The Insolence Of Abanda, The Uppity Illegal Alien!

A long, whiny rant today, in the Guardian of course, by a woman whose name is Goodfellow.

https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2020/mar/30/hostile-environment-covonavirus-crisis-britain-migrants

I’ll abhor the temptation to make bad jokes about her surname, but since the Guardian only describes her as a ‘writer and academic,’ I felt it my duty to dig a little, to see how bad she really is!

And, sure enough, it turns out she’s up to her neck in pro-crimmigrant activity – a trustee of the notorious Runnymede Trust!

“Repeal Good Character Requirement For UK Citizenship!” Seriously? 

We know thee who thou art!

Let’s focus, however, on one little extract, a quote which Goodfellow says comes from a female crimmigrant named Abanda, “a refused asylum seeker who advocates for migrant rights!”

What?

“A Refused Asylum Seeker?”

If the authorities in the UK had believed there was even an iota of veritas in her claim to ‘asylum,’ she’d not have been ‘refused!’

All kinds of dross are allowed in under that category, many of them as ungrateful as Norway’s Krekar…

Good News! Pig Krekar’s Particularly At Risk! 

…but thanks be, many are like Abanda, and, once their bogus grounds for ‘asylum’ are exposed as a tissue of lies…

….they are rejected.

Unfortunately, the authorities are negligent about following through, and the lying parasites are left prowling around British streets.

If they have an ounce of sense, they keep a low profile, or you’d think they would!

Not Uppity Abanda, though!

Not content to over-stay her welcome in a country where she’s not wanted and NOT welcome…

.

.

..this arrogant bitch ‘advocates for migrants rights!’

How dare she?

‘Rights?’

She’s neither a citizen nor a legal migrant nor even a bona fide ‘asylumer!’

What right has she to ‘advocate’ about any British political issue?

…

No photo of Abanda provided, so I improvised

…

The cow seems to think she and the other illegals matter!

“I haven’t seen anything addressed to us….I don’t think we exist.”

Alas, such people do exist.

Most sane patriots probably wish that were not the case.

.

.

To hear one of them shrilling for ‘rights’ to benefits gouged from the public purse is intolerable!

. https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2020/mar/30/hostile-environment-covonavirus-crisis-britain-migrants

“Repeal Good Character Requirement For UK Citizenship!” Seriously?

• Yes, seriously!

• That’s what this pinko outfit is demanding!

• ===
• =

 

• “Ultimately it’s necessary to repeal the good character statutory requirement in relation to those registering their citizenship because all the evidence suggests that it is racially discriminatory and affects vulnerable BME children and adults disproportionately.”
• https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2019/jan/15/updated-uk-child-citizenship-good-character-test-still-poor-say-campaigners

(NB – BME is the current pinko-speak for ‘coloured’)

• What a slur!

• Think about what she’s saying, this arrogant uppity from a ‘charity’ to which the Home Office of the UK government is a contributor https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Runnymede_Trust –

• 

• How come the UK Government has been dishing out British tax-payers’ money to a brazenly political agitprop outfit?

• =

• If you or I were to suggest that non-white people, of any age or origin, were ‘disproportionately’ lacking in good character, all Hell would break loose.

• Her statement can and should be deemed offensive by people of good character of all ethnicities.

• =
• 

• The Guardian breathlessly tells us that hundreds of children, some as young as 10, who were born or who grew up in the UK were having their applications for British citizenship denied on the basis of convictions for crimes such as petty theft.

• 

  Bloody good thing too.

• Lawless brats grow up to be big bad scumbags, and so should not be granted the privilege of citizenship. Far better to send them packing, so some other country, the one they belong in, can handle their dishonest predispostions. .

• Britain, unfortunately, due to ever-weaker standards of discipline both within the home  – Fresh call for smacking to be outlawed in the home – and in schools, where Eurogroveller John Major outlawed proper punishments years ago…

• =

• 

• ..

• …has plenty of British brats who need to be dealt with.

• No need to hang onto anti-socials who aren’t British!

• =

• 

• =

• Yet – the very same Home Office that has been funding this outfit has already begun caving in to the rants  of the Runnymede ratpack  reportedly in receipt of largesse from the public purse.

• Instructions have been issued to take into account “the child’s age and particular circumstances and any mitigating factors such as their ability to understand the consequences of their actions.”

• 
• =

• What about a question more important than whether the dirty little thieves understood that the consequences of stealing other people’s property…

• =
• 
• =

• ….might include a boot on their criminal backsides that sends them back where they belong?

• A MUCH better question, to ask each other, dear readers, is –

• When you were ten years old, did YOU understand that thieving was wrong?

• I did.

  • What child of ten does not understand that stealing is wrong? 

  .