servants', Defra subversion, Liz Truss   

    Defra’s Dastards? Fire The Foul Flunkeys! 


    Ooo

    Anti-Brexit civil servants ‘almost derailed trade deal with Australia

    https://www.telegraph.co.uk/politics/2022/05/05/anti-brexit-civil-servants-almost-derailed-trade-deal-australia/

    And who among British patriots is in the least surprised by the revelation of subversion?

    We know that so-called ‘civil servants…’

    • not the low-level pen-pushers, though quite a few of them need booted too –

    …have for decades been rabid Europhiliac collabos…

    Loyalty To Whom? Cast-Iron Casts About for Coolie Commissar! 

    …as we reported eight years ago!

    But what is truly disturbing is that it’s been left to an Australian ex-minister, George Brandis…

    ..

    George Brandis DFAT 2017 1.jpg

    Brandis

     …

    …to accuse the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra), which represents British farmers, of being the most obstructive.  

    Good on ya, Mr. Brandis!

    But what about the UK ministers, whose job it should have been to slap down uppity ratbags?

    The report actually names Liz Truss as the senior British Tory who found herself ‘fighting Whitehall’ during the talks.

    Oh, THAT Liz Truss?

    We Must Distrust Liz Truss

    Did Truss Border Blunder Delight Dublin? 

    ‘A Deal To Be Done?’ Dis-Truss Her!

    How hard has she ever fought Whitehall?

    And this is who so many Tory MPs aim to instal if Bojo bites the dust?

    She won’t put Defra’s foul flunkeys in their place?

    Does anyone think she’ll stand up to the Fourth Reich?

     

    https://www.telegraph.co.uk/politics/2022/05/05/anti-brexit-civil-servants-almost-derailed-trade-deal-australia

     
  • ross1948 07:59 on February 11, 2022 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , , Lavrov, Liz Truss, ,   

    Did Truss Border Blunder Delight Dublin? 


    Ooops!

    Lavrov said, “Do you recognize Russia’s sovereignty over Rostov and Voronezh oblasts?” Truss said the UK would “never” do so – before the ambassador told her they’re not in Ukraine.. 

    https://www.theguardian.com/politics/live/2022/feb/10/politics-live-boris-johnson-nato-brussels-keir-starmer-john-major-cressida-dick

    .

    .

    So should Brits in Ulster now be on the alert in case Eire’s Foreign Minister asks her about where the Fourth Reich’s beloved soft border actually runs!?!

     
  • ross1948 23:59 on January 19, 2022 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , , Liz Truss,   

    ‘A Deal To Be Done?’ Dis-Truss Her! 


    Brexit: there’s ‘a deal to be done’ over Northern Ireland, says Liz Truss | Northern Ireland | The Guardian
     

    Once more, one feels obliged to revise what Kipling wrote 110 years ago… 

    ‘Before an empire’s eyes, the traitor names his price…
    .

    .

    And the evident satisfaction of Eire’s Coveney…

    Will Brussels Reward Ulster’s Dublin Enemy With High Office?

    …infamous for his arrogance…

    =

    Gambar terkait

    .there can be no British-only direct rule. That is the Irish government’s position.”

    ….

    …as anti-British as Dirty Dev…

    ….  if it had not been for the loyalty and friendship of Northern Ireland we should have been forced to come to close quarters with Mr. de Valera or perish forever from the earth.

    However, with a restraint and poise to which, I say, history will find few parallels, we never laid a violent hand upon them…

    . .

    ….

    ….which at times would have been quite easy and quite natural, and left the de Valera Government to frolic with the German and later with the Japanese representatives to their heart’s content.

    Winston Churchill

    ======

    ..who mourned Hitler’s death in 1945, suggests a sell-out by Truss is on the cards.

    Dublin’s foreign minister may be endlessly aggressive, but he knows what the denizens of the FCO are like…

    “I think it is a good thing that the Brexit issues and the protocol issues are back in the Foreign Office in London rather than in a separate unit led by Lord Frost

    https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2022/jan/14/brexit-deal-northern-ireland-liz-truss-talks-eu 

    AND…

    ….he has presumably noticed how incapable Ms. Truss is of bringing under control the decadent flunkeys…

    We Must Distrust Liz Truss

    …who work in that government department.

     
  • ross1948 00:30 on January 19, 2022 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , Liz Truss, , subsidising perverts,   

    We Must Distrust Liz Truss! 


    Any real conservatives still in the Tory Party who thought Liz Truss might be a welcome replacement  (if/when Jellyfish Johnson gets ousted) will be rethinking rapidly.

    Bojo’s eager commitment to causes promoted by the cesspool ‘charity’ known as Stonewall…

    A Jellyfish Trapped In A Fairy Circle? 

    …is off-putting, but the revelations over the festive season…

    Stonewall gets £1.2m in taxpayer cash as Foreign Office accused of ‘propping up’ charity..

    Stonewall has received £1.25 million in taxpayer-funded grants in the past 18 months, with the Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office as its largest donor….

    Liz Truss’s department revealed as LGBT+ group’s largest donor, funding more than half the amount throughout 2020-21

    The funding revelations come despite the charity’s value for money being called into question by Liz Truss, who urged departments to quit its diversity training programme

    She claimed previously to be against largesse to undesirables, but it has not stopped, so the obvious question must be….

    CAN SHE NOT CONTROL HER PRO-HOMO UNDERLINGS AT THE FCO?

    One had hoped for some happy reading at least as the New Year gets under way.

    Granting that queer cabal the status of ‘charity’ could only happen in a very sick society, but even in decadent times, donations to charities, genuine or not, are voluntary.

    Suddenly every UK tax-payer has learned that he or she has had hard-earned cash siphoned off, hush-hush, no publicity, naturally, due to the dubious character of the recipients.

    Will they welcome  – can they TRUST – a minister who said such hand-outs must stop but appears powerless to make her flunkeys comply?

     

     

     
  • ross1948 00:04 on December 6, 2021 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , , , Gender therapy consultation, , Liz Truss   

    Bojo’s Therapy Ban – Brits, Please Speak Up! 


    For no clear reason, the Johnson Government, which we know is influenced by the notorious Stonewall ‘charity….’

    =

    A Jellyfish Trapped In A Fairy Circle? 

    …is proposing to drag the UK down the same rancid alley into which Justin Turdo has just led Canadians.

    =

    Canada Condemns Kids Who Desperately Need Therapy 

    There’s much that is very bad, and nothing really good, about the UK version.

    In particular, from the second half of this email, I plucked this chilling sentence.

    The paper says young people should be supported in “exploring their identity without being encouraged towards one particular path.”

    Is that not horrific?

    Neither parents nor anyone else should seek to discourage a youngster from embarking on a life-time of perversion?

    As with Cameron’s homo-wedding diktat, there is to be a flawed consultation, but in the absence of any alternatives, decent Brits need to use it to oppose the jackboot scheme as best they can.

    C4M has circulated a useful advisory, and I append it, urging all UK citizens to put it to good use and send your conclusions to the Minister, Liz Truss.

    =

    TELL THE GOVT: “CONVERSION THERAPY CONSULTATION IGNORES IMPACT ON FAMILIES”

    The proposed conversion therapy ban could give the police dramatic new powers to intervene in family life. It is likely that there will be huge scope for false accusations to be made against parents.

    Yet in the Government’s consultation there isn’t a single question about the impact on parenting and family life. All we have is a vague assurance that “parents will remain able to raise their children with the values of their faith”. We need to speak out now.

    The proposal covers ‘talking therapy’ intended to change someone’s sexual orientation or gender identity. The consultation says this will be unlawful with under-18s “under any circumstance”. But what does therapy mean? Astonishingly, under the plans a single conversation could qualify as ‘therapy’.

    It’s not at all clear how this will operate. Could parents’ conversations on same-sex marriage or trans issues trigger a criminal investigation? Yes, we think so in the examples below. The plans risk severely damaging the ability of parents to talk to their children about marriage and gender.

    The 36-page consultation document completely fails to address the crucial area of everyday family life. The standard 12-week consultation period has been slashed to just 6 weeks. Ministers say they are trying to get ready for legislation in the spring. But rushing a ban through will inevitably lead to bad law.

    Having spoken to lawyers, here are some scenarios we fear could happen if the Government gets this wrong:

    • Noah, aged 13, asks his dad what he thinks about same-sex marriage. His dad says he’s totally against it. Noah disagrees. He tells a youth worker about the argument, saying, “I might want to get married one day, and who knows whether it will be to a man or a woman?” The youth worker claims to the police that the father was trying to change Noah’s sexual orientation.
    • Parents find out that their daughter Olivia, aged 14, has been visiting the website of Mermaids, a controversial trans group. Her parents block her access to the website. Olivia mentions it to her teacher in passing. The teacher reports it because he believes Olivia is actually a trans boy whom the parents are trying to change. Police interview the parents.
    • Lucy, age 5, tells her parents she learned in RSE lessons that men can marry men and women can marry women. She’s glad, because she’ll be able to marry her best friend Rachel. Her parents tell Lucy that marriage is between a man and a woman. Lucy tells her teacher what her parents said. Social services and the police are informed about potential conversion therapy.
    • A school is heavily promoting trans rights, using Stonewall and Mermaids materials. A teenage boy, Jack, tells his school teacher he thinks he’s a girl trapped in a boy’s body but doesn’t want his parents to know. The school treats him as a girl. When Jack’s parents find out, they withdraw him from the school. The parents are reported for conversion therapy.
    • A mother learns that her 13-year-old daughter, Eve, wants to buy a chest-binder and take puberty blockers. Eve’s mum warns her about Keira Bell, who started down the same path and ended up having a double mastectomy, only to regret it later. Eve describes this conversation to her friend and it ends up being reported as conversion therapy.

    Even if the parents are not convicted, the process of being reported to the police and investigated would be extremely damaging for these families. The consultation ought to have devoted a substantial discussion on these issues. But not one question is asked.

    By overlooking the whole area of family life the consultation is not fit for purpose. Please tell Equalities Minister Liz Truss MP this today. You could make two or three of the points below. 

    Please use your own words.

    • The consultation document completely fails to consult about the impact of the plans on family life.
    • The plans contain no safeguards that everyday conversations in the home will be protected.
    • Parents have a pretty good idea when a school has addressed gender ideology in a completely biased way. They should be able to complain without any risk of counter accusation by the school deploying the new law against them.
    • A six-week consultation period is far too short for something this complicated and controversial.
    • The new offence could be easily used to make false accusations against parents simply because they disagree with same-sex marriage or transgender ideology.
    • The Government must respect the right of parents to bring up their children in accordance with their beliefs, whether religious or otherwise. This is protected under human rights law.
    • The new law on conversion therapy could lead to massive intervention in family life. Yet not a single question is asked about this. The Government hasn’t considered this issue.
    • Parents are worried about the impact of gender ideology on their children. They must not be at risk of prosecution simply for, say, discouraging their 12-year-old daughter from taking damaging puberty blockers or wearing a harmful breast binder.
    • The paper says young people should be supported in “exploring their identity without being encouraged towards one particular path”. But parents must not be at risk of prosecution just because they express a viewpoint. There is a lack of safeguards.
    • Rushing a ban through to please activists is a recipe for a bad law.
    EMAIL EQUALITIES MINISTER LIZ TRUSS MP NOW
     
    • Colin Marne 13:00 on December 6, 2021 Permalink | Reply

      We all need to do what is asked of us.
      What the Tories (I will not call them conservatives)are proposing should be resisted tooth and nail but if this consultation is the only weapon to hand, then we must use it.

      Like

c
Compose new post
j
Next post/Next comment
k
Previous post/Previous comment
r
Reply
e
Edit
o
Show/Hide comments
t
Go to top
l
Go to login
h
Show/Hide help
shift + esc
Cancel
%d bloggers like this: