Tagged: sexual maladjusts Toggle Comment Threads | Keyboard Shortcuts

  • ross1948 16:30 on September 26, 2022 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , BBC double-standards 'diversity', Dan Roan, Mark Lawrenson forced out, millenial BAME, , sexual maladjusts   

    OMG! BBC – Racist, Sexist AND Ageist? 

    Frankly, I wouldn’t work for UK Pravda if they paid me…



    …and, gosh, with their snouts dug deep into the British public’s cash-strapped purse…


    • .H


    …they do pay remarkably well!

    But this latest revelation of arrant hypocrisy on the part of “diversity’s” most dogmatic disciples…


    How less inclusive can it get, we need to ask, after reading the sad story of Mark Lawrenson.

    “I was axed by the BBC for being a 65-year-old white male!”

    Lawrenson covered six World Cups in total…


    But no more!

    Were he a modish millennial…



    …or a BAME, or any kind of queer, or…

    …most fashionably…


    …a cosmetic-caked tranny, would he then have been cast out so callously?

    And a separate, but not unrelated, nor unreasonable, question.

    If somebody in the BBC Sports stable has to go, why not this unpleasant leftist?


    BBC Sport’s Dan Roan ‘taken off air’ after offensive comments about tragic Leicester City owner – as he faces calls to resign..


    ….a slimy creep, who scurrilously, swinishly, gossiped about a dead man at the scene of the crash in which the man had died horribly.

    Mr Roan was picked up on a live Sky News feed having a conversation in which he mocked Mr Srivaddhanaprabha’s marriage and hinted that his assistant was also his ‘mistress’.


    What a pig!

    But isn’t his snout still in the tax-trough – the BBC didn’t fire him, despite a petition from angry citizens!

    Of course BBC rather likes lousy leftists.

    So a better man is forced out!

    What do you think?

  • ross1948 00:53 on July 3, 2022 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , , sexual maladjusts   

    Can’t Gulf-Bound Queers Just Behave? 

    I went to the World Cup, once, in Germany, and had a great time.

    But I took a dim view of it being held in Qatar…


    Yes, Another Petition! After FIFA Scandal, Stop Qatar Cup! 

    …because that country is not a democracy.

    Just as I disliked all that unsporting ‘sport’ stuff…

    Gu Makes Me Spew – Born In The USA But…? 

    …in Red China.

    However, the decision having been taken, let those go who wish to go.

    And let’s not put up with infantile interrogations, viz.


    Qatar Fails To Offer World Cup Safety To LQBTQ Fans

    Thus the gaystapo-grinches gabble again, seeking sympathy for maladjusts…

    In fact, rather than let the numerous gaystapo pressure groups take up the queer cause, the Guardian takes it upon itself to push a list of pushy, downright insolent ‘questions…’


    Read the whole load of tripe here..


    …aka demands – at Qatar.

    • LGBTQ+ people would be protected by Qatari authorities if threatened because of their sexuality.
    • Maybe the deviants would not be at risk if they dress and behave like normal people?
    • Articles of the Qatari penal code, including those which outlaw “leading, instigating or seducing a male in any way to commit sodomy”, would be suspended during the tournament.
    • Maybe a sovereign state will take badly such an arrogant demand to freeze law enforcement?
    • Fans carrying rainbow flags would be allowed to take them into stadiums.
    • Get stuffed. You take your country’s flag to the World Cup or you don’t take any.
    • The Supreme Committee would specifically welcome LGBTQ+ people as World Cup visitors.
    • Why would they?  Will they specifically welcome each sub-group of the maladjust alphabet soup, viz.
    • Lesbian, Gay, Bestiality, Transfreak, Queer and Incest?
    • ooooo

    Nobody could blame the Qataris if they responded succinctly..,


    But instead the recipients of the Guardian’s importunate epistle offered ‘a general reply’ –

    Everyone will be welcome to Qatar in 2022, regardless of their race, background, religion, gender, sexual orientation or nationality.
    We are a relatively conservative society – for example, public displays of affection are not a part of our culture.

    We believe in mutual respect and so whilst everyone is welcome, what we expect in return is for everyone to respect our culture and traditions.”


    Fair enough!

    In other words, sexual deviants would in all likelihood be perfectly safe….


    ….as long as they don’t choose to flaunt their deviant inclinations!

  • ross1948 06:43 on May 1, 2021 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , sexual maladjusts   

    Mustn’t Vex Maladjusts! Small Town, Narrow Minds!. 

    If you’d never heard of Featherston till this week, join the club.

    It’s apparently a small town in NZ, distinguished by its plethora of bookshops.

    So they call themselves a book-town!

    As you regular readers know, I like books very much…

    Grovelling Gramedia’s BookBurning Bonanza – Appeasing Fanatics 

    …and have condemned the bigot book-burners here in Indonesia.

    But I wouldn’t join Featherton’s  ‘book-town fair’ committee, which is so left-infested that they’ve ‘chosen not to feature a popular Harry Potter quiz on this year’s programme because of alleged transphobic comments made by the beloved fictional series’ author, JK Rowling.’


    This intolerant diktat emerged despite the huge popularity of Harry Potter quizzes in previous years.


    But we mustn’t upset the freakos, must we?

    Tell Nasty Nat, The Oz Freak-Fan, What You Think

    These jack-booters remind me of Australia’s Nasty Nat.



    I only noticed this because one expects small towns to be saner than the metropolitan morasses which are big cities nowadays.


    You have to read the whole absurd story to get the measure of their narrow-minded P-C creepiness, how they kow-tow…


    …ever so anxious not to inflict ‘hurt feelings’ on cry-baby maladjusts.

    • Delise W 11:19 on May 1, 2021 Permalink | Reply

      That’s not a town I would like to live in.
      A Harry Potter quiz sounds like fun but we can’t have fun in this day and age if some shirt-lifters are going to get all tearful.

      Besides, it’s not as if there’s anything in Harry Potter that would even offend them.
      It’s just spite against an author whose opinions they want to silence.
      They should rename their town, Unfairtown.


Compose new post
Next post/Next comment
Previous post/Previous comment
Show/Hide comments
Go to top
Go to login
Show/Hide help
shift + esc
%d bloggers like this: