Tagged: shariah sexism Toggle Comment Threads | Keyboard Shortcuts

  • ross1948 6:14 pm on January 10, 2018 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , Catherine Deneuve, , , shariah sexism, Weinstein   

    Ladies With Class V Oprah The Ass! 


    I hear that one of Muppet Macron’s minions, his ‘Gender‘ Minister (For God’s Sake!) has joined in the shrill shrieks of weirdo ‘wimmin’ against Catherine Deneuve…

    =

    Gambar terkait

    =

    …and the 99 other ladies who signed an Open Letter in Le Monde, calling into question the way flirtatious behaviour is deliberately being conflated with the sort of predatory vileness exemplified by the warthog Weinstein.

    Best to let the ladies’ words speak for themselves…

    “Rape is a crime, but trying to seduce someone, even persistently or cack-handedly, is not — nor is being gentlemanly a macho attack…Men have been punished summarily, forced out of their jobs when all they did was touch someone’s knee or try to steal a kiss..” 

    http://www.france24.com/en/20180109-france-star-catherine-deneuve-defends-mens-right-chat-women-metoo-weinstein

    …but, honestly, just looking at the two photographs, who on earth would you fancy a date with?

    =

    Hasil gambar untuk oprah ugly

    =

    Again, I’m reminded of the words of my old Scots drinking buddy, viz, ( adapted to today’s context) –

    ‘Ah widnae crawl ower Cathy tae get tae yon mouthy cow!’ 

      I suppose some pinko minx will now complain that my jibe is sexist.

    But seriously, as far as effectively fighting real, mean-spirited sexism is concerned, I’d like to hear that ghastly black-robed gang (at the Golden Globe knees-up the other day) call for a worldwide campaign…

    =

    =

    …against one iniquitous ideology, the very essence of which is sexist.

    Advertisements
     
    • Petra Malley 7:46 pm on January 10, 2018 Permalink | Reply

      Ross, you are incorrigilbly sexist but in the ways Catherine Deneuve described, none of which grown-up women mind. .
      You probably hold open doors for ladies to enter houses, rooms and restaurants ahead of you, and thanks to the horrible libbers of the 1960s,there are precious few gentlemen left

      You hit the nail on the head with those final comments.
      Shariah law should be declared a crime against humanity by the United Nations, but that is as likely to happen as is the UN gaining the respect of any sane person.
      ZERO chance.

    • Tam Baird 8:40 pm on January 10, 2018 Permalink | Reply

      Your boozy friend is the spitting image, or accent, of Rab C Nesbitt, that used to keep us glued to the tv and make us laugh a lot in Scotland.
      He has good taste in women, if that’s what he’d say..

    • Tina Sorley 9:01 pm on January 10, 2018 Permalink | Reply

      I hope you and your archaic blog go up in smoke together.
      You disgust me, with every word you vomit ..

  • ross1948 7:00 pm on January 9, 2018 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: 'refugee' Jew-Haters, , , , , shariah sexism   

    Mama Stasi’s Weasel Words – ‘Possibility’ Of Deportation? 


    So!

    Mama Stasi Merkel’s Coalition is planning beefed-up legislation to deal with anti-Semitism among migrant groups, which would include the possibility of deportation.

    =

    “…those who reject Jewish life in Germany or question the right of existence of Israel, cannot have a place in our country..

    https://www.politico.eu/article/german-conservatives-propose-deporting-anti-semitic-migrants/

    That’s one translation, borrowed, but I prefer the actual German link  –   https://www.welt.de/politik/deutschland/article172205448/Antisemitismus-Union-im-Bundestag-will-Judenhasser-ausweisen.html

    – which uses the more telling words Judenhasser, ‘Jew-Haters.’

    The proposal is all very well as far as it goes…

    …EXCEPT for two things.

    A – that little bit about ‘possible’ deportation. There should be no nonsense about giving these ignorant sectarian savages an opportunity to repent their evil. They have been brought up in their backward beliefs and any ‘repentance’ will as fake as CNN’s commitment to letting their pro-Trump interview guests be fairly heard

    ..and…

    =

    =

    B – While we can only applaud CDU-CSU spokesman Stephan Harbarth when he says: “We must resolutely oppose the anti-Semitism of migrants with an Arab background and from African countries…”

    ….  

    ….

    …any such ‘Jew-Hatred’ is neither more nor less unacceptable than the savage sectarian belief that ‘apostates‘ and ‘blasphemers‘ (real or perceived) should be murdered – or harmed in any way.

    =

    =

    Any vile jihadists who cleave to such evil should also be guaranteed speedy and permanent removal from Germany, or any civilised country.

     
    • Grady 10:22 pm on January 9, 2018 Permalink | Reply

      I do NOT understand why Europeans are letting their governments get away with this.
      They have elections, yes? We did it here in the USA, stopped our internal enemies, for the time being, even tho it was with a bit of help from our old-fashioned electoral college system.
      What is wrong with the people in France and Germany and Italy, that they keep returning the same trash ‘migrant-friendly’ parties?
      Eastern Europe stands out as exceptions and I feel that must be because their years under communism made them value patriotism.

  • ross1948 6:22 pm on December 20, 2017 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , air hostesses, , Firefly, , Islamist UMNO, , , Malindo, Senator Abdullah Mat Yasim, Senator Hanafi Mamat, , , shariah sexism   

    Fear And Loathing of Knees In MaIaysia, Truly Arabia! 


    I’m certainly not a fan of AirAsia, and won’t be until they stop trying to coerce passengers into eating their over-priced meals.

    =

    Hasil gambar untuk fried egg sandwiches l

    My home-made specialty -bacon and fried egg sandwiches!

    =

    It’s the height of arrogance to seek to confiscate any customer’s private property (i.e. sandwiches) before  allowing them the privilege of boarding their scheduled flight  – after all, they have paid hefty sums for valid tickets.

    However, needs must, and there’s a need to defend that airline’s stewardesses from sad-sack kill-joys in Malaysia’s legislature.

    Malaysia is  increasingly a country one wishes to avoid…

    Malaysia – Aged Scholar Hauled to Bigot Court 

    Malaysia, Truly Arabia! Intolerance Rules Kuala Lumpur Court! 

    …but most of the stories reported previously, like those in the above links, are of shocking sectarianism.

    Today’s, in contrast, is just ludicrous, but albeit with rather unwholesome overtones.

    ==================

    Hasil gambar untuk Abdullah Mat Yasim

    Abdullah Mat Yasim

    =

    I refer to the likes of Senator Abdullah Mat Yasim, who is a stalwart of the government party, UMNO.

    He has declared in Parliament that the fitted attire of AirAsia’s and Firefly’s female flight attendants can “arouse passengers..”

    What a pathetic old geezer, you say, as I do!

    But in that delightful photo, he doesn’t look THAT old, so how come he’s such a curmudgeon?

    =========

    Hasil gambar untuk curmudgeon

    ========

    One of the few agreeable aspects of air travel is the fact that ( except for Qantas, which seems unable to hire young sexy women ) the average air hostess is fairly yummy.

    Certainly, admiring them as they shimmy along back and forth does assuage nervousness among passengers who fear flying.

    And for sure it helps pass what is usually a tedious time in the air.

    =======

    Gambar terkait

    ==

    Behold the proof of what I write.

    Above, Air Asia girls, visual delights all, and below, some Firefly lasses, busy but equally easy on the eye, I hope you’d agree.  Actually, I’d never heard of Firefly, till yesterday, but no matter.

    ==, Hasil gambar untuk firefly air

    —————

    Poor old wowser Abdullah – what’s wrong with his uptight outlook on life that he can disapprove of those girls’ outfits?

    Nothing remotely naughty about them, unless one doesn’t like shapely females.

    Perhaps he’s one of the nutjob sort, the sorry sorts who think women should only venture out of doors looking like the Michelin Man..

    Gambar terkait

    …as illustrated in the infamous poster below?

    =====

    ‘fathers and husbands, their private parts are your responsibility!’

    =

    Aaah, but there’s one airline whose stewardesses do merit Abdullah’s approval, more or less.

    …the flight attendant uniforms of Malindo Air, a Malaysian-Indonesian budget carrier, were “acceptable….”

    More or less, I observe, because Ole Grumplestiltskin had to add that the uniforms are also body hugging but at least the “sensitive areas” are covered

    The clear implication of Abdullah’s asinine observation is that ‘sensitive areas’ of the AirAsia and Firefly girls above are UNcovered.

    Like, which sensitive areas are uncovered? Their faces? Their hands? Their hair?

    OR…have we stumbled on another case of…

    ‘Knee-ophobia?’

     In Sumatra, Knee-ophobia Rules! No Knees is GOOD Knees

    ==================

    No knees to be seen on Malindo!

    .Gambar terkait

    Pretty ladies, but over-dressed, one could argue!

    ======

    In case you reckon they broke the mould after Abdullah was created, get this!

    Abdullah was praised by the assembly’s deputy president Abdul Halim Abd Samad for highlighting the issue. “This is a good topic that many people can relate to as they always take flights

    And there’s another strange man been haranguing the senators, Megat Zulkarnain Omardin, who suggested that the airlines redesign the uniforms.

    =====

    Hasil gambar untuk Megat Zulkarnain Omardin

    ======

    “My wife is worried whenever I fly alone on Malindo or AirAsia,” said Megat…”This is a real hassle for me,” he said, drawing laughter from other members of the Dewan Negara or Upper House of Parliament.

    Odd as a nine dollar bill!

    AND ANOTHER, the week before, Senator Hanafi Mamat from Kelantan, who came right out and confessed his sectarian motivation,  claiming attendants should wear “syariah-compliant” uniforms as Malaysia is an Islamic country.

    But what about the large non-Muslim minorities? Will Catholic, Protestant, Hindu and Buddhist attendants be allowed to dress like normal women, and will Hanafi’s “syariah-compliant” uniforms look like this…

    ..

    ….to ensure normal blokes will still want to use the airlines?

    All interesting questions, but how sad that such rubbish is even aired in a place meant for discussion of serious issues!

    Listen to Hanafi’s hogwash…


    Hasil gambar untuk Senator Hanafi Mamat

    Tourists might get the wrong impression of Malaysia if flight stewardesses dress up “sexily and disrespectfully!”    

    http://www.straitstimes.com/asia/se-asia/airasia-firefly-stewardesses-uniforms-too-sexy-malaysian-mp

    Disrespectful to whom?

    Since when is being sexy the same as being disrespectful?

    But while we may shed a tear for Malaysia, it’s not the only country that is getting totally screwy about the babes in the skies.

    My own preference for the ideal air hostess outfit would be that worn by Zuhal Sengul, in this photo below…

    —–

    Zuhal-Şengül-İngilterede-dergilere-kapak-olmuştu

    …I wonder whatever happened to her, after she lost her job for being gorgeous!

    Kasihan Zuhal Sengul – Hot Turkish Delight Fired By Kill-Joys! 

    … but the wearer is no longer in that line of business. Magnificent Zuhal got fired after some classy pictures were published online, which upset the mean-spirited management of Turkish Airlines.

    But what can one expect from the Land of Erdolf?

     
    • Pamela 7:46 pm on December 20, 2017 Permalink | Reply

      Sorry, Ross, I have been too busy to comment on anything much, with preparation for festivities to see to here, but this is very readable’
      I applaud your mockery of the Malaysian sexists.
      I do puzzle over why they have such serious problems with women.

    • Jacko 8:51 pm on December 20, 2017 Permalink | Reply

      Zuhal is SO tasty.
      I like that Michelin Man comparison too. I used to read your blog once or twice a week but it keeps getting better. Very much appreciated, mate.
      Nothing quite like poking fun at oddfellows like those sexist senators…

    • Ned Porteous 9:06 pm on December 20, 2017 Permalink | Reply

      I suppose these moaners would say a good old-fashioned knees-up is simply out of the question, then?

  • ross1948 7:25 pm on December 12, 2017 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: cinemas, , , , shariah sexism   

    Coming Soon To Saudi Cinemas -Back Stalls Snogging? 


    It’s a measure of just how stagnantly backward Saudi Arabia is that simply allowing cinemas to exist has hit the headlines around the world!

    ==

    Saudi Arabia to reopen cinemas that have been banned since the 1980s, says crown prince

    But the photo in the ABC report is scarier, maybe, than even the most rivetting zombie horror film Saudi audiences might soon get to see.

    =

    Hasil gambar untuk saudi cinema audiences

    Saudi cinema -no women to be seen?

    ==

    As the report ominously declares, the announcement by the ministry of culture did not specify whether seating in cinemas would be gender-segregated as most public spaces are in Saudi Arabia…

    Progress?

    ===

    What’s the fun in a cinema if a guy can’t take his girl and look forward to a serious bout of snogging in the back stalls?

    =

    Hasil gambar untuk kissing at the cinema silhouette

    =

    My teen years occurred a regrettably long time ago but unless my memory is more impaired than I believe, that was the main purpose of attendance at a movie theatre for young, healthy and normal people!

    And another thing the decree did not specify?

    …how heavily censored movies will be.

    The newly re-opened cinemas could well resemble Saudi Airlines, on which passengers can only view films usually greatly censored with pixelation added to cover the chest and legs of actresses…

    Pixelation? So that’s the word? I usually refer to the process as imposing an opaque blob, when I have one of my regular pro-cleavage protests.

    Ma’af, Nia Danata! Jakarta Needs More Than New Censor Rules 

    =

    =

    So is such rancid sexism, women’s bodies demonised, to be on the menu of the brave new society this ‘reform’ is said to herald?

    True, Saudi Arabia is not the only country afflicted by this sort of nonsense…

    =====

    =

    We have reported on knee-phobia here in Indonesia, in the Province of Jambi, where the governor not long ago wanted to ban female students from wearing short skirts that reach above the knee..    In Sumatra, Knee-ophobia Rules! No Knees is GOOD Knees

    …and Dark Ager abhorrence of the female form is all too often a topic for our musings.

    February 14th – ‘International Hide-The-Yummy-Bits Day!’ 

    …and never mind snogging, even hugging is beyond the pale in some places!

    ‘Haram’ Hugging, Nosey Shariah Parkers in Jambi! 

    As to Indonesia’s film and tv censorship, enjoy this –

    Dimana Bokong2nya? – Where Are Our Buttocks? 

    The poster below, which needs to be widely circulated, makes the cause of this sexist censorship absolutely clear.

    000000000

    aurat-mereka-dosa-anda-2

    Addressed to ayah dan suami, fathers and husbands, you can see what’s  forbidden in the lists on either side of Michelin Maid.

    Then, at the bottom, it offensively tells the afore-mentioned gents that –

    ‘Their Aurat is Your Responsibility.’

    In other words, inspect your women before you allow them out!

    But you men can go bare-headed, flaunt your knees, etc…

    =

    Pathetic, the killjoys here, but so too are those in Paris, pathetique! .

    Will France Sink To Indonesian Film Censor Levels? 

     I hope the Arabs do get their cinemas re-opened.

    But also that they can take their chicks to the flicks!

     

     

    Airlineshttp://abcnews.go.com/International/cinemas-reopen-saudi-arabia-crown-prince/story?id=51713660

     
    • Penny 7:42 pm on December 12, 2017 Permalink | Reply

      Lots of fun and all that, Ross but I think your American readers will never have heard of snogging.
      Smart to put that photo so as to explain for them.

    • Vanessa 10:05 pm on December 12, 2017 Permalink | Reply

      Shariah should be against the law in our country or any country where people have respect for women.
      It’s disgusting, that poster you show, as if wives and daughters are the property of the men who live with them.
      No wonder so many ‘migrants’ turn to sex crime when they find themselves in civilised countries where women are free to do as they please.
      That must infuriate Islamists.so badly that they decide to teach the ‘naughty’ girls a lesson.

    • Jacko 12:41 am on December 13, 2017 Permalink | Reply

      Very entertaining, mate,
      You have to ask, are these shariia people completely off their heads??
      Knees? Whats wrong with knees?
      .

  • ross1948 12:25 pm on September 16, 2017 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , shariah sexism, , ,   

    Wow! REAL ‘Marriage Equality!’ Congratulations, TUNISIA! 


    Tunisia has overturned a law that banned women from marrying non-Muslims.

    A spokeswoman for President Beji Caid Essebsi made the announcement and congratulated women on gaining “the freedom to choose one’s spouse…”

    =====

    Gambar terkait

    ==========

    It sets apart Tunisia as the first country in the Middle East and North Africa to remove the legal hurdles to marrying outside the official state religion. 

    .   http://www.bbc.com/news/world-africa-41278610

    Since I have offered harsh criticism of Tunisia recently…

    Tunisia Obstructing Defence Of Europe? Fish Off! 

    …it’s only fair that I now offer congratulations on this splendid news coming out of the North African country.

    Not only is this a major step out of the Dark Ages for women, but also for men, who hitherto could legally be coerced into apostasy to wed the girl they love!

    =

    =

    Until now, a non-Muslim man who wished to marry a Tunisian Muslim woman had to convert to Islam and submit a certificate of his conversion as proof.

    =

    =

    Any religion should of course be free to excommunicate congregants who defy its rules.

    But at the same time, no religion should be exalted to a position of secular power, outrageously enabled to call in the state to enforce sectarian dogma.

    We have seen that problem here in Indonesia.

    Cops – “Islamist ‘Scholars’ Can Veto Religious Liberty” 

    That’s why it’s important to distinguish, when we oppose absurd ideas about allowing men to ‘marry’ men, we do so not on the basis of somebody’s theology, but on the simple, glaringly obvious, fact that ‘gay’ marriage flies in the face of nature.

    Tunisia has got a clearer understanding of the concept.   Real ‘marriage equality’ means that any female adult not already married should be free to marry any male adult not already married…

    =

    .The country banned polygamy as far back as 1956, setting it apart from other Muslim-majority nations.

    ==========

    …excluding incestuous relationships, of course, since, like homosexual relationships, they are aberrant.

    But Tunisia has a long way to go.

    =

    =

    …women in Tunisia still face discrimination, particularly in matters of inheritance which still prioritises sons over daughters.

    Funny, though, that the UN Human Rights Council has not been seen or heard making moves against the many backward nations that maintain such grotesque sexist discriminatory laws.

    =

    Hasil gambar untuk un human rights hypocrisy

    =======

    I haven’t read that book, but its title makes a lot of sense!

     
    • Keith Milner 6:40 pm on September 16, 2017 Permalink | Reply

      You had me confused with this one, Ross.
      I thought you were talking about the ‘marriage equality’ slogan the queers in Australia are using to confuse voters but you were using the words as they should be used.
      Turnbull seems to want to control how we fight the gaystapo by slapping controls on free speech but we are doing alright,
      Even so another one or two of your blog posts to stoke the fires of debate will always be welcome.

    • clairethinker 6:55 pm on September 16, 2017 Permalink | Reply

      Excellent news. Thanks for reporting this, which is so different from what we hear on the mainstream news.

  • ross1948 11:16 am on September 10, 2017 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , , , George Christensen MP, , , shariah sexism,   

    Sorry, Barnaby Joyce – Appeasement Is No Argument! 


    A narrow defeat for common sense in Australia, where federal conference of the National Party voted by 55-51 not to support a burqa ban.

    =

    =

    Although George Christensen MP pointed out the obvious security risks of allowing head-shrouded undesirables to roam about ‘in government buildings and other public spaces,

    It seems the delegates in Canberra preferred to follow their party leader, Barnaby Joyce, whom, in the past, I have defended, when he was insulted by that hideous ABC leftist Triola…

    Just Asking- Does Red Vixen Trioli Yet Leech Off ABC’s Public Purse? 

    Virginia Trioli 

    ===

    …but henceforth I may be reluctant to take up bloggy cudgels on his behalf.

    I quote the Deputy Prime Minister’s deeply principled ‘hands-off-the-bag-heads’ argument.

    =

    ====

    Barnaby Joyce says banning the burka could damage Australia’s trade relations with Islamic countries, including Saudi Arabia And Indonesia..

    .http://www.abc.net.au/news/2017-09-09/joyce-slaps-down-burka-ban-push-citing-trade-relations/

    I’m tempted to observe that it’s a bit offensive to bracket Indonesia  (where I’ve lived happily for nearly two decades, and where perhaps 1 or 2% of women wear the revolting head-gear) with an absolute sectarian monarchy where women are such second-class citizens that, last I heard, they’re not allowed to drive a car!

    So Saudi Women CAN Look Like Women!?! 

    But let’s move on.

    Since when do Australians tailor their domestic laws and customs to keep in with foreign countries?

    If Joyce had come out openly saying he thinks that shariah sexism is just jim-dandy…

    =

    =

    …I’d be disgusted, but somehow muster a modicum of respect for his candour.

    But he doesn’t say that. He’s quoted in another newspaper as opposing a ban ‘despite disliking the burqa.’

    So for Barnaby it’s not about security or about rescuing women from a barbaric dress-code, but merely a matter of dollars and cents?

    One is obliged to ask just how low Australia’s Deputy PM is prepared to sink to appease Saudi Arabia.

    Please note the Saudis have a bad record of arrogant intrusion into the internal affairs of more civilised countries.

    =

    =

    Saudi Arabia and other Islamic countries accused Norway of doing too little to protect its Muslim minority, with Saudi Arabia calling for all criticism of religions or their prophets to be made illegal.

    What next, Barnaby?

     

     
    • Keith Milner 11:33 am on September 10, 2017 Permalink | Reply

      You got it right. We should ban the head-bag.
      If they want to wear it indoors, it’s up to them, but not outdoors where it’s an insult to every Australian principle.
      The same security principle should be used to prohibit Antifa masks too.

    • Uncle Oz 12:10 pm on September 10, 2017 Permalink | Reply

      Before this Barnaby Joyce was a sensible man, I always thought, but now I am having a re-think.
      I feel sorry for those women in Arabia but I don’t see how we can do anything for them.
      So why should Australia worry what they think about our country?

      Unless he’s saying both countries allow women a free choice on burka-wearing?

    • Jerry Jerman 12:45 pm on September 10, 2017 Permalink | Reply

      I have seen tonight that one of these savages attacked a Berlin shop assistant for selling lingerie.
      Police will have difficulty in finding her because her head was covered. http://www.breitbart.com/london/2017/09/07/niqab-clad-woman-assaults-saleswoman-lingerie-islamic-headscarves/
      The burka wearers are as you often say primitives and should get no home among Europeans.

  • ross1948 8:47 am on September 1, 2017 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , , , , shariah sexism,   

    Mogherini, Just Like Julie Bishop, Betrays Iran’s Women! 


    Communists of course are liars, all that prattle about workers’ rights and ‘the people,’ when they stomp workers and impose a new ruling class wherever they get the chance.

    But they are usually quite good at lying.

    =====

    ===

    It’s essential for their chances of success.

    So given the Euro-Commissars’ pretend-concern for “women’s rights,” it was surprising to see Federica Mogherini, the Italian communist currently rejoicing in the title of ‘European Union High Representative for Foreign Affairs…’

    ===

    While she shakes the hands of these men, she thinks of the nine-year-old girls who are “legally” forced into marriage with the consent of the government?

    https://de.gatestoneinstitute.org/10912/feministinnen-dschihadisten

    ===
    ….exposing her duplicity by publicly crawling to the sexist bigots who run Iran, it’s worthy of mention.

    So much for the dignity of women!

    Red Fed went to great trouble to remove evidence of her enthusiasm for Arab terrorism around the time she got her promotion to Euroglory.

    She excised this infamous picture of herself smiling in the company of Yasser Arafat, a figure notorious for his terrorist activities from her social media.

    ==========

    =

    However, the top photo, of her miserable headscarf kow-tow, was not only unconcealed but comes to us courtesy of the European Union – originally.

    However, the link below that Tehran photo belongs to the Gatestone Institute, and although it takes you to an article in German, Gatestone has a neat translation system, and you can refresh your knowledge of just how evil the Islamist regime in Iran is…

    …….

    ////////

    … especially in its iniquitous maltreatment of women. Check out this video link!

    Iran: Young woman apprehended in Tehran for not covering her hair

    =

    =

    None of the Euro-Commissars, who pretend to care about women’s rights, has yet, so far as we can see, ever called for Mogherini’s resignation, nor even suggested she should apologise and give an undertaking never again to don the shariah scarf.

    =

    =

    But Red Fed is not unique. We saw those immensely ‘liberated’ and ‘feminist’ Swedes grovelling to shariah too, remember?

    =

      Iran – Contemptible Swedish Cows Crawl To Shariah Sexists 

    =======

    And before any readers in the English-speaking world start mocking the appeasement mentality of the afore-mentioned weasel-women…

    =======

    Australian Foreign Minister Julie Bishop holds a press conference with her Iranian counterpart Mohammad Javad Zarif following a meeting in Tehran on April 18, 2015.

    ========

    Look at that Aussie bint Bishop!

    ===

    If these women, any of them, had worn a scarf in order to visit a mosque, nobody would raise an eye-brow.

    Respect for somebody else’s place of worship means following its rules, as I did when I took off my shoes to visit the magnificent mosque in Cairo years ago.

    But outside mosques? On the streets? In public buildings, as were those Western rat-bags in the photos?

    Craven collaboration, compliance with the primitives’shariah subjugation into which Iranian women are brutally coerced every day of their lives?

    SICK!

     
    • Santi 1:23 pm on September 1, 2017 Permalink | Reply

      Not many of the Muslim women in my office wear headscarf so why do these non-Muslim western women?
      I think they better dress like they do every day at home in Italy or Sweden or Australia.
      They look stupid dress up like Arab women when they are not.

    • Uncle Oz 3:11 pm on September 2, 2017 Permalink | Reply

      Bishop wants to be PM here.
      If anybody could be worse than the one we got, it must be her.

  • ross1948 1:47 pm on July 19, 2017 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , , Ibrahim al-Munayif, , Khulood, , , , shariah sexism,   

    So Saudi Women CAN Look Like Women!?! 


    I guess we always suspected that the female population of Saudi Arabia included a lot of yummy chicks.

    =====

    =====

    It stands to reason that, beneath those repulsive shrouds they’re forced to wear, many are attractive.

    But proof positive at last!

    And it’s causing an uproar.

    Threats to prosecute the slender young gal in the photo below, named Khulood, it seems, for wearing an ‘indecent’ mini-skirt?!?!

    What Dark Age do these people live in?

    ==

    View image on TwitterView image on Twitter

    The Saudi writer Ibrahim al-Munayif told his 41,000 Twitter followers that if everyone disregarded the law in this way there would be chaos.  https://www.theguardian.com/world/2017/jul/18/saudi-arabia-video-of-indecently-dressed-woman-at-heritage-site-prompts-investigation

    No, daftoid, there would be a glimmer of hope that your benighted country is at last becoming civilised!

    But then he makes a very interesting statement!

    ——–=

    “Just like we call on people to respect the laws of countries they travel to, people must also respect the laws of this country,” he wrote.

    ===========

    So what is Mr. al-Munayif telling ‘migrants’ from the Middle East, Pakistan, etc. who choose to settle in civilised Western countries?

    That they must repudiate the iniquitous shariah laws which treat women as second-class human beings?

    That Londoners, New Yorkers, normal folks in Toronto and Paris and Sydney, should no longer have their street scenes blighted by burka-clad bints wandering along, about three or four subjugated paces behind their men?

    If so, he’d be doing more than that lousy appeasement artist, Theresa May.

    =

    Theresa May hails ‘benefits’ of Sharia as inquiry set up

    But I doubt the sectarian sexists who oppress Saudi women really would encourage alien immigrants in the UK to accept civilised standards of behaviour.

    Even here in Indonesia….

    ……

    Miss Indonesia contestants, 2013.

    …..

    ….where many of its lovely women do behave like and look (very much!) like women, we have shariah fanatic outfits who wish to see women coerced by men.

    “Fathers and Husbands, their ‘aurat’ is your responsibility!”

    000000

    I imagine that kill-joy Welya woman from the MUI, the Indonesian ‘Scholars’ Council, has not changed her dismay at seeing lovely ladies unashamed to display their God-given femininity! 

    —————————

    …the Aceh model is a good example…most importantly, wearing the hijab must meet three conditions. That it’s Shariah compliant, conceals the genitals and shows no curves

    ‘Scholars’ on Scarfs – ‘Must Be Shariah-Compliant, Hide Genitals, Show No Curves!’ 

    Of course she’s not actually talking about ‘genitals.’

    That’s the dumbo Google Translate interpretation of ‘aurat’ – a catch-all word for ‘private parts,’ which, to the backward brigade, includes thighs, belly-buttons, hair (of course) but even shoulders!

    Pathetic!

    But at least here in Jakarta, there’s no shariah gestapo harassing women whose delightful appearance might provoke primitive passions.

    Not yet.

    0000000

     

    ‘Immoral Activities – Sitting in Coffee Shops Laughing and Talking…’ 

    I wish I could say the same for all of Indonesia’s provinces!

     
  • ross1948 12:03 am on July 16, 2017 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , Christel Weissig, , , , shariah sexism, shooting rioters,   

    Shooting Red Nazi Antifa? Sense, NOT Shariah, Herr Klutz! 


    Just a few days ago, we made the point that if the police in Hamburg had been authorised to use fire-arms to take out a random sample of Red Nazi hoodlums who subjected Hamburg to a reign of terror last week…

    Gambar terkait

    Not just violence but arson and looting too…

    Violent Reds Amok in Hamburg – 9 Cops Injured? Open Fire!

    …., the Antifa animals would not be so keen on showing up next time.

    I was going to say ‘to show their faces,’ but they don’t, do they?

    000000

    00000000

    Whether in America as above, or on the streets of Hamburg, as last weekend, the gutless red vermin skulk behind masks while engaging in violence and mayhem- and looting, which was a feature of their riot at G20.

    But their criminality should not distract us from their essential role as the storm-troops of cultural marxism.

    ———-

    0000

     

    unch

    ffff

    So it was good to hear common sense being echoed in Germany itself, with a provincial parliament legislator named Christel Weißig, of the German patriot party, the AfD….

    ….posting some wise words on her Facebook pages.

    “Looters are shot immediately, why is that not the case here?”

    Bravo!

    But before we cheer, hang on! Christel somewhat let the side down by deleting the post a few hours later.

    ======

     Hasil gambar untuk mecklenburg Afd Christel Weissig
    =

    And sad to say, her AfD colleagues instead of echoing her sound sentiments, issued a soppy statement, viz.-

     Weißig had reacted emotionally to the riots in her hometown. “Using an exaggerated question, she wanted to draw attention to the fact that the state is powerless in the face of such inhumane violence.”

    What the Hell is wrong with those Mecklenburg AfD people? Weissig’s reaction must have resonated with millions of decent Germans.  Around 200 cops were injured, some very grievously, by the red vermin, so why not shoot the scum?

    One expects pussy-footing prigs like Mama Stasi Merkel’s local side-kick, Lorenz Caffier, to spout drip-speak.

    Get this hogwash!

    Caffier accused the AfD of seeking to introduce “sharia methods.”

    http://www.politico.eu/article/hamburg-germany-far-right-german-politician-suggests-g20-rioters-should-have-been-shot/

    0000

    Caffier

    ===

    Does Caffier even know what ‘shariah’ is?

    It’s a code of ‘law’ exalted by Islamists, , and its best known aspects concern how women are to be subjugated. It includes stuff like polygamy, unfair inheritance rules…

    /

    ..

    … and is the source of all the iniquitous head-shrouding etc. discriminatory fatwas which apply to women but not to men.

    I don’t know if there’s anything in shariah about properly constituted police forces dealing effectively with filthy communist thugs who commit crimes against people and property. If so, then it clearly has some saving graces.

    But Herr Klutz Caffier is just a dummkopf to compare the AfD lady’s Facebook post to the alien code.

    His name rang a bell and sure enough he’s been on our blog before, also for talking rot.

    German In-Crowd Running Scared – And Lying! 

    And I hope German voters in their federal election in September will remember what manner of mediocrities make up the Merkelite sell-out party.

    =

    =

    As for AfD, their leader Beatrix Von Storch was quite right two years ago when she said border guards should open fire on crimmigrants gate-crashing her country’s sovereign frontiers.

    They stood by her then and should not have distanced themselves from Christel’s clarion call.

    inlstatement read.

    Other state-level politicians.

    were outraged by the remark. The state’s interior minister Peter Caffier (of the Christian Democrats)

     
    • jerry Jerman 2:50 am on July 16, 2017 Permalink | Reply

      And why should the antifa not be shot if they are attacking police and guitly of many crimes.
      The Merkel man in Meckenburg I think wants very much to get approval from his boss in Berlin
      We have no conservative party now in Germany excepting for the AfD.

  • ross1948 6:10 pm on May 20, 2017 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , , shariah sexism, ,   

    Bravo, Melania! A Fine First Lady! Such A Contrast With The Crawlers! 


    Hasil gambar untuk trump arrives in Saudi

    ”””

    There she is, Mrs. Trump, looking like a normal woman, blonde hair blowing slightly in the breeze, absolutely NO head-shrouding as she meets the Arab King.

    What a healthy, indeed refreshing contrast with those sicko appeasement bints we saw a few months ago!

    ———–

      Iran – Contemptible Swedish Cows Crawl To Shariah Sexists 

    Or indeed that dismal dame who shamed Australia with her sycophantic scarfing stunt in the land ruled by evil ayatollahs.

    ==============

    Gambar terkait

    ====

    Melania today has shown that no woman should ever feel obliged to cover her head.


    Hasil gambar untuk women's rights sharia

    Unless men do too! .

     

     
    • Ben Baniek 8:13 pm on May 20, 2017 Permalink | Reply

      Yes, she is a beauty.
      After those 8 years of Obama we need some glamor in the White House and Lord knows those poor Arabs need to see how women should look.

c
Compose new post
j
Next post/Next comment
k
Previous post/Previous comment
r
Reply
e
Edit
o
Show/Hide comments
t
Go to top
l
Go to login
h
Show/Hide help
shift + esc
Cancel