So Saudi Women CAN Look Like Women!?!

I guess we always suspected that the female population of Saudi Arabia included a lot of yummy chicks.

=====

=====

It stands to reason that, beneath those repulsive shrouds they’re forced to wear, many are attractive.

But proof positive at last!

And it’s causing an uproar.

Threats to prosecute the slender young gal in the photo below, named Khulood, it seems, for wearing an ‘indecent’ mini-skirt?!?!

What Dark Age do these people live in?

==

 —-

The Saudi writer Ibrahim al-Munayif told his 41,000 Twitter followers that if everyone disregarded the law in this way there would be chaos.  https://www.theguardian.com/world/2017/jul/18/saudi-arabia-video-of-indecently-dressed-woman-at-heritage-site-prompts-investigation

No, daftoid, there would be a glimmer of hope that your benighted country is at last becoming civilised!

But then he makes a very interesting statement!

——–=

“Just like we call on people to respect the laws of countries they travel to, people must also respect the laws of this country,” he wrote.

===========

So what is Mr. al-Munayif telling ‘migrants’ from the Middle East, Pakistan, etc. who choose to settle in civilised Western countries?

That they must repudiate the iniquitous shariah laws which treat women as second-class human beings?

That Londoners, New Yorkers, normal folks in Toronto and Paris and Sydney, should no longer have their street scenes blighted by burka-clad bints wandering along, about three or four subjugated paces behind their men?

If so, he’d be doing more than that lousy appeasement artist, Theresa May.

=

Theresa May hails ‘benefits’ of Sharia as inquiry set up

But I doubt the sectarian sexists who oppress Saudi women really would encourage alien immigrants in the UK to accept civilised standards of behaviour.

Even here in Indonesia….

……

Miss Indonesia contestants, 2013.

…..

….where many of its lovely women do behave like and look (very much!) like women, we have shariah fanatic outfits who wish to see women coerced by men.

“Fathers and Husbands, their ‘aurat’ is your responsibility!”

000000

I imagine that kill-joy Welya woman from the MUI, the Indonesian ‘Scholars’ Council, has not changed her dismay at seeing lovely ladies unashamed to display their God-given femininity! 

—————————

• 

…the Aceh model is a good example…most importantly, wearing the hijab must meet three conditions. That it’s Shariah compliant, conceals the genitals and shows no curves. 

‘Scholars’ on Scarfs – ‘Must Be Shariah-Compliant, Hide Genitals, Show No Curves!’ 

Of course she’s not actually talking about ‘genitals.’

That’s the dumbo Google Translate interpretation of ‘aurat’ – a catch-all word for ‘private parts,’ which, to the backward brigade, includes thighs, belly-buttons, hair (of course) but even shoulders!

Pathetic!

But at least here in Jakarta, there’s no shariah gestapo harassing women whose delightful appearance might provoke primitive passions.

Not yet.

0000000

 

‘Immoral Activities – Sitting in Coffee Shops Laughing and Talking…’ 

I wish I could say the same for all of Indonesia’s provinces!

United? How About YAHOO’s Wowser Take On Mid-Riffs?

I was planning something of an indolent day today, not so as to be compliant with Hari Nyepi…

=====

=====

…the Balinese Hindu holiday that requires silence for 24 hours, but because basically I have nothing much to do and none of my usual visitors are available to visit. 

It may be a national day off – for everyone in Indonesia, not just Balinese Hindus – but if you work in a department store, like one regular caller here…

=

Indonesians work hard!

=

…no chance!

However, when one’s retired, every day is a holiday!

=

=

That, of course, doesn’t excuse me from my obligation to say what I think!

Hence it’s incumbent on me to take United Airlines to task for their downright backward ban on certain types of clothing for certain categories of passenger.

Miniskirts, clothing that “reveals a midriff”, short shorts and “form-fitting lycra/spandex tops, pants and dresses” – such as leggings – are banned.

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2017/mar/27/united-airlines-leggings-policy-women-sexist

• 

=

In my view, United Airlines are denying me the basic human right of having somebody dressed like the cutie below sitting next to me when I fly!

===

How dare they?

===

But lots of people are talking about United Airlines. It was my search for a suitable photo  – did  well, didn’t I?- that gave me ammunition to renew my long-standing quarrel with Yahoo.

=

=

I have never forgiven Yahoo for their arrogant coercion of customers into changing from the good old Classic style to the much less handy thing we have to use now, my resentment not at all assuaged by the huge sum being paid to Marissa Mayer…

==

=======

…who oversaw that act of overweening arrogance. Marissa Mayer’s Payday Is Even More Insane Than You Think – Fortune

Nonetheless, I still use Yahoo, having for years provided all my friends, family, fans and foes with my email address, issued by that company.

But until this week I’d never used their Search Engine to find an illustration for ‘bare mid-riffs.‘

Google’s is much better and in the end I used them, but not till after my simple Yahoo search for a cute female tummy evoked this bizarre message!.  .

Results for bare mid-riffs may contain adult oriented content. Safe Search must be turned off to display these results..

What?

Or rather, as I put it over this morning’s multiple coffee infusions…

‘What the &#*#!?!?!?’ 

I duly entered into what I suppose must be defined as their ‘Unsafe Search’ zone and indeed the sights to be seen there are not what one would wish one’s kiddies to view.

Bare bums, bare boobs, not terribly scary for me – but ‘adult content’ for sure.

But WHY bracket them with ‘bare mid-riffs,’ which are not only often highly agreeable, yet in no way offensive…

‘Fathers and husbands, their private parts are your responsibility’

===========

…to the sort of uptights who published that poster I often use to illustrate the iniquities of sexist shariah.

==

So let’s put Yahoo’s feet to the fire!  

---

—

Why have they included cute navels in what is, let’s face it, something of a porno section?

Kenyan Woman Stripped Naked by Brutal Bullies – Just For Looking Nice!

 Black is beautiful!

====

I don’t use a lot of news from Africa, not because of any particular bias against that Continent, and certainly not  – given this post is concerned about women – because of any indifference to black women. You can see from previous posts that I’m not averse to covering attractive black ladies, even those like Beyonce and Naomi who display not only their attractive bodies but also imbecilic attitudes.

Beyonce (and who?) Bolster Brutal Marxist Misrule in Cuba 

–

Cadbury’s Crumbles before Nutty Naomi – Beauty Sans Brains? 

oooooooooooooo

So today I give attention to the disgraceful thugs in Kenya who attacked and stripped a girl simply because she was wearing a mini-skirt.  

We have Dark Agers here in Jakarta, notably the ex-Minister of Religion, Suryadharma Ali, who thinks hiding female knees is a ‘universal criterion’ for public morality – how dim-witted can one get? Ali justified his nonsense by invoking the ‘aurat‘ rules, forbidden areas prescribed by sectarian dogma on knees, thighs, mid-riffs etc – even hair! – which apparently displease God (so how come He created them?)

Bizarrely the aurat are out of order only when displayed delightfully by women, not by us boring men.

However, in Kenya, and, so I have newly discovered, in Namibia and Swaziland, and maybe other countries too, this benighted mentality is not based on Islamist bigotry but more basic (and arguably more candid) sexism.

Hence the outrageous incident reported below. 

An act of ‘slut-shaming’ in Nairobi has prompted women to protest in defence of their right to wear what they choose  Kenyans protest after woman is beaten and stripped in public …http://www.theguardian.com  Nov 17

=======================·

• Hundreds of women have turned out on the streets of the Kenyan capital today to defend their right to wear what they choose after a woman was stripped and beaten for wearing a miniskirt.
• Apparently, a mob of ‘men’ surrounded the woman, tore off her clothes and forced her to the ground.
• ‘Men?’ More like despicable pigs, those contemptible creatures! They claimed she was “indecently dressed”, and accused her of “tempting” them.
• Indecently dressed?
• These cowardly creeps never seen a burka? Pathetic bag-head bints who trail behind their primitive husbands, dressed like potato sacks, peering out through a slit in their horrible hoods.
• They’re disguising their humanity. THAT’s indecent!
• I’m sure Kenya has some. Thanks be there ain’t many here in Indonesia.
• –
• 
• ==============
• Now look at the lovely lasses in the pic below – attractive bright blossoms, proud to look like women.

• ————

  

  .==============================

• Anyone who picks on them for being normal should be tarred and feathered. I was pleased a lot of Kenyans, both men and women, came out on the streets to demand proper punishment for the scumbags, who so far have not been apprehended.
• “This is our chance to stand together as women and deliver a message to our country that sexual violence will not be tolerated.”
• Traditional values include a measure of chivalry. Good to know these women had some honourable men to protest with them!
• .