Tagged: pretended BBC impartiality Toggle Comment Threads | Keyboard Shortcuts

  • ross1948 23:43 on June 18, 2020 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , pretended BBC impartiality   

    Just Another Little Bit Of Dirty BBC Deceit! 

    Even among mainstream media, there are times when eye-brows must be raised at the utter lack of integrity on the part of the grubby hackettes infesting the BBC to as you may see for yourselves.


    Marra spoke to Adams for about six minutes – and at no point was his position as a Labour councillor mentioned.


    The BBC has been approached for comment…

    • Craig Findlay 23:51 on June 18, 2020 Permalink | Reply

      That Kay Adams should be fired!
      There’s nobody likes her snotty attitude but she cant help that.
      But her bias is not on.


  • ross1948 20:29 on October 1, 2019 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , munchetty whiner, pretended BBC impartiality, , refusal to face critics   

    BBC Defines 'Racism' – With Dazzling Clarity…NOT! 

    So what, we must first ask, does the BBC mean by ‘minority?’

    Does it refer to us left-handed folks, or chess-players, or middle-aged white males…

    ( who are undoubtedly a minority – and one often subjected to bigot insults  – like that foul ‘Tory’ Claire Perry’s rant on behalf of Theresa the Appeaser –Ms Perry also backed the Prime Minister, who she said was “killing herself” to deliver a Brexit deal, while the “bunch of old white men no doubt are enjoying their morning coffee…”.  https://www.politicshome.com/news/uk/political-parties/conservative-party/news/101738/senior-minister-blasts-tory-backbench-  )

    …or does it just mean coloured people, aka ( in pinko-speak) ‘people of colour?’

    I was tempted to suggest the BBC might also mean sexual deviants.….

    Courtesy Of All You Brits – Special Bogs

    ….but that sort are probably near enough a MAJORITY of non-manual BBC employees by now!


    Minority staff and presenters at the BBC have been told by the corporation not to join in any form of protest supporting presenter Naga Munchetty…

    Fair enough! Best they shut their gobs and earn their excessive pay!

    But the way that assertion is framed makes it sound as if the majority staff were not so instructed.


    How long must we put up with the self-pity of this uptight leftist Munchetty, who’s both privileged and very well-paid?

    (over-paid? you decide; if you are a UK tax-payer, it’s you that’s paying her, whether you are a ‘minority’ or not! )

    I fear we must put up with her whining a while yet, if the half-baked wittering of the ‘BBC’s executive committee’ is any indication.

    The message said in part:

    “The BBC is not impartial on racism.”

    What the Hell?

    If they mean incitement to injure or kill innocent people because of their race, then fair enough.

    Equally, such incitement against innocents for ANY reasons should not be acceptable.

    But you all know how  ‘racism’ is imputed against anyone who calls for the law to been forced against illegal immigration…



    …AND against anyone who calls on alien settlers to shape up and adapt to the ways, embrace the identity, of those whose land they come into.

    Telling primitive aliens that they need to shape up, abandon backward beliefs…

     – e.g. about shrouding women’s heads in burqas and that their inability to exorcise the urge to remove anyone’s head who commits ‘blasphemy…’



    … is also categorised as ‘racism,’ especially since plain English has been so twisted by effete authorities that criticism of religion…




    …or at least one religion, is now reckoned also to be ‘racism!’

    So a precise definition is essential.

    And what do we get in the way of definition from the mush-noggins of the BBC’s ‘executive committee?’

    “Racism is not an opinion and it is not a matter for debate…. 


    Well, you’ll be waiting till Hell freezes over before anyone at the BBC will say the same about the poisonous ideologies of multiculturalism…




    …or cultural marxism, or marxism in general!

    But meanwhile, stand by for the anointed elite’s dazzling clarification about what may never be debated.

    Racism is racism.

    Aaah, now that that’s understood, speak freely!

    PS – You’d think after The Arrogant Eleven’s antics at the Supreme Court last week that we had heard quite enough from lousy lords.

    Not so, alas, because another un-elected upstart, Lord Hall, whom some eejit appointed to be big BBC boss…

    Tony Hall, Baron Hall of Birkenhead - Global Conference for Media Freedom (48256794687) (cropped).jpg

    Hall – BBC Director General,  ex Channel Four, AND since 2018, President of the European Broadcasting Union

    …has chosen to meddle in uppity Munchie’s case.

    He’s overturned the guilty verdict, so now she’s free to rant and whine as much as she likes.

    Hubristic Hall is known for his condescending contempt for critics.

    He refused no less than three times to face MPs who wanted to question him about the BBC’s vicious pro-EUSSR bias – why?

    Because he’s a lord!


    Eventually he was shamed into responsibility.

    Watch the belated hearing here…

    https://www.parliamentlive.tv/Event/Index/a2aa652a-168b-4899-95ee-=”red”>BBC journalists to “express their concern at a climate of fear” at the organisation.

    • Diana 21:22 on October 1, 2019 Permalink | Reply

      Was that fool of a lord appointed during Cameron’s time, or May’s?
      Who ever was running the country then was negligent in allowing him to take over our state broadcasting corporation.
      It’s time we took it back.


  • ross1948 19:17 on June 29, 2019 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , , , pretended BBC impartiality, turds   

    Turds? BBC Collabo Censors Exposed, Again! 

    So once again, thanks to the Daily Mail, we learn how the BBC, which lies and lies again and again…

    We stand by our impartial, independent journalism.” https://www.rt.com/news/446609-bbc-reporter-yellow-vests/

    …about its ‘independence,’ is ever-ready to work hand-in-glove with politically motivated bureaucrats, in this case those in the government department which was famously and accurately defined by the late great Enoch Powell as ‘a den of vipers and a neśt of traitors.’



    The Foreign Office memo, dated 13 November last year, is irrefutable evidence of dishonest journalism, and the readiness of FCO flunkeys paid from the public purse to keep their employers, the British people, in the dark.

    “We negotiated the removal of one potentially awkward moment where the former foreign secretary calls the French ‘turds’ so as not to distract from the rest of the programme.”

    As others will have realised already, the leak is no altruistic blow against the BBC’s cover-up collaborationism…


    ….collaborationism as despicable, almost but not quite, as their vicious servility when they obliged Harold Wilson by undermining Rhodesia’s Ian Smith in the 1960s …


    Will the BBC EVER Be Pro-British?

    ….but most likely a bid by one of the many Deep State Remainiacs who infest the FCO to harm Boris Johnson’s leadership campaign.

    Actually, a lot of Brits will applaud the turd word, not because they dislike French people but because they remember Le Retch Hollande and they know Muppet Macron is a pro-crimmigrant menace.



    BoJo’s cowardly pretence that he has no recollection of saying ‘turds’ is in my view just more proof that he’s not to be trusted.

    Yet the anti-Brexit leaker may come to regret his or her leakery!

    It can only reinforce the belief among the BBC’s coerced license payers that, despite all those quids they are forced to give to the parasitic BBC…


    bbc propag


    …they are rewarded by political censorship of what they get to see and hear.

    Which of course raises the BIG QUESTION.

    How many other awkward words and dubious deeds by government ministers have been covered up by the BBC at the behest of Europhiliac bureaucrats?


    • Petra Malley 21:16 on June 29, 2019 Permalink | Reply

      It’s good how you remind us of that Rhodesia episode. It was pure chance that evidence was found of the BBC’s complete betrayal of their charter-principle of fair reporting.
      No doubt the records were gone through after that exposure and a fine-tooth comb used to make sure any other compromising documentation was erased.
      The ‘turds’ leak was indeed probably ordered by high-level BBC mandarins to undermine Johnson, but it’s a measure of their desperation which could blow back when people see how dishonest their reporting can be, when it suits.


  • ross1948 17:45 on November 7, 2017 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , , , pretended BBC impartiality,   

    Katty Kay – One Bare-Faced BBC Liar! 

    I’ve been meaning to compose this post for some time, but this rainy arvo – yeah, Jakarta’s rainy season is coming round again…




    …has left me with time on my hands as I wait for an evening visitor.

    Katty Kay.jpg


    If you ever watch that BBC World Channel, you must have heard Ms. Katty Kay, filmed as she struts around, braying the praises of her pay-masters.

    Actually, she doesn’t. She extols the BBC, but her fat salary comes from the pockets of the British people, who are forced to fund that next of biased vipers.



    The line that grates most harshly in her incantation is the totally dishonest claim that the BBC is the ‘ONLY’ media institution that ‘has never taken sides’ in any war, revolution or whatever.

    That was more or less true when the treacherous swine in Broadcasting House infamously declared themselves neutral when brave young Brits were laying down their lives for freedom.

    But NEVER?

     Every senior BBC mandarin and broadcaster MUST be aware of how their servile bias was exposed, how they very definitely DID ‘take sides’ against Rhodesia.

    We’ve published on that episode more than once.

    Will the BBC EVER Be Pro-British? 

    But today we do so again.


    The same BBC which cast its charter to the winds by acting as Harold Wilson’s Pravda during the Rhodesian sell-out.

    Harold Wilson used the BBC World Service to promulgate false information about Ian Smith. A letter in the PRO from the Rhodesia Ministerial Committee to the Prime Minister advised that Ian Smith should be portrayed as a weak unreliable figure. Note that the BBC’s World Service, although fully financed by the government, is subject to the same “public service” conditions as the Home Services…




    ….Another letter from the Commonwealth office dated 25th May 1967 refers to a request by the PM to be shown fresh guidance before it was sent to the BBC. The official said; “I am afraid this guidance has gone; in accordance with our usual practice it was given orally and confidentially to the Head of their African Service. It was suggested to the BBC, we should continue as in the past to make Mr Smith appear incapable of making up his own mind. He should be portrayed as evasive, weak and vacillating. Full agreement was reached with the BBC and the guidance has already been reflected in the content of broadcasts.”…-

    • propaganda2

    This campaign went on for two years. A letter from the BBC to the Civil Service asks for permission to discontinue the campaign because of staffing problems. The BBC man in charge, presumably responsible for continuously breaking his obligations under the Royal Charter, was being promoted.

    These letters are probably the only official documents available which prove without any doubt that the BBC has been used by the government of the day to broadcast government propaganda. Stop BBC Bias – BBC Charter Review



    More than most, Comrade Kay, whose years of service to Pravda UK began in that once happy and prosperous African country, now a basket case and known as ‘Zimbabwe,’ HAS to be fully aware of how her shrill propaganda is mendacious.

    Brits need to demand her dismissal!

    • Pamela 20:42 on November 7, 2017 Permalink | Reply

      Never trust the BBC!
      They do not serve the people whose money they live off. Their loyalties lie somewhere else.
      I would bet a king’s ransom that after that document was made public, they had reliably leftist staff go through all their archives to make sure similar documents exposing their betrayal of their duty to impartiality were carefully collected and shredded, or burned, or otherwise disposed of.


    • Edward Lamont 22:04 on November 7, 2017 Permalink | Reply

      Yes, demand her dismissal, but she is no worse than the rest of them.
      Better idea?
      Demand the BBC be privatised so we no longer are compelled to pay for their lies and bias.


    • Leonard 11:48 on January 12, 2018 Permalink | Reply

      I was watching the BBC world channel a little while ago and they were talking about how the BBC had been happy to help the war effort in WW2, as of course they should.

      However,they declared themselves neutral in the Falklands War. We have to deduce they thought the Nazis were bad but the Argentine, Galtieri’s junta, was not so bad.
      Their behaviour in the Rhodesian affair was exactly as you describe, outrageous.
      This Kay woman is just ignorant.
      Or is it dishonesty.
      I think the latter, like all those BBC leftists who use their power to load their talk-shows with invited guests they can trust to broadcast biased propaganda.


Compose new post
Next post/Next comment
Previous post/Previous comment
Show/Hide comments
Go to top
Go to login
Show/Hide help
shift + esc
%d bloggers like this: