Tagged: Transfreak ‘self-ID’ Toggle Comment Threads | Keyboard Shortcuts

  • ross1948 18:27 on December 3, 2020 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: Nasdaq, Transfreak ‘self-ID’, Women directors   

    Nasdaq Nonsense! Hands Off Women! 


    What exactly is Nasdaq?

    We read about it and hear about it, but like you, most of you, anyway, I had, until today, no idea what the name actually meant.

    .

    .

    However, some bizarre news this morning drove me to investigate the meaning and from Investopedia, here it is.

    Two meanings, to be precise!

    ….first, it is the National Association of Securities Dealers Automated Quotations exchange, the first electronic exchange that allowed investors to buy and sell stock on a computerized, speedy, and transparent system..

    Secondly.

    ….an index. When you hear people say that the “the Nasdaq is up today,” they are referring to the Nasdaq Composite Index, which, like the DJIA, is a statistical measure of a portion of the stock market. https://www.investopedia.com/ask/answers/difference-between-dow-and-nasdaq/

    There you go.

    No matter if we’re talking about the first or the second meaning, the common key aspect is accuracy and reliability.

    .

    .

    People dealing in stocks, shares, anything involving their money, want to be sure that Nasdaq can be trusted to present ‘the facts, ma’am, just the facts!

    But now?

    The hell with facts.

    Facts are what somebody says is a fact, even if it’s a lie.

    Nasdaq has moved to erase the reality of biological women in its quest to increase diversity in its thousands of listed companies, requiring them to include a director who only “self-identifies as female….”

    Nasdaq Requirements Erase Women, Requires Companies to Hire Director Who ‘Self-Identifies as Female’

    .

    .

    .

    In other words, if some male plonker wakes up one morning, with exactly the same physical equipment between his legs as was there the night before…

    .

    .

    …and decides he’s a ‘she,’ then so be it?

    Only a day or so ago, we briefly discussed the folly of pandering to maladjusted persons…

    UK Court Gives Kids Some Protection- How About Adults?

    ….instead of seeing to it that their mental health problems are addressed and remedied.

    .

    Now we have to note that a major financial institution bastardising the English language..

    ..

    .

    ….making a mockery of not just women’s aspirations but the very concept of womanhood,  by ‘requiring’ all manner of companies to include as a director, a ‘woman’ who in fact may not be a ‘woman’ at all but a sad, freaky faker.

     

     
    • Chrissie Miles 00:55 on December 4, 2020 Permalink | Reply

      Not much hope of these companies doing well for their share-holders if they can’t tell the difference between men and women.

      Like

  • ross1948 17:37 on February 18, 2020 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , , , leader, , long-bailey, nandy, , Transfreak ‘self-ID’   

    Freak-Show! Labour Leaders Want Shut-Down On Free Speech 


     …Rebecca Long-Bailey seemed to find more common ground with the activists outside against gender critical meetings. “We need to end the discussion [on self-ID],” she told Newsnight.  https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2020/feb/16/labour-pledges-to-fight-transphobia-stifle-debate

    And if you read that link, to a very long article, you’ll see that her equally intolerant rival, Comrade Lisa Nandy, shares that determination to silence criticism of uppity freaks…

    .

    .

    ….who insist that they are not what they really are!

    It is a long read but perhaps worth the effort, exposing as it does how just about all leading Labour figures now extol deviancy.

    The author of the article certainly isn’t any kind of conservative – she seems to find it unacceptable to mock or ‘offend’ sexual maladjusted creatures…

    oooooo

    .Why? If a bloke minces about in a frock, wearing make-up, endless mockery should be his fate!

    00000

    …but she does seem worried about these potential Prime Ministers’ eagerness to impose censorship on expression of opinions which the transfreak gaystapo dislikes.

    But Tory readers should not crow about Labour Party pandering to sickos.

    Next month I plan to write more about Bojo…

    .

    Gospel according to St. Boris!

    .

    ..who, despite his previous amusing reference to ‘tank-topped bum-boys,’ is at least as bad in this respect…

    Mrs. May Set To Poison Tots’ Minds 

    Forget Guy Fawkes – Make It St. Theresa Of Transgendria

    ….as was his rotten predecessor.

     

     
    • Fiona F 20:17 on February 18, 2020 Permalink | Reply

      Labour must be determined to make themselves unelectable if this is what they think is a good idea.
      They have no connection with how most people think.
      Offending somebody should never be a crime.
      What does give real ‘offence’ is not telling a man in drag that he is still a man.
      It’s our political class telling us that we must address him as her.

      I take your point about Boris Johnson.
      There are people in the Tory Party still who know the difference between right and wrong.
      That’s not much help when they fail to act on that knowledge.
      I regret to say that after Jacob Rees-Mogg’s cringe-worthy performance when Ken Maginnis upset that lesbian SNP MP, I have no faith in any of them.

      Bring on the Reform Party!

      Like

c
Compose new post
j
Next post/Next comment
k
Previous post/Previous comment
r
Reply
e
Edit
o
Show/Hide comments
t
Go to top
l
Go to login
h
Show/Hide help
shift + esc
Cancel
%d bloggers like this: