Tagged: mob rule Toggle Comment Threads | Keyboard Shortcuts

  • ross1948 17:01 on May 25, 2021 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: mob rule, , , , Sturgeonistan   

    Sturgeonistan, Where Cops Collaborate With Crimmigrants? 

    I suppose if three leftist parties combine in support of crimmigrants…

    …that might be reported as a  ‘cross-party’ cause, but while Sturgeon’s leftist SNP…



    …the Scottish Greens and Labour may differ on separatism etc, they are now clearly as one in their determination to turn poor Scotland into a cosy sewer in which fake-‘refugee’ rats may frolic…



    …secure from enforcement of the law.

    This comes after the disgraceful scenes in Glasgow…


    Glasgow Cops Appease Pro-Crimmigrant Mob

    …when Police Scotland belly-crawled to a far-left rabble, allowing two aliens, detained for deportation, to escape justice.

    No, not ‘allowing’ but actively aiding and abetting the illegals’ escape!

    Merely the UK”s most cowardly cops?

    Or collabo curs in agreement with the street-scum?

    They may fly their true colours soon, if they respond publicly to a call from a local leader of Britain’s Enemy Within.

    'The sad thing is that we don’t see the humanity when we make decisions' - Sabir Zazai on his battle with the Home Office

    Afghan agitator Sabir Zazai


    Sabir Zazai, the ‘CEO of the Scottish Refugee Council ‘ issued this pompous demand.

    We need Police Scotland to use the operation notification process to push back on the over-the-top and scary Home Office raids that have no place in Glasgow or Scotland https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2021/may/21/glasgow-politicians-call-on-home-office-to-halt-immigration-raid

    One could dwell on this Afghan  creature’s character, given sanctuary as an ‘asylum seeker’ by Britain and almost at once plunging into political agitation, cleaving to the swarm of leftist ‘NGO’ cliques…


    …doing all in their power to undermine curbs on the alien influx.

    But there are many such who bite the hand that feeds them.



    What Scots must surely dwell on is the nightmare future that awaits them in Sturgeonistan, the squalid republic that so many in the SNP plan to establish…



    …in which the rule of law will depend on the whims of politicsed police.

    • Jock T 18:27 on May 25, 2021 Permalink | Reply

      I would just add, if she tries to break up the union, there are many unionists who will resist.


  • ross1948 18:00 on May 22, 2021 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: 'Animal Right' fanatics, blockading public roads, mob rule,   

    X-Stinkos, Now ‘Animals?’ Break These Blockade Bullies! 

    . ..

    Slap on the wrist’ judgment sends the wrong message, say critics of the activists who used blockade in attempt to stifle press freedom..  https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2021/05/17/extinction-rebellion-print-works-protesters-fined-just-150

    I have expressed loathing and contempt for the X-Stinko scum often enough, so decided to ignore the recent display of irresponsibility.

    By that I don’t mean their deliberate assault on press feeedom…

    …but the retard/s who decided the sentences – a mere 150 pounds sterling per scumbag – dished out when they came before a court.

    Blockading people who wish to go about their legitimate business, get to work, deliver goods to shops, or just go for a walk – is NOT a trivial offence.

    It is currently being used to devastating effect by red vermin in Colombia, seeking to oust the democratically elected government there.


    • Hasil gambar untuk colombia marxist farc


    No doubt the defeated narco-terrorist FARC gang view this with glee.

    Democratic governments everywhere should view it with dismay.

    We need to revisit the issue today, because ANOTHER gang of misfits – ‘animal rights’ agitators – have blockaded Macdonalds deliveries, causing real problems for the fast-food business.

    I am no big fan of the Golden Arches, and I am obviously not ill-disposed to animals…


    ..but THIS has GOT to stop!



    The police should go in with billy-clubs, tasers and tear-gas.

    BATTER The Bullies!

    BULLDOZE The Blockades!


    • JazPen 18:28 on May 22, 2021 Permalink | Reply

      Another good one.
      I don’t know anything about the situation in Colombia but nobody in a democracy has any excuse for blockading public roads.
      The police should clear the way, as you say.


    • Amanda A 20:34 on May 22, 2021 Permalink | Reply

      Who do they think they are?
      If they want to stop us enjoying beef, pork or lamb, they can petition parliament to ban meat.
      That would never pass because most of us like burgers and steaks and chops.
      So they turn to gangster tactics?
      You are quite right, the police should use force and look after law-abiding people.


  • ross1948 15:33 on September 9, 2020 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , , mob rule, , ,   

    No Baton Charge? Herts Cops Need Chief With Cojones! 

    A while ago, we had to give serious consideration to the calibre of Hertfordshire’s Chief Constable, Charles Hall, when the man in charge of law and order there…

    Petition HM! Remove Hertfordshire Cur Cop’s Medal!

    Chief Constable Charlie Hall (1)

    Get Hall Of Hertfordshire Fired! Contact This Police Commissioner! 

    …crawled on his belly to the far-left BLM mob, instructing his officers that ‘although the gesture is “optional,” those who refuse to bend the knee “may become the focus of the protesters attention.” 

    At the same time, kneeling “has a very positive and engaging effect,” and draws “a positive reaction on the protest groups.”  

    Appalling behaviour, on the part of a top cop, to suggest that law enforcement should somehow NOT be ‘the focus of the protestors attention,’ when of course the whole point of pro-active policing in a free society…



    …should be to make sure subversive trouble-makers are very much focused on the cops’ readiness to maintain law and order, no grubbing about for any ‘positive reaction’ – no kow-tow kneeling tom-foolery.  

    Now we learn that during the scandalous X-Stinko assault on press freedom last week…

    X-Stinko Revulsion. Green Nazis Make War On Press Freedom! 

    …Hall appears to have exhibited the same kind of flaccid response to that Green Nazi rabble!

    More than 100 protesters used vehicles and bamboo structures to block roads outside Newsprinters works at Broxbourne….

    ….Hertfordshire police said delivery lorries had not left the Broxbourne site as of 6am on Saturday, and that 42 arrests had been made. https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2020/sep/06/extinction-rebellion-organised-crime-group-ridiculous-uk

    Why the HELL were a mere hundred far-left fanatics…

    One XR statement said the action was about racism, as well “immigration policy, the rights and treatment of minority groups and dozens of other issues”. Daily Telegraph

    …and they were, and are, far-left fanatics, able to blockade a public highway?

    Bulldozers should have been brought in to crush the obstructions off the road!

    Herts Police water-cannon should have been deployed – or borrowed from other constabularies if Hertfordshire has none of its own.

    I don’t have access to data on whatever constitutes the equipment armoury of Herts cops, but it’s safe to say they have batons.

    Why did the HELL did HALL not give the order to clear the road at once, or send in as many bobbies with batons as it took…


    Maggie had the right idea!


    …to teach those swine that British freedoms will not be surrendered to mob-rule without a fight?

    One show of force to break the bullies ought to be enough to quell the Stinko Rebellion!

    • Diana 17:49 on September 9, 2020 Permalink | Reply

      I agree with you on this too. I think I always agree with you!
      The Stinkos should be bulldozed.


  • ross1948 19:30 on June 27, 2018 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: Angela Rye, , harassment of patriots, , , , mob rule,   

    Muzzle Mad Max – She’s A Dangerous, Deranged Ranter! 

    There’s a demented old creep in the USA who has been inciting mob-intimidation.


    Hasil gambar untuk mob rule


    “If you see anybody from that cabinet in a restaurant, in department store, at a gasoline station, you get out and you create a crowd. And you push back on them. Tell them they’re not welcome anymore, anywhere!”

    That’s an elected legislator ranting, please note, none other than Mad Maxine Waters, one of the most vicious leftists in the USA…

    =Gambar terkait


    …and even some other members of the Media-Democrat Party have been sufficiently alarmed by her deranged and dangerous babbling that they’ve publicly distanced themselves.

    Mind you, for doing so, they’ve been smeared as ‘racist’ by an equally nasty vixen on CNN (where else!?)


    Gambar terkait


    Angela Rye, a fanatic leftist ( CNN Commentator: The National Anthem Is ‘Problematic’) who once worked as ‘executive director of the Congressional Black Caucus‘ (which is a rather racist concept, surely, for there is not, so far as I know, any ‘Congressional White Caucus!’) defended Rep. Maxine Waters’ (D-Calif.) harassment comments Tuesday on CNN with host Erin Burnett.




    The far-left nasty of course played the race card, an irrationality too far even for some CNN sorts!

    Some congressmen are now seeking Mad Max’s censure by the House of Representatives. Censure Mad Maxine Waters

    That’s good, but you American readers can signal support for their call by adding your names to this petition, which has a similar, but more effective objective.


    Gambar terkait


    There are other petitions too, so if you wish to browse, feel free.

    • Ken Kasic 20:54 on June 27, 2018 Permalink | Reply

      Tremendous illustrations today, Ross.
      Red Hen last week, Mad Cow this week, what next week?
      I hate to think.
      Thanks for that petition.


  • ross1948 13:34 on September 25, 2014 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , Ehibit B, , , , , , Jogja universitas, , mob rule, , Slaves in chains   

    Hurt Feelings, ‘Racisits’ and Mob Rule – in Indonesia AND UK! 

    Last week I was about to post on a disgraceful example of rabble rule, a bunch of louts  arrogating to itself the right to determine what sort of meetings a university may hold.

    A radical group has threatened to use force to close down a seminar on LGBT (lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender) issues organized by Sanata Dharma University’s School of Psychology.

    Most readers will know I have no time for the gaystapo, who target decent values in the West.

    But a meeting in a college, to discuss such issues?

    Free speech under threat from savages?

    • voltaire


    Gotta speak up.

    “We have requested the seminar be cancelled. If not, we will cancel it by force,” Muhammad Fuad, leader of the Ka’abah Defender Movement, one of the elements grouped under the Islamic Society Forum (FUI), said on Wednesday.



    I wanted to urge the univeristy to stand firm. But I was overtaken by events.

    Tempo’s recent report says that Sanata Dharma University in Jogja cravenly cancelled plans for a seminar on lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and intersex on 27 September.

    I suppose no surprise is called for. The JP report had already indicated a degree of pusillanimity, the University Rector quoted thus – “We always have the option to cancel the seminar if we find out that it could hurt the feelings of some groups.”   http://www.thejakartapost.com/news/2014/09/18/group-threatens-close-down-lgbt-seminar.html


    F### their hurt feelings!

    Universities in particular, and democracies in general, are not meant to be in the business of pampering tantrum brats.

    Hurt feelings?

    If that gal doesn’t show up, that you arranged to take to the movies, that’s hurt feelings

    If you thought you’d got the job, after that interview, but you didn’t – that’s hurt feelings


    • tantrum
    • =======
    • If you reckon your sectarian fanaticism should over-ride basic principles of free expression?

    THAT IS NOT HURT FEELINGS. That’s crass intolerance


    The Islamic People’s Forum (FUI)  had said the plan was insulting to Islam .

    Not so!

    Policies discussed would likely be in contradiction to that religion’s tenets, as to Christianity’s tenets and to most people here’s ideas of what’s decent and what is not.

    But to dispute is not to insult.

    The queers were not going to DO anything at the meeting, so I understand, no snogging or worse. They were simply going to discuss their ideas. I’d not much like listening to that, but tough – nobody would have forced me to do so.

    But in a betrayal of academic freedom, the Rector, Johannes Eka Priyatma, buckled and cancelled. Disturbingly, he did so after a meeting with the Jogja Police. Evidently they had little interest in defending people’s rights to free expression of ideas.

    And I find that pathetic. :http://www.tempo.co/read/news/2014/09/17/058607716/Universitas-Sanata-Darma-Batalkan-Seminar-LGBTI

    Yet no way can I single out Indonesia on this issue.

    I just watched the news from UK, where a ranting ill-educated rabble, including one whose grasp of English is so bad that he or she managed to mis-spell ‘racist’ – so no, it wasn’t my typo in the headline – who shut down an exhibition (with an H!) in London.

    Intelligent people would have urged a boycott, if they found it unacceptable, but these Hitlerian bootboys (and girls) decided to suppress free expression – just like IslamoNazis here.


    Exibition? Ignoramuses!


    Because it depicted the evil of slavery by showing some black actors in chains.

    Do these yelping cretins imagine slaves, black or white, were NOT shackled? Did they get to dress in finery, walk about freely. Do the chains suggest slavery was OK? 

    Is historical truth unacceptable? 

    Evidently, because the organisers caved in to the morons! 

    Art show Exhibit B called off after racism protests
    BBC News


    sod that

    For God’s sake, Britain, grow a pair!

    • Leo Cozijn 23:34 on September 25, 2014 Permalink | Reply

      A seemingly sophisticated guy talking about “gaystapo” ?


      • ross1948 01:14 on September 26, 2014 Permalink | Reply

        I suppose, Leo, that I’m not without pretensions, but pretension to ‘sophistication’ is not one of them, especially if it’s used in its proper meaning, which is not complimentary.
        I think gaystapo is a very suitable term for the sort of people who glory in intimidation of their opponents.


        • Leo Cozijn 01:42 on September 26, 2014 Permalink

          According to The Concise Oxford Dictionary “sophisticated” simply means “educated and refined”, which sounds rather complimentary to me. About your justification for exercising the expression “gaystapo”, do you mean to articulate that gays are the sort of people who glory in intimidation of their opponents?


        • ross1948 21:24 on September 26, 2014 Permalink

          Hello, Leo. I have been out all day since morning, so my apologies for not replying sooner. I see another commenter has grabbed the semantics issue, so I’ll skip that one.
          To your main question, ‘gays’ as individuals no doubt vary in their view on the intimidation meted out to those who oppose the ‘gay’ agenda, but it is very clear that their organised groups DO want to silence critics and/or punish them, and are currently using sympathetic judges in America to undermine democracy on such matters as marriage.


        • Leo Cozijn 00:02 on September 28, 2014 Permalink

          Having a cynical nature myself, I agree with how you deal on a lot of topics; I also appreciate the way you use the English language. As a regular reader of your articles I’m aware you’re no novice concernining controversies and hyperbolic extravagances. Still to talk about gay extremists is in my opinion way too far-fetched (although I’m not denying gay activists are – rightfully – active around the world) and talking about gaystapo, suggests (which I cannot imagine) that you’re unaware of what the Gestapo stood for and what they were capable of! Linking gays with Gestapo simply makes no sense!


    • Ted McPh. 16:47 on September 26, 2014 Permalink | Reply

      I think Ross means the derivation from ‘sophistry,’ and he’s right.
      Sophistry is the art of using clever but actually flawed arguments to advance your case, So sophisticated carries a meanng of seeming to be better than the average but only in a superficial way.


Compose new post
Next post/Next comment
Previous post/Previous comment
Show/Hide comments
Go to top
Go to login
Show/Hide help
shift + esc
%d bloggers like this: