Tagged: Muslims Toggle Comment Threads | Keyboard Shortcuts

  • ross1948 13:44 on May 27, 2019 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , , Muslims, , ,   

    Brum’s Top Cop To Pro-Decency Parents – ‘Don’t Even Stage Lawful Protests!’ 

    Spouting the usual sloganised hogwash about ‘diversity,’ the West Midlands’ top cop has warned parents protesting against gaystapo indoctrination aka ‘LGBT Lessons,’ that he doesn’t care if their resistance is lawful or not!

    They shouldn’t be happening!




    Appalling to read of the bias of Birmingham’s police chief, Dave Thomson, who has bluntly refused to distinguish beween legitimate peaceful demonstrations and ‘unlawful protests’ against the ‘gay’ agenda in local primary schools.


    Image result for west midlands chief constable



    The point of having a police force is to prevent crimes, and according to this Dave Thompson geezer, there have been some ‘criminal offences,’ outside Birmingham’s Anderton Park Primary School  this month.

    So he’s quite right to show concern about those.

    But he is surely NOT entitled to intrude his own pro-queer prejudices into the huge controversy that has erupted over ‘diversity’ indoctrination of little children inside that school.




    Needless to say, large numbers of decent parents are up in arms, some 600 kiddies withdrawn on one day recently.

    These are good people who do not want their children taught rubbish like the ‘curriculum on equality,’ propaganda which claims that sexual perversion merits parity of esteem with normal human relationships.




    But telling home truths about homos is a bit of free speech too much for Thompson.

    His cops have been ‘monitoring’ the righteously indignant mums and dads and even though their peaceful protest has been ‘ lawful to date,’ Dave the Pinko Prattler has‘stepped in to express his increasing concern over the rhetoric of the protests.’

    This likely means that he can’t stand hearing voices that dissent from the ugly ideology that pervades Brum these days.

    He urged campaigners to consider the adverse impact their protests were having on “the reputation of the city, broader cohesion and, most importantly, the children at the school….


    ….Frankly, a primary school is no place for the continuance of a large-scale protest, however lawful.”

    On the contrary, it is exactly the place, if your sons and daughters are inside, facing ‘lessons’ calculated to subvert the values your family believes in.

    As most readers will be aware, the protesting parents are mostly, if not all, Muslims, and this bumptious blusterer aims his scolding directly at their creed, offensively juxtaposing their holy month with his political masters/comrades’ obsession with perversion…

    “In this holy period of Ramadan, and as we celebrate Pride in our city, I urge those involved and those who can influence these events to think again…


    elite arrogance-s

    …and bring this protest to an end.”\

    Condescending twit, that Thompson, but no worse than the elitist West Midlands Police and Crime Commissioner, David Jamieson, who is himself a former headmaster and so brazenly asserts that –

    “Teachers should be free to get on with teaching a full curriculum, that highlights and explains Britain’s full diversity without fear of protests or threats. All forms of equality are equally important.


    Why on earth should ‘all forms’ of anything be ‘equally important?’

    Some equalities make sense.

    Equal access to school library books is fair.

    Equal portions in school dinner rooms, sure!



    No discrimination against, equal consideration for, kids who like to eat only veggies, or only pork, with their mashed spuds, as agreeable alternatives to fish n chips at lunchtime.

    But if ‘Britain’s full diversity’ includes catering to, or promoting as somehow ‘natural,’ every citizen’s sexual maladjustments…


    …then are parents expected to allow cultural marxist teachers to instruct the little ones on the joys of bestiality, incest and pedophilia, as well as sodomy and transgenderism?

    Inconsistently, though, he at once wittered about how “schools need to work with parents,” the same parents, presumably whom he thinks should sit back and let teachers pump the gay agenda down their children’s throats.


    • Eli Allison 15:42 on May 27, 2019 Permalink | Reply

      What is wrong with all the non-Muslim parents?
      Are they content with having their children suffer a regular diet of pro-‘gay’ propaganda?
      Or are they scared because of the way Christians in Britain have been bullied by pro-‘gay’ police and politicians and even put in prison cells for preaching the Gospel?


    • Belinda Harris 16:04 on May 27, 2019 Permalink | Reply

      No wonder British people are no longer proud of their ‘bobbies’ they way they used to be!
      That cop is out of line to back one side of the issue like that.

      Like in my country, Canada, where many people never liked and still don’t like the ‘gay’ agenda, I see that police in the UK are prepared to force that on adults and children alike.
      Why should anybody have to honour ‘Pride?’ I would say ‘Shame’ would be a better way to describe what is going in.
      Parents are the ones to decide what kind of morality their children learn.
      Not cops and not ‘gay’ teachers.


    • Ned 18:33 on May 27, 2019 Permalink | Reply

      Cops should not take sides unless the parents break the law.


    • Raymie Cruz 21:02 on May 27, 2019 Permalink | Reply

      What a terrible thing for any senior police officer to say.
      Where else should parents make their protest against school indoctrination but outside the school their children attend?


    • Iris 02:21 on May 28, 2019 Permalink | Reply

      I think as Eli thinks.
      Why are non-muslim parents not fighting with the same energy as muslims and not only in West Midlands but in every city across the UK.
      In Canada when we had to battle over this in Ontario, we had a multi-faith coalition.


  • ross1948 21:56 on June 5, 2016 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , , , European Championship football, football fans, , , Muslims   

    ‘Offended’ By Crusaders? Shape Up or Ship Out! 

    One does become fatigued with constant foot-stamping by whiners about how British people live in Britain, whether about their children’s liking for pork in school dinners or for piglet pictures in kindergarten books. 


    • tantrum
    • ————
    • Are the whiners really so easily ‘offended’ by aspects of the country which they or their parents should surley have known of, when they chose to settle there?
    • But if Islamists  – or anyone else  –  feel ‘offended’ by reminders of the country’s heroic history, in this current case the English role in the Liberation Wars known as Crusades, then they don’t deserve the privilege of living in England.



    Or indeed in France, whose Christian soldiers also served in those ferocious campaigns about a thousand years ago to free the Holy Land from Saracen invaders.

    • ooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo
    • jerusalem Old Jerusalem
    • ————-
    • But there’s something much more offensive than those splendid Crusader outfits sported by English soccer fans, for the forthcoming European Championship games in France.

    It’s the BBC’s iWonder website, which  has questioned whether the outfits are appropriate given that “crusaders were the perpetrators of violent attacks on Muslims…”    http://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/you-re-offending-muslims-english-crusaders-warned-0xs0msdtb

    All the Middle East back then had been subjugated by violent attacks, by Islamic armies. Crusaders went there to undo that subjugation.  

    How the French respond to this kind of typical BBC cr%p is up to them, but England is a Christian country, HM The Queen the head of its Established Church.

    So every Englishman and Englishwoman is fully entitled to take pride in their forebears’ exploits in those brave attempts to roll back Islamic aggression.  

    Just look at the map of caliphate expansion.




    Had the Crusaders succeeded in rolling back those invaders, back into the Arabian Peninsula whence they had originally emerged, there might well be no ISIS holed up in Syria and Iraq, nor Hamas in Gaza.

    And Libya might never have become a base for crimmigrant incursions!

    Who knows for sure, but…

    Those warriors of old did their best.



    Nice to see today’s footie fans retain a healthy spirit of Englishry.

    • Lee Christoff 05:49 on June 7, 2016 Permalink | Reply

      Should never be ashamed of the crusaders, they were freedom fighters and the Saracens were the agressors.


  • ross1948 18:54 on April 27, 2016 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , , , , , Muslims, ,   

    Discrimination in Vienna! Boycott This Pinko Dive! 

    We are endlessly beset with pinko shrills bleating about ‘discrimination.’

    So howzabout THIS!

    A cafe owner in Vienna has sparked heated debate after barring supporters of Austria’s far-right Freedom Party from her establishment following the party’s Sunday’s election triumph.  http://www.thelocal.at/20160426/vienna-cafe-tells-bars-far-right-voters-austria-presidential-election

    Now if she barred ‘gays’ or some other pampered, PC-favoured element, there’s no doubt at all that a horde of ‘human rights’ agitprop A-holes would swoop on her establishment.
    I don’t know about Austrian law, but in Canada, and many other Western lands, ‘discrimination’ can land you in court, fines, jail-time, draconian punishments galore!
    For my part, I wouldn’t want to see this red vixen prosecuted.
    Proprietors should be free to ban whomsoever they wish from their premises. Besides, damn sure I’d not want to spend a single Austrian schilling (oops, it’s the euro there these days!) buying coffee or apfelstrudel if that kept her in business.
    Nor would I wish to sit among her clientele – read the linked story and see for yourself what an unwholesome crowd hang out within the weirdo’s den.
    Discrimination should be a civil right everywhere – but so should the art of BOYCOTT!
    • Carney 19:00 on April 27, 2016 Permalink | Reply

      You are a throw-back to the 1950s.
      The world has moved on and intolerance is no longer permissible.
      Canada is a wonderful example of diversity but it would not be if government action had not been used to achieve it. That means stamping out discrimination wherever it appears.
      You had better stay away from Canada, we have no time for people like you anymore..


  • ross1948 12:17 on January 27, 2016 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , , , , museum nudes, Muslims, , , Rouhani   

    Naked Truth? Renzi Belly-Crawls To Islamist Intolerance! 

    It struck me as odd that leftist Italian P.M. Renzi would even bother to take any leader of Iran’s rabid bigot regime like Hassan Rouhani to Rome’s magnificent Capitoline Museums – casting pearls before swine is an old  saying but HIGHLY appropriate to such an outing.


    • RENZI_12_resize Matteo Renzi
    • ———————-
    • But it might have been worth a try, if it was an effort to cure the Islamist of engrained uptight attitudes towards civilisation.

    Alas, far from it!



    • On the left, what Rouhani saw of the beautiful statue on the right


    Renzi was clearly keen to avoid offending his new business partner. The nude statues and sculptures in the museum were completely covered by large white boxeshttp://www.thelocal.it/20160126/nude-statues-covered-up-for-rouhanis-visitas a mark of respect for the traditions of the Muslim country.

    As it happens, I live in Indonesia, 90% Muslim, and often go shopping to a mall guarded by two of these splendid ladies, who are clad in outfits that leave little to the imagination.



    Plenty of Muslims go to and fro without reeling in shock. Jakartans are, of course not (yet) subject to primitive ayatollah-type rule and retain the tolerance characteristic of most people, of all creeds, in this lovely archipelago.

    I look forward to Renzi’s reciprocal visit to Tehran, when Rouhani will presumably show similar respect for civilised Western traditions by telling the city’s female population to remove the uglifying head-shrouds into which they are daily intimidated…


    Supporters of Iranian religious hardliners take part in a demonstration after the weekly Friday prayer in Tehran on May 16, 2014 against an ongoing online campaign by Iranian women for greater social freedoms. AFP Photo Tehran – collaborationist bag-heads rant against women’s rights


    ….yeah right!

    You can see a video via The Local link, of the ‘scandalous’ examples of Italian cultural excellence which Renzi hid to avoid upsetting this lackey of a theocratic tyranny.

    And Italian grovelling just goes on and on – seems no wines were served at the state dinner!


    • Beaujolais_Nouveau_wine
    • ——————-

    If Renzi had attempted to ply Rouhani with vino, that would have been rude, true. But why impose a shariah menu on non-Muslim guests!

    It’s disgusting appeasement…


    ….and SUCH a contrast with proud France, where even lefty Hollande refused to crawl last year. 

    In November, plans to invite Rouhani to a formal lunch at the Élysée in Paris were scrapped when the Iranian president’s request for a halal, alcohol-free menu was declined due to French ‘republican traditions’.

    Vive La France, and SHAME on Italy.

    • Pam Trevelyan 23:14 on January 27, 2016 Permalink | Reply

      Good for France, and a terrible black mark on Italy’s report card.
      You could have added that Islamists hate any kind of statues, and culture. We see that with ISIS vandalism of ancient works of art and the Taliban’s vandalism in Afghanistan.


  • ross1948 09:53 on September 9, 2015 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , Muslims, , , ,   

    Migrant Muslim Ban? How to Allay ‘Islamophobia!’ 

    I read a week or two ago that Slovakia, a small country located in the very heart of Europe, is reportedly prepared to accept 200 ‘migrants,’ but only Christians. Since then, Finns have expressed similar noises.

    Today, Australia’s Foreign Minister Julie Bishop was almost instantly subjected to whines about ‘discrimination’ after she dclared ‘a focus on assisting those persecuted ethnic and religious minorities who will have no home to return to when the conflict is over. 

    “So that includes Maronites, it includes Yazidis, there are Druze.” 

    Discrimination in favour of those most at risk is just plain good sense, and common decency. Christians and Yazidis have been evilly tormented by the Islamist rape-gang ISIS and deserve our sympathy.



    • But we need to be forthright on the issue of ‘Islamophobia,’ a bogus word conjured up by the likes of CAIR, whose character we should all understand by now.

    Let’s listen to the Slovaks.

    Bratislava officials claim Muslim refugees wouldn’t feel at home because the country has such a tiny Islamic population. Daily Mail Online.

    I frankly find it unlikely that a lack of suitable places of worship is the real reason behind this policy. Muslims, after all, can and do pray anywhere.

    Considerate Muslims, like my former colleague in London, find unobtrusive locations, like a small room in the office complex, whilst less considerate ones obstruct the public footway en masse, even highways, thus contributing to ‘Islamophobia.’. https://rossrightangle.wordpress.com/2011/08/04/jakarta-top-cop-slams-traff-islamic-jams/


    • slovakia
    • ======================
    • So I’d say this attitude on the part of the Slovaks is actually down to the failure of most clerics in Europe to do what I have often suggested as the best antidote to anti-Islamic feeling, namely use their pulpits to denounce several unacceptable attitudes rightly or wrongly imputed to Muslims.
    • birminghamosque mosque in England

    First, at every Friday prayer session, all good clerics should begin their sermon with a clear-cut assertion that Muslims in the UK (or any country) may not elevate any imagined empathy with Muslims abroad either above, or on a par with, loyalty to Queen and Country.

    • Any such supranational allegiance is an affront and if held, should be cause for detention pending deportation.
    • ================
    • .

    Secondly, the sermons should decree that, under no circumstances, should anyone in their audience think, never mind act, violently towards ‘apostates’ or ‘blasphemers.’


    People in those categories are not bad. They simply hold different views about how to worship or not worship. Some ‘blasphemers’ may be rude, but in those cases, in a civilised country, civilised people do not behave like the rabid morons in the above photo. They ignore what might offend, or write a critical letter to their favourite newspaper.


    Third, again at least once a week, it should be explained that polygamy is for primitives. Civilised people should not, and, where it’s illegal, may not, engage in multi-spouse relationships.


    polygamy a backward polygamous brute


    Again, anyone who feels strongly, once a citizen, may propose to change the law, but of course only on the basis of sex equality, any reform conferring the right to more than one legal bed-mate to both men and women. 


    Thirdly, on the same theme, responsible clerics should powerfully aver that men and women are not to be iniquitously treated. Already, in the UK, and elsewhere, we have heard rational Muslim input on this. 

    ‘An Archaic Tribal Rag’ – Wise UK Muslim Imam Says ‘Ban the Burqa!’ 

    It’s on the BBC! Bag-Head Bans Do Not Infringe Religious Liberty! 

    Fiery Islamists – ‘Head-Scarves NOT a Big Issue!’ 

    If women are told to shroud their heads, men also should be instructed accordingly!


    Clerics should moreover speak out against any demand by fanatics to be above the law, and this is a topical matter, given what I read in the UK media last week, about certain people saying they should be excluded from the attentions of sniffer dogs.

    POLICE sniffer dogs trained to spot terrorists at railway stations may no longer come into contact with Muslim passengers – after complaints that it is against the suspects’ religion.

    Sniffer dogs could be banned
    A report for the Transport Department has raised the prospect that the animals should only touch passengers’ luggage because it is considered “more acceptable.”   http://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/50071/Sniffer-dogs-offend-Muslims

    There’s no excuse for permitting the infantile notion of ‘cultural sensitivity’ to trump public safety.


    I honestly believe regular repetition of all the above in every house of worship (Muslim or otherwise ) would reassure host nations immensely.

    Most, if not all, Western countries practise religious liberty. Decent Muslims can practise their religion happily, and fit in well, like these Ahmadiyah in the UK.


    • royal_wedding_ahmadiyya
    • —————
    • It’s when attempts are made to exalt alien and obnoxious customs – multicult – that trouble starts. Sane Muslims know this, and have said so, admirable Muslims like Tarek Fateh in Canada.
    • ======
    • Tarek Tarek

      A Muslim Voice of Reason – Khadr May Return, IF………!!!! 

    • ooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo-

    Like Tarek Fateh, and, I reckon, the equally estimable American Muslim, Zuhdi Jasser…Witch-Hunt In America – Against A Muslim Patriot!  ...and the Muslims I count as friends, people I hang out with socially and frequently have here as house-guests, would find little fault with anything I’ve suggested. 

    Even here in 90% Muslim Indonesia, only a malignant minority would go along with that fanatic to whom I often refer. 

    IslamoNazi Gauleiter – “Women Already Have Limitations, Let Alone Non-Muslims!” 

    The more loudly that decent Muslims disown such drivel, the less ‘Islamophobia’ will appear.



    • Neil Raines 11:06 on September 9, 2015 Permalink | Reply

      Excellent arguments, but what about ‘taqiya,’
      How do you know if they mean what they say?
      I think you are too trusting, Ross, softened up by life in sunny tropics.


    • James Rierson 07:57 on September 10, 2015 Permalink | Reply

      You cannot be faulted in your list of faults that need to be corrected by these people but do you honestly think any sermons along the lines you suggest would be done without a very visible tongue in cheek, “nudge-nudge, wink-wink, just fulfilling kafir commands, you know what the real message is?”

      All the evidence we have seen and heard in Australia, from the top ‘establishment’ Islamic authorities down to the lowest Lakemba levels of jihadism, has shown us that they automatically object to Australia fighting against any Muslim country/army/organisation.
      They DO put their ‘sectarian allegiance,’ as you correctly describe it, before loyalty to the country they claim to be part of.

      I’m sure there are honourable Muslims in Australia whose first duty is to Australia, but they don’t seem to rise high in the groups that speak for their communitiy.


  • ross1948 08:04 on February 14, 2015 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , , Muslims, ,   

    AURAT! Uptight Malays Tell Non-Muslims How To Dress ‘Properly!’ 

    “It also aims to inform non-Muslims about the advantages of covering up and how to cover one’s aurat properly for men and women…” 
    “The campaign will also use the social media to encourage people to send selfie or wefie (group selfie) covering their aurat with the message conveyed through the hashtag #iam4humanity as a sign of support,” he added.
    That comes from yet another ‘Boo-hoo Bad Valentine’ story. But we’ll skip that kill-joy whine – the big day’s here, so SWALK all round. 
    Those selfies and wefies would no doubt rank high in the annals of the most boring pics ever taken.
    aurat-mereka-dosa-anda-2 This ‘educational’ poster sums up the mentality
                                            ‘Fathers and Husbands–Their Aurat is Your Responsibility!’
    NB – for new readers, aurat refers to haram (forbidden) parts of the body, which for women includes not only private parts as normal people understand the term, but also shoulders, thighs, mid-riffs and of course cleavage – not to mention glossy black hair.
    Now here’s what a good photo SHOULD look like!
    boobs indonesia
    These ladies are not Malaysian but Indonesian, stars of stage and screen, and bigger and better photos of their impressive forms can be seen at this link  – http://harianterbit.com/hanterentertain/read/2015/01/11/15909/24/24/WOW-6-Artis-Ini-Memiliki-Payudara-Besar 
    – which has, as its headline,

    These Artistes Possess Big Bosoms!’

    Who in their right mind would want them to ‘cover up?’
    Oya, there are some benighted bigots here who would, but Indonesians are a lot less uptight than Malaysians. No immediate danger of intolerant eejits triumphing here as they seem to be across the Straits. In Java, the traditional women’s wear is the kebaya.
    You may have seen it if you watched the movie Java Heat

    Java Heat, Poso Poison – Fiction V Islamist Reality 

    kebaya star
    Grumpy old men, and some grumpy young men, and a number of po-faced bints, in Malaysia, seem to spend a lot of time nagging and scolding, and bullying women there to go bag-head.
    And if they direct their kill-joy ranting at women of their own creed, well, good luck to sensible Muslims, men and women, who fight back. It’s on the BBC! Bag-Head Bans Do Not Infringe Religious Liberty! 
    But now we read they’re aiming their prattle at ‘non-Muslims?’  


  • ross1948 14:19 on February 9, 2015 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , Muslims, ,   

    Where Were Sunday’s ‘British’ Thousands When Jordan’s Pilot Burned? 

    One of the few positive things to arise from the horror of last week’s Middle East news was the opportunity it gave some of us to hammer home the point that the young man so monstrously murdered by ISIS, Muath, was, like many of my friends here, a Muslim.

    He became a hero to millions.

    His martyrdom by satanic jihadists should have been a salutory lesson for some Facebook commenters who consistently use abusive words ( ‘muzzie’ being the most polite) to describe Muslims, that many, very many, Muslims share my detestation of the primitive nonsense, the sexism and intolerance we hear from too many of their clerics.

    But then, just when we were thinking that message might have got across to those that need it…

    Muslims in london-gath-008


    Thousands of British Muslims protested against cartoons of Mohammed in French satirical magazine Charlie Hebdo…

    The crowd marched to Downing Street holding signs reading “Charlie and the abuse factory”, “We love Prophet Muhammad more than our lives”, and “To insult is not freedom”.

    Speakers addressed the protest and held communal prayers, before representatives delivered a petition signed by over 100,000 British Muslims to Cameron’s office.


    So one Sunday morning’s jolly outing, showing open abhorrence of the freedoms Britain has long championed, showing how little they have adapted to the country that took them or their parents in, has probably undone whatever hopes might have emerged from the horror.

    And how many Britons today must be asking, as I am, where were those thousands when the video of that innocent Muslim man burnt alive was spread across the internet by the ISIS rape-gang?


    Where were they, in their self-righteous, censorious thousands?

    No thousands out on the streets condemning jihadist rape, murder, terror?

    No 100,000 signatures demanding the UK respond in the right and proper manner, as Jordanians have done, execution of terrorists already captured, extra effort put into military action against the vermin?

    ‘Revenge for Muath’: Jordan Unleashes 56 Airstrikes …

    Do those thousands on Downing Street yesterday, those hundred thousand whose names are on that petition, really lack any understanding of the Western democracy whose freedom of expression they themselves practiced yesterday?

    Do they really want to live in a country with mediaeval blasphemy laws?

    Then they are perfectly free to get the hell out of the UK and find a cosy corner in some region of the world where such nonsense prevails. 

    • Laurence Heal 14:55 on February 9, 2015 Permalink | Reply

      We are weak are we not


    • Marion James 01:43 on February 10, 2015 Permalink | Reply

      On this, I agree with you 100%. These people do not belong in Britain.
      They don’t belong in the modern world.


  • ross1948 10:06 on January 11, 2015 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , , Muslims, , , ,   

    Nasty Nabila, BBC’s Shariah Star, On Charlie’s ‘Consequences!’ 

    Just watching BBC World News discussion at 8.45am Jakarta time, and incensed by a nasty  Islamist vixen named Nabila Ramdani, who’s ranting violently about ‘hateful’ cartoons, demanding that freedom of speech be restricted, that you have to ‘draw a line.’

    She had already launched into a tirade about how those poor Paris terrorists came from a ‘troubled background,’ in a community that suffered ‘discrimination!’

    Happily, other panellists were quick to shoot down her drivel, but it occurred to me to check her own – it turns out – very ‘untroubled’ background.

    It seems she easily traversed whatever discrimination lay in her path, with an LSE M.Phil in International History and another M.Phil, from Paris 7 University in British and American History and Literature.

    She’s also held plum jobs, including ‘lectrice’ (lecturer) at Oxford, the University of Michigan, and at Paris Diderot.

    Poor little rich girl…and it turns out also that she’s a former winner of the European Muslim Woman of Influence (EMWI) Award (2010)

    And she’s the kind of intolerant who gives her creed a very bad name, a campaigner for sex segregation. As as young student, in 2000, she formed something called the “Comité des usagères de la ligne A“, demanding public transport sex apartheid. 

    Okay, we have something of that here in Jakarta, though women can sit in the men’s area if they wish.  It’s an anti-groper measure, no more, no less.




    But her naked sexist motivation becomes clear when we learn that in the Guardian, in 2012, she was into whine mode again, accusing France’s Minister for Women’s Rights,  had “let down Muslim voters” by not introducing measures such as “women-only swimming sessions in public pools.”

    If women choose to live in France, then they should understand that France is a civilised Western country. If they want to follow alien customs, there are foreign lands where such are acceptable. 


    nabila ramdani


    So she witters about discrimination yet wants it imposed on public facilities?

    Her work as a journo is studded with anti-Western outbursts, but her piece de resistance must surely have been the whopper of August 2013 The Observer when she claimed that Israel had used chemical weapons against Gaza, in the form of white phosphorosus shells. After numerous people objected to this untruth, The Observer issued a formal correction. 

    This info is all from wikipedia..  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nabila_Ramdani, not always a totally reliable source, but on this matter, I’m relaxed about using it, thanks to its final entry on this nasty bigot bint.




    On 10 January 2015, following the Charlie Hebdo killing in France, Ramdani declared on the BBC’s Dateline London “You can’t print hateful vindictive cartoons and think they will have no consequence.” 

    Arrogance, the very personification of the mind-set which seeks to tell civilised people how much liberty we dare taste, without offending sectarian sensibilities.

    Why does the BBC afford her a platform for her venomous vituperation? 

    • hutchrun 12:02 on January 11, 2015 Permalink | Reply

      Hewitt: Will you name one who has called you up and has stood by you?

      Donohue: It’s freedom of speech.

      Hewitt: You just made an assertion that people are calling you up. I’ve been doing this longer than you, Bill. You get an occasional microphone, you’re not going to bully me. Name one Archbishop or Cardinal who called you up and said I stand with your statement, which is morally repugnant, embarrassing, it’s a scandal on the Church.

      That was just the first five minutes of a 24-minute must-listen radio argument which got very personal at least on the part of Donohue, who kept asserting that Hewitt knew very little about Catholicism and the Constitution (Hewitt is a constitutional law professor as well as a radio host, a fact that based on his interview Donohue didn’t realize).

      After he conducted the interview, Hewitt posted this statement on his website:

      Bill Donohue wrote a horrible thing yesterday; “Muslims Are Right To Be Angry.” I have just concluded an interview that I conducted with him on that statement. It was heated. He is an embarrassment to the Roman Catholic Church on this issue, and should not be understood by anyone to represent the Church on this issue. I doubt very much he will find even one bishop, archbishop or cardinal to stand alongside him in seconding his statement of yesterday. He cited Raymond Arroyo as being in support of his statement, and I do not believe that, and I will seek Mr. Arroyo for confirmation or denial of Mr. Donohue’s statement. But I believe the vast majority of Catholics would be appalled by Mr. Donohue’s statement.


    • Lairedion 19:46 on January 11, 2015 Permalink | Reply

      “You can’t print hateful vindictive cartoons and think they will have no consequence.”

      This is the big problem with many Muslims, even those “moderates” publicly condemning terrorism. Criticizing Muhammad is for the majority a licence to kill. Few will actually commit such a barbaric murder but many silently or unapologetically nod their heads in approval.

      Before I see Muslims taking to the streets en masse and express outrage and disapproval on what happened in Paris, 9/11, London 2005, Kobani, Darfur (and not just Gaza), with Theo van Gogh and against Al-Qaeda and IS, I remain a sceptic.


    • Nina G 10:40 on January 12, 2015 Permalink | Reply

      She’s a horror.


Compose new post
Next post/Next comment
Previous post/Previous comment
Show/Hide comments
Go to top
Go to login
Show/Hide help
shift + esc
%d bloggers like this: