Italian Head-Scarf Whiner’s Legal Jihad – Court Caves In!
Another whining bint, in Italy this time, coining it in on the basis of the lie that Muslim women have to wear head-shrouds.
Hard to keep count of the number of times we’ve addressed this issue..
00000000000000000000
‘An Archaic Tribal Rag’ – Wise UK Muslim Imam Says ‘Ban the Burqa!’
It’s on the BBC! Bag-Head Bans Do Not Infringe Religious Liberty!
Fiery Islamists – ‘Head-Scarves NOT a Big Issue!’
ooooooooooooooo
… but that’s a few links to previous posts.
And in this case, it’s even more absurd, this arrogant baggie applying for a job as an SPG, a sales promotion girl handing out leaflets to interest people in a product featured in a shoe fair in Milan.
We here in 90% Muslim Jakarta who attend expos etc. do so, at least in some cases, to enjoy looking at the SPGs.
——-
SPGs taking a well-earned rest at Jakarta Fair
Jakarta Expos – iFMAC, Sofa Parts, Beauties and Similar Delights
They are clearly selected for their visual appeal.
So the last thing you’d want spreading the good news for your company is a self-righteous drab unwilling to display even her hair. It seems the whiner is a university student, so presumably smart enough to know this…
———–
————
… but smarter still to put the squeeze on the company.,
After sending a photo of herself wearing the headscarf, the company asked if she would be willing to remove it, to which she responded ‘no’, explaining that she wore it for religious reasons.
Because of this, Evolution declined to send her application to its client. In court, the company argued that it selects applicants on the basis of “aesthetics and image” and that its clients “would never be so flexible.”
Quite right too!
The woman, who was born in Italy to Egyptian parents, then sued for discrimination based on religion and gender. A court in Lodi, Lombardy, rejected the case, arguing that the applicant for the role also had to conform with the employer’s “image” requirements.
With which anyone with a non-bigot brain would agree. Image is what promotion is all about.
—————
—————–
But Italian appeal court judges don’t seem to know what appeals to the normal public, or are addicted to appeasement of primitives.
The Milan appeals court overturned this decision, ordering the company to pay the woman €500 in damages. http://www.thelocal.it/20160506/italian-firm-was-wrong-to-refuse-to-hire-hijab-wearing
Pathetic. If she wants to wear a scarf, okay, she should be left in peace to hide her crowning glory – it’s not a burka, after all, which should be outlawed.
But by the same token, she should understand that she’s in a civilised country where such sectarian affectations are not admired, and certainly not seen as a lure for whatever she’s on about.
Emile 14:37 on May 11, 2016 Permalink |
It’s so annoying, this vexatious money-making litigation,taking full advantage of idiot judges like this one and the one who let off the goat-killers in your other article.
If they can’t hack living with normal people’s standards, they have a lot of places they would feel more comfortable in.
But they won’t go there, much happier causing trouble then making a profit here in the West.
LikeLike