Tagged: perversion Toggle Comment Threads | Keyboard Shortcuts

  • ross1948 18:00 on January 7, 2023 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , Mark Winn, perversion, Pihonak Petition   

    Hurrah For Mark Winn! 

    And who is Mark Winn?

    He’s the good guy in the story below!

    After a local father quoted Jesus Christ at a Loudoun County School Board meeting, 19-year-old “community organizer” Andrew Pihonak launched a petition to ban hate speech…



    And what had Mr. Winn said, to get poor Pihonak’s pinko knickers in a twist?


    “[LGBT] behaviors should never have been promoted, taught, or encouraged in the schools that you oversee,” the dad had said…



    “If any man or woman causes one of these little ones to stumble, it would be better for [them] if a millstone be put around your neck and thrown into the lake.”  


    Words of wisdom, indeed, and if only more people in all our countries would speak out thus…


    …what a cleaner, better world we’d be living in!

    READ  the whole story.

    I haven’t even tried to find a photo of the pinko Pihonak.



    We can imagine what he looks like!

    Not a pretty sight!





  • ross1948 12:06 on February 25, 2019 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: department of education, perversion, , , , ,   

    Mrs. May Set To Poison Tots’ Minds 

    Nauseating but somehow, with that foul thing May as Prime Minister…


    theresa tran


    ..not at all surprising to read that British tots fresh out of kindergarten are to be drenched in state-sponsored filth.

     “Gay & trans sex education to be taught to FIVE-YEAR-OLDS in UK ...”

    …and woe betide any mum or dad who takes a stand for decency, because…


    …opting out is ILLEGAL!”

    I can only give thanks that my offspring are grown and not being coerced by degenerates to wade into dirty drivel such as that described in the report out today, viz.

     ‘Tango Makes Three,’ a book about two gay penguins who nurture an egg taken from another family, and ‘My Princess Boy,’ which celebrates a dark-skinned child who loves to cross-dress.


    A hundred thousand signature petition from citizens horrified by this evil indoctrination will hit the House of Commons this week…




    If you are British, please sign it, and/or ask your MP where he or she stands on poisoning the minds of small children.

    PS …there’s a link to the petition in the RT story.

    • Vicki 12:29 on February 25, 2019 Permalink | Reply

      A hellish step and May is a devil for taking it.


    • Noreen Paterson 13:18 on February 25, 2019 Permalink | Reply

      Why would anyone even write that perverted rubbish, except as brainwash material?
      Does anyone think children have any need to read such nonsense? Normal adults don’t have any interest in reading about queers or cross-dressers so why foist it on little schoolchildren and threaten parents who object?
      May must have a very twisted mind. I would say soul but I think she sold that long ago.
      The petition was still open when I looked so consider it signed.


    • Mack the Knife 14:26 on February 25, 2019 Permalink | Reply

      She is rotten to the core, agreed, but..
      When she is replaced, do you really think the next PM will be any better!?
      Remember Boris Johnson’s gay-appeasement when he was London Mayor?
      Mogg might be on decency’s side but he will never win power.
      Revolution time?


    • Edward Lamont 16:34 on February 25, 2019 Permalink | Reply

      May is worse than Cameron.
      I never thought I would say that about anyone.


  • ross1948 09:45 on October 12, 2017 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , , , Edward Heath, , , perversion, , Tom Driberg   

    Weinstein’s Woes And Democrat Double Standards! 

    For a few days now I’ve been looking at the controversy over Weinstein’s generosity to various Democrat politicians…

    Clinton Ridiculed for Calling Out Weinstein Five Days Late | Vanity Fair

    …and wondering if their belated ( ?) awareness of his proclivities – an alleged enthusiasm for taking sexual advantage of ambitious young women – would result in their repudiation of his support and the repayment of his large cash contributions.

    I use that question mark after ‘belated’ because a glance at a cross-section of the American media suggests his unwholesome activities were something akin to an open secret.

     George Clooney ‘heard rumors’ for years about Harvey Weinstein’s .

    It’s hardly unique in the history of the Anglo-Saxon World that the political/media in-crowd have known about scandalous behaviour among powerful notables and yet continued to interact happily with those involved, whilst collaborating to keep the common people in the dark.

    Weinstein is unluckier than others, in that his variety of ‘outreach’ has gone public during his lifetime.

    In the UK, it’s only recently that Brits have been allowed by the media to learn of what many in politics and the press undoubtedly knew about Heath The Homo.

    Ted Heath would be interviewed over sex abuse allegations – Daily Mail

    Same cover-up applied years before in the case of Labour Party Chairman Tom Driberg, a vile queer predator.

    ‘Sleaziest, Most Disreputable’ Media in the World? Britain’s! 

    But reverting to today’s scandal, let’s just ask the obvious question, or that which should be obvious.

    If Ms. Clinton is, quite correctly, disavowing the support of Weinstein for his sexual exploits…



    …will she follow the logical – and honourable – path and disavow the support of even more prominent people with a proven, not alleged, record of similarly scandalous activity?


  • ross1948 14:17 on October 27, 2015 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , ENDA, , , perversion, ,   

    Paul Ryan is NO Conservative – He’s Got a Gaystapo Record 

    The last thing America needs, given the Supreme Court and the White House are now both in thrall to the evil gaystapo agenda, is a Republican House Speaker even more compromised on  fundamental principles than the windbag Boehner.



    Paul Ryan Speaker


    Yet if the GOP members of Congress anoint Paul Ryan for the job, they will be elevating an enemy of traditional values who has shown himself willing to endorse the most vicious legislation, the Employee Non-Discrimination Act.

    Some US patriot media have woken up, a little belatedly, to the threat Ryan represents. He openly supports banning workplace discrimination against gays and lesbians …acknowledging he ‘took a lot of grief’ for the ENDA vote from members of his own party.


    I should damned well hope so!




    We’ve seen how ‘gay rights’ lawfare has trampled freedoms in Canada and in the UK. Any similar codes passed at federal level in the USA would galvanise the gaystapo to finish off freedom altogether.


    Let’s just think about the specter of a Speaker of the House who supports the current horrific so-called “Equality Act”, introduced as H.R. 3185 and S. 1858 in July just after the SCOTUS marriage decision…



    It’s the top priority of the major homosexual groups right now and vaults across any previous anti-discrimination bill to essentially wipe out free speech and religious liberty on the issues of homosexuality and gender change by declaring these behaviors to be civil rights in America.



  • ross1948 23:13 on November 29, 2014 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , , , Lord Monckton, perversion, , ,   

    Farage Acts the Fool – Appeasement Ain't a Winner!. 

    Much ado in the Independent, which is slobbering over Nigel Farage’s cheapest stunt. i have wondered about his centre of gravity ever since he failed to fire that pusillanimous pinko he’s got as party chairman, Steve Crowther.




    Newark’s Warning to UKIP – Stop Back-Sliding, Fire Crowther

    The guy is a mill-stone round UKIP’s neck, but he’s not been cut loose. And now his pernicous influence appears to be spreading – upwards!

    The Real Risk to UKIP – PC Pusillanimity 

    The UKIP leader has spat in the face of the hundreds of thousands of Conservatives who abandoned their party after Cameron sold out to the gaystapo and legalised bugger weddings.http://www.independent.co.uk/news/people/nigel-farage-condemns-former-ukip-deputy-moncktons-comments-that-gay-men-have-20000-sexual-partners-in-their-miserable-lives-9890191.html

    • Nigel+Farage Farage
    • =====================
    • Farage’s former colleague, Lord Monckton, may be a few dozen off when he says so-called ‘gays’ can have up to 20,000 partners, but that hardly matters. They do live ‘miserable’ lives, as he says, unsurprisingly, given their life-style is an affront to nature.


     Lord Monckton

    UKIP should long since have made it a priority to scrap poofter ‘marriage.’ For Farage to start bleating about how he’s got a prominent poofter in his ranks merely adds insult to the injury he’s inflicting on his voters.  

    Fact is, I reckon Farage knows he’s in the wrong – otherwise why did he slip into this tautological gibbering?

    Asked to further explain his position on gay marriage, were Britain not part of the EU, he said: “I do not support same sex marriages all the while we’re under the auspices of the European court of human rights.”

    • Meaningless waffle!

    It’s about time Farage stopped this nonsense and took an honourable stance against perversion.

    He owes his party’s success, at least in significant part, to the revulsion that decent Brits feel for the betrayal of their values by the swine in 10 Downing Street.

    If he reneges on that debt, he can expect BIG trouble!
    PS- I began by attributing this to the Guardian, not the Indpendent. I’ve now amended that error – my apologies – one’s about as bad as the other!

    • And So? 18:31 on November 30, 2014 Permalink | Reply

      Miserable lifestyle, hey? So how does this compare to your bed-hopping ways, Ross?


      • ross1948 22:21 on November 30, 2014 Permalink | Reply

        A coarse deviant’s view of my appreciation of nice ladies’ company – skip the pen-name and stick to your ‘gay’ bars!


        • And So? 23:57 on December 1, 2014 Permalink

          Fine. Feel free to pass judgement on others’ private lives, but complain not when your own predilections are made public.


    • JazPen 10:12 on December 1, 2014 Permalink | Reply

      I dont think he is a ‘gay,’ Ross. It sounds like more that And-So is jealous. Or else its not a man at all. Hell has no fury like a woman scorned, like the poet said. Maybe she is an ex?


    • Ati 10:42 on December 1, 2014 Permalink | Reply

      I think this is funny, thinking about you hopping.
      Like grass-hopper, yes, Ross?


    • Alan H. J 13:05 on December 1, 2014 Permalink | Reply

      What does “And So’s” comment deserve except “So What?”


    • TLC California 13:24 on December 1, 2014 Permalink | Reply

      We each embrace our destinies.


    • Dee-Anne 15:13 on December 1, 2014 Permalink | Reply

      What is with this And So Sad guy?
      After reading a lot of your writing, Ross, and no offense, I would say it’s a safe bet you must be no spring chicken, could be pushing your mid-sixties (your Grandpa was in the First World War, so you mention one time )
      So if you are guilty as he accuses you, congratulations, sir! I do not believe anyone I know would consider that kind of senior citizen life-style to be in any possible way ‘miserable!’
      In fact I know quite a few oldies who would be envious.
      Carry on hopping!


    • Senter 09:11 on December 2, 2014 Permalink | Reply

      I see why you can annoyed by So’s fear of putting his real name to his comment. It makes me interested to know what is going on in his own life. Or is it she?
      But eventhough you always support organizations like the American NOM defending ‘traditional marriage’ you are not denying this person’s accusations?
      I do not desire to make you ‘hopping’ mad, but what selection of Western values do you pick and mix from, Mister Ross?


      • ross1948 20:06 on December 2, 2014 Permalink | Reply

        I’ll draw this to a close. My mistake, approving a comment from some freako who pretends to know me but clearly doesn’t. I was vexed with my recalcitrant computer at the time and vented my vexation on the creep – I truly dislike pinkos who snipe from behind phoney names.
        As for your criticism, Senter, you got it right that I give NOM some support- but you miss the important point that their cause is marriage, as defined in Western civilisation, and many others, for centuries.
        I, on the other hand, have not been married for quite some time and am thus at liberty to enjoy the company of as many ladies as wish to enjoy mine.
        Hopping, alas, is not something I often indulge in.
        And yes, Mia, I have had a few laughs about this.
        BTW – If ‘And’ wishes to comment again, he (I doubt it’s a she, though maybe something in between!) must provide his real identity.


    • Mia 12:13 on December 2, 2014 Permalink | Reply

      I bet you are just loving all this, Ross.


Compose new post
Next post/Next comment
Previous post/Previous comment
Show/Hide comments
Go to top
Go to login
Show/Hide help
shift + esc
%d bloggers like this: