Tagged: Naga Murchetty Toggle Comment Threads | Keyboard Shortcuts

  • ross1948 00:01 on March 26, 2021 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , Naga Murchetty,   

    Sneering At The Flag, Nasty Naga Gets ‘Spoken To!’ 


    If anything exposes the rot at the top of the BBC, it’s this quote from the media –

    BBC Breakfast presenters Charlie Stayt and Naga Munchetty have been “spoken to and reminded of their responsibilities” after complaints about their reaction to a government minister’s flag.

    ‘Spoken To?’

    I know what decent Brits should have said to them, after the disloyal UK Pravda scumbags were seen sneering at their nation’s flag. 

    Those colours represent our United Kingdom.

    If you don’t love it, leave it.

    Stayt is clearly just an inadequate, but Murchetty has long been seen by patriotic Brits as a menace…

    =

    Naga Munchetty has received the full backing of the BBC after she was accused of ‘endorsing criminal behaviour’ during a report on the Black Lives Matter movement

    https://metro.co.uk/2020/07/24/naga-munchetty-backed

    =

    …. obsessed with issues of race and nationality…

    BBC Defines ‘Racism’ – With Dazzling Clarity…NOT! 

    ….and her belated back-tracking ‘later’ – ‘Munchetty later apologised for liking “offensive” tweets about the exchange.’

    https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/amp/entertainment-arts-56495032

    In other words, the nasty leftist vixen has no regrets at all, and why would she, since that recently appointed BBC big-boss, Tim Davie, took NO disciplinary action, merely had some flunkey ‘speak to’ her.

    One does not like to say we told you so, but we did!

    Nasty Uptight Naga’s Job Is Safe, No Matter What! 

     

     

     
    • Ben Baniek 06:07 on March 26, 2021 Permalink | Reply

      A few years ago you wrote about some dirty bitch who photographed herself wiping her ass with the Stars and Stripes.
      Maybe BBC will be hiring her as their USA reporter?

      Like

    • Mel Henderson 08:15 on March 26, 2021 Permalink | Reply

      Send her out to wherever Begum is.
      They do have a lot in common, Begum and Murchetty, both experienced in living off the British tax-payers, whose flag they don’t respect.
      You are right about Charlie the Chump.
      Office boy material at best.

      Saying that, being an office-boy at BBC must be hazardous, all those effeminate ‘men’ eyeing up any likely lads in their vicinity!

      Like

  • ross1948 16:25 on August 31, 2020 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , censoring patriotism, , , , , , Naga Murchetty   

    BBC Prom Queen Facing ‘Death-Threats?’ She Should Tell All! 


    While it’s unacceptable that the Finn Staveska should receive ‘death threats,’ if true, the Guardian, which last week made the claim, leaves us with questions still unanswered.

    https://www.theguardian.com/music/2020/aug/27/bbc-conductor-issues-statement-over-proms-controversy

    BBC scheming to de-patriotise the Proms is entirely credible.

    The preposterous pretence that replacing vocal renderings of Rule Britannia…

    .

    ..

    …and Land of Hope and Glory with instrumentals, meaning we hear tunes but not heroic words, is just an insult to Brits’ intelligence.

    That lousy lord, Horrid Hall, repeatedly failed to give a straight answer when subjected to determined questioning.

    ..

    Tony Hall, Baron Hall of Birkenhead - Global Conference for Media Freedom (48256794687) (cropped).jpg

    Hall – BBC Director General,  ex Channel Four, AND since 2018, President of the European Broadcasting Union

    https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8670167/Amol-Rajan-tells-Lord-Hall-fears

    Clearly he is on the side of the Enemy Within – he proved that by succouring Nasty Naga after her vicious bias outburst two months ago.

    Nasty Uptight Naga’s Job Is Safe, No Matter What! 

    .

    .

    Naga Munchetty has received the full backing of the BBC after she was accused of ‘endorsing criminal behaviour’ during a report on the Black Lives Matter movement

    The Guardian now quotes a BBC statement saying that their Proms subversion policy was a purely BBC decision.

    It would be, wouldn’t it?

    My shopping list is my decision. But if somebody tells me there’s a discount on a certain brand of cheese slices, my decision is influenced.

    So did the far-left Finn have any in-put or did she not?

    Staveska has so far NOT denied her alleged pro-BLM sympathies and….

    ..dalia

     ….

    …we have already noted her ‘praise of Democrat US politician Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez,’ who, as I observed last week,  is so far left she could easily fall off the world.

    Priti Patel Has Powers To Declare Staveska ‘Persona Non Grata!’ 

    SO?

    Was she involved in the ‘discussions’ which Horrid Hall was so desperate to obfuscate?

    The Guardian notes the whimpers of disapproval heard from Johnson and one of his ministers, and we certainly can’t criticise the leftist newspaper for ignoring the action those Tories have taken…

    .

    .

    ….because neither Johnson nor any Conservative in his Cabinet have proposed ANY actual steps to stop the massive abuse of public funds represented by the tax-funded propaganda channel in its brazen BLM ranting.

    .

     

    Action, please, Tories, not mere mealy-mouthed moaning!.

     
    • Mack the Knife 17:22 on August 31, 2020 Permalink | Reply

      No ifs, no buts, no trust in any BBC functionary.
      Defunding is the only way to fix the problem.

      Like

  • ross1948 15:56 on August 11, 2020 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , Fran Unsworth bbc, , moonlighting scandal, Naga Murchetty,   

    Nasty Uptight Naga’s Job Is Safe, No Matter What! 


    For some reason, that nasty Naga Murchetty seems to be in the UK media at least once a week, despite her unpleasant personality and hardly appealing appearance.

    .

    .

    Naga Munchetty has received the full backing of the BBC after she was accused of ‘endorsing criminal behaviour’ during a report on the Black Lives Matter movement

    https://metro.co.uk/2020/07/24/naga-munchetty-backed

    ..

    But this week there’s a genuine reason for a headline.

    She’s not content with raking in a totally undeserved nearly TWO HUNDRED thousand quid annual salary from the pockets of unwilling Brits, who are coerced into paying for the BBC whether they ever watch it or not.

    The uptight race-obsessed ranter took to moonlighting, as explained via the following link.

    https://inews.co.uk/news/naga-munchetty-conflict-interest-warning-bbc-moonlighting-aston-martin-pr-video-574797

    .

    And, wow, she’s apparently been warned!

    She will no doubt treat that warning with the arrogant contempt we saw the last time she got her boney knuckles rapped, after she abused her position to emit a leftist political outburst.

    And I don’t mean that extract at the top of our page.

    I refer to the previous controversy.

    .

    And what became of that?

    She ran blubbing to her pay-masters, and another slimy leftist, BBC’s ‘news director,’ the far-left Fran Unsworth, pompously declared –

    The BBC is not impartial on racism.’

    Please note, no similar declaration of BBC war on marxism…

    ….an evil responsible for millions of death and the enslavement of more than millions!

    With the eager approval of ‘Lord’ Hall, BBC’s equally left-biased director, Nasty Naga was instantly un-rapped.

    BBC Defines ‘Racism’ – With Dazzling Clarity…NOT! 

    So we know – and NN knows – that nobody can play the blame game with this particular BAME dame and have any hope of winning.

    .

     
    • Vanessa R 22:24 on August 11, 2020 Permalink | Reply

      I’m sick of seeing her ratty self-righteous face.

      Like

  • ross1948 21:32 on July 30, 2020 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , Naga Murchetty   

    Nasty Naga Sees Her Uptight BBC Rants As ‘Very Good Value!’ 


    That uptight leftist Naga Munchetty seems to get altogether too much media attention since her infamous abuse of her BBC ‘Breakfast’ tv job, when she had a near meltdown about ‘race.’

    Now it seems freaky Munchetty last week told the Radio Times that –

    But at Breakfast, we’re not ratings-driven, we’re not there to garner attention on social media. We’re there to provide a service and make sure people are informed, educated and entertained.”

    Hmm.

    .

    .

    Does she really believe such gunk?

    Flaunting her own uptight hang-ups was certainly not educational, nor entertaining, nor informative, except insofar as it informed us of how big a chip she carries on her shoulder…

    BBC Flunkeys Getting Above Themselves? Fire Them! 

    …a chip not significantly diminished even by her rescue from condemnation by the leftist lord who was then Director General.

    BBC Defines ‘Racism’ – With Dazzling Clarity…NOT! 

    Her arrogance was probably enhanced by subsequent events!

    Poor Uptight Naga, Darling Of The Twitter Mob! 

    She is entitled to her obsessive attitude to race, and should be free to express her views, however offensive to normal British people…

    .

    .

    Naga Munchetty has received the full backing of the BBC after she was accused of ‘endorsing criminal behaviour’ during a report on the Black Lives Matter movement

    https://metro.co.uk/2020/07/24/naga-munchetty-backed

    ….and will no doubt continue to do so so, having once again been given the green light by an institution steeped in bias…

    .

    BUT…it should be at her own expense, not yours!

    I address that ‘yours’ to every UK tax-payer coerced into paying for the BBC.

    But Nasty Naga doesn’t see any reason why she should be expected to self-fund the promotion of her personal Trumpophobia or of BLM propaganda

    “I think a licence is worth that,” the BBC presenter added.

    This rich bitch presumably gets the same gigantic salary as her studio partner Dan Walker, who gets by somehow on a measly 238,000 (pounds sterling, not euros!)

    .

    .

    Meanwhile, senior citizen Brits, who until this week were exempted from paying for the license to watch BBC ( extorted from all other tv-owning Brits whether they watch UK Pravda or not!) are now losing that exemption, though no simultaneous trimming of fat-cat propagandists’ salaries has yet been announced!

     
    • Penny 23:37 on July 30, 2020 Permalink | Reply

      She is a stuck up opinionated cow but there’s no sign of her being fired. All her bosses are as stuck up and opinionated as she is.
      I want to add the Daily Express doesn’t help, with a story about some stupid trivial thing she’s said or done every other day!
      It just makes her a household name, like Ena Sharples used to be.
      People now accept her eccentricities as part of the routine.

      Like

    • Fiona F 00:18 on July 31, 2020 Permalink | Reply

      That munchkin needs taken down a peg or two.
      She hgas such a high opinon of herself which would be bearable if it were in any way justified.

      Like

  • ross1948 14:55 on April 28, 2020 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , High-heeled boots, Naga Murchetty,   

    Poor Uptight Naga, Darling Of The Twitter Mob! 


    That uptight leftist Naga Munchetty seems to get altogether too much media attention since her infamous abuse of her ‘breakfast tv’ job, when she had a near meltdown about ‘race.’

    BBC Flunkeys Getting Above Themselves? Fire Them! 

    =

    Image result for naga munchetty

    Naga ‘Bias’ Munchetty

    =

    Her skin-colour certainly didn’t prevent her getting a vastly over-paid job with the BBC, and as soon as she was slapped down for the meltdown, she was succoured via the outrageous intervention of that snooty pinko Lord Whatsit, the Director General.

    BBC Defines ‘Racism’ – With Dazzling Clarity…NOT! 

    Her arrogance did not abate!

    https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-7556675/Naga-Munchetty-controversy-hundreds-viewers-complain-BBC-Breakfast.html

    .

    Now she is back in the headlines because she wore high-heeled boots to work!

    Personally, I think girls in high-heeled boots are cute…

    Hot selling wine red suede high heel boots sexy pointed toe lace-up thigh high boots cut-outs thin heels boots woman boots

    …but one viewer didn’t  – and dared to say so.

    Boom!

    The trendy lefty Twitter in-crowd roared into action, made a huge fuss and the poor guy who criticised her was subjected to a torrent of abuse.

    He eventually apologised, with the following words.

    Lockdown lesson 1: never, ever tweet about what a presenter wears on TV. Apologies to anyone, especially @BBCNaga, upset by my badly worded comment on her stunning shoes. I’ve been accused of being a white, bald man (true), sexist & racist (not) and a dinosaur (probably). Sorry.”

    https://www.hellomagazine.com/fashion/news/2020042788757/naga-munchetty-responds-to-criticism-about-her-heeled-shoes

    How absurd, that he’s been bullied into this by shrills, some of whom, judging from his words above, made it a ‘race’ issue.

    Anybody in public life who appears on tv has no grounds for complaint if viewers comment on any aspect of his or her appearance or conduct.

     

     
    • Jeff-Davis Brocken 15:55 on April 28, 2020 Permalink | Reply

      Never heard of her but now I have, I don’t think much of her.
      Besides, I don’t like her hair-style.
      Does that mean I will get a crowd of lefties chasing me angrily around Twitter?

      They will not catch me there because I know what Twitter is like, run and censored by a biased Yank, so I am not a user!

      Like

    • Noreen Paterson 16:57 on April 28, 2020 Permalink | Reply

      Why else do they dress up and appear before millions if they don’t want their ‘style’ to be noticed?
      They do, of course, but only if admiring notice is taken.
      Criticism is not welcome, any more than complaints about the prejudices they substitute for fair and balanced discussion.

      Like

    • JazPen 18:03 on April 28, 2020 Permalink | Reply

      Naga, as you will know, is the Indonesian word for dragon!

      Like

  • ross1948 08:16 on March 18, 2020 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , dan walker, , Naga Murchetty   

    Sack The Lot! BBC Slugs Back Up Each Other’s Bias! 


    So after days of reading about that arrogant elitist Lord Hall telling us what the British people may or may not do with the bloated broadcasting corporation…

    .q

    .

    …which they are forced to pay for whether they ever watch it or not – remember, the uppity lord doesn’t think the people’s elected representatives should intrude on the BBC’s un-elected hackery-

    politicians must be kept away... https://www.theguardian.com/media/2015/jul/11/bbc-funding-deal-tony-hall-politicians

    …now we have Dan Walker, an unfunny clown who shares the hosting of a morning chat-show with the uptight Naga Munchetty, ranting that his intermediate pay-masters…

    – intermediate, in that it’s not their money they use for Walker’s grossly excessive salary –…Walker, who earns £280,000 a year, also told the Radio Times he was “embarrassed” to have his salary published...

    …should have made a ‘robust defence’ of her opinionated Trumpophobic whining.

    ..

    Dan Walker and Naga Munchetty on BBC Breakfast (BBC)
    Dan Walker said he didn’t speak up earlier to keep pressure off Naga Munchetty 

    As the Telegraph reports, Walker, and the uptight Munchetty ‘were embroiled in debate over comments about US President Donald Trump last year…

    Of course it’s open season all year round on Trump, the BBC diligently suppressing voices of support for POTUS…

    ‘We DO Try To Get Trump Supporters On Our Show’ –BBC 

    Nasty Nabila Stars In BBC’s Hate-Trump Show! 

    ecd7d-datelinelondon

    Dateline – Lying BBC’s Anti-Trump Jihad! 

    – and lying about their suppression!

    .

    Walker has now fallen in line with His Lordship, who burnished his own bias credentials by overturning the rare rap on the knuckles that Nasty Naga got for her little tantrum about one of Trump’s enjoyable observations.

    Although the Telegraph says ‘the BBC was widely criticised for censuring Ms Munchetty,’ the fact is that only the dregs of the media/political elite got fretty.

    Without double-checking, I’d hazard a guess that many of those who leapt to defend Nasty’s right to vent her toxic obsessions about ‘racism,’ were among the stasi chorus who objected to hearing a ‘robust attack’ on the evils of multicult from that lady in the Question Time audience.

    Hateful Left Hacks Demonise ‘Question-Time’ Heroine! 

    ‘Lord Hall of Birkenhead’ took more notice of those dregs than of the normal Brits who complained about Nasty – over 300 viewer complaints over her rude and arrogant antics –

    He took more notice of the orchestrated pinko creep chorus than even of the BBC’s own complaints board!

    The BBC is completely unwilling to play fair.

    .

    .

    Their yappers on one programme after another present slanted, left-liberal perspectives on one issue after another.

    Check out these previous reports..

    https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-7556675/Naga-Munchetty-controversy-hundreds-viewers-complain-BBC-Breakfast.html

    The BBC is a disgrace…

    If Only The BBC Cared About The Country! 

    Katty Kay – One Bare-Faced BBC Liar! 

    Nasty Nabila Stars In BBC’s Hate-Trump Show! 

    A Leftist Lesbian Love Affair – ‘Auntie’ And ‘Mother Jones?’ 

    Will the BBC EVER Be Pro-British?

     

    An interim director from outside the in-crowd should be appointed, to oversee its demolition.

     

    Sent from my iPad
     
    • Arnold 10:43 on March 18, 2020 Permalink | Reply

      Same problem in Canada. The CBCis like Pravda!

      Like

    • Dave Monck 11:32 on March 18, 2020 Permalink | Reply

      No wonder so many British people have a bad opinion of President Trump!
      Their national broadcaster is as biased as CNN, but uses their taxes to pay for all the propaganda.
      Why will the British government not do something about it?t

      Like

  • ross1948 19:04 on September 29, 2019 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , , , defunding state broadcasters, Emily Maitlis, Naga Murchetty,   

    Sneer-Minx Maitlis – No Charm School Grad, She! 


    That snotty sneer-minx Emily Maitlis, having just been slapped down herself a week or so ago, for her own crass lack of professionalism…

    .Image result for maitlis

    …has some nerve to coming rushing to the defence of her BBC comrade Naga Munchetty.

    We have noticed this phenomenon before, in connection with BBC bigots urging as ban on free speech on televised discussions.

    censorship

    BBC Flunkeys Getting Above Themselves? Fire Them! 

    =======================================

    The insolent vixen ( Maitlis, not Munchetty, though they are both arrogant upstarts!) is now all a-whine about how the BBC is “massively out of touch with the real world.”

    https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2019/09/28/emily-maitlis-joins-condemnation-bbcs-treatment-naga-munchetty/

    Why?

    The BBC is certainly out of touch with millions of British people…

    =

    bbc propag

    =

    …as viewers can see for themselves every day.

    But Maitlis thinks her employers – the broadcasting mandarins, not the tax-payers from whom both these women get their huge salaries…

    =

    bbc--shameful-dont-pay-the-license

    =

    …are out of touch because the BBC’s Executive Complaints Unit (ECU) told Munchetty to stop mouthing off, after an ugly, uptight rant against President Donald Trump.

    Well, Maitlin would take Munchetty’s side, after all, one uppity lefty backing up another.

    And that Complaints Unit is certainly open to criticism.

    Neither of the bleating Beebettes was suspended, nor even lost a day’s pay, nor even got a final warning.

    =

    Image result for slap on the wrist

    =

    Instead a feeble reproof, despite no sign of any serious apology from either offender against the principle of impartial state broadcasting.

    The two shrews ought to be tamed.

    =

    41ac4-shape-up-or-ship-out

    =======

    Better still fired!

    I know any call to discipline these delinquent dames will fall on deaf ears at Broadcasting House.

    But we need to make BBC bias an election issue.

    If Bojo won’t batter the broadcasters into doing their job in accordance with the rules of objectivity, one hopes the Brexit Party will.

     
    • Petra Malley 20:03 on September 29, 2019 Permalink | Reply

      None of your readers will disagree with you about those abysmally biased BBC women, and there are as many abysmally biased men there too.
      Notwithstanding that, I seriously doubt the Brexit Party is coherent enough about anything, except Brexit, to achieve real reforms, in the BBC or the courts or whatever.
      Farage wanted a broad range of candidates, but when he recruited apologists for republican terrorism, he crossed a line for many of us.
      I am still trying to make up my mind what to do for the best.

      Like

      • Fiona F 20:55 on September 29, 2019 Permalink | Reply

        Petra, in the absence of any other party that is wholly committed to a clean break, I can’t see how we have much choice.
        i still find it hard to trust Boris Johnson.

        Like

    • Penny 20:08 on September 29, 2019 Permalink | Reply

      We have been sitting around discussing this and we all think the ideal solution would be a firing….
      What?
      Think about it!

      Like

    • Vanessa Reilly 21:19 on September 29, 2019 Permalink | Reply

      Who do they think they are?
      They are our paid servants, paid to report what’s going on, paid to interview people without sneering at them offensively, paid to be impartial and objective and to keep their mouths shut whenever they feel like spraying us with their own opinions.
      They get paid more than I have ever been paid in any of my jobs since I left school.
      If they don’t like the work, they can quit, the sooner the better in my view.

      Like

    • Noreen Paterson 23:08 on September 29, 2019 Permalink | Reply

      The Anti-British Broadcasting Collaborators.
      The BBC is left through and through and it never misses a chance to use the tell-tale tag ‘despite Brexit’ when anything hopeful is reported.
      These two women are symptoms only.
      The disease must be eradicated by abolition or privatisation.
      Who suggested selling it to Soros? It does his propaganda work already so he should pay their salaries, not UK tax-payers.

      Like

c
Compose new post
j
Next post/Next comment
k
Previous post/Previous comment
r
Reply
e
Edit
o
Show/Hide comments
t
Go to top
l
Go to login
h
Show/Hide help
shift + esc
Cancel
%d bloggers like this: