As the scandals keep coming, distrust of the police has gone mainstream | Police | The Guardian
Just when you think somebody in the Guardian has been afforded access to reality, the hope is fast dashed, because it’s this girly again….
…who very much reflects the Guardian mind-set, as her previous rants indicate.
(although at least Gabbling Gaby can write a whole article without using dirty talk, unlike her revolting colleague…Guardian’s Posh Gutter-Mouth – ‘Something Of The Shite About Her!’ …the unspeakable Marina Hyde!)
Alas, Gaby’s content never makes contact with the real causes for concern that have turned Middle England off.
(That includes Middle Scotland, Wales and Ulster, though in the case of the latter, we can’t ignore the unpalatable truth that, thanks to the Bad Friday Deal, Stormont ministers include vile scumbags who idolise traitorous swine….Distance Double-Standards – Terror ‘Mourners’ Get A Pass?…whose hobby was murdering police officers!)
Gaby frets about the perennially delicate balance between police operational independence and political meddling.
Some of us might think the police are now totally politicised…

…enforcers of the ruling cultural elite’s ideology.
…with its skewed left-liberal focus on trivia, appears blind to what is really wrong.
I see no merit in repeating what I’ve said before, and instead offer you an extract from a very good C4M piece, which reached me yesterday, about a recent ruling in the case of Harry Miller, a former police officer.
He took the police to court over a visit to his workplace to ‘check his thinking’, after he posted views critical of transgenderism on social media.
In modern Britain, Paul says, “we all know what we can say or what we can’t”.
So-called non-crime hate incidents intimidate people so they won’t take part in the [LGBT] debate. He goes on, “someone just says they’re offended and you get a policeman coming around”.
A Police record is then kept, and may be revealed as a ‘hate’ incident on a DBS check, even if comments were innocuous and no crime was committed.
Of Mr Miller’s reaction, Paul says, “anybody of lesser strength would have just folded. They’d have never tweeted again”.
There have been other scandalous incidents where the police have unlawfully challenged people on their beliefs about marriage or gender. But brave individuals have taken a stand and successfully taken the police to court.
Paul says, “you have got free speech”. When these cases reach the courts, “the courts are coming good”. However, he continues, “what is still at fault is that you’ve still got to go to court”. Although you may win your court case, “you would be vilified by the media”. This adds to the chilling effect.
The Miller case was a very helpful judgment, he says. People can “have a degree of greater confidence” because of it. But we should ‘exercise our freedoms before we’re intimidated not to use them’.
Yes! A fightback is what’s required!
Most senior police officers in the UK have forfeited respect, and when they send their gaystabulary goons out, to put the frighteners on common folk, the common folk should treat the bullies with contempt!
Like this:
Like Loading...
Reply