Tagged: polygamous primitives Toggle Comment Threads | Keyboard Shortcuts

  • ross1948 10:08 on February 4, 2017 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , Mumtaz Nawi, Muslim majority, , polygamous primitives, ,   

    Malaysia Truly Arabia – Doubly Discriminatory? 

    Saturday morning.

    No particular place to go.

    So maybe take my paper-back and finish it over a coffee somewhere nearby.

    But first?

    I had been thinking I should have a look at Malaysian news.

    It’s a sad sort of place, where even God Almighty’s Name is the subject of bigoted Islamist authoritarianism.




    Malaysia, Truly Arabia! Intolerance Rules Kuala Lumpur Court! 


    Then sure enough, up pops a story in the Jakarta Post, illustrating to perfection the sectarian slither which that once-civilised country has been on, for quite a few years. 




    Come to Kelantan if you want to take on more wives, Muslim men told

    Muslim men who plan to take on more wives can now head to the north-eastern state of Kelantan instead of southern Thailand…  http://www.thejakartapost.com/seasia/2017/02/03/come-to-kelantan-if-you-want-to-take-on-more-wives-muslim-men-told.html ,



    A  -Against all the ( no doubt numerous) non-Muslim horny hounds who’d like to have their enthusiasm for multiple bed-mates approved by the authorities.

    State Family Development, Welfare and the People’s Wellbeing committee chairman Mumtaz Md Nawi’s words indicate that this intended boon is ONLY available to her co-religionists. 


    Hasil gambar untuk Mumtaz Md Nawi


    “This is to encourage the birth of more Muslim children…We will give them comprehensive information and counselling to guarantee that the children from these marriages will turn out to be good Muslims.  

    Can’t get much more blatantly sectarian than that.

    Christians of course are not meant to be polygamous. Don’t know about Buddhists and Hindus. But agnostics, or atheists, who fancy an extra wife or two? They won’t stand a chance.

    Mind you, I don’t fancy their chances if such unbelievers do stray into Mumtaz’s Kelantan, which is infamously intolerant!


    But if that’s A, how about B?

    Arguably, what’s even worse is Mumtaz’s failure to offer the same opportunities for sexual gluttons of her own sex (sorry, ‘gender’ – trendy lefties will be upset if we employ the word that normal folk prefer!)

    In any fair-play society, surely, it’s incumbent on the law to afford the same rights to women as to men.




    If the latter can have a variety of carnal delights waiting for them after a hard day’s work, then it goes without saying that women too should be allowed up to four blokes to jump into bed with, once the household chores are done….oops, sexism again!

    ( Here too in Indonesia, polygamy exists, although the Muslims I know undoubtedly share my view that one wife at a time is enough – or sometimes more than enough!

    One notable practitioner, apparently, is the former Islamist PKS party leader, Anis Matta, perhaps more notable for his post-9/11 ode praising mass-murderer Osama Bin Laden.



    Bin Laden fan Anis Matta, of PKS.    https://rossrightangle.wordpress.com/2011/07/06/brits-banned-michael-savage-but-let-in-top-jakarta-islamist-author-of-odious-ode-to-911-mass-murderer/


    But while legal in certain circumstances,  polygamy tends not be looked on as acceptable behaviour. For more details on the Indonesian situation, here’s another couple of links –



    Polygamists to file judicial review on marriage law


    Mumtaz of course would vigorously deny that this discriminatory scheme panders to horny hounds. 

    “It is not for men to take advantage of the policy by taking more wives simply to appease their lust.”  

    So why else would men take advantage of the policy?

    Does Mumtaz really believe that they’ll be motivated merely to pursue her stated goal  – to encourage the birth of more Muslim children?

    To my consternation, I have to wonder if she’s right. 


  • ross1948 21:29 on January 13, 2017 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , course in constitution, , , , polygamous primitives,   

    Courses for ‘Clerics?’ Worthless, If No Tests Included! 


    One might wonder, if people are considered needful of instruction in the basic principles of democracy,  who vetted their entry into the country in the first place?


    Hasil gambar untuk vetting?

    BUT anyway…  

    Italy’s Interior Ministry is preparing a course in common constitutional decencies for  ‘clerics’ operating within their borders.

    Participants will learn about Italy’s constitutional principles including freedom of religion, freedom of speech, and the right to have a place of worship and practise religion.

    Italy’s imams to get training on the Constitution

    That’s all well and good, but – apart from the fact that it’s only in some areas of Italy – …

    ‘Participants’ in our classes in high school were taught about such things as German/French grammar, how to use Bunsen Burners in science classes, historical events, and Shakespeare’s works.


    Gambar terkait

    • Or at least we studied them!
    • —–

    Whether we LEARNED them or not was established by tests and exams.

    So the same should apply to these lessons set by the Italian Government. Clerics enrolled  in the course – it’s not clear if enrolment is compulsory, as it no doubt should be – should face assessment!


    Simple questions, for example –

    Do you reject as barbaric any suggestion that people who leave one religion to join another, or abandon religion altogether…




    …should be subject to harm, threat of harm, or other anti-social victimisation?


    Do you understand that only retards would offer threats of violence or actual violence towards those who mock your own or any other religion?




    Do you agree that it is disgusting and iniquitous for anyone to suggest that men may have more than one wife…




    …yet women should NOT have the right to enjoy more than one husband?


    Do you agree that women should be free to dress as they please, subject to Italian law?


    • burqa
    • ———

    Do you agree that daughters should be entitled to the same share of inheritances as sons?


    There are other questions that might be useful, but those, I think, make quite a good start! 

    The new courses are part of a €90,000 plan from the Interior Ministry to improve integration of Muslims in Italy.

    All right.
    But let’s be fair.
    Not only Muslims should be registered for this learning process – the classes and the tests should be compulsory for all varieties of preachers, because, after all, there are unsavoury aspects to more than one creed.
    And the ‘graduates’ should be required, as part of their subsequent license to preach, to stand up regularly in pulpits and advise, warn and exhort their congregations to heed the basic lessons in the course.
    out with them
    Refusal to do so ought to result in their exclusion from pulpits, in mosques, temples and churches.
    And, one hopes, from Italy too.
    PS I re-read the article, and the move is not aimed solely at any one religion but at all denominations not registered  in Italy
    • Deirdre Kelly 15:35 on January 15, 2017 Permalink | Reply

      Why do you say that not only Muslims need this course?
      I never heard of Lutherans or Buddhists saying that people who convert to other religions should be killed, or people who draw cartoons of Jesus or Buddha should be stabbed to death?
      Sounds like a waste of time to make every parson or priest enrol in this course, so exactly what’s your point? What dangers do other religions have for our society?.


  • ross1948 14:45 on August 16, 2016 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , , Neanderthal Man, polygamous primitives, Robert Lugar   

    A Good Laugh in Vienna! 

    Looking at the Austrian news, about Herr Hofer’s excellent speech on the Turkish Enemy Within, which I will go over tomorrow.

    However, my attention strayed to a separate item about a guy named Robert Lugar.




    He’s also an MP in Vienna, though not of the FPO patriot party. He belongs to a smaller fairly conservative faction called Team Stronach.

    But whilst I don’t know a lot about them, one idea that Lugar came up with merits serious consideration, given the frequent ordeals suffered by decent Austrian women at the hands of alien predators.

    …he demanded all male migrants over the age of 14 to undergo DNA tests as they cross the border.

    This move would allow to track down possible sex offenders among the refugees much faster. He argued that such practice would not be discriminatory as asylum seekers already have to give their fingerprints.

    Intrigued by this splendid idea, and curious to know why it has not been mooted – and adopted- across Europe, I delved back to February, when Lugar presented his proposal.
    The Reds and Greens were into frenzy-mode, demanding the guy be forced out of parliament for saying his piece.
    Funny notions of democracy, these pinkos.
    Not only had he put forward an effective idea that might curb alien sex-predators, but he dared suggest that a lot of the crimmigrants have a worldview like Neanderthals, which thank God in most places is now extinct.”
    I wish I could have been there when he said that – the paroxysms of spittle-flecked fury among the bad element must have been a delight to behold.
    But maybe Lugar was going too far. 
    We don’t know for sure if the extinct cave-dwellers actually shared the primitive so-called ‘culture’ of crimmigrants, the murder of apostates, polygamy and pedophilia.
    Until archaeological proof is unearthed, it might be fairer for Lugar to lay off bad-mouthing Neanderthal Man. 
  • ross1948 12:48 on April 7, 2016 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , , , , , , polygamous primitives, , victory for democracy   

    Hurray for Holland – But Euro-Slime Play for Time To Thwart UK Patriots! 

    Nothing will happen in a hurry, not least to avoid giving any succor to Britain’s “out” campaigners.   http://www.reuters.com/article/us-netherlands-eu-idUSKCN0X300U

    • EU - referendum vote
    • Hurray for Holland, indeed, a sweet kick in the teeth for the Brussels autocracy. The referendum result shows over SIXTY percent of those who voted did so to scupper the regime’s ratification plan. And the turn-out was over the 30% required to make the regime respond.

    But the enemy in Brussels is up to the usual dirty tricks, already playing for time to get the better of Brits – and the Dutch.

    Here’s the thing.

    Although the Dutch referendum is not officially binding and only a minority of the overall electorate voted against the agreement, the government pledged to abide by the outcome.   http://www.wsj.com/articles/voting-starts-in-dutch-referendum-on-eu-ukraine-deal-1459939630

    And that’s just as it should be!

    BUT…the law which affords the people even a modest measure of control is already being criticized. “It is an instrument for anti-establishment forces,” said Cad Mudde, an expert on Dutch politics and populism at the University of Georgia.http://www.reuters.com/article/us-netherlands-eu-idUSKCN0X300U


    elite arrogance-s


    So some pinko stuck-up in a US uni thinks the Dutch don’t deserve a say via participatory democracy? Big deal. His name is Mudde and he’s a nobody. That ivory tower creep’s arrogance carries more than a whiff of cultural marxism.

    What matters is the response of Prime Minister Mark Rutte.


     Rutte stands before the enemy banner.


    He says he would no longer automatically proceed with ratification and would look for “a solution that is acceptable for all parties.”


    Sounds like he is seeking an alternative route to the same goal. And it’s hardly his job to make the democratic choice ‘acceptable to all parties,’ which does NOT mean all Dutch parties but those party to the EUSSR deal on Ukraine.


    • eussr10
    • —————
    • Ukraine itself, as an issue, is NOT the issue.
    • Because his government refuses to let the Dutch people vote on the EUSSR itself, Netherlands patriots used this ‘consultative’ mechanism to voice their aspirations.

    Rutte has NO duty to Brussels, except to tell them in no uncertain terms that the deal is a dead duck because his citizens had the chance to decide on it and they decided they don’t want it.

    If he now goes grubbing about the corridors of the EurocRats’ lair, placating their indignation at this latest popular revolt, he’s no more than a renegade.

    Maybe not as bad as Mama Stasi Merkel’s treason against Germany, but bad enough.

    Rutte ratified the ‘quota’ diktat, taking in a ‘share’ of Mama’s alien mob, with no popular consent, despite the notorious refusal of many primitives, imported from Middle East cess-pools, to abide by civilised standards. 

    Predators and Child Molestors

    As many as 20 girls between the ages of 13 and 15 have been given legal permission to join their older partners at Dutch asylum centres, according to regional news channel RTV-Noord. The figures were reportedly obtained from a leaked immigration service document.

    Migrant Pedophilia – ‘Our Traditions Are Hard To Break!’ 

     No referendum on the migrant menace, needless to say. 

    Bright morning for Holland, but clouds already gathering. 

    • Penny 15:23 on April 7, 2016 Permalink | Reply

      I’ve not read your blog for a while but I’m glad I rediscovered it today. This is very good, makes all the points and reminds us why Brussels os so bad for our health as a nation.
      I’m going to spend the next hour catching up on your previous posts that I haven’t seen yet.
      Brilliant work, well done.


Compose new post
Next post/Next comment
Previous post/Previous comment
Show/Hide comments
Go to top
Go to login
Show/Hide help
shift + esc
%d bloggers like this: