Tagged: SCOTUS Toggle Comment Threads | Keyboard Shortcuts

  • ross1948 08:01 on July 4, 2022 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , Obergefell flawed ruling, SCOTUS,   

    Give To A Good Cause – Overturn Overgefell 

    Who knows, but that a great wrong may yet be righted!



     I didn’t think I’d ever say this, but Nancy Pelosi is right.

    This past Friday she told reporters that in overturning Roe v Wade, the US Supreme Court has set the stage for a future ruling ending the Court’s 2015 imposition of gay ‘marriage’ on the nation in Obergefell v Hodges. 

    She is exactly right, and we at NOM will do everything in our power to rid America of the lawless, illegitimate and anti-constitutional Obergefell ruling that shredded the marriage laws of the overwhelming number of states in the union.

    We need your help to restore marriage to our nation’s laws.

    We have the Constitution on our side, but we will be opposed by powerful and wealthy adversaries.

    The battle will be difficult and intense, but it is one we can win with your help. Please give generously


    We need only your continued support to fight the coming battles in order to prevail.


    Thank you for your ongoing support, and for your prayers.

    Brian S. Brown, President, National Organization for Marriage
    Brian S. Brown,

    President, National Organization for Marriage

  • ross1948 14:55 on June 26, 2022 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , , , SCOTUS   

    ‘Birthing People?’ AOC = BS! 

    Having looked at Rapinoe (unwillingly, as she’s not a pretty sight, ever!)

    BBC Debate Expected, But Why Rapinoe? 

    ….and thus been reminded of my famous error…..


     “AOC’s” Boy-Friend! 

    I am now obliged to pay heed to the absolute hogwash spewed out by that less ugly but still God-Awful woman in the photo above.

    While deep into a rant about ‘women,’ that far-left congresswoman muddied the waters of the argument by injecting a chunk of woko-weirdness….

    AOC: “What the Supreme Court just did was that they chose to endanger the lives of all women and all birthing people….

    What the HELL are birthing people?

    Didn’t she realise, even as she blurted out that nonsense…


    …that she was subverting her own case by linking it to tranny-appeasement?

    • Tam Birnie 15:47 on June 26, 2022 Permalink | Reply

      She reminds me of that eejit Sturgeon
      Our dearly beloved separatist leader has also been chipping in on the American controversy, never thinking it’s nobody’s business but the Americans.


  • ross1948 18:45 on June 25, 2022 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , , , , SCOTUS   

    Xi’s Tool Tedros Joins Meddler Mob 

    After I deplored the big-mouthed foreign meddlers last night, uppity outsiders interfering on the Roe v Wade reversal..


    Jellyfish, Muppet, Turdo – Who Do These Meddlers Think They Are?

    …i.e. Pretty Boy, Jellyfish and Muppet, I expected more names would soon need to be added to the Sticky-Beak list.



    While I didn’t dare predict which of the many global nosey-parkers might seek to join the meddling throng…


    ….I’m not exactly amazed that Bachelet the Red Bat is speaking much more harshly about America…

    United Nations rights chief Bachelet slams Supreme Court abortion decision https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2022/jun/24/united-nations-rights-chief-bachelet-slams-supreme/

    • bachelet_1589760c

      Old bats are dangerous!

    …than her marxist roots would ever allow when twittering with her comrades in Red China.

    UN Red Bat Bachelet, Still Braying

    Aha…and now, guess who?

    Yes, W.H.O!

    Xi’s Tedros – 5 More Years, Affronting Every Virus Victim

    Xi Jinping (left), Tedros Adhanom (right). (Allan Rios illustration)

    Red Alert! Why Won’t W.H.O. Confront Xi’s Lies?


    No surprise at all to read that WHO’s Red Tedros has come forward.

    Of his own volition, or obeying HMV?

    WHO knows?

  • ross1948 19:50 on April 8, 2022 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , , , SCOTUS, ,   

    Will New Judge Be As ‘Fair & Balanced’ As BBC? 

    This is a really joyous day!’

    Thus UK Pravda’s guest about 8am ( Jakarta time) today.

    Sonia Gipson Rankin of the University of New Mexico, who gushed extensively for several minutes about how wonderful that abominable leftist…

    Dotard’s Judge? A Soft Spot For Evil? 

    Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson arrives for her confirmation hearing on March 21.
    Ketanji Brown Jackson chose leniency even in baby sex torture cases

    …truly is – oh, and Sonia is an ex-president of the New Mexico Black Lawyers’ Association!

    Needless to say, there was no spokesperson from the New Mexico White Lawyers’ Association..

    A  – because White lawyers would not dare form such an association – racialised groupings are a privilege only afforded to some, not others!


    B – because NO contrary voice at all was heard, nobody invited to dispute Gushing Sonia’s nauseating eulogy.



    Now, if only a tiny percentage of Americans had opposed The Dotard’s nominee, perhaps the BBC could argue they had no obligation, under their charter duty to be fair and balanced…

    …..to give a miniscule minority equal time.

    But how was the Senate split?

    99-1?   90-10?   80-20?  70- 30?  60-40?

    Er, NO.  None of the above.

    Actually, it was 53-47….



    ….and only because three RINO rats deserted their colleagues to vote for the far-left woman.

    So BBC World News betrayed their responsibility to let both sides be heard on a key issue.

    Predictable, if you know about BBC guest-choices.

    Guest-Expert” Impartial? Hee-Ha

    Linda Tirado –BBC Says ‘Journalist’ – She Is A Far-Left Activist 

    ‘Quite Frighteningly, He’s Getting Good!’ BBC ‘Expert’ On Trump

    Zeinab Welcomes Red Cop-Killer’s Fan



    Later in the day, we got a couple of brief shots of Ted Cruz and another Republican asking her pre-confirmation questions, but that was more than outweighed by a camera dwelling on an absurd Democrat popinjay, Cory Booker, being so sycophantic towards Jackson that I thought he was about to ask her for a date.

    But nothing after the confirmation vote EXCEPT Gusher’s glorification.

    Not even one of the 43 loyal Republicans




    • Mel Henderson 20:46 on April 8, 2022 Permalink | Reply

      Will she?


    • Amanda Adams 22:53 on April 8, 2022 Permalink | Reply

      Yes, isn’t it funny how there’s a Black Lawyers Association but not a chance there’s a White Lawyers Association.
      Racism just like here there’s BLM but God help anyone shouts about WLM.
      Even ALL lives Matter gets the racists upset.
      How many English people are bored of being second class citizens.


  • ross1948 00:01 on March 12, 2021 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , , SCOTUS   

    Is Amazon Racist? Sign This Petition! 

    We know Amazon is run by censorious pinko creeps….

    Big Tech Book-Burning? The New Normal? 

    ….but are they also motivated by racial antagonism?

    Read on!

    Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas is an American hero whose common sense jurisprudence and life’s story deserve more study.

    But, Amazon’s Prime Video streaming service inexplicably decided to remove the documentary showcasing Thomas’ life and work, “Created Equal: Clarence Thomas in His Own Words.”



    This is unacceptable! And, Amazon must be held accountable for its efforts to censor and silence conservative voices.

    Please take a minute to SIGN and SHARE this petition asking Amazon to restore Thomas’ documentary to their streaming service.

    ‘Created Equal’ is a classic American story revealing Thomas’ rise from poverty in the segregated South to eventually becoming one of the most influential justices on the country’s highest court.

    Of course, in order to take his seat on the Supreme Court in 1991, Thomas had to go through the crucible of Senate Hearings which served as the launching point of a smear campaign against him.

    What many remember was how Thomas was up for the fight.

    However, what many people forget is that it was none other than Joe Biden who lead these “disgraceful” nomination proceedings against Thomas, for, in 1991, Biden was the Chairman of the Senate’s Judiciary Committee!

    Could it be that Amazon’s decision to remove Thomas’ documentary is politically-motivated, covering for present-day Joe Biden not wanting to show him in a bad light?

    Or, could it be that Amazon is continuing its efforts to censor and silence conservative American voices?

    Please CLICK HERE to learn more about Justice Thomas’ documentary, ‘Created Equal: Clarence Thomas in His Own Words.’ Then, please SIGN this petition!

    Given the fact that ‘Created Equal’ is the twentieth-highest ranked documentary on Amazon, it should be an easy business decision for Amazon to make, if their decision is not, indeed, politically-motivated.


    Please SIGN and SHARE now, and urge Amazon to restore Clarence Thomas’ documentary, ‘Created Equal: Clarence Thomas in His Own Words,’ to their streaming service, Amazon Prime.

    Anyone can sign, remember, not just Americans – let’s relieve WFH fatigue by bashing Amazon’s evil in-crowd!
    • Jim Ex Jakarta 07:04 on March 12, 2021 Permalink | Reply

      No, I would say they’re not racist. They will censor anyone of any race, creed or color, whose opinion or beliefs challenge their own biases.


    • Tommy Giesler 10:07 on March 13, 2021 Permalink | Reply

      I signed it. So should everybody.
      He’s one of the best judges.


  • ross1948 00:01 on November 6, 2020 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: ‘judges owing favours’, , SCOTUS, ,   

    SCOTUS ‘Doing Favours?’ BBC’s Leftist Lucy Roams The Gutter! 

    UK Pravda’s Lefty Lucy Hockings is a piece of work – and that’s for sure!


    Lefty Lucy Hockings


    We hadn’t really paid much attention to Lucy the Leftist till very recently.

    Bitter Twitter Bias – BBC’s Lefty Lucy Has Dirty Dorsey’s Back! 

    But this week, it’s fair to say, she sank pretty low…

    Pretty Nurse Faces Down BBC Inquisitors!

    ….anxious perhaps to keep up with The Preying Maitlis!

    But at 6.45pm Jakarta time, 5th November, she stunned me with a question she put to one of her anti-Trump guests.

    About the Supreme Court…” she sleazed.


    The U.S. Supreme Court justices questioned how broadly a federal law targeting immigration advice could be used.

    The U.S. Supreme Court


    Will Trump think like this, that I’ve put some judges there and they owe me some favours!?!”

    What the Hell?

    This is not just an insult to the President, but an insult to every judge on the Supreme Court, with its implication that they have given Donald Trump any reason to assume that’s how they make their decisions.

    It goes without saying that they don’t.

    They have no need to!

    Already one of his most recent appointees has cast a vote which deeply disappointed millions of Trump supporters.

    He complained about another SCOTUs ruling a week ago.

    These judges go their own way, left or  right or haywire, precisely because they are appointed for life.

    They don’t ‘do favours!’ 



    Whatever else Trump may be, he is not naive.

    Lefty Lucy surely knows that as well as you and I do, so she has NO excuse for spreading, WITHOUT EVIDENCE, this entirely UNFOUNDED insinuation.


    • Ken Kasic 16:20 on November 6, 2020 Permalink | Reply

      Thanks, Ross, you explained very well why she is out of line.
      That BBC is using the people’s taxes, without their consent, for this trash-talk.
      It is not an American problem but up to British people who have got to get it reined in.


    • Del Genet 00:37 on November 7, 2020 Permalink | Reply

      Arrogant woman, very insulting, but I have got the impression that is normal BBC style.


    • Ben Baniek 14:00 on November 7, 2020 Permalink | Reply

      That goes way too far.


  • ross1948 03:01 on July 18, 2020 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , Cassandra Stubbs, , SCOTUS, Wesley Ira Punkey   

    ACLU Trumpophobe Backs Callous Quartet’s Bid To Thwart Justice! 

    What utter hogwash we heard in Kansas this week, from a merciless killer’s attorney!

    Rebecca Woodman said her client was “a 68-year old, severely brain-damaged and mentally ill man who suffers from advanced Alzheimer’s disease and dementia.”



    This May 2000 photo provided by the Kansas Department of Corrections shows Wesley Ira Purkey, who was convicted of kidnapping and killing a 16-year-old girl, and was sentenced to death.

     Wesley Ira Purkey

    If that beast Wesley Ira Punkey had been any or all of those things when he kidnapped and murdered an innocent 16-year-old girl, then his attorney would have been entitled to adduce those facts in his defence.

    But he wasn’t.

    The brutal crime took place  MORE THAN TWENTY years ago.

    Let’s be absolutely clear – he was guilty as sin and admitted it, though even as he was rightfully sent to Hell this week, his ‘dementia’ didn’t prevent him whining a suspiciously articulate objection to his fate!


    .But okay, Woodward’s job was to defend the swine.

    The truly deplorable performance came at the Supreme Court, where that callous leftist quartet again forced a vote, losing 5 to 4, again…

    At Last! First Federal Execution For HOW MANY Years? 

    …in a bid to let the poor murderer…

    ..sorry, the pure evil murderer, avoid the death he deserved.

    And even their irresponsible antics were outdone by the revolting Cassandra Stubbs, director of the Capital Punishment Project at the American Civil Liberties Union.


    Look at me, I’m off my bloody rocker!’ Cassandra Stubbs did not say that but one has to wonder!

    We expect the ACLU to be on the wrong side of just about every issue…

    Memo To ACLU – Yer Off Yer Rocker! 

    A Liberal Diagnoses Disease In America’s Body Politic! .

    The Final Nail in the ACLU’s Coffin

    Bravo ICE! Pro-Active Plan Provokes Pro-Crimmigrant ACLU Tantrum 

    …but this rabid woman’s ranting effort to exploit the Chinese Virus Crisis surely ought to get her a prize for outrageous irrelevance!

    There was no reason for this administration to restart federal executions now — after a nearly two-decade hiatus, during the worst public health crisis of our lifetime — except to distract from its mainly failings, particularly its failure to keep people safe during this pandemic…” 


    So wedded to leftism that she invokes the pandemic, which has absolutely NOTHING to do with Punkey’s crime, nor his guilty verdict, nor the high court’s decision, nor his execution!

    What a disgraceful woman, so immersed in Trumpophobia that she can’t stop gibbering about completely extraneous issues even when she’s mounted on her favourite hobby horse!


  • ross1948 12:46 on April 24, 2020 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , deported Jamaican, SCOTUS   

    Donald Wins Court Battle – Undesirable Aliens Out! 

    A bit of good news from the US Supreme Court – an undesirable alien can be deported!

    Does anyone else think it’s just about unbelievable that any dorky ‘rights’ ratbags would even think that’s debatable…


    …never mind push it all the way to the highest court in the land, wasting the time of justices who have plenty of cases on their desks?

    Not to mention the cost of wading through all the lesser courts, which must have amounted to hundreds of thousands of dollars!



    BTW, who picks up the tab for the deported Jamaican’s lawyers?

    Did they conduct the defence pro-bono, as an act of selfless charity?

    Or not?

    If it was funded by some crummy leftist outfit, should the said outfit not also be billed for the tax-dollars the admirable Trump Administration had to spend defending the common-sense decision to boot the brute?

  • ross1948 18:58 on January 28, 2020 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: 'public charge' rule, , , SCOTUS   

    Good News USA- Top Court Okays Trump ‘Curb Welfare-Bum Migrants’ Plan! 

    Just a brief but sincere round of applause to SCOTUS…



    …which has given a mostly green light to one of President Donald Trump’s smartest moves so far, an overdue plan to stop aliens coming into his country and adopting a ‘welfare bum’ life-style.



    I have no time tonight to describe the details, but patriots in every land should rejoice both at Trump’s good idea and the Justices’ sensible ruling.

    Read all about it!

    Supreme Court clears way for ‘public charge‘ rule


  • ross1948 03:44 on November 1, 2018 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , birthright citizenship, , , SCOTUS,   

    An End To The Anchor-Brat Argument? 

    It is of course absurd to assert that because somebody is by chance, or deliberate sly plan, born in a country, then that someone is therefore entitled to citizenship of that country.


    Image result for cat puppies

    A cat giving birth in a kennel does not produce puppies.


    One could digress and say that even many who are born, raised, schooled and in other similar ways might seem to be in many ways British, for example, or Australian…




    …yet who embrace the most primitive and malevolent of alien mind-sets, should be deprived of citizenship and sent out to some place where blood-thirsty savages might fit in.

    But leave that aside for now.

    There will be many Americans delighted with the news from the White House this week, that, thanks to having a patriot as President, the USA may soon catch up with the more common-sense approach we have seen in other countries.

    Anchor-Babies Ruled OUT – Crimmigrant Off-Spring Are NOT Australian! 

    in .

    Hasil gambar untuk anchor babies

    Good News From Italy – Anchor-Baby Law Scuppered 



    The American president said he is preparing an executive order with White House legal staff that would reverse so-called birthright citizenship, a policy that grants automatic citizenship to those born on U.S. soil.   


    Sensible Americans have been waiting for years for somebody to do something about the ridiculous situation….

    Birthright Citizenship Is a Magnet for Illegal Immigrants,

    …and will cheer Trump on.


    evil judge


    But knowing how many Enemy Within judges there are, illegitimately exercising their powers to thwart the democratic will, as we saw with the clown court rulings against Trump’s moves to block entry of undesirables a year ago, judicial action reflecting the arrogant mentality of far-left mobs like that in Seattle…

    Spineless In Seattle? Why Don’t Cops Hammer The Scum? 

    …I’m not surprised to read the prediction below,

    aillegitimate powersholding onto theirUT

    An executive order by Trump would likely trigger judicial action. Many legal scholars argue that the policy is rooted in the 14th Amendment of the U.S. constitution, and would hence require a constitutional amendment to change.

    And THAT, as much as any other issue, is why it was SO important to beat off the lying hags and get a majority on the Supreme Court which is not disposed to make Un-American rulings.


    • Tex Shorten 17:11 on November 2, 2018 Permalink | Reply

      A big Texas thankyou for all the above.
      Everybody in America who is not brain-tuned to CNN agrees with everything you have said so well.


    • Vinnie F 22:50 on November 2, 2018 Permalink | Reply

      They have no right to cross any border without passports or without lining up at border controls.
      My friends in Canada face these kinds of formalities if they want to visit their friends in the USA. If they can’t comply with rules, they can and do get sent back.
      If I came to visit with you in Indonesia, I am sure I would be required to have a visa before leaving the airport, right?


    • Mike Yates 09:11 on November 3, 2018 Permalink | Reply

      Trump is great.
      We want them out and he is doing his best to get them out and keep them out.
      If our soldiers shoot some of those violent illegals on the border, that will teach them a lesson.


Compose new post
Next post/Next comment
Previous post/Previous comment
Show/Hide comments
Go to top
Go to login
Show/Hide help
shift + esc
%d bloggers like this: