The Government’s terror watchdog today said introducing tough new laws to tackle hate preachers would be “quite wrong” despite a recent wave of Islamist attacks.
=

=
It was only last month we had to stand aghast at Max Hill QC’s eagerness to welcome back sectarian scum who wanted to come ‘home’ after serving the satanic cause of the ISIS rape-gang.
=

=
=====

This, please note, is the watch-dog, aka ‘adviser’ on whom Theresa May relies for guidance on how to tackle the Enemy Within!
Now he’s ranting against imposition of common-sense curbs on blood-thirsty ‘clerics’ spreading their poison.
It’s surely been long enough that preachers of vile doctrines that call for violence – even murder- of ‘apostates’ and blasphemers…’
=

=
….have felt free thus to incite a slaughter-house mentality among anti-social undesirables like those in the photo above.
Brandishing that placard alone should be sufficient to merit immediate deportation.
=

=
Hills’ justification for inaction is downright weird.
“Thought with steps towards action can be terrorism. Thought without action or preparation for action may be extremism, but it is not terrorism.
HUH?
Go figure.
Even in Macron’s France there is more gumption to be found! Look at their brand new law, as describe on Gatestone –
The new law authorizes prefects to order the closure of mosques or other places of worship for a period of up to six months if preachers are deemed to express “ideas or theories” that “incite violence, hatred or discrimination, provoke the commission of acts of terrorism or express praise for such acts.”
https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/11258/france-terrorism-law
Why should Merry Englande lag behind?
We can’t control what our internal enemies think, but we absolutely can interdict what they put into words, written or spoken.
=

If I were to stomp along a road saying ‘pinko progressives deserve to be slain,’ would not the police take an active interest, and rightly so?
Hill may be correct in saying no new laws are required – though I doubt it – but there are already laws against incitement to murder, so they must be enforced against ‘clerics’ as strictly as against anyone else.
And not just post facto but preemptively.
Any preacher, of every denomination, must be told to make a declaration each time he takes to his pulpit…
…

!!!
…that those who convert from their creed are under no circumstances to be subjected to threats or other sanctions, except that of ostracism. Sure, if some Anglican drops out to become a Baptist, and you are a keen Anglican, you are free to snub him.

Or not shop in his grocery store.
But…in a civilised country…
THAT’S AS FAR AS YOU GET TO GO!
If any cleric crosses that sectarian red line, deportation should ensue. Any such preacher is pig-ignorant of how to behave in a democracy…

Hill’s other exhortation is equally bizarre, urging ministers to speak to a wider range of Muslims, including those with whom they did not agree…
Like, what is this geezer on about?
Of course ministers should talk to decent Muslims, who repudiate shariah law and reject any notion that supranational sectarian solidarity trumps duty to Queen and Country.
But no way should ministers talk to Hizbut Tahrir, or the likes of Anjem Choudary, or to evil people like these, in the photo below…
—-

——-
….except to tell them to take a hike – they’re not welcome in a civilised realm.
As for how Hill has criticised calls for them “to ‘do more’ to fight extremism” without spelling out what that should involve…
…fair enough.
But we have, as above, already spelt out what that should involve!
No hate-speech sermons, no threats to converts, no elevation of dogmas emanating from imams in Saudi Arabia or ayatollahs in Tehran above loyalty to Her Britannic Majesty!

Like this:
Like Loading...
Mort 14:12 on May 5, 2019 Permalink |
You must have enjoyed your break, Ross, because your recent output has been refreshing.
This is good, defending apostates’ rights but warning us against the bad ones.
I think if a patriot rally was attacked with many casualties, a lot of antifa nazis would be dancing in the streets, and some of those new ‘American’ congresswomen would be very slow to condemn the terrorism.
LikeLike