Tagged: UK citizenship Toggle Comment Threads | Keyboard Shortcuts

  • ross1948 14:46 on December 1, 2019 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , Peter Maurer, Red Cross, , UK citizenship   

    Rotten ‘Charities?’ Add The Red Cross To Your List! 

    I can remember a time when the Red Cross commanded universal respect, an organisation helping those in need for a hundred years or more!


    American Red Cross image



    Times are a’changin…

    Not A Penny More To The Red Cross!

    Surely that should be our watch-word when contemplating Christmas giving this year, after Peter Maurer, the Red Cross International Committee chairman’s strident attack on Britain’s policy of removal of citizenship from adherents of the ISIS rape-gang.


    Most of us would prefer that the sectarian scumbags’ heads be removed!

    The ass argues the policy ‘is “not conducive” to long-term peace in the region

    • .
    A shooting range in Liverpool is offering customers an image of Shamima Begum as a target


    …an essentially irrelevant argument, in support of which he adduces the outrageous example of the filthy vixen Shamima Begum.

    Maurer “failed to see” how depriving the evil ISIS sow- and other satanic Islamists of citizenship would help a crisis made more complex by the recent Turkish invasion.


    IICRC’s Maurer

    Dumbo Maurer does not seem to get it!

    Can he really ‘fail to see’ that if every ISIS pig were buried six feet under, the Middle East and the world as a whole would be a cleaner, safer place? In what possible way is it preferable to bring them ‘home?’ 

    Satanic evil should have no home, except deep in unhallowed ground.



    Traitors, sows like Begum and swine like Usman Khan ( thanks again, BTW, to the cop who put that pig down the other day!) who repudiate their duty of allegiance to the country they have lived in, and lived off, instead declaring fealty to a foul jihadist ideology, have NO right to the nationality of the nation they betray.

    • Tam Birnie 18:12 on December 1, 2019 Permalink | Reply

      As I said yesterday, your words to the wise make hard reading but the truth needs to be told.
      Nothing will persuade most of these politicised charities to change their ways.
      A lot of them even get their hands on our money without our permission, via local and national government or from Brussels.
      They should be stripped of charitable status.
      If I see a Salvation Army band then I will donate without a moment’s hesitation, otherwise, Scrooge Rules OK!


  • ross1948 16:09 on January 17, 2019 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: 'child' thieves, anti-social brats, good character, , , UK citizenship   

    “Repeal Good Character Requirement For UK Citizenship!” Seriously? 

    • Yes, seriously!

    • That’s what this pinko outfit is demanding!

    • ===
    • =Image result for Dr Zubaida Haque, the deputy director at the Runnymede Trust,


    (NB – BME is the current pinko-speak for ‘coloured’)

    • What a slur!

    • Think about what she’s saying, this arrogant uppity from a ‘charity’ to which the Home Office of the UK government is a contributor https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Runnymede_Trust –

    • snout
    • How come the UK Government has been dishing out British tax-payers’ money to a brazenly political agitprop outfit?

    • =
    • If you or I were to suggest that non-white people, of any age or origin, were ‘disproportionately’ lacking in good character, all Hell would break loose.

    • Her statement can and should be deemed offensive by people of good character of all ethnicities.

    • =
    • c7c47-shame
    • The Guardian breathlessly tells us that hundreds of children, some as young as 10, who were born or who grew up in the UK were having their applications for British citizenship denied on the basis of convictions for crimes such as petty theft.

    • Related image

      Bloody good thing too.

    • Lawless brats grow up to be big bad scumbags, and so should not be granted the privilege of citizenship. Far better to send them packing, so some other country, the one they belong in, can handle their dishonest predispostions. .

    • Britain, unfortunately, due to ever-weaker standards of discipline both within the home  – Fresh call for smacking to be outlawed in the home – and in schools, where Eurogroveller John Major outlawed proper punishments years ago…

    • =

    • amajor

    • ..

    • …has plenty of British brats who need to be dealt with.

    • No need to hang onto anti-socials who aren’t British!

    • =

    • out with them
    • =

    • Yet – the very same Home Office that has been funding this outfit has already begun caving in to the rants  of the Runnymede ratpack  reportedly in receipt of largesse from the public purse.

    • Instructions have been issued to take into account “the child’s age and particular circumstances and any mitigating factors such as their ability to understand the consequences of their actions.”

    • hogwashmeterred
    • =
    • What about a question more important than whether the dirty little thieves understood that the consequences of stealing other people’s property…

    • =
    • Image result for  thieves
    • =
    • ….might include a boot on their criminal backsides that sends them back where they belong?

    • A MUCH better question, to ask each other, dear readers, is –

    • When you were ten years old, did YOU understand that thieving was wrong?

    • I did.

      • What child of ten does not understand that stealing is wrong? 


    • Noreen Paterson 17:16 on January 17, 2019 Permalink | Reply

      Somebody should require good character checks on these NGO ‘charities!’


    • Diana 21:35 on January 17, 2019 Permalink | Reply

      That would be unbelievable, a number of years ago, but now?
      If these thieving brats deserve citizenship, then it’s not of the United Kingdom.
      Maybe their parents are criminals too,so why not get rid of the whole criminal clan?


    • Vicki Small 21:52 on January 17, 2019 Permalink | Reply

      You expected anything else from the Home Office?
      I know little enough about the present Home Secretary, but before her we had Amber Rudd and before that we had Theresa May.
      All of them far too soft on illegals.


    • Leo Fyler 22:24 on January 17, 2019 Permalink | Reply

      We Americans have this problem too, even with Trump in. The White House the federal government is handing out our money to extreme left ‘community’gangs for ‘urban’ projects.
      Why is the UK Home Office involved in financing organizations that campaign against the government that is in charge of the UK Home Office?
      If the Communist Party or the Antifa Nazi is want to campaign against government policies, that is their right.
      But why the Home Office? It’s part of the government, right?
      Or is my understanding of the UK government not good enough?


    • Keith Milner 08:27 on January 18, 2019 Permalink | Reply

      Why would anyone not want a good character test for citizenship?
      Why would anyone want known thieves to be allowed to stay in the country?
      These Runnymede people need theur heads read.


    • Edward Lamont 21:42 on January 19, 2019 Permalink | Reply

      Rudd, as you say, Vicki, had May’s full support when those military age adults were brought unvetted into Britain from Calais.
      Rudd,like all of us,could see they weren’t child-migrants but refused to admit it and in fact abetted their lies by refusing to carry out simple dental checks.
      If she had done her duty, and the Home Secretary’s mainduty is to ensure we can live safe and without internal threats, she would surely have found what the Austrians just learned,that 40% of those migrants were liars.


Compose new post
Next post/Next comment
Previous post/Previous comment
Show/Hide comments
Go to top
Go to login
Show/Hide help
shift + esc
%d bloggers like this: