Can’t Count On ANY Tory MP!
Well, we were all set to cheer Jonathan Gullis, Tory MP for Stoke-on-Trent North, Kidsgrove and Talke, after he sensibly said ‘the UK needed to withdraw from the European convention on human rights...
![]() Jonathan Gullis MP
|
“It is clear that the ECHR prevented the flight from departing, after efforts in U.K. courts were exhausted. The ECHR has no place in the U.K. judicial system.The government needs to free itself from it entirely!”
Hold that cheer!
Within barely an hour, somebody up there in Jellyfish Johnson’s Fairy Circle….
…had gotten to him, and…
…he amended the post, removing the final sentence saying the UK should withdraw from the ECHR and instead replacing it with: “The ECHR’s role in U.K. law needs looking at urgently!”
Wow, true grit, huh?
Turns out that ‘Gullis’s decision to drop his call for withdrawal from the ECHR is linked to the fact that the commitment to the ECHR is embedded in the Good Friday agreement, which the government is committed to supporting…’
And we learn how the pressure might have been applied.
. Gullis is parliamentary private secretary to Brandon Lewis, the Northern Ireland secretary.
God forbid that Gullis risk dismissal from power and glory by sticking to his guns on an issue of principle…like UK sovereignty.
The saddest part of writing this, for me, is that up until today, I’d have said Gullis is exactly the kind of Tory we could hope might turn the party round.
He’s a member of the European Research Group, has identified BLM as what it is, and talked sense on wokery of all sorts.
.
Yet now he eats his words on the Sorosoid court? A little jellyfish taking his cue from a big fat one?
And it all boils down to the UK political establishment’s obessive obeisance to…
.
B.Liar’s Dirty Deal With Blood-Beast Adams!
PS.
In the same Guardian report we read a bizarre outburst from another Tory MP, a man whose education and profession ought to have precluded such vapourings.
He’s entitled to his opinion – despite the many evils attributable to that convention.
.
.
But then he justified this opinion by saying it was British Conservative lawyers who helped draft it.
Buckland is correct, but he MUST know that the draft, and the treaty it became…
Sauron Rules, Abetted By Strasbourg Legalice!
…and the court which ‘interprets’ its ‘rights,’ have been utterly perverted, that court hi-jacked and its purposes perverted by rogue judges.
…In most countries that ratified the deal, governments had both capital and corporal punishment in use – British conservatives and all other leaders would have been hypocrites to seal a deal which outlawed both!
Of course it did not!
The LLegalicejust stopped reading what laws said – they just read their own prejudices into the laws….
ooooooo
Reply