Tagged: Theresa May Toggle Comment Threads | Keyboard Shortcuts

  • ross1948 04:51 on May 23, 2019 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , , , , The MEP Project, Theresa May,   

    Read This As Polls Open – Report Slams Sly MEP Swine! 

    A third of MEPs even declined to reveal addresses of their offices, gave addresses that could not be found on the map or simply refused to answer.

    That’s pretty bad.

    What have they got to hide?

    …investigations (brought together under The MEPs Project) had shown that many of these offices just did not exist….


    The question above, and the stunning conclusion, come from a report on a case lost by a group of journalists  and you should note well that these are NOT ‘populist’ or ‘nationalist’ journos.

    Not at all.

    I’m looking at a page from the fanatically Europhiliac EUObserver.

    As they say themselves –

    We, the journalists from The MEPs Project who have co-signed this opinion piece do not share a political platform.

    We have very different opinions on the future of the EU.

    However, as reporters covering European affairs, we have one common objective: to hold elected officials accountable for their decisions as well as their use of taxpayers´ money.

    I’m not going to quote the entire report, but it’s worth noting that their indictment of ‘Europe’ is not ONLY of the Strasbourg Slug MEPs..



    ….but also of the arrogant elitists on the ECJ – the very body to whose arbitrary rulings…


    evil judge


    …Theresa the Traitrix would have her sleazy deal, backstop and all, be subject.



    the European Court of Justice…decided that the MEPs’ right to privacy trumped our right of access to documents

    Euro-Jerk Judges laughing at the tax-payers?


    We thought the European Court of Justice would recognise the democratic public interest in this request.

    We thought the European parliament would share our concern and seize the chance to strengthen the legitimacy of the parliament.

    We were wrong on both assumptions.

    Given that reality, why would ANYONE in the UK want Britain to stay in a sty occupied by dirty, disreputable, greedy swine?





    In 2019, all members receive €4,513 each month for keeping offices in their home countries while not on duty in Brussels and Strasbourg.

    This allowance comes on top of their salaries (€8,757.70/month), and in addition to reimbursements for travel costs (business airfare/first-class rail fare).

    They also receive allowances for living costs (€320/day). The office allowances represents more than €40m a year.

    Out of 748 MEPs at the time of our investigation in 2017, only 53 were prepared to show documentation for actual spending.https://euobserver.com/opinion/144827


    enjoy-its from europe


    As the journos remark…

    So much for transparency of public spending.

    We did not ask what tax the parliamentarians pay or how they otherwise use their salary.

    We were not looking for information about their private lives.

    Rather we asked for documents that the European parliament is supposed to have in order to verify that this public money is spent in accordance with the rules.

    This argument was not enough to break the privacy barrier, we were told by the court.

    Their final segment is headed, accurately, with the words, ‘Lost battle...’

    Thus, we lost the legal battle. Then there was the political reaction.

    On 31 January 2019 a majority of the Members of the European Parliament voted in favour of a change of the rules that govern their expenditures.

    It will in the future be made technically possible for individual MEPs to publish a voluntary audit of their use of the General Expenditure Allowance (GEA), the office money, on their official websites.

    That is to say:

    No demand for auditing.

    No obligations to document costs.

    No accountability of how the allowances are used.

    There’s a lot more, but anyone naive enough to contemplate a vote for Remain stooge shouldn’t need ANY more!

    f the European parliament rejecting responsibility and accountability.

    This is all the more surprising as now the EU commissioners and the top officials of the EU agencies publish details about their travel expenses.

    • Mick Smith 13:27 on May 23, 2019 Permalink | Reply

      You got off to an early start but this is a damning indictment of ‘Europe!’
      Merkel has no principles so naturally she wont say a word about her cronies in Strasbourg.


    • Chubby Chalmers 14:41 on May 23, 2019 Permalink | Reply

      We knew the slugs suck up as much of our money as they can with all those expenses, but hiding out and non-existent addresses is incredibly out of order,
      That ECJ court is up to its neck in the system, which is why they protect the MEP rip-offs from scrutiny.
      I would love to know how much tax money drains away there into the judges pockets, salaries, expenses and unlike the MEPs they’re not even elected.


    • Noreen Paterson 19:25 on May 23, 2019 Permalink | Reply

      A long day if you’re leafletting in a fresh breeze but I think we will win.
      Your slug story was very handy as a different talking point with people.


    • Diana 22:38 on May 23, 2019 Permalink | Reply

      Now that all the campaigners have fallen silent, almost, once the voting’s done, we have to wait and see.
      I read somewhere that Brussels has banned exit polls.
      Is that so and if it is so, who gave Brussels the power to tell our UK media what they can and cannot publish?


      • Adrian Bonner 23:06 on May 23, 2019 Permalink | Reply

        I’m afraid so, Diana. There are lots of laws about elections but as usual the UK has to do what it’s told by Brussels, or else.
        EU dictates are not to be challenged.

        I confirmed this from the BBC’s own website, and they admit that ‘there is an additional restriction in the UK for European elections…it is a criminal offence to publish exit polls or opinion polls which ask people how they’ve voted (anywhere in the EU) before 22:00 BST on Sunday 26 May.’

        British political leaders have never stood up to Brussels on this and I have never heard of any media protests either. To me, it’s not something I care much about, one way or the other but I don’t like any bossy rules from anywhere so I looked it up.

        The excuse is that if Brits vote for a left or right party, for example, today, then the Greeks or Italians (who vote on the weekend ) might be influenced by the British results, which is pretty illogical if you ask me, and insults the intelligence of the Greeks and Italians, as if they can’t think for themselves!
        In the USA results on the Atlantic coast are announced while Californians are still voting but nobody thinks that’s a problem.


        • Ernie Lyon 22:30 on May 25, 2019 Permalink

          Whatever UK law says about banning exit polls, it is not being applied in other countries.
          I just watched news from Dublin, all about the exit polls there.


        • ross1948 13:56 on May 26, 2019 Permalink

          Ernie, and all others bemused by this topic, I have just found a brief explanation of the exit poll mystery, in EUObs, that Brussels-friendly site that has its uses.
          Here’s the link.


      • Pamela 23:21 on May 23, 2019 Permalink | Reply

        Diana, you will be arrested and charged if you try to conduct an exit poll.
        It’s the British Government acting as enforcers for the EU again.
        I think it’s ridiculous.
        Nobody is obliged to say how they vote but why should it be a crime to ask politely?


    • Brian Cessner 01:24 on May 24, 2019 Permalink | Reply

      I have been catching up on the news about the European election and maybe we are at cross purposes but in Holland exit polls are happening. Euronews has a short report https://www.euronews.com/2014/05/22/wilders-anti-eu-party-pushed-to-fourth-place-in-netherlands-exit-polls
      So are exit polls illegal or not?


    • David Terelli 09:34 on May 24, 2019 Permalink | Reply

      A Google check, lots of news about exit polls. I also double-checked that BBC site. No exit polls.
      This is intriguing.


  • ross1948 12:06 on February 25, 2019 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: department of education, , , , Theresa May, ,   

    Mrs. May Set To Poison Tots’ Minds 

    Nauseating but somehow, with that foul thing May as Prime Minister…


    theresa tran


    ..not at all surprising to read that British tots fresh out of kindergarten are to be drenched in state-sponsored filth.

     “Gay & trans sex education to be taught to FIVE-YEAR-OLDS in UK ...”

    …and woe betide any mum or dad who takes a stand for decency, because…


    …opting out is ILLEGAL!”

    I can only give thanks that my offspring are grown and not being coerced by degenerates to wade into dirty drivel such as that described in the report out today, viz.

     ‘Tango Makes Three,’ a book about two gay penguins who nurture an egg taken from another family, and ‘My Princess Boy,’ which celebrates a dark-skinned child who loves to cross-dress.


    A hundred thousand signature petition from citizens horrified by this evil indoctrination will hit the House of Commons this week…




    If you are British, please sign it, and/or ask your MP where he or she stands on poisoning the minds of small children.

    PS …there’s a link to the petition in the RT story.

    • Vicki 12:29 on February 25, 2019 Permalink | Reply

      A hellish step and May is a devil for taking it.


    • Noreen Paterson 13:18 on February 25, 2019 Permalink | Reply

      Why would anyone even write that perverted rubbish, except as brainwash material?
      Does anyone think children have any need to read such nonsense? Normal adults don’t have any interest in reading about queers or cross-dressers so why foist it on little schoolchildren and threaten parents who object?
      May must have a very twisted mind. I would say soul but I think she sold that long ago.
      The petition was still open when I looked so consider it signed.


    • Mack the Knife 14:26 on February 25, 2019 Permalink | Reply

      She is rotten to the core, agreed, but..
      When she is replaced, do you really think the next PM will be any better!?
      Remember Boris Johnson’s gay-appeasement when he was London Mayor?
      Mogg might be on decency’s side but he will never win power.
      Revolution time?


    • Edward Lamont 16:34 on February 25, 2019 Permalink | Reply

      May is worse than Cameron.
      I never thought I would say that about anyone.


  • ross1948 21:05 on January 1, 2019 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , , Manchester railwat station, Theresa May,   

    A Satanic New Year In Manchester! 

    Counter-terrorism police are leading an investigation after a man went on a rampage with a knife in Manchester during New Year’s Eve celebrations on Monday night, stabbing three people, including a police officer, and was heard shouting Islamist slogans. https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2018/dec/31/three-people-stabbed-at-manchester-victoria-railway-station


    Related image


    We don’t yet know about this particular primitive pig, so would like to ask two questions.

    Question Number One  –

    Was he one of the more than 20,000 jihadist scum ‘known to police’ yet permitted to roam freely in British towns and cities?  https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/islamist-extremists-uk-highest-number-europe-25000-terror-threat-eu-official-isis-islam-britain-a7923966.html


    And, regardless of the answer to Question Number One…

    Question Number Two  –

    When will Theresa May’s government empower the police to act on their knowledge and detain the savages for internment and/or deportation?


    out with them

    • Grenville Janz 02:10 on January 2, 2019 Permalink | Reply

      Good questions.
      I doubt they will get good answers.


  • ross1948 16:14 on December 20, 2018 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , Stupid Woman, Theresa May   

    ‘Stupid Boy!’ Was OK, So Why Not ‘Stupid Woman?’ 

    Remember that outstandingly funny tv series “Dad’s Army?”

    Most of its stars are long gone now, to wherever good actors go, but Captain Mainwaring’s dismissive castigations of the ‘Stupid Boy’ who never got anything right became something of a catch-phrase among fans.


    Image result for dads army stupid boy


    I do not recall angry protests from militant young males at being put down by a sexist remark. It was the boy target of the insult who was being insulted, not boys in general.

    Yet what was all that nonsense in the House of Commons about, this week, where Corbyn was forced to deny he’d used the obscene insult ‘woman’  – ‘Stupid Woman!’ – in relation to Theresa the Traitrix.

    He is not hostile to women – if anything he is altogether too indiscriminate about the sort of women he likes to have around him…



    …yet he was hounded by pompous Tory clowns, and in response he denied saying the words – apparently he’d said ‘Stupid People!’

    And THAT was okay!

    Is May not a woman?

    Can we no longer refer to a stupid woman as a stupid woman?


    Can we therefore  – logically- not call a stupid man a stupid man?

    I have called her much worse than ‘stupid!’

    But I have also called Cameron and Hollande, and various other male politicians, much worse too.

    We are defined, and define each other, in everyday conversation, by what we are, men, women, boys, girls, fat, thin, tall, short, smart…STUPID…

    If I see somebody walking down the street balancing a buffalo chicken wing on his or her head…


    Image result for balancing chicken on head


    …I will say to my companions that the person is a weird man or a weird woman.

    It’s called accurate description.

     Why not?


    • Mack the Knife 17:24 on December 20, 2018 Permalink | Reply

      Yes, me too, as they say.
      If her fans object to her being called stupid, I can understand that.
      But ‘stupid’ is peanuts by political insult standards.
      Corbyn maintains he said ‘Stupid people’ as if it’s the word ‘woman’ that is the problem, and it seems to be.
      Suppose her supporters called her a clever woman?. Would she still take exception then?
      What is wrong with calling a woman a woman?
      Or can we only use the word with a flattering adjective?
      Are we meant to call Diane Abbot a gorgeous woman, even if it’s an obvious lie?
      The entire kerfuffle makes no sense at all.


    • Pamela 18:39 on December 20, 2018 Permalink | Reply

      Delighted to read this.
      It was an astonishing ‘much ado about nothing,’ as if calling her a woman is some sort of slur.
      What’s wrong with being a woman? Nothing.
      So if Corbyn though she was behaving in a stupid way ( and she was,to be honest) there was nothing wrong with him saying she was a stupid woman.
      If she had been worth her salt, she would have called him a terrorist-sympathising man and that would also have been quite in order.


  • ross1948 19:00 on December 18, 2018 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , Brighton and Hove, , periods, , Theresa May,   

    Brain-Dead Brighton – Male Freaks Can Have Periods! 

    theresa tran


    As St. Theresa of Transgendria faces a no-confidence vote on Brexit, let’s not forget all the other disgraceful ways she has behaved, one of the worst being how she has pandered to transgender freaks…


    …emboldening male nutjobs across the land who think, or pretend to think, that they are female.

    May’s exaltation of maladjustment to the status of a ‘right’ continues to poison British society.




    Now we read that the education authorities in Brighton and Hove, on the English south coast, have made it official policy to lie to young children.

    The brain-dead degenerates are to ‘begin teaching children as young as eight that “trans boys and men and non-binary people may have periods…” https://www.rt.com/uk/446756-boys-periods-school-curriculum/


    In case you find it hard to believe this, RT has provided the official source.

     ‘Taking a Period Positive Approach in Brighton & Hove Schools,’ guidelines issued by the local council in early December…

    Sadly, even if May is overthrown because of Brexit, no foreseeable successor, of any party, is likely to step up and stop this Gadarene slide into madness.

    A cultural revolution is overdue.


    • JJ Knight 20:13 on December 18, 2018 Permalink | Reply

      It’s bad enough that the British Government has given currency to the nonsense that a man, complete with a penis, can slap on make-up and high heels and call itself a woman.
      This Brighton bull-sh-t has taken falsification of biological reality to a new level, and the fact that they are lying to little children makes it even worse.
      You are regrettably right.
      The cultural marxist poison has spread so deeply and so widely that it will take more than political pressure to restore sanity.


  • ross1948 17:18 on November 8, 2018 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , Cabinet code, , legal advice, Theresa May,   

    May Must Reveal Her Duplicitous Deal! 

    The convention that legal advice to the cabinet is never published is enforced by the ministerial code. 



    Theresa May imposes new layer of secrecy on Brexit legal advice

    …but as The Guardian goes on to remind us, Section 2.12 of the ministerial code explicitly declares that if law officers, such as the attorney general, provide legal advice then cabinet ministers should expect to see the entire text.

    We expect the in-crowd to keep as much information as possible from the mere citizens…


    theresa tran


    …because they see the common people as –

    A, beneath them – and B, their enemies.

    But now even the in-crowd is excluded from examining the full scope, all the implications, of Theresa The Traitrix’s dirty, duplicitous deal…




    …which from all we have been able to learn, is a total betrayal of Brexit, and thus of the majority of British voters, who made their decision for deliverance in June 2016.

    This vile vixen has got to go.

    • Diana 19:19 on November 8, 2018 Permalink | Reply

      She refuses to tell even her own cabinet ministers?
      Some very dirty tricks going on.
      She has to go, as you say.


    • Pamela 22:35 on November 8, 2018 Permalink | Reply

      Traitrix! A new word? Or an old one that you have revived?
      What you say is indisputable, and what May is doing is reprehensible, but it’s your use of that word that intrigues me.
      Am I right in thinking that you are not very subtly goading the feminazis?
      Words like ‘actress’ have been subject to PC disapproval, because for some reason some women in show business dislike being distnguished from ‘actors.’
      They then justify their dislike as ‘feminist,’ which makes no sense to me because the word ‘actress’ at once tells us that they are female.
      Are they ashamed of being female?


    • Lee Somerville 23:43 on November 8, 2018 Permalink | Reply

      What’s in an -ess or an -ix?
      I still laugh every time I think about the Anglican arguments over ordination of women, to which Ross has referred more than once.
      They were a sour-faced lot, always cross if anybody asked why they wanted to become priestesses.


  • ross1948 20:28 on October 6, 2018 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: Gender Recognition Act consultation, Theresa May, ,   

    Theresa May’s New Freak-Show Plan? Object! 

    I pass this on to British readers, no need for comment.

    But why not comment?

    If this emerged from some cultural marxist cesspool, like the Guardian editorial room, it would be disgusting but not surprising.

    The fact that. coming from Theresa May’s government, it is still not surprising and reminds us of her revolting speech for which the clown audience at her ‘Conservative’ conference gave her such resounding cheers, makes one wonder if the UK can ever recover from the moral blight inflicted by the Tory Party.




    Sick leader, sick sheep, sick scheme…



    Dear marriage supporter,

    The definition of traditional marriage as between a man and a woman depends on an understanding of what “man” and “woman” mean.

    So the idea that gender can be changed almost at will strikes at the heart of what the Coalition for Marriage stands for. It is crucial that marriage supporters speak out against the Government’s proposed changes to the 2004 Gender Recognition Act.

    We have published guidance on responding to the consultation, which may be downloaded here.

    Changes consulted on include:

    • Allowing a person to change legal gender without first living as a member of the opposite sex for two years;
    • Allowing legal gender change without any medical diagnosis, which would remove a key protection against bad faith from the current system;
    • Removing the requirement that a married person who changes gender may only do so with the permission of their spouse, thus potentially forcing people into ‘same-sex marriages’;

    The present laws on gender are far from ideal. However, the changes proposed by the Government have the potential to be even more harmful to marriage and the family.

    We urge all supporters to respond to the consultation. It runs until 23:00 on October 19th. Our sincere thanks to all who do.



    All the best to the CfM campaigners.


    They didn’t give us the link to lodge comments and objections!

    However, I have located it -from the pages of the Amnesty website!

    Submit your response to the Gender Recognition Act consultation

    They are urging people to support the vile plans put forward by the government, so all the more reason for decent people to fight back!

    PS – I have just completed the consultation. It takes a good half-hour, minimum, and coping with the drivel vocab, ‘non-binary’ and ‘intersex’ for example…freak_show

    …is a creepy experience.

    CfM should send out some guidelines to help good people not used to such a process navigate through the swamp.

  • ross1948 22:00 on September 15, 2018 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , , Theresa May   

    Fake ‘Child Refugees!’ May Lets ‘Em Stay! 

    So now it doesn’t matter if they were refused asylum after being brought to the UK?

    Bad enough that so many obvious fakers are granted ‘asylum!’

    But thanks to that Faker Floozy in 10 Downing Street, even those deemed unfit to gain that privilege are welcomed in and provided with freebies galore?



    Is there no end to this woman’s treachery?


    She’s as bad as Mama Stasi Merkel, and it’s a mark of shame that Brits are not emulating Germans in taking to the streets to protest.

    We are of course taking about the fake ‘refugees’ and fake ‘children…’

    …whom ‘Orrible Amber let in, from what the idiot scribbler in the Guardian  miscalls the ‘Calais refugee camp,‘ which of course was teeming with violent savages who by no stretch of the imagination were ‘refugees.’

    How Many Evil ‘Aid Workers’ Covered Up Calais Rape

    Female Afghan interpreter ‘raped by armed migrants’ at CalaisJungle

    Calais Women ‘Take Turns Staying Awake In Case Someone Attacks!’ 

    So what if the Guardian insists that only a small number did not qualify for refugee status under immigration rules.

    No actual number is mentioned, but no matter!

    If they failed the tests, and God knows it’s hardly an exacting test when the spineless Tory Government won’t even order a dental check to see if they ARE children, they should have been kicked out.




    Instead, their greedy snouts have been given wide-open access to the tax-trough, and May adds insult to injury by coining a new category of sponging.




    …the government is to offer this group “Calais leave”, which will grant those who qualify the right to study, work, and have access to public funds and healthcare, with the option to apply for settlement after 10 years. The rule change will take effect in the autumn.

    Please note, the topsy-turvy definition applied to these youthful parasites is those ‘who were under the age of 18 at the time’ of their arrival. Oh, and who had family ties in the UK.

    In other words, spongers who arrived previously can sponsor (no financial contribution, mind!) these latest leeches.


    Image result for leeches


    Astoundingly, the report makes no mention of ANY MP demanding this outrageous action be overturned.

    What about Leave EU’s hero, Boris?

    What of Mr. Rees-Mogg?

    No call for an emergency debate in the Commons?

    Of course the pro-crimmigrant lobby has ‘welcomed the change but’ have at once stepped up pressure for MORE slugs to be added to the benefit burden British tax-payers already have to bear.

    One of the most bizarre parts of the report tells us that a private member’s bill, spearheaded by the Scottish National MP Angus MacNeil, going through the Commons proposes to broaden the definition of a family member under the rules.   https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2018/sep/13/uk-offers-calais-leave-to-children-denied-asylum

    Please note, Mr. McNeill’s SNP separatist party has made it very clear that they do NOT regard 18 as the age at which people cease to be children.

    If you look at how old you need to be to vote in the ‘Scottish Parliament’ elections, you will see that young Scots get to vote as soon as they’re 16 years old.

    In other words, NOT a child any more once you are over 15.


    Image result for double standard

    Why don’t they apply the same yard-stick to crimmigrants?

  • ross1948 23:45 on July 10, 2018 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , , , , , Theresa May   

    Good For India, Where Judges Still Dispense Justice! 

    Nirbhaya gangrape convicts will hang, says Supreme Court once again

    No mercy for Nirbhaya rapists, Supreme Court upholds death penalty

    If Juncker hears of this, he’ll have to take time off wittering about Brexit and do his usual sicko stuff, demanding those filthy brutes be spared appropriate punishment.


  • ross1948 08:30 on July 6, 2018 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , Aum Shinrikyo, , , Theresa May,   

    Bravo Japan! But Will E.U. Now Try To Save Mass-Murder Mob? 

    The leader of Aum Shinrikyo doomsday cult which carried out a deadly nerve gas attack on the Tokyo underground in 1995 has been executed, Japanese media report.   https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-43395483


    Gambar terkait


    And good riddance to an evil monster!

    Remember the shocking story?

    The sarin attack, Japan’s worst terror incident, killed 13 people and injured thousands more.

    So an excellent execution.

    With more to come, according to the BBC!

    Seven other Aum Shinrikyo members are also awaiting execution.

    But what are the Euro-Commissars saying about this good news?


    The European Union is the leading institutional actor and largest donor in the fight against death penalty worldwide.


    That’s their official, public stance, in which, at least until Brexit is effected, Theresa May is as complicit as Juncker and Merkel and the rest of the Brussels rat-pack.



    The EUSSR, including the UK, as a servile Brussels flunkey, has been arrogantly interfering in other people’s internal affairs for years!

    UK’s Jakarta Rep Frantic to Save Terrorist Skins -A Neo-Colonialist Par Excellence! 

    Will they now start weeping in protest at this well-deserved punishment…

    …and begin bleating at the Japanese Government in a bid to save the skins of the dead monster’s fellow-killers?

    • Edward L 18:22 on July 6, 2018 Permalink | Reply

      I tried three times to comment since you posted this but there is some technical issue that’s obstructed me, so once again, I offer praise.
      It is very welcome, the way you don’t let these permissive Brussels elites get away with their anti-democratic campaign.
      If May held a vote in Britain on capital punishment, we’d be hanging terrorists by the end of July.
      Same goes for France and Germany, I would think, but we cannot say for sure because they too refuse to ask their voters.


Compose new post
Next post/Next comment
Previous post/Previous comment
Show/Hide comments
Go to top
Go to login
Show/Hide help
shift + esc
%d bloggers like this: