Tagged: Switzerland Toggle Comment Threads | Keyboard Shortcuts

  • ross1948 13:39 on March 31, 2019 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , Switzerland   

    Swiss Train Staff Facing Faceless Quandary? 

    Swiss train staff 'should have power to demand people uncover their face'

    Suppose you’re a ticket inspector on a Swiss train and you come across the nightmarish creature in the photo above.

    I use the bag-head photo simply because it was included in the media report that led me to write on today’s cause for concern – apparently it’s ‘Nora Illi, the women’s representative of an unofficial group called the Islamic Central Committee of Switzerland.’

    Well, it might be her, but then again, it might be me!

    Or anyone else who had stolen, borrowed or otherwise acquired the scary shrouded person’s rail-card.

    Obviously, you, as an inspector, have the right to see the face behind the sectarian shroud, so you can do your job and compare it to the likeness on the card.

    NOT so!

    Incredibly, we read that –

    The Swiss government hopes to introduce a new law that would make it illegal for people to refuse to uncover their face when asked to do so by government officials, transport staff or privately-contracted ticket inspectors.


    Switzerland’s federal authorities are only NOW looking at passing legislation to give public sector officials the right to require compliance, at least in the fields of immigration and a few others, like aviation and rail transport? https://www.thelocal.ch/20180628/swiss-government-outlines-counterproposal-to-burqa-ban,

    So meanwhile, burka bints, and anyone else skulking behind a mask, can simply refuse to show their faces?

    Time indeed to fix this, and a mere fine, as envisaged, is hardly an adequate penalty for recalcitrant refusal.



    Uppities like that should be hauled off to the cop-shop, unmasked and held, not just until the fine is paid, but until they sign an enforceable undertaking NEVER to don the primitive shroud again.   



    • Hosking 14:06 on March 31, 2019 Permalink | Reply

      Anybody who wants to look like that should move to the EuroDisney Haunted House in Paris.
      I’m joking of course.
      There’s no place anywhere in Europe for these women ( and their husbands) who want to live their miserable lives in submission to codes that should have died out centuries ago.
      Unmask or get out, that’s a fair choice to offer them.


    • Del Vallon 22:18 on March 31, 2019 Permalink | Reply

      The Swiss people are still pretty down to earth and have got no time for multuculturalism. They have been a four-language four-culture country since hundreds of years sgo, but none of them wants to add alien cultures to the mix.
      The problem is that apart from the SVP, the big parties have bought into the soft option, even on extremely offensive intrusions like the burqa.
      What is very dangerous is that the same big parties are trying to obstruct Swiss direct democracy and prevent the people making decisions.
      You wrote about that before and should write about that again.


      • John Lochard 15:29 on April 1, 2019 Permalink | Reply

        I spent a year there and In my opinion, Switzerland is a lot safer than Germany. It’s like Germany used to be before Merkel ruined the country. The Swiss won’t stand for cheek and the police are not under orders to put up with stroppy migrants.

        Even so, there are too many unacceptable aliens for most Swiss. I am referring to the bad kind, not foreigners who show respect and fit in and do honest work and are usually made welcome.

        It’s the others who cause problems. I think you know about the Winterthur mosque scandal as well as that group who objected so much to Swiss identity that they wanted the flag changed.
        That’s the reason so many Swiss have been getting militant.


    • Keith Milner 07:59 on April 1, 2019 Permalink | Reply

      We have too many women ( though we can never be sure they are women) in Australia.
      The government should ban wearing masks in public, except on Halloweeen!


    • Uncle Oz 09:31 on April 1, 2019 Permalink | Reply

      I would pay my own fare for the privilege!


      • Uncle Oz 15:00 on April 1, 2019 Permalink | Reply

        Oh, beg pardon, Ross.
        That comment was meant to be about helping hang the ISIS gang!
        But while I’m back at your blog again, I agree with what Keith says on this.


    • Stan D 14:54 on April 1, 2019 Permalink | Reply

      Just don’t let them on the trains or the buses.
      Seeing things like that on public transport is frightening for young children and unsettling for all respectable passengers.


      • Madge Allason 20:54 on April 1, 2019 Permalink | Reply

        Stan, I wish more people would say what you say, about the effect these horrible looking things have on children.
        Some people never know what its like walking the kids to school or the shops and being faced with something like a ghoul or a goblin all in black.
        These women should be banned from appearing in public dressed like that.


  • ross1948 17:21 on October 20, 2018 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , going home for holidays, svp/udc, Switzerland   

    Swiss Tell Fakers – If You Go Home, Stay Home! 


    Splendid Swiss decision, this, ‘to strip asylum from those travelling to their home country,’ an abuse reported often but so far rarely tackled by pro-crimmigrant governments.

    We first noted a shocking example in Canada, where lying Tamils, given sanctuary on account of the terrible dangers they faced in Sri Lanka, were exposed for taking vacations back where they ‘fled’ from.

    Mangy dishonest swine, yet we have never yet heard news of any Canadian Government kicking the scumbags out – if anyones does know of any such deportations, I’d be delighted to be stand corrected.

    In Europe too, a lot of the recent horde have been caught going happily home for nice little holidays…

    ‘Desperate Migrants’ Demand ‘Asylum’ – Then Go Home for Holidays! 


    Like Canada’s Tamils, ‘German’ Syrians Exposed -‘Fake Refugees!’ 

    …yet how many of the scammers have been rounded up on their return to the European troughs they love to slurp at?

    So good news that the Swiss reform was approved by 129 members of the National Council  but who are 57 who voted against?

    Almost needless to say, the reform was put forward by the SVP/UDC – the Swiss People’s Party – who have been in the vanguard of all constructive moves on ‘migrant’ issues in Switzerland.

    According to the news report, the case was successfully made that ‘returning home for a holiday or to visit parents proves the refugee is not threatened or persecuted there and should should lose their asylum rights.

    Moreover, the argument was linked to facilitating identification of fake ‘refugees’ and the considersble number of economic migrants who have flooded Europe since the Merkel sell-out on 2015.

    The measure, it was said, would contribute to ‘reducing the attractiveness of Switzerland as a destination.’



    Now it’s up to the other branch of the legislature to get it passed and start the process of expulsion for every liar leeching off the Swiss tax-payers!


    • Roy Lomax 00:28 on October 21, 2018 Permalink | Reply

      The Swiss have real democracy.
      if politicians step out of line, the people can crack the referendum whip.
      That’s what we need!


  • ross1948 20:06 on September 28, 2018 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , court v democracy, , , , Switzerland   

    Swiss Judges Rule Against Democracy! 


    So now we read that another court in another country has ruled democracy out of order.

    evil judge

    The Swiss Supreme Court has interdicted a referendum in Valais Canton on the burqa issue, despite the Swiss People’s Party (SVP) having followed constitutional rules and gathered enough signatures (over 4,000) to give citizens a vote on ‘head coverings’ in schools.


    But it’s not just the court to blame – the SVP’s opponents in the cantonal legislature also rejected any right by the people to have a vote.

    Every Swiss patriot should descend on the Federal Court headquarters to  show their solidarity with the voters of Valais…


    What is most offensive about the ruling, and most disturbing, is that one of the reasons the high court gave for ruling against the people was ‘international law!’

    No international statute should be permitted to supersede the rights of a sovereign nation.



    No citizenry should be jackbooted out of their democratic rights because of some supranational convention!

    Even less so when the court confuses a right to religious liberty with the ‘right’ to flaunt one’s ( or some parent’s! ) sectarianism.

    Listen to this.

    .’..the Federal Supreme Court said that the wearing of headscarves indicated a religious conviction and that the Swiss constitution enshrines religious freedom.’


    We have been making the truth known time and again over the years, that there’s NO obligation on Muslim girls to cover either their hair or their faces! 

    An Archaic Tribal Rag’ – Wise UK Muslim Imam Says ‘Ban the Burqa!’ 

    It’s on the BBC! Bag-Head Bans Do Not Infringe Religious Liberty! 

    Fiery Islamists – ‘Head-Scarves NOT a Big Issue!’ 

    When will they ever learn?

    The good news is that ‘another popular initiative calling for a nationwide ban on such garments is due to be voted on in a referendum.’

    Unfortunately, there’s no date yet named for the national ballot…

    referndmlet peole vote

    …but unless some Alpine version of Project Fear is unleashed against the electorate, it should be a clear victory over imported alien customs.

    The report tells us that a poll a couple of years ago showed more than SEVENTY PER CENT will vote to approve a ban on face coverings.


  • ross1948 20:49 on August 24, 2018 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , Lausanne, , , Switzerland   

    Won’t Shake Hands? Send ‘Em Back! 

    Great to see some authorities in Europe are refusing to bow down to backward aliens who can’t, or more accurately won’t, adapt to civilised standards.



    But shocking to see how others  grovel to multicult!

    Hats off, firstly, to Mayor Gregoire Junod of Lausanne, who’s forthright in his defence of last month’s decision to deny Swiss citizenship to a brace of aliens.’


    Related image

    He refused to divulge the couple’s nationalities or other identifying details, but said they “did not shake hands with people of the opposite sex…. They also “showed great difficulty in answering questions asked by people of the opposite sex.”

    Unfit to play any part in Switzerland in the 21st century.

    Even better sentiments came from his deputy, Pierre-Antoine Hildeband.


    • Related image

    “The constitution and equality between men and women prevails over bigotry,” he said.


    Trust The Leftal, sorry, The Local, to throw in the ‘news’ that ‘some devout Muslims argue that Islam does not permit physical contact with a member of the opposite sex.’

    The proper word is NOT ‘devout.’

    Normal Muslims, ‘devout’ or not, certainly in this 90% Muslim country I live in, hold to no such pig-ignorant sexist nonsense.

    And whatever, just because some ‘devout’ or otherwise sectarians ‘argue’ some crappy case, that’s no reason normal people, Christian, Muslim or of any creed, should respect primitive rubbish.



    After all, we all regard the vile ‘behead blasphemers’ skunks with loathing and contempt.

    Yet elsewhere in Europe…



    …where else – you could guess, I suppose, but it’s Sweden – the authorities, in this case an ombudsman, in that northern kingdom, have crawled on their bureaucratic bellies to backward bints who flaunt their sexism.

    Muslim woman denied job for refusing handshake awarded $6000 compensation

    • A nation that abases itself before aliens who refuse to leave their benighted habits at home deserves to sink into the swamp called multicult.

  • ross1948 21:58 on March 4, 2018 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: citizens patrols, criminal aliens, Geneva, Resistance Helvetique, Switzerland   

    Swiss Patriots Take Action – But Against Whom? 

    As ever, The Leftal, sorry, The Local, seems to be hiding something, this time in its report on ‘citizen security patrols whose members sported red and white Swiss Cross armbands in central Geneva.

    Needless to say, they define the unarmed patrols as part of a ‘far-right group.’

    Résistance Helvétique (Helvetian Resistance) is thus smeared on the basis of their wish to ‘defend ancestral Helvetian values.’

    How dare they seek to defend such values?!

    The Leftal found one grocer who didn’t like the patrollers, but must have been vexed by ‘an Australian expat living in the area,’ who reveals that there are good reasons for concern about crime –

    …there were “a lot of people standing around in the shadows and selling drugs..”    https://www.thelocal.ch/20180222/switzerland-right-wing-security-patrols-not-making-genevans-feel-safer


    …he “would not be surprised”, he said, if there were people who were nervous about walking at night in the area.

    However, despite admitting these disturbing truths, the Aussie no doubt redeemed himself in Leftal editorial eyes by adding that the patrols are ‘unnecessary too….

    But he was honest enough to add that –

    …the group are probably getting some kind of response from some people.”

    None of those responsive ‘some people‘ are quoted in the report. Did the hacks not seek them out to report their views?

    But the Australian’s final words to the far-left media outlet are significant, revealing what seems to be the true source of the problem.

    “Maybe they are playing into people’s fears and xenophobia,” he added.

    Aha! ‘Xenophobia!?!’

    Which of course means concerns about non-Swiss activity.

    SO! It’s not Swiss criminals who are the issue!

    An indication confirmed by the organiser of the patrols, who asserted that, rather than worry about patriot patrols, people should instead fear the “dealers who stink of drugs from miles away,” Rouiller said, adding the police were not doing enough to deal with crime.

    Given what the expat says, this has the ring of truth, and in fact the Geneva Police say that while Swiss law does not allow for the formation of militias, the cops are not lodging any objections, as long as the group limited itself to calling the emergency 117 number it was acting within the law.

    Why doesn’t The Leftal offer us a report of similar length on the extent of alien criminality in Geneva?

  • ross1948 21:00 on February 18, 2018 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , Freedom and Direct Democracy, , , , Switzerland,   

    “It Ain’t Me, Babe!” Liar Juncker Blames Smart Swiss! 

    “…I have always noticed on holidays that when I met Swiss people, they have dim view of me….”




    “I think the Swiss government and the Swiss media have projected an image of me that in no way corresponds with reality…”

    Poor Liar Juncker, who let slip years ago that he lies without conscience. He was this week talking about on-going talks with the Swiss Government and blaming them for everything.

    The Swiss, of course, must be anathema to Brussels and all its authoritarian denizens, because of their democratic constitution. Citizens there have the right to hold their leaders to account, by referenda.

    What must Liar Juncker think of that?


    Well, he’s told us!

    PS – Speaking of liars, however, that Luxemburg louse has no monopoly on mendacity…

    Theresa May and Michel Barnier fooled British public to hide ‘REAL’ £90billion Brexit bill, EU chiefs claim

    Negotiators allegedly performed ‘maths acrobatics’ to produce a total amount that is less than half the true total – so as not to undermine the PM’s authority.


    … or so it seems. according to that link provided by Brexit At Noon.



    • Pamela 23:25 on February 18, 2018 Permalink | Reply

      Keep pounding away at her, Ross.
      She has done more damage by her abdication of leadership during this Brexit era than we can at the present time calculate.
      She’s a disgrace to the office of Prime Minister..


    • Tallion 15:38 on February 19, 2018 Permalink | Reply

      I’m surprised Juncker was sober enough to notice what the Swiss said.


  • ross1948 00:15 on February 10, 2018 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , Gregor Rutz, , , , Switzerland   

    Some Swiss Sense On How To Nail Lying ‘Migrants!’ 

     Gambar terkait

    Gregor Rutz is a sensible man, a leading legislator for the Swiss patriot party, the SVP.


    Hasil gambar untuk gregor rutz svp


    He’s currently pressing ahead with a wise reform.

    But what’s absurd is that it’s a reform which should never have been needed! It’s an obvious part of any country’s defence against illegal invasion by lying undesirables, namely – .

    …a parliamentary initiative that would allow the electronic devices of asylum seekers to be checked for evidence of their identity….


    Since when does any illegal alien have the right to say no to such basic security checks?

    The very idea that illegals have ‘rights’ is an affront to common sense, a logical nonsense.

     As Herr Rutz told media-

    “With this new possibility we are sending out a clear signal that we don’t accept fake asylum seekers. Then fewer people will come here because Switzerland is less attractive.”


    Indeed, making one’s country less attractive to crimmigrants is more than just a good idea.



    It should be a moral obligation!

    And the SVP man also said that anyone who refused to comply with the measure would be sent home.

    It almost goes without saying that the Green Party have chosen to oppose the move.



    Some Turk-born lawyer named Sibel Arslan, who has somehow got onto the Swiss National Council, was quick to slam the measure…


    Hasil gambar untuk sibel arslan


    “The proposal is a fake populist solution!”

    Huh? What on earth is the daft bint yapping about? Does she mean the SVP are ‘fake populists?’ Or that the proposal is a ‘fake solution?

    Since populists only means those who speak up for the people and represent their aspirations, I’d say the Swiss People’s Party is hardly fake.

    On Swiss National Day, Arrogant Elitists Fretting! 

    They have a very good track record of seeking to give citizens a say via their country’s enviable direct democracy system.

    As for the solution, sure, it’s not going to make the crimmigrant menace vanish overnight, but it’s not a bad step to start with.

    It would, she whined, be an intrusion into the private life of those concerned.



    Those concerned can sod off back to whence they came if they don’t want their precious ‘private lives’ intruded upon.


    They forfeited any such privilege when they came parasiting across the Med or the Aegean.

    Uninvited guests unwilling to comply with simple requirements placed on them by their unfortunate hosts deserve not a Green mantle of protection but the bum’s rush!

    Th only practical objection raised by Shrill Sibel is that people who really wanted to hide their identity could use apps where data was deleted instantly or change their SIM cards over. 

    Yes, they could, but every extra step undesirable aliens have to take offers a chance to keep them on their toes, all the better to trip them up.

    And Arslan’s at least as much concerned about what would be done with any data obtained and who would have access to this.

    The obvious answer should be that ALL such info should be sedulously circulated around all government departments and to all police and security agencies of every Western country.

    That’s perhaps exactly what she fears, when she grizzles that the Rutz plan could be the start of a slippery slope with the practice being used for other purposes.

    It only, dear comrade, needs to be used once -to get the swine OUT of Switzerland. But if you think of other useful uses, be sure to let us know!


    • Mort 01:38 on February 10, 2018 Permalink | Reply

      Smart to use those pictures, Ross!
      They underline the connection between crimmigration and terrorism, a link the Enemy Within seeks to play down whenever they think they can get away with it. .


  • ross1948 10:19 on December 14, 2017 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , , , St. Gallen, Switzerland   

    Yes! Swiss Bag-Head Ban To Include Red Nazi Antifa! 

    Hurrah for the Swiss in St Gallen, where regional legislators earlier this month approved a bag-head ban, which not only slaps down  primitive burka-bints…



    ….but also prohibits anyone from covering their face in public if they present a security risk or threaten social or religious peace

    So that can be used to hammer Red Nazi Antifa scum, internationally infamous for launching attacks on patriots whilst concealing their cowardly countenances…


    Hasil gambar untuk G20 black bloc violence

    …as our selection of photos confirms!

    What is truly shocking about the Swiss canton’s admirable action, however, is the slim majority by which it passed, a mere 57 to 55 vote on second reading.

    Even Switzerland, it seems, has a large Enemy Within element among its own citizens!

    As usual, liberal media hacks have expressed indignation, one local editor whining that it’s wrong for cops to have to make an “instant assessment” as to whether a person who covers their face is a threat. 

    What’s wrong with that?

    Cops are trained to assess situations where trouble is likely. An arrogant bag-head, flaunting her sectarian triumphalism, is not hard to spot.


    Hasil gambar untuk quebec city antifa


    Nor are louts like those in our photos!

    Meanwhile, better still, that citizens’ initiative rolls on, having got enough support to force a nationwide referendum, on a proposal which, delightfully, goes further than St Gallen’s new rule in that there is no assessment of risk — instead it proposes a general ban on covering the face in public, apart from certain exceptions for health, safety or the weather.

    That’s what all civilised countries should be doing, and also looking at the sexist shairah aspect, the subjugation of women.


    The potential new law would also ban anyone from forcing another person to cover their face because of their gender.



    • Colin Nesherson 16:01 on December 14, 2017 Permalink | Reply

      Well said, Ross.
      They all should be deported, the Antifas along with the bag-heads, regardless of their citizenship.
      Where I come from, it has always been seen as only reasonable to expect people who don’t like their country to accept a free ticket to wherever they do like.
      In the Cold War, we felt that peaceniks should be sent to Moscow, or Beijing.
      In the present day situation, Somalia would be a perfect destination for jihadists, now that Daesh is out of action.


  • ross1948 17:52 on December 9, 2017 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , 10 year ban, , , Switzerland,   

    Evil ‘Asylum’ Imam Gets ‘Non-Custodial’ 18 Months! 

    An Ethiopian who served as imam at a mosque in Winterthur has been found guilty of inciting violence after calling on worshippers to murder non-practising Muslims.

    No photo available in The Leftal, sorry, The Local…


    …so here’s what we imagine he may look like.

    We’ve followed this saga over the past year or so…

    Pray Or Die? C’mon, Swiss, Deport This Brute! 


    Deport Brutal Bigots Who Beat Up Righteous Muslims! 

    ….and would in most circumstances be pleased to hear the foul fiend has been convicted and facing suitable punishment.


    Not that the most suitable punishment for such an evil savage is available in Switzerland, since there’s no death penalty!

    But when we read of the court’s idea of suitable justice, we can only recoil in dismay.

    The 25-year-old was handed a non-custodial sentence of 18 months and banned from Switzerland for 10 years…

    https://www.thelocal.ch/20171124/imam-found-guilty-of-incitement-to-violence reports.

    What the Hell!?!

    ….guilty of three counts of public incitement to crime and violence, multiple depiction of violence…

    Oh, and …working without a permit.

    We can skip the permit part and remind you of the background.

    …during Friday prayers on October 21st last year at the An’Nur mosque the accused called for the killing and burning of Muslims who refused to take part in communal prayers.

    Jihadist of scum like burning, don’t they?

    Who’s likely to forget what ISIS did to that Jordanian POW?

    The primitive pig in Winterthur was also convicted of having posted violent images of executions on Facebook and distributing these to other people.

    Now we get to the pertinent part of the story.

    The asylum seeker…

    Yes, he’s one of the phoney ‘refugees’ who have over-run Europe over the past couple of years.

    But what about that 18 month ‘non-custodial’ sentence?

    Since the Swiss are to expel him…


    …I can see why they might not want to waste good Swiss francs on the provision of board and lodgings for a year  and a half. I conceded that in a previous post.

    Swiss Make A Good Move, But Thousands More Needed! 


    But if they’re going to deport the swine anyway, surely a more serious sentence, albeit ‘non-custodial,’ is in order?

    Life, perhaps. Or at least ten years. Pour encouragez les autres!

    Then we get to the ten years actually specified in the court’s decision.

    WHY is his exclusion from the country whose hospitality he sol disgracefully abused ONLY for ten years?

    In the previous post, it was suggested that a 20-year ban would be imposed. I questioned that too.

    Does the court seriously think that, after a decade ( or two) back where he belongs, the dirty sectarian beast should then be free to return to the scene of the crime?

    Meanwhile, I reiterate my point, oft-made, that if incitement to murder merits action in this case…


    …why should it not apply to all those barbarous brutes who parade their hate through the streets of civilised countries?


    • Vicki 21:53 on December 9, 2017 Permalink | Reply

      We should kill every jihadist captured.
      By we, I mean every Western country, and any other countries that value their freedom.


  • ross1948 22:25 on November 14, 2017 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , John Major UN, , , , Switzerland   

    A Swiss Reminder Of John Major’s Despicable Euro-Grovel 


    Even on Alpine slopes, namby-pamby weeds can flourish!



    What else can we deduce from The Leftal, sorry, The Local’s news, that ‘a group of Swiss citizens has launched a petition aiming to make it illegal under Swiss law for parents to slap or smack their children.’



    The wet wallies call themselves ‘No To Violence Against Children,’ and they plan to hand in a petition to the Swiss government with the aim of changing its mind, after the lower house of parliament voted against legislation on the subject last May.


    A quick slap from a responsible mum or dad can work wonders, but it’s up to each parent to decide when or if such sensible discipline should be applied.That’s presumably what the legislators thought.

    Unlike some other countries, Switzerland doesn’t qualify a slap by parents in the home as corporal punishment and has faced criticism from the UN on the subject.

    If some pinko twits disagree, then Switzerland has a democratic constitution, does it not, which gives them the right to start a citizens’ initiative?Don’t collect signatures for a petition…

    ….but for a referendum, and let EVERY Swiss decide in the ballot-box whether or not a smack or a trip to the wood-shed should be outlawed.

    But there’s no mention of the whiners doing that.Perhaps they suspect their far-out folly would be voted down if subjected to the test of democracy.


    But why, above, do I mention John Major?


    Because it was he who U-turned most cravenly, and bowed to the robed cretins of the Euro-Court, when they ordered him to end corporal punishment in the UK schools.

    Not only did Major thus scorn his own citizens, who had NO sympathy with the creeps who wanted to ban the cane and the tawse from class-rooms throughout the British Isles…


    Scots tawse in action


    …but he made himself a laughing-stock too!



    When the House of Commons, not long before the Clown-Court ruling, voted for the continuation of corporal punishment, Major had cast his vote with the majority of MPs and reflected the majority will of the British people.


    Yet within months, when HMV in Strasbourg snapped their wine-sodden robes and ordered him to flout his conscience and diss democracy, Major did so, shamefully.


    A spineless cur  beyond compare!

    Yet these days, he’s dredged up as a champion of the Anti-Brexit cause.

    Sir John Major attacks ‘unreal’ Brexit vision

    Hardly surprising, given his record of despising the people’s will.

Compose new post
Next post/Next comment
Previous post/Previous comment
Show/Hide comments
Go to top
Go to login
Show/Hide help
shift + esc
%d bloggers like this: