Tagged: New York Times 1619 lies Toggle Comment Threads | Keyboard Shortcuts

  • ross1948 09:19 on February 19, 2022 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: New, New York Times 1619 lies,   

    So NYT Thinks Its Readers Are Thick As Pig-S? 

    Hilarious, this!


    ….just think about the implications!


    So because readers might need to think about what they’re consuming from a news outlet rather than just uncritically accepting what an outlet tells them at face value, according to Savage, means “raising the question of whether news outlets should even cover such claims.”


  • ross1948 17:14 on August 31, 2021 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: Marxist murderers, New York Times 1619 lies, Pulitzer Prizes, , , victims of Soviet Occupation,   

    A Useful Reminder, How Worthless Pulitzers Are 

    It’s not every day we get a powerful reminder of the lack of both principle and professionalism to be found in the DNA of the liberal media.

    But the fresh discovery of human remains in Odessa, between 5,000 and 8,000 victims of Communist mass murder…


    Not only Ukraine – remember Katyn!


    ….should refresh our contempt for the slugs who run the Pulitzer pantomime, still dishing out ‘prizes’ to hacks  – and hackettes!

    On the other hand, if they take pride in their reporting, they should return the trophies, soiled as they are by the refusal of those who bestow them to acknowledge the truth…

    Fighting The First And Worst Fake-News Fiend! 

    Pulitzer-Winning Lies | The Weekly Standard

    . …that they handed that Pulitzer Prize to a lying, lickspittle New York Times leftist.

    Until they remedy their predecessors folly, no decent person should accept any honour from the cabal.

    And those who have already received Pulitzers?

    Hand them back!

    Or stage a public ceremony, involving dumping the things into a vat of pig-sh-t!


    Churning out Pulitzer Prizes;


    Duranty’s evil work for the NYT was NOT journalism but collaboration with Marxist evil.

    As last week reminds us, ‘hundreds of thousands of Ukrainians died during Joseph Stalin’s rule of the Soviet Union.’

    Stalin-era mass grave found in Ukraine

  • ross1948 15:20 on July 18, 2021 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: ‘media's systemic racism’, Capital B for black, , New York Times 1619 lies, Nikole Hannah-Jones   

    Uppity’s Yelp Highlights Guardian’s Racist Line 

    That self-important hackette, Nikole Hannah-Jones, acclaimed for running down the country which allowed her to rise to fame and fortune, via the NYT.

    …is still whining.

    Evidently not content that the Pulitzer prigs gave her a prize, it seems now that she recently returned…



    …like a dog to its vomit, to her tales of woe.

    ‘Since the second grade when I began being bussed into white schools, I have been fighting against people who did not think a Black girl like me belonged… ‘


    Big deal!

    I know where I think her propaganda belongs.


    But what we should notice is how the Guardian hack disrespects whites by his choice of capitalisation.

    Uptight Nikole, like you and I, may use capital letters when she writes, but when her words are quoted by a newspaper, it’s the media plonkers who choose which colours get exalted.

    So the Guardian echoes her prejudice and elevates ‘Black,’ with a capital ‘B…’

    …but disses ‘white’ by denying us poor pale-faces the capital ‘W’ which you’d think the equality industry would require.

    To be fair to the rotten Guardian, it’s only acting in subservience to the diktat we have noted previously…

    Blatant Bigot Bias, deserving capital letters…Euronews Avoiding Bias? Whatever Next? 

    … but it’s important to offer periodical reminders of the media’s collective discrimination.

    • Mort 16:03 on July 18, 2021 Permalink | Reply

      Pulitzer was discredited as a prize once the truth about NYT’s Duranty was exposed.
      If you, are Un-American, you are ‘ in with a chance! ‘


      • ross1948 16:07 on July 18, 2021 Permalink | Reply

        Sorry, Mort. I published your comment as an appendix to my own post,
        It is of course yours, though I completely agree with you!


    • JazPen 18:27 on July 18, 2021 Permalink | Reply

      I am brown. Born fairly white but after years in sunny countries, not very white.
      It never occurs to me to use a capital letter for my skin shade.
      Only idiots fixated with race would treat one race as more deserving of a capital letter than another.


  • ross1948 08:56 on September 28, 2020 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: David Smith guardian bureau chief, , New York Times 1619 lies,   

    Without Evidence, Media Break Suspiciously Timed ‘News!’ 

    If a real newspaper makes sensationalist allegations, based on dishonestly obtained ‘documents….’



    ….then won’t publish those ‘documents’ for inspection, the ‘revelations’ must be taken with a pinch of salt.

    Especially when it’s carefully timed to sway as the approaching election!

    Even the BBC noticed that!

    Though they promptly found a guest named David Cay Johnston, who was given free rein to rail about President Trump.



    BBC chose him with exquisite care, methinks, based on his non-partisan piece in the Guardian 2 years ago, viz. –

    We need tax police – and they should go after the likes of Donald Trump



    …which indicates his animosity towards The Donald.

    However, since the NYT recently proved its anti-American motivations with its ‘1619’ hogwash propaganda project…

       1619 Projects Fires off New Lies to Cover Up Old Lies 

    See the source image


    …let’s leave that to our USA friends to counter-attack, and focus on its ideological catamite in the UK.

    The Guardian, naturally, has jumped into the fray….

    At a White House press briefing on Sunday, Trump made wild allegations about plots against him.. 


    …which shows how sober and impartial their approach to news is  – on this and on most things.



    Occasionally, critics suggest I use harsh, pejorative words and phrases in my blog.


    I cover lots of news and do not knowingly falsify it, but I use the news to attack those forces I regard as bad and to support those on the side of right.

    That’s what political blogs are for.

    Newspapers usually contain both news and opinion, but keep them separate.

    Thus fanatical leftists write in the Guardian, for instance, expressing extreme intolerance e.g.

    Guardian Jackboot Bigot Calls Brexit Brits “Thugs!=

    Guardian’s Nick ‘Storm-Troop’ Cohen.

    Guardian Bigot- “Don’t Even Acknowledge Patriot Point Of View!” 

    Middle-Aged Posh Dirty-Mouth -‘Politicians Mustn’t Appeal To The People!’ 

    But that is listed as Opinion.

    Fair enough.

    Reporters, on the other hand, are supposed to tell us the facts, without inserting their own prejudices.


    Hence my dismay this week when I opened up this ‘news’ report, written by the Guardian’s ‘Bureau Chief’ in Washington DC, David Smith…




    ..and found this objective, impartial turn of phrase. 

    His latest attempt to stoke fear and instability…

    Inevitably, Smith was spewing bile at President Trump, but those bilious, bitter, bigot words belong in a Democrat ad, not a ‘news’ report.

    If the Guardian insists on appending its assertion that its purpose is to provide…

    …open, independent, quality news every day…

    …as it does append, as a begging bowl, to every one of its online reports I read…

    …best they fire Smith, whose leftist bigotry, already so overt, was visible again this week, when he summed up the 100% constitutionally legitimate Supreme Court nomination thus – 

    For democracy, murder most foul.




  • ross1948 07:44 on September 22, 2020 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: -a, , , New York Times 1619 lies, , ,   

    Q-Anon – BBC Brings On SPLC Hate-Group! 

    Up very early, hard to sleep in the heat of the Jakarta night, so turned on the Beelzebub Broadcasting Corporation aka UK Pravda…



    ….just to see what tripe The Embley Monster was spouting today.

    But he passed us on to one of the BBC’s far-away flunkeys, a correspondent in the USA, who ‘specialises’ in attacking alternative sources of news, stuff the in-crowd dislike.


    Marianna Spring
    Specialist Disinformation and Social Media Reporter at BBC News
    London, United Kingdom


    She went on, an on, and on, railing at Q-Anon!

    I only recently got to know much abut Q Anon, when I reported on BBC collaboration with a dodgy ‘NGO.’ 

    BBC, With Soros-Funded ‘NGO,’ Takes On Q.Anon! 

    The Beebling, whose name is Marianna Spring, drew some satisfaction from how ‘social media’ were working tirelessly to prevent people deciding for themselves what the ‘conspiracy theorists’ are all about.

    Truth or Untruth?

    Given the New York Times’ latest tissue of lies, on their ‘1619’ propaganda project…

     1619 Projects Fires off New Lies to Cover Up Old Lies https://www.breitbart.com/the-media/2020/09/21/nolte-1619-projects-fires-off-new-lies-to-cover-up-old-lies/

    See the source image


    …you’d think Miss Spring might better spend her time in The Big Apple, focusing on a fount of mendacity that reaches FAR more people than Q-Anon ever does.

    But that’s another matter, which you can read about on that link beside the rotten apple.

    What was most jarring about the report was that, ostensibly to advance her ( the BBC’s) case against ‘unproven’ or is today’s buzz-word ‘unfounded,’ opinions…

    ….The Beebling turned to a notorious far-left hate-group, the SPLC, which constantly indulges in indefensible smear tactics.

    67 Nonprofit Leaders Urge Media to Drop ‘Anti-Christian and Morally Bankrupt’ SPLC

    The SPLC spokesman obligingly provided several minutes rant.

    It is inconceivable that, even if Beebling Spring is unaware of the SPLC’s dangerous and dishonest record…

    …her senior editors in Broadcasting House MUST know what kind of a rat’s-nest the organisation is.

    You can refresh your memory here…

    Exposing The SPLC Hate-Gang! 

    …or here.

    Big Biz Banksters Funding Hate Group – Tell ‘Em Off!  

    Why is BBC giving respectability to a hate-group?.

    • Ken Kasic 08:11 on September 22, 2020 Permalink | Reply

      As far as I can tell, a lot of what Qanon says is not convincing.
      So how come this BBC woman is using an extreme leftwing organization like SPLC to keep us from hearing what they have to say?


    • Jim Ex Jakarta 09:02 on September 22, 2020 Permalink | Reply

      Thanks for telling us, Ross.
      I just tuned into BBC and saw her interview three anti-qanon, nobody on to defend it.
      I dont find much of the QAnon theory credible but I know for a fact the New York Times is full of lies.
      Anybody who reads that link you give us can see how dishonest the NYT is.
      So is this Marianna Spring going to investigate their dishonesty.


    • Mel Henderson 11:21 on September 22, 2020 Permalink | Reply

      I saw that BBC ‘ report’ so it must have been repeated all day and that says something about how BBC excludes real news and wastes time on hit jobs like Marianna Spring’s. She makes no effort to give any QAnon believer a chance to explain or defend the claims made by the believers.
      Who knows? A conspiracy of pedophiles?
      Whose friend was it that died in a dodgy prison ‘suicide? ‘ Yes, HRH’s but also the Clintons!


    • Ray Messner 11:57 on September 22, 2020 Permalink | Reply

      So why shouldn’t QANON be free to offer their strange stories to the public on social media? Nothing they say that I have read is urging people to commit crimes.
      Their message not to trust the political class and that means they are preaching to the converted.


    • Joseph Fox 12:29 on September 22, 2020 Permalink | Reply

      Q-Anon is a false-flag operation.


Compose new post
Next post/Next comment
Previous post/Previous comment
Show/Hide comments
Go to top
Go to login
Show/Hide help
shift + esc
%d bloggers like this: