Tagged: Soros ECHR Toggle Comment Threads | Keyboard Shortcuts

  • ross1948 1:45 am on September 8, 2021 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: Soros ECHR, Sorosoid judges   

    Setback For Sauron? Sorosoid Wannabe Judge Loses! 

    Anything that’s bad news for George Soros’s Open Society has to be good news for decent people around the world.



    Just read this, below, and see what a valuable service the ECLJ has done, with its report…

    BBC Won’t Tell! Why’s The Afghan In UK? 

    …which we noted en passant some months ago.


    The ECLJ’s report circulated around the world, revealing the hold of a few large private foundations on the European institutions, in particular the ECHR. The first beneficial effects of its publication are appearing within the Council of Europe itself.

    On 20 April 2021, the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe elected the new Belgium judge to the ECHR. Among the three candidates proposed by the Belgian government was a lawyer employed by George Soros’ Open Society, as is often the case.

    But for the first time in a long time, the Open Society failed to get its candidate elected, despite its considerable financial and political power.

    In the end, a Belgian lawyer, less political and more competent, was elected: Mr. Frédéric Krenc, with 148 votes against 81 for the Open Society employee and 29 for Sylvie Saroléa. This is a victory for the independence of the Court, and a fruit of the ECLJ Report on NGOs and the judges of the ECHR.


  • ross1948 2:36 pm on August 5, 2021 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , , , Soros ECHR   

    Insanity! Soros Court Stops Afghan Deportations 

    Sheer insanity.



    That’s the only way to describe the diktat issued to Austria by the Soros-stacked ECHR.




    Strasbourg’s robed ratbags have ordered the Austrian government to ‘postpone deportation of an Afghan national, given the worsening conflict in the war-torn country.’

    If the Afghan in question were an heroic opponent of the evil Taliban, fair enough.

    But then he would probably not be facing deportation, would he?

    Fact is, not nearly enough aliens are deported from Austria…


    …or any other country.

    Only a fraction of the worst crimmigrants get sent back where they belong.

    Enemy Within vermin even seek to stop expulsion of rapists.

    German Leftist Lawyer – “Rapist Refugees Don’t DeserveDeportation!” 

    And certainly some of the worst primitives plaguing Europe are from Afghanistan, like these scum…

    Klagenfurt and Vienna Too – More About Austria’s Grateful Guests!

    Unaccompanied Minors?’ Groping? Again? Poor Wee Boys? 

    Wrist-Slap for Rape-Refugee? 

    And Another One? Girl, 13, Molested, Killed 

    …or this feral swine…

    An Afghan man suspected of being a leading member of an international people-smuggling network has been arrested in north London.

    And the following vile ignoramuses?

    Ingrate Afghans – In Athens – Tell GREEK To “Go, Go!” 

    Arson! Ingrate Afghan Savages Amok, Stoning Cops 

    Why on earth should any of those featured in those true stories NOT be sent back to Afghanistan?

    Because they might come to grief there?
    God willing, they might well, and no regrets in Austria or Germany or Italy or Greece, or Britain, if they catch a stray bullet or two back home!
    It’s not just the Austrian case, please note.
    Such deportations have already been suspended in Finland, Sweden and Norway. Afghans in Germany are also increasingly winning their appeals against deportations, with a 76-percent success rate between January and May. Court stops Austria’s Afghan deportation, as conflict worsens

    It’s like we said the other day.


    Send them back!

    • Amanda Adams 11:27 pm on August 5, 2021 Permalink | Reply

      If any of the ungrateful criminal Afghans, as described in your previous posts, are still in Europe, that is an outrage and has to be rectified.


  • ross1948 4:00 pm on August 2, 2021 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , Nordic Foreign Ministerss, Soros ECHR   

    Nordic Natterjacks, Ignorant Of History! 

    Just looking back at things we should have covered last month, questions we should have asked…like…

    What do these klutzes have in common?

    Jeppe Kofod is Danish minister of foreign affairs. Pekka Haavisto is Finnish minister of foreign affairs


    The Nordics unite to support the Council of Europe and ECHR


    Gudlaugur Thór Thórdarson is Icelandic minister for foreign affairs and international development cooperation. Ine Eriksen Søreide is Norwegian minister for foreign affairs. Ann Linde is Swedish minister for foreign affairs.

    Apart from their parallel positions, foreign ministers of their respective countries, they are all stunningly ignorant of modern history.

    I say this because they know that the Council of Europe, which we have written about before…

    Bojo Gangs Up Against ‘Our Oldest Ally? ‘ 

    …when we showed you it’s hugely expensive HQ in Strasbourg….

    • .

      Building of the Council of Europe Headquarters located in Strasbourg, France. Stock Photo - 103414864
      Council of Europe Headquarters


      …a deplorable body which spawned the ECHR, now a Sorosoid tool used to bludgeon national sovereignty – was established in the aftermath of the World War Two…



      ….in Strasbourg on the basis of international law – including human rights and the principles of democracy and the rule of law.

      So it was.

      And many, if not all, of the signatory countries had capital punishment on their statute books.

      Many had corporal punishment too as a legal sanction.

      Sexual (‘gay’) perversion in many European nations was against the law – certainly in the UK, which only legalised it in the early 1960s.

      Yet the Council of Europe and its Sorosoid Court has declared capital and corporal punishment unacceptable….



      …and engaging in all manner of sexual perversion, while not yet mandatory….



      ….is deemed as acceptable as living decently within normal relationships.

      Were those original signatories hypocrites?

      Hardly likely they would sign up, if they thought any laws in their own lands were transgressions against  human rights and the principles of democracy and the rule of law

    • So the original convention, which these Nordic Natterjacks invoke so readily, has itself been perverted by malevolent jurists.


      Wise nations should withdraw.

    • Jim Ex Jakarta 6:17 pm on August 2, 2021 Permalink | Reply

      All very true, what you say, Ross, these foreign ministers are just air-brushing the truth about that post-war rights pact.
      What I want to know is why you are still energetically publishing all these readables after you said you were going to ease off.

      Dont get me wrong, I am always happy to read what you offer, but if this is you easing off, I am wondering what we would get ( 10 pages a day?) if you decided you had relaxed too much.


      • ross1948 7:33 pm on August 2, 2021 Permalink | Reply

        Okay, Jim, I confess. I can’t sit idly by.
        It’s not that I don’t have things both onerous and enjoyable to do, but there are gaps between them and so much in the news that I feel obliged to deride or dispute.


    • Tam Birnie 6:41 pm on August 2, 2021 Permalink | Reply

      You are absolutely right about the governments that signed up to the convention but I think you’re wrong to say the ministers who made this new statement are ignorant.
      They are just dishonest.
      It goes without saying they know the convention was never meant to stop the use of the death penalty or to etop badly behaved children getting a quick wallop with a cane or a strap in school.
      The Council of Europe and the ECHR make fools of theirselves when they contradict the intentions of the convention.


  • ross1948 6:00 pm on May 6, 2021 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , , , scottish schools, Soros ECHR, Tawse   

    Why’s BBC Flogging Old Belt Issues? 

    Andrew Campbell got a whole slew of time to whine soppily about the Scottish tawse…



    …but at least admitted that the majority of Scots did not want it abolished.

    Who the Hell is he?

    The son of a whiner mother, Grace Campbell, so inept in her arguments that she could not persuade her fellow-Scots to bow to her pinko shrilling.

    So she slunk off to the robed rogues in Strasbourg…



    …who of course obliged with an anti-democratic diktat.

    Grisly Grace is thus to blame, but the worse villain is that spineless clown Major…



    …who actually opposed the abolition of corporal punishment in schools…

    A Swiss Reminder Of John Major’s Despicable Euro-Grovel 

    …but cast principle to the wind and jumped through the hoop held out by the ECHR.



    But the real question I asked, of nobody in particular, when UK Pravda gave us soppy Andrew’s abolitionist spiel yesterday…


    …was WHY did they plaster such pinko guff on our screens, and, of course…


    …why did UK Pravda not give an equal platform to one of the MAJORITY of Scots who took a different view?

  • ross1948 3:25 pm on December 1, 2020 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , climate panic brat gang, , Soros ECHR,   

    Soros Court Orders 33 Nations To ‘Answer To’ Brats! 

    Back in the ever more demented West, that Soros Court….


    …aka the European Court of Human Right ( but truly more accurate to say ‘Soros Court!’)…


    …has issued a new diktat, ordering no less than 33 European governments to ‘answer to’ a clutch of Climate Panic tykes, one of them only EIGHT YEARS OLD!



    Since when did any elementary school-kid even hear of, never mind instigate, a lawsuit?

    Who’s put these brats up to it?

    The brats are Portuguese, we read, ‘youth campaigners,’ but are their agitprop outfits, is their lawsuit, funded by Brussels….



    ….or by The Dark Lord himself?



    Unless the uppities come from plutocrat families, it’s unlikely that they could themselves afford the legal fees involved in this nonsense.


     A lot of pocket money!

    If EUObs is quoting directly from that lawsuit – ‘that government inaction to halt global warming jeopardised their futures and wellbeing – ‘  then who wrote that tendentious tripe?

    The  countries, including Germany, France or the UK, have until the end of February to respond – unless a settlement is reached before then. https://euobserver.com/tickers/150236

    A timely reminder, as if British patriots need one, of yet another failure by the Johnson Government…



    ….which, despite his pretended committment to ‘taking back control,’ has NOT extricated the UK from the imbecilic meddling of the Sorosoid slugs in Strasbourg!

    • Edward Lamont 4:17 pm on December 1, 2020 Permalink | Reply

      I have free time today, and so I decided to look into this, but I only got so far.
      The brats have powerful helpers, a group which has a website that tells a lot about who it helps but seems very shy about whose ‘donations’ it accepts.
      It’s called GLAN, the ‘Global Legal Action Network.’
      I think we should all email them Info@glanlaw.org and ask if Soros groups give them financial support.
      It does reveal that a lot of universities are implicated in their operation.
      The brats also have started crowd-funding.
      I agree, Boris Johnson should remove Britain from ECHR jurisdiction.
      It is not much use exiting one ‘European Project’ if we stay shackled to another!


    • Delise NZ 1:52 am on December 2, 2020 Permalink | Reply

      Seen and not heard. That was how children were prevented from being brats in times past.
      Time to reintroduce that approach!


  • ross1948 2:00 pm on October 26, 2020 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , SBS, slimy lawyers, Soros ECHR, Tanker   

    Hi-Jackers? Pity The SBS Didn’t Shoot The Swine! 

    It used to be that piracy on the high seas was punishable by death, but like all sensible penalties, that’s been done away with.



    However, the problem now, with those dirty savages who menaced the tanker crew off the English coast, is what to do with them.



    It would have made things a lot simpler if the good guys of the SBS had quickly taken them out, but tons of slimy lawyers would have whined all the way to the European Court in Strasbourg, to which, despite Brexit…



    ….Bojo keeps Britain subordinate.

    Now the obvious step is to deport them back to where they apparently come from, Nigeria.


    But if they have been landed on UK soil, for trial, and that seems to be the case, then what if the scumbags declare they want to seek ‘asylum?’

    I see reference in the Reuters report on this crimmigrant news to a similar event a year or two ago.

    In December 2018, British forces stormed an Italian cargo ship and regained control after stowaways threatened crew as it sailed close to the southeast coast.

    It would be interesting to know what became of those crimmigrants. Were they imprisoned, or booted back to whence they came?


    Did May and Rudd end up giving them ‘asylum?’


    Back to the slimy lawyers again, like the one we mentioned earlier this month…

    Identify This Legalouse, “Scared,” But Heedless Of Migrants’ Many Victims! 


    ….who will doubtless see fresh opportunities to plunder the public purse.

    If this Tory Government allowed the filthy ISIS sow Begum to get ‘legal aid…’


    ….why would they draw the line at savage Nigerian hi-jackers?

    This story is worth keeping an eye on!


    • Vanessa Reilly 4:42 pm on October 26, 2020 Permalink | Reply

      I’m watching the news carefully.
      If they try to sneak them through the ‘asylum’ process, what’s the betting there will be people seriously determined to cover it up.


    • Mack the Knife 5:43 pm on October 26, 2020 Permalink | Reply

      Good idea, but not practical for the time being.
      I think you may be right about them wanting ‘asylum’ and I fear you may be right about Priti Patel.


  • ross1948 4:29 pm on August 18, 2020 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , , , , , , , Soros ECHR   

    If Bad Laws Disadvantage Honest Brits, FIX Them! 

    Much uproar about undesirable aliens being foisted on England’s West Midlands, understandably…

    ….but is it not fascinating that the noisy complainers are people who have never, so far as can be told, demanded that the incursions of fake-refugees, aka ‘asylum-seekers,’ be blocked from entering the UK…


    ….nor have they been often, or, probably, at all, heard calling for the expulsion of the thousands upon thousands of parasites…



    …whose claims for ‘asylum’ have been rejected as baseless but whose lying snouts yet continue to root about freely in the tax-payers’ pockets!

    Leeching Off Brit Tax-Payers, ‘Asylum’ Aliens Complain! 

    But you may read about the latest culprits via the link.

    Today I want to focus on just a few sentences almost hidden away in the middle of the report.

    The UK has a legal responsibility to settle anyone claiming political asylum while their cases are assessed


    Firstly, if it’s a legal responsibility, there is a law somewhere on the statute book.


    Find it, and repeal it.

    Same for supranational courts…



    Sorosoid ECHR


    ….or conventions that tie British hands! Bojo and Priti have a majority in the Commons. There is huge popular back for a clamp-down, over 70% in a poll last week. Speedy legislative action would be cheered nationwide!

    Pending such overdue legal reform, interpret the existing bad law intelligently.

    Never let leeches be put up in luxury.


    Nigel Farage


    Nigel Farage has done useful work recently, but while what’s happening is bad, it’s not really bad ‘news!’

    Such outrageous misuse of public funds has been reported here and elsewhere for years, e.g. this in 2015!

    Guilty Conscience? Home Office Hiding Crimmigrant Costs! 

    If, and I emphasise IF, Brit tax-payers have to have these mangy albatrosses hung around their necks, then the budget per ‘asylum’ slug should be pared to the most basic level.

    Food? Bread and water!

    No hotel-style menus from which to pick and choose.

    Take it or leave it.

    Any complaints, as Italy heard from similar ingrate swine there…

    Crimmigrants Seize Italian Cop-Shop – Punishment? ‘Specialised African Cuisine!’ 

    …..should be met not with appeasement, as happened there, but with a prompt withdrawal of rations – when they get hungry enough, they’ll eat.

    When my six-year-old self refused to eat his asparagus, that approach worked.



    After all, containers are multi-purpose!


    Buy or hire unused containers.

    Shove ‘em in.

    Such lodgings would be handy for deportation too.


    No Man's Land

    One of Britain’s offshore and uninhabited islands

    ….as suggested before, give ‘em tents and stick ‘em on those old off-shore fortifications, a patrol-boat circling to make sure nobody swims ashore!

    Word would get out!

    Channel incursions would dry up, tout suite!



    • Mack the Knife 5:16 pm on August 18, 2020 Permalink | Reply

      You made my day with this.
      I had to think a while before I got the right word, compendiun.
      A compendium of cracking good ideas and if Johnson and Patel dont get cracking on at least some of what you suggesr, it will be the end of them at the next election, if not before.


    • Vanessa Reilly 4:35 pm on October 1, 2020 Permalink | Reply

      The governnent is gradually catching up to your positive approach. Not containers yet but ferries.
      IMHO ferries are far too nice.
      The illegals must be made to regret they ever came across the channel.
      But at least the government is inching towards a more sensible policy.
      An uninhabited island still makes the most sense to me.


Compose new post
Next post/Next comment
Previous post/Previous comment
Show/Hide comments
Go to top
Go to login
Show/Hide help
shift + esc
%d bloggers like this: