Tagged: sexism Toggle Comment Threads | Keyboard Shortcuts

  • ross1948 2:43 pm on March 4, 2018 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: Cathy Newman, , , sexism   

    Another Video For Sunday Arvo – Highly Recommended! 

    My Sunday arvo video spot seems to be quite popular, so here’s another.

    It’s all the more interesting because Channel 4’s loopy left Ms. Cathy Newman…

    • Cathy Newman.jpg

    ….behaved so irrationally in her approach to her interviewee, Professor  Peterson, that some wilder elements among his fans were provoked to make threats against her!

    Or not…

    This claim was subsequently investigated and proven to be a lie – she got criticised, naturally, but not a shred of proof of any actual threat.

    THe Prof’s a sensible guy, who has challenged Turdo’s pro-freak law.

    Peterson’s refusal to accept new legislation regarding the use of pronouns at his university saw some hail him as a free speech martyr and others as an enemy of the transgender movement…

    But he’s also chivalrous.   https://www.theguardian.com/media/2018/jan/21/no-excuse-for-online-abuse-says-professor-in-tv-misogyny-row



    To his credit, her tv adversary issued an appeal to the harshest critics to lay off.

    Anyway, it’s bound to be a better way of spending an hour than mindless ‘soaps’ or biased BBC current affairs.

    • Marylin Rodrigo 11:52 pm on March 4, 2018 Permalink | Reply

      He’s a smart guy and he talks in a way that makes it easy to understand what he’s talking about and that’s more than a lot of professors do.
      I can see why that woman had a lot of people threaten her.
      She is rude and shallow.

  • ross1948 1:56 pm on August 17, 2017 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , Brandeis University, , , sexism   

    The Scourge of Racism Blights America, Again… 

    And sexism!



    That’s the only possible conclusion we can reach after reading a piece from PJ Media this month.


    I quote the key part of an official notice, which a real  journalist, Tom Knighton, exposes to public scorn.

    Journalism grants to probe social justice issues offered through Brandeis University are open only to women and journalists of color, according to a news release announcing the opportunity.

    Gambar terkait

    As you can see from their fine badge, above, Brandeis, which I had heard was a distinguished academic institution, still places some theoretical emphasis on ‘Truth.’

    The truth is that their bare-faced racism reminds us of the worst sort of old-fashioned Southern segregation…

     Gambar terkait

    ..while its sexism is a mirror-image of shariah, irrational discrimination, against half the population, on grounds of ‘gender’ – which is how trendy lefties refer to sex.

    Backward Brandeis!

    Read the whole report, in which Mr. Knighton takes apart the specious justification for this scandalous scheme.

    Gambar terkait

    And if you think there’s something rotten in the state of Brandeis, by all means let them know!

    Phone or FAX us.
    Schuster Institute for Investigative Journalism
    Brandeis University
    415 South Street, MS 043
    Waltham, Massachusetts 02453

    Phone: 781-736-3873
    FAX: 781-736-5030

    Email us.

    Visit us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter.


    If you wish to tell them what you think, there are a variety of ways to do so.

    • Neil Hasleton 11:00 pm on August 17, 2017 Permalink | Reply

      Ii is very strange that the left media like CNN is not in uproar about Brandeis racism?
      White people not allotted just second class status but worse. No status at all. No place available for horrible whites in this apartheid organisation.
      As a white male, I am doubly discriminated.

  • ross1948 11:38 pm on July 21, 2017 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , good shape, Madame Macron, offensive ads, Reeboks, sexism   

    The Leftist Sexist Hypocrites of Reebok – Boycott! 

    As a former marathon runner -London, New York, Helsinki and Belfast (twice)…


     Hasil gambar untuk helsinki marathon

    • ….I have never understood why people waste so much money on fancy/fashionable running shoes like Reeboks!

    • You can get functional, comfortable footwear that serve you well for much less, and if you’re running, the last thing you should be thinking about is how trendy you look.

    • Now Reebok have produced an ad aimed at pinko retards who probably run with two left feet….


    …on the theme of chatting up women, or not.

    As you see, it’s a brain-dead jibe at President Trump’s complimentary remark when he met Mrs. Macron.

    I had a debate with a pinko pal a few days ago, who was HORRIFIED when I observed that I would certainly praise women in such terms.

    Paying tribute to beauty never does, nor has done ( in my experience) any harm to existing or potential relationships.

    You may or may not agree.

    However, it ill becomes some shoe-maker to start lecturing us on whom we may or may not chat up, especially when they are simply trying to score points with simpletons who dislike The Donald!


    Hasil gambar untuk boycott reebok


    And they deserve a boycott all the more because they are absolute hypocrites, pandering to us terrible sexists with this ad!

    Gambar terkait


    I don’t see anything wrong with showcasing a near-naked woman sporting its shoes (see below.)

    But as National Review’s Ericka Andersen notes it’s not exactly the picture of an anti-misogynistic ring leader!  http://www.nationalreview.com/article/449643/reebok-trump-brigitte-macron-women-brands-should-stay-out-politics?

    And looking for more Reebok advertisements, I found this one  – which is pretty nasty!


    Gambar terkait


    Strangely, Ms. Andersen says she will continue to buy and wear Reeboks.

    WHY? They’re nothing special!

    As I said above, I never have used them, so can hardly boycott them any more than I do already!

    But if we want to send them a message, boycott is the best way – and tell them you’re going to, too, until they apologise and promise to keep politics out of their adverts….

    Official Reebok® Fitness | Contact Us.

    Reebok Footwear & Apparel | Official Reebok Canada Online Site

    ….otherwise they won’t know why some sales are lost.

  • ross1948 9:03 am on June 18, 2017 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: CSI Miami, Horation Caine, , Prime Suspect 1973, sexism, smoking in bars   

    Prime Suspect 1973? Good Yarn, Cute Star, Plus Nostalgia! 

    Beautiful sunny morning, fourth black coffee so far, cat fed, now a-blog.


    The rather dull social scene here – aka the ‘fasting month’ – oft impels me towards my comfy chair facing the TV screen, which alas seems to offer a diet of unpleasant news and re-runs of series I have already watched.

    I’m still baffled by CSI Miami, in which, a month ago, the doughty Lieutenant Caine was last seen stretched out, shot, on an airfield.



    No subsequent info on whether he will rise again, only old episodes in which he’s hale and hearty!

    NB – I have done a little research – but I won’t spoil your suspense.


    However, we did get a ‘prequel’ of a news series, ‘Prime Suspect 1973,’ which was quite promising.

    Gambar terkait

    It stars Stefanie Martini, as WPC Jane Tennison, a cute blonde from suburban Maida Vale, who tells a detective that she joined the Metropolitan Police because she ‘thought the Force could do with some posh sorts, sir.’


    Gambar terkait


    Even that appealing throw-away line resonates, for back then the Met still had the cojones to call itself a ‘Force,’ rather than a ‘Service,’ which I understand was a change designed to appease whining pinkos.

    Looking at internet reviews of Prime Suspect, I gather we’re meant to be aghast at the ‘sexism’ that prevailed in that era…


    Gambar terkait


    …but frankly I so far haven’t noticed, for it’s all good cops and robbers entertainment.

    My enjoyment is enhanced by a certain nostalgia,though I didn’t live in London then but passed through every so often.

    And what freedoms British folk enjoyed in those days, since lost, like the right to relax in your local with not just a pint but a cigarette!


    Gambar terkait


    I wonder how long it will be until the health-freaks here in Jakarta replicate the persecution of peaceful smokers that is now rife in the Western world.




    This young lady, below, has absolutely nothing to do with the series, or with Stefanie Martinie.

    Her name is Stephanie Knight. And I stumbled across her whilst trying to locate a similar sort of photo of the Prime Suspect star.

    Unable to do so, I settled for this instead, just to brighten up your Sunday morning.

      Gambar terkait

    Right, must prepare for the trip across town, for a pool-party beckons.

    Have a happy!

    • Jim in Jakarta 5:25 pm on June 19, 2017 Permalink | Reply

      Stephanie Knight is ALL RIGHT.

      I have not seen the new series but you make it sound good. I will try to be home when its on.

  • ross1948 6:03 pm on May 1, 2017 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , Broxtowe Notts, , , Labout, Remoaners, sexism, Shipley, Sophie Wlaker, , , , Women's Equality Party, Yorks   

    Brits Making Holiday Plans? This Summer Try Shipley! 

    Most Brits may have already booked their summer holidays this year but many may not have.

    Many of those may also be patriots and should give serious thought to spending a week or so in sunny Shipley, Yorks., ideally a week in the second half of May or the beginnig of June.


    • Hasil gambar untuk shipley yorkshire


    No, there are no beaches, though I believe the countryside is pleasant enough.

    But what’s on offer is door-to-door recreation, canvassing, leafletting, anything that can assist the sound-thinking Tory ( it’s rare these days to couple that adjective with that noun!) Philip Davies.



    He’s a dashed fine chap, has even made it into our blog previously   Bring Back Hanging? UK MPs Prepare to Snub the People – AGAIN!  and is facing a challenge from a Guardian bint named Sophie Walker.



    Standing as an ‘anti-sexist,’ she’s not likely to win a lot of votes on her own merits and she knows it!

    So she’s doing her stern-faced best to put together a coalition, with the Greens already shimmying in behind her and the LibDems also busily contemplating giving her their support too.

    UKIP have shown a bit of civic responsibility by standing down to help Davies fight off the shrill feminist.

    She would, in my opinion, have a much better chance if she were to be transported through the streets of the the Yorkshire town on the back of a lorry, garbed in similar manner to one of our Indonesian dangdut songstresses, say Roro Fitria…


    Roro Fitria


    ...because then she’d get lots of male votes, in addition to those of the sort of dull, drab dames whose lack of humour will probably lead them to accuse me too of sexism!

    However, this slightly frivolous focus on Shipley is merely a wake-up call to patriots, needful due to that grim harpy Gina Miller…


    Hasil gambar untuk gina miller enemy of the people


    …the Anti-Brexit Ass who’s so coy about her background but who revels in her elevation into an object of adoration by the UK’s forces of darkness.

    Sworn to thwart the people’s will, she has now turned her driven energies to tactical voting strategies, aiming to oust patriots by swinging all Remoaner votes behind the candidates most likely to beat pro-Brexit men and women in June’s election.

    Rather than write a lot more on this, I’m appending part of a rather good piece sent out by the Freedom Association.

    Let me know if you agree with its author’s approach.

    Gina Miller and the Remoaners may sound like a pop group, but they are actually a heavily-funded group intent on thwarting the expressed wish of the British people to leave the EU. Jonathan Isaby, editor of the excellent Brexit Central, did a grand job of exposing Miller on Channel 4 News. Despite her loud complaints about receiving abuse from Brexiteers, Miller took to Twitter to make a disgusting personal attack on Jonathan. What a truly loathsome, hypocritical and anti-democratic woman she is!
    Bankrolled, inevitably, by Richard Branson, Miller has set up the laughingly named ‘Best for Britain’ to try to target pro-Brexit candidates at the general election. The name may be laughable, but the intention is not; Miller and Branson are intent on keeping Britain in the EU at all costs.
    It is imperative that those of us who support Brexit do all that we can to assist MPs under threat from these Eurofanatics.
    Philip Hollobone and Jonathan Bullock have shown the way in Kettering, but Ukip deserves plaudits for also agreeing not to stand against Conor Burns, Christopher Chope and Stewart Jackson. It looks as though Philip Davies, David Nuttall and Kate Hoey will also not face Ukip candidates.
    If, like me, you want to stop Miller, Blair and Branson from reversing Brexit, please do your utmost to help pro-Brexit candidates who are under threat.
    Below, I have listed six Brexiteers worthy of your support.
    Just click on their names for contact details etc. I shall add half a dozen more names every week.
    1. DAVID NUTTALL (Conservative), Bury North, defending a 2015 Conservative majority of 378.
    2. PHILIP DAVIES (Conservative), Shipley, defending a 2015 Conservative majority of 9,624.
    3. NICK DE BOIS (Conservative), Enfield North, seeking to overturn a 2015 Labour majority of 1,086.
    4. MARIA CAULFIELD (Conservative), Lewes, defending a 2015 Conservative majority of 1,083.
    5. PAUL SCULLY (Conservative), Sutton and Cheam, defending a 2015 Conservative majority of 3,921.
    6. KATE HOEY (Labour), Vauxhall, defending a 2015 Labour majority of 12,708.


    End of extract

    So what do you think?  

    But here’s a little extra idea I want to suggest.


    Hasil gambar untuk anna soubry stand again broxtowe

    That abominable Europhiliac Tory woman with rather a coarse gob on her, Anna Soubry, won Broxtowe in Nottinghamshire last time round. 

    Conservative  24,163  45.2

    Labour            19,876  37.2

    UKIP                5,674 10.6

    If it’s true that, in the Midlands and northwards, UKIP got much of its support from Labour, might UKIP see fit to skip this contest next month?

    Let Labour back in? Why not? Better an overt pinko than a she-wolf in sheep’s clothing! 

    Soubry represents all that’s worst about the Cameron/May party. Getting her out would deprive May of back-up should she try a Brexit sell-out.

    • Sherwood Forrest 6:27 pm on May 13, 2017 Permalink | Reply

      You do well to pin-point Anna Soubry as one who deserves to be defeated.
      In Nottinghamshire we have a few we’d like to see the back of, but that old fool Ken Clarke has too many deadwood Tories who would vote for a monkey in a blue collar.
      Soubry is beatable however and I will go there to help whoever is opposing her.
      Here’s a link I have been sent by leave.Eu, and it has some good ideas too. http://www.leave.eu/support-local-brexit-candidate/?

  • ross1948 9:23 am on March 28, 2017 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: adult s only, , mid-riffs, , sexism, , ,   

    United? How About YAHOO’s Wowser Take On Mid-Riffs? 

    I was planning something of an indolent day today, not so as to be compliant with Hari Nyepi…



    …the Balinese Hindu holiday that requires silence for 24 hours, but because basically I have nothing much to do and none of my usual visitors are available to visit. 

    It may be a national day off – for everyone in Indonesia, not just Balinese Hindus – but if you work in a department store, like one regular caller here…


    Indonesians work hard!


    …no chance!

    However, when one’s retired, every day is a holiday!



    That, of course, doesn’t excuse me from my obligation to say what I think!

    Gambar terkait

    Hence it’s incumbent on me to take United Airlines to task for their downright backward ban on certain types of clothing for certain categories of passenger.

    Miniskirts, clothing that “reveals a midriff”, short shorts and “form-fitting lycra/spandex tops, pants and dresses” – such as leggings – are banned.


    • Hasil gambar untuk defending rights


    In my view, United Airlines are denying me the basic human right of having somebody dressed like the cutie below sitting next to me when I fly!


    Hasil gambar untuk bare midriff miniskirt

    How dare they?


    But lots of people are talking about United Airlines. It was my search for a suitable photo  – did  well, didn’t I?- that gave me ammunition to renew my long-standing quarrel with Yahoo.



    I have never forgiven Yahoo for their arrogant coercion of customers into changing from the good old Classic style to the much less handy thing we have to use now, my resentment not at all assuaged by the huge sum being paid to Marissa Mayer…


    Gambar terkait


    …who oversaw that act of overweening arrogance. Marissa Mayer’s Payday Is Even More Insane Than You Think – Fortune

    Nonetheless, I still use Yahoo, having for years provided all my friends, family, fans and foes with my email address, issued by that company.

    But until this week I’d never used their Search Engine to find an illustration for ‘bare mid-riffs.

    Google’s is much better and in the end I used them, but not till after my simple Yahoo search for a cute female tummy evoked this bizarre message!.  .

    Results for bare mid-riffs may contain adult oriented content. Safe Search must be turned off to display these results..


    Or rather, as I put it over this morning’s multiple coffee infusions…

    ‘What the &#*#!?!?!?’ 

    I duly entered into what I suppose must be defined as their ‘Unsafe Search’ zone and indeed the sights to be seen there are not what one would wish one’s kiddies to view.

    Bare bums, bare boobs, not terribly scary for me – but ‘adult content’ for sure.

    But WHY bracket them with ‘bare mid-riffs,’ which are not only often highly agreeable, yet in no way offensive…

    ‘Fathers and husbands, their private parts are your responsibility’


    …to the sort of uptights who published that poster I often use to illustrate the iniquities of sexist shariah.


    So let’s put Yahoo’s feet to the fire!  

    Why have they included cute navels in what is, let’s face it, something of a porno section?

    • Young Gordon 2:05 pm on March 28, 2017 Permalink | Reply

      Somebody is bound to say you are sexist.
      But its got to be a universal right, Ross. Fair go. Women should be given the same right to have a smoothie guy beside them.
      Oh, and I beleive I am younger than you so would I have a right to reserve a 17-21-year-old girl, possibly the one in the photo at the bottom of your post?.

  • ross1948 7:48 pm on February 15, 2017 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , , , sexism, , ,   

    Iran – Contemptible Swedish Cows Crawl To Shariah Sexists 


    Sick joke

    But sadly, not ‘fake news.’



    More like Fake Feminists, these contemptible Swedish cows abasing themselves in shariah scarves before the tyrannical sexist regime in Tehran.

    These pathetic pukes, an official ministerial delegation, simpered into the ayatollahs’ despotism and cast aside their usual clothing that might suggest Western concepts of sex equality.

    They make a mockery of themselves, their country and all the left-lib babble about women’s rights.


    • sexism
    • ============
    • As CFP noted, and as we must concur, so much for Stockholm’s promise to promote “a gender equality perspective” internationally, and to adopt a “feminist foreign policy” in which “equality between women and men is a fundamental aim.”
    • http://canadafreepress.com/article/walk-of-shame-swedens-first-feminist-government-don-hijabs-in-iran
    • I can count five of the hypocrites in the photo above. That means their backward bearded host – to whom shariah ‘law’ affords the right to marry four of them, would, were he single, need to disappoint at least one.
    • ===
    • polygamy

    This debauched old devil obviously cheated – more than four?


    Nor will she be consoled by any equal reciprocal right to go pub-crawling in Tehran in search of four jihadist jerks dim-witted enough to marry a sour Swedish feminist.

    Shariah ‘Law’ is totally unfair and discriminatory against women, who DON”T have any similar rights to those enjoyed by over-sexed males. 

    • Pamela 3:47 pm on February 16, 2017 Permalink | Reply

      How very off-putting, for any women to do such a thing, and how very hypocritical, for faux ‘feminists.’
      I have a low opinion of that Femen group that you reported on last year, I think, when they jumped up bare-breasted during an Islamist event in France.
      On this occasion, however, it might have been more to be applauded if these Swedish ministers had done something similar.
      I’m not sure if I’m joking or not, but I am hoping that any Swedish ‘feminists’ who have any integrity will have something to say about the the double standards of those ministerial madams.

    • Penny 4:12 pm on February 16, 2017 Permalink | Reply

      Look at the state of those women, not one in a dress or a skirt, not one brave enough to let her hqir be seen.
      Makes me sick that they don’t care about the women in iran who are forced into that kind of covered-up appearance every day by the ayatollahs.

    • Ali Wenzel 6:24 pm on February 16, 2017 Permalink | Reply

      You remember all those ‘anti-apartheid’ movements?
      Out on demos every week, making companies ‘dis-invest’ in South Africa, and sanctions by every government, unless apartheid was abolished? The reason was that one part of the population was treated as different and lesser than another, because of their skin color.

      Where are those people or their kids today, when we need to start a worldwide anti-shariah movement, demos for sanctions every week, demands that companies dis-invest in Iran, and all the other countries where one section of the population is treated as lesser because they have different genitals.
      Shariah is downright WICKED, to anybody who believes that God created men and women as human beings entitled to the same respect and without discrimination.

      Donald Trump should definitely scrap that deal with Iran.
      But he could do even better.
      He should get Nikki Haley, his UN ambassador, to propose a motion at the UN Genera Assembly, declaring shariah a c rime against humanity.

  • ross1948 6:47 pm on September 25, 2016 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , Rear of the Year, sexism, stupid leftist students,   

    Back in Jak, Still Laughing About ‘Rear of the Year!’ 

    Well I got back to Jakarta late last night…

    i love jkt


    … but it’s taken me all day to regain control of my laptop from Windows, who seized it for installation of  ‘updates!’  They offered no option to postpone their installation, so I was unable to email my numerous friends in The Old Country who made my visit fun.

    First time in the UK for quite a few years, and much to comment on ( incidentally, no blog comments recently from anyone, so if I don’t publish yours, please resend – Windows maybe erased them whilst making free with my technology!)

    Meantime, no rush to blog about all my experiences in modern Britain, which will include a gripping comparison of Manchester and Abu Dhabi Airports…


    Britannia sad


    …except for the hilarious poster I saw when strolling nostalgically around my alma mater. It comprised an imaginary (?) conversation, presumably between two normal British blokes, roughly along the lines of –

    ‘Why would she be offended when I said she had the ‘Rear of the Year?’



    This nice pic was NOT on the ‘diversity’ poster.


    Yeah, I’d have thought she’d take it as a compliment.’


    Indeed, any normal girl would!

    But the poster was a warning from some nut-jobs in the campus ‘diversity’ shrill-squad, whining about men being ‘disrespectful’ to women!  I laughed aloud at the po-faced ( and presumably skinny-assed) prigs who felt so slighted. Then I continued my walk and came upon the most recent update of the student union discipline code, which has now included ‘leering’ as a possible disrespectful disciplinary offence.


    • leering


    As my former Scots colleague might have put it, were these people born, or did their maw knit them?  

    However, it turns out there is an actual event – no, not a ‘National Leering Day’ – but a Rear of the Year contest! 

    Hasil gambar untuk rear of the year 2016


    The ‘Rear of the Year’ is a light-hearted award presented annually to British celebrities with prize-winning rear assets.  It was created by publicity consultant Tony Edwards and is organised by Rear of the Year Limited.  http://www.rearoftheyearcompetition.com/

    So belated congrats to Jennifer, above – uptights please note, there are awards for both female and male bums, but you won’t get any of the latter featured on THIS blog!


    But a big question mark over how students supposedly engaged in serious studies at a respectable UK university have time to get their knickers in a twist over a neat chat-up line.

    • Diana 11:45 am on September 26, 2016 Permalink | Reply

      I sent a comment last week but so far it hasn’t been published. It’s a little late now so I am sending anther, to say how much I agree with you about the ‘rear rage’ students. They are so censorious. I thought university years were for fun. They were for me.

      • ross1948 1:07 pm on September 27, 2016 Permalink | Reply

        Sorry, ma’am. Some trouble with the comments column.
        I think some are lost permanently, but it seems to be working well now, just slow.

  • ross1948 7:07 pm on July 22, 2016 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , , , , , Nottingham Police, , , , sexism, , wolf-whistling   

    Breaking – English Cops To Nab Shariah Preachers? 

    So wolf-whistling is a hate crime…

    Wolf whistling can now be reported as a hate crime

    BBC News20 Jul 2016

    OR NOT?


    Let’s look at The Guardian!

    One police force (Nottinghamshire) has expanded its definition of hate crime to include misogyny and harassment of women.

    Wolf-whistling is no crime – but it is part of our misogynist culture

    Hate Crime to include misogyny?

    If this were true, then it would mean that anyone advocating shariah law  would, ipso facto, be guilty of a ‘hate crime.’


    Shariah is an iniquitous code that imposes mean-spirited and absurd misogynistic discrimination on women.

    Not only the misogynistic ‘aurat’ stuff, whereby every woman is coerced into shrouding her God-given crowning glory, the lovely hair on her head, not to mention her knees, mid-riff, thighs and even those soft smooth shoulders on which her hair ideally cascades…



    ‘Fathers and Husbands, their aurat (private parts) are your responsibility!’


    …..a nonsense that would degrade all girls until they resemble the famous Michelin Man advert…




    …but also the grossly discriminatory inheritance laws, which denies daughters equal inheritance rights.

    Utterly misogynistic.

    And let’s not even discuss the grotesque concept of polygamy…




    ….how can anyone seriously maintain that men can have multiple spouses while women may one have one?

    As misogynistic as it gets!

    Alas, I fear the PC Plods in Notts County lack the guts to go after shariah hate crimes.


    Of course the very idea of ‘hate crime’ is an affront to justice.

    If you kill or injure somebody, whether in a fit of temper and/or jealousy, or during a bar-room brawl, or, most horrendous of all, surely, because he or she converts to another religion – ooops, that’s shariah law again…




    …then you are guilty of murder.

    There’s neither fairness nor logic in making the penalty heavier if your crime was motivated by ‘hate.’

    However, if the ruling PC ideology imposes such a nonsense as ‘hate crime’ on our legislation, then the Guardian scribbler whose link I’ve appended above, makes a fair point.


    If the gigantic PC catch-all net includes ‘disability, gender identity, race, ethnicity or nationality, religion, faith or belief and sexual orientation. Is it really so shocking for sex to be included in that list?


    And that’s what Nottinghamshire Police have done.

    But here’s another curious extract from her article, a statement from Notts Police, which declares that a ‘hate crime’ is not a crime at all.


    Madhouse England, yeah? Here’s the full quote – 

    A hate crime is simply any incident, which may or may not be deemed as a criminal offence, which is perceived by the victim or any other person, as being motivated by prejudice or hatred.”

    In other words, whether it’s a crime depends if the complainant or his or her pals or some agitprop pinko whiner have a big enough chip on their shoulders.

    A charter for uptights.

    The authoress ( that’ll wind her up nicely – I’m sure ‘authoress’ is as non-PC as ‘actress’ these days) is named Laura Bates, BTW.

    Laura Bates

    Laura doesn’t like being whistled at!


    Laura in fact began her article with the words wolf-whistling has been reclassified as a crime! But then she explains how that sentence, that ‘crime,’ wolf-whistling is not even mentioned in the police report.

    She blames the Guardian’s media rivals for trivialising abuse of women by introducing the non-existent ‘wolf-whistling’ crime. Again, fair comment.

    But then she exposes her own loopy libber mentality, by adding that wolf-whistles are the thin end of this wedge…

    Nice legs! They're taking the p*ss...maybe they're not. Maybe they mean it...


    I don’t walk around Jakarta whistling at girls – a friendly smile seems a more decorous approach, and is often reciprocated.  

    And on my rare trips to the Wicked West I regret to admit that nobody has wolf-whistled me.

     Were it to happen, assuming the whistler wasn’t a poofter, I’d not be upset at all. It’s a compliment, albeit an unsophisticated one.

    So why should it be cause  for complaint?

  • ross1948 11:13 am on May 10, 2016 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , , , , , sexism, , SPG,   

    Italian Head-Scarf Whiner’s Legal Jihad – Court Caves In! 

    Another whining bint, in Italy this time, coining it in on the basis of the lie that Muslim women have to wear head-shrouds.

    Hard to keep count of the number of times we’ve addressed this issue..


    ‘An Archaic Tribal Rag’ – Wise UK Muslim Imam Says ‘Ban the Burqa!’ 

    It’s on the BBC! Bag-Head Bans Do Not Infringe Religious Liberty! 

    Fiery Islamists – ‘Head-Scarves NOT a Big Issue!’ 


    … but that’s a few links to previous posts.

    And in this case, it’s even more absurd, this arrogant baggie applying for a job as an SPG, a sales promotion girl handing out leaflets to interest people in a product featured in a shoe fair in Milan. 

    We here in 90% Muslim Jakarta who attend expos etc. do so, at least in some cases, to enjoy looking at the SPGs.


    SPGs taking a well-earned rest at Jakarta Fair

    Jakarta Expos – iFMAC, Sofa Parts, Beauties and Similar Delights 

    They are clearly selected for their visual appeal.

    So the last thing you’d want spreading the good news for your company is a self-righteous drab unwilling to display even her hair. It seems the whiner is a university student, so presumably smart enough to know this…


    foreign money


    … but smarter still to put the squeeze on the company.,

    After sending a photo of herself wearing the headscarf, the company asked if she would be willing to remove it, to which she responded ‘no’, explaining that she wore it for religious reasons.

    Because of this, Evolution declined to send her application to its client. In court, the company argued that it selects applicants on the basis of “aesthetics and image” and that its clients “would never be so flexible.”

    Quite right too!

    The woman, who was born in Italy to Egyptian parents, then sued for discrimination based on religion and gender. A court in Lodi, Lombardy, rejected the case, arguing that the applicant for the role also had to conform with the employer’s “image” requirements.

    With which anyone with a non-bigot brain would agree. Image is what promotion is all about.


    b5300-retardalert All rise, for the verdict!


    But Italian appeal court judges don’t seem to know what appeals to the normal public, or are addicted to appeasement of primitives. 

    The Milan appeals court overturned this decision, ordering the company to pay the woman €500 in damages.   http://www.thelocal.it/20160506/italian-firm-was-wrong-to-refuse-to-hire-hijab-wearing

    Pathetic. If she wants to wear a scarf, okay, she should be left in peace  to hide her crowning glory – it’s not a burka, after all, which should be outlawed.

    But by the same token, she should understand that she’s in a civilised country where such sectarian affectations are not admired, and certainly not seen as a lure for whatever she’s on about.

    • Emile 2:37 pm on May 11, 2016 Permalink | Reply

      It’s so annoying, this vexatious money-making litigation,taking full advantage of idiot judges like this one and the one who let off the goat-killers in your other article.
      If they can’t hack living with normal people’s standards, they have a lot of places they would feel more comfortable in.
      But they won’t go there, much happier causing trouble then making a profit here in the West.

Compose new post
Next post/Next comment
Previous post/Previous comment
Show/Hide comments
Go to top
Go to login
Show/Hide help
shift + esc