Tagged: UK court Toggle Comment Threads | Keyboard Shortcuts

  • ross1948 18:45 on January 17, 2023 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , , UK court   

    Ingrate Afghan Bints Bite The Hand 

    With all the horrors inflicted by the Taliban pig-ignoramuses on women in Afghanistan….


    Evil Savages! AKA Taliban… 

    ….you’d think those given sanctuary in Britain would wake up every morning and go to bed every night….



    …singing a constant chorus of thanks for the goodness of Great Britain.


    Some bums are incapable of gratiitude.

    Afghan refugees made to move school take UK to court

    Can you believe it?


    Even I was shocked at how low these ingrates could sink.



    A group of Afghan families brought to London after the Taliban took power are taking the government to court because a subsequent move north meant their children had to leave a local school during their GCSE studies https://www.bbc.com/news/education-6423895

    • Amanda Adams 23:16 on January 17, 2023 Permalink | Reply

      These women are beneath contempt and should be put on the next plane for Kabul.
      That’s where they’ll find something real to complain about as far as schooling is concerned.


    • Gavin Nairn 00:05 on January 18, 2023 Permalink | Reply

      I can rell this has made you even more furious than usual and so should we all be.
      Ingratitude’s deeply offensive in any culture and this is a colossal example.
      Send them back.



  • ross1948 22:00 on November 12, 2021 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , , UK court   

    London Court Lets Terror Fan Walk Free! 

    Who is Feras al-Jayoosi?

    Well, perhaps surprisingly, he’s ‘from Swindon,’ a very unremarkable city in England, though we don’t know if he was born there.


    No photo, alas!

    He’s 34 years of age.

    More interestingly, he has just ‘pleaded guilty to four counts of wearing an article supporting a proscribed organisation…’

    Which, you’d think, would mean he is now behind bars.



    Not so!

    Because the clown – aka chief magistrate – at Westminster Court last Friday decided that overt support for ‘the Izz ad-Din al-Qassam Brigades – the military wing of Hamas – and Palestinian Islamic Jihad…

    ….…groups proscribed as terrorist organisations in the UK.

    …doesn’t mean instant imprisonment.

    I frankly don’t get why the Guardian sees any need to say this terrorist supporter was wearing the articles in a part of London ‘with a large Jewish population.’

    Any outfit calling itself ‘Islamic jihad’ is a menace not just to Jews but to every decent Brit.

    But what I also, more indignantly, don’t see is how Golding could possibly assert that –

    “These are difficult cases to sentence.”




    I’d throw the book at the sectarian SOB!

    But Golding gabbled as follows –

    There is a fine line between support for a legitimate cause and support for a proscribed organisation and you have entered your pleas on that basis.”

    Like Hell there’s any fine line.

    The terror gangs named are banned in Britain.

    Any skunks supporting them should not be in Britain, and if said skunks are in Britain…

    ….they should not be free to walk about like honest citizens!

    But Golding ‘released Jayoosi, who the court heard has been diagnosed with autism, on conditional bail.. ‘



    • Mack the Knife 22:06 on November 12, 2021 Permalink | Reply

      Madness rules the land.
      Or at least Westminster magistrates court !


  • ross1948 22:11 on February 15, 2020 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , , , , UK court   

    Not 3 Cheers, Just 1.5 – For UK ‘Free Speech On Freaks’ Ruling! 

    Police compared to Stasi and Gestapo by judge as he rules they interfered in freedom of speech by investigating ‘non crime’ trans tweet


    We called for support of the brave Brit who went to court…

    Christmas Giving? Skip ‘Charities’ – Support British Freedoms! 

    suggesting then, as now, that ‘you can read an excellent article here…


    ……which explains the background to one brave man’s court battle against intolerant PC gestapo cops.’


    Harry Miller

    Challenging Thought Crime: HarryTheOwl v The College of Policing


    …and are pleased that he won…

    …but he only won on one of the issues he took to the judge.

    The individual assault on his liberties was correctly neutralised, but the major threat to free speech represented by the evil ideologues…



    …who concocted the College of Policing’s ‘guidance’ which defines a hate incident as “any non-crime incident which is perceived, by the victim or any other person, to be motivated by a hostility or prejudice against a person who is transgender or perceived to be transgender…”

    …has NOT been disallowed.

    So when Spiked.com gives a banner headline commending the good ruling…

    We need more Harry Millers

    He fought the thoughtpolice, and he won.


    … okay, I agree.

    But the main threat remains to be dealt with.


    A lot of top cops in the UK are mere political ciphers, serving the ruling class’s gaystapo and other (e.g. multicult) agendas in order to win promotion, or, worse, because they share the intolerance of the elite.

    The reponse of those Berk Bobbies in Humberside shows little sign of repentance.

    They are slugs who deserve no respect from those they police.

    And the response of the vexed freaks represents a downright dangerous mentality – they seem to think normal people may not enjoy the right openly to despise their degenerate delusions.


    Pro-Freak English Judge Rules -Truth Is ‘Offensive, Exclusionary!’ 

    And they have friends in high places –

    Men mincing about pretending to be women earn ridicule or contempt.

    The College of Policing has dedicated itself to suppress the expression of normal human feelings.

    Time that cabal was purged.


    mbeiles d

    • Mack the Knife 23:54 on February 15, 2020 Permalink | Reply

      Time they were purged, very long overdue, but do you think ‘Bojo’ will clean up the College of Policing?
      Not in a hundred years.
      We may be out of the EUSSR but Britain is still snared in their so-called ‘values.’


    • Amanda Adams 19:17 on February 16, 2020 Permalink | Reply

      We have even seen people in big trouble for calling a him a her.
      These trannies need to be told to get a life, or dare I say it, grow a set!
      If they dont like being mocked they should stop masquerading as members of the opposite sex.


  • ross1948 20:44 on February 8, 2020 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , Oxford Circus, , sue parfitt, UK court,   

    About Time This Daft Old Priestess Had A Revelation! 

    The Reverend Sue Parfitt told the City of London Magistrates’ Court it had been hard for her as a law-abiding priest to defy police… https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/amp/uk-england-bristol-51389053

    A – she is not a ‘priest!’

    She is a priestess!

    The High Priestess wallpaper

    If she looked like this priestess, I’d offer my house for purposes of detention!


    Just as a female in the acting profession is not an actor but an actress, just as HM, before ascending the throne, was not a prince but a princess!

    And ‘law-abiding?’

    Get real, ya daft old biddy!

    When she set out to make life a misery for decent folk going about their legitimate business by obstructing the public highway at London’s Oxford Circus, the arrogant Priestess Parfitt made a conscious decision to ignore all the many options democracy offers to advance her manic cause.

    I could be harsh and hope she goes to prison.

    But a divine revelation might be better – the truth shall set you free! Otherwise, Vox Pop, Vox Dei?

    Vox Blog, Vox Pop? Brits Want X-Stinkos Hammered! 



  • ross1948 18:13 on December 14, 2018 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: airport sabotage, , , pro-crimmigrant mayhem, UK court   

    Pro-Crimmigrant Stansted Scumbags? Give ‘Em 10 Years Hard Labour! 

    Good to see guilty verdicts in the case of a gang of leftist louts who ran amok at Britain’s Stansted airport in a bid to prevent the deportation of a batch of unwanted and undesirable crimmigrants.

    Related image

    The spokeswoman for the Crown Prosecution Service told the court –

    “Fifteen protesters used equipment such as industrial bolt cutters, chains, expanding foam, scaffolding poles and lock box devices to prevent the take-off of a plane.


    It’s important also to recognise it wasn’t just damage to property, though that of course merits serious punishment, especially when undertaken for such a disgraceful purpose.

    Again, listen to the CPS sum up their heinous criminality.

    “These people placed themselves, the flight crew, airport personnel and police at serious risk of injury or even death due to their actions on the airfield.

    Amazingly, not, the global sticky-beak industry, notably Shamnesty…

    …is making a fuss, not just over the verdicts –  “a blow for human rights” – which are irrefutably correct, but also at the prospects of serious punishment.

    Amnesty International’s Kate Allen showed her total lack of comprehension of what peaceful, lawful protests actually are –

    “This whole case will send a shiver down the spine of anyone who cares about the right to protest in our country.”


    The layabouts could have stood outside the airport with their placards, chanting moronic chants. –


    Hey-hey, ho-ho,we don’t want the scum to go!’


    They chose not to, instead causing hours of delays to honest citizens going on holidays or taking business trips, a shocking indifference to trouble caused to innocent people purely in order to support illegal aliens being properly expelled from Britain.

    Sentencing has not yet been announced.

    What’s required are HEAVY punitive prison terms, maybe ten years each…

    Related image

    …and whatever happened to imposing hard labour on scumbags?

    It’s only a pity, moreover, that there’s not still corporal punishment available for anti-social ratbags like –


    • Helen Brewer, 28;
    • Lyndsay Burtonshaw, 28;
    • Nathan Clack, 30;
    • Laura Clayson, 28;
    • Melanie Evans, 35;
    • Joseph McGahan, 35;
    • Benjamin Smoke, 27;
    • Jyotsna Ram, 33;
    • Nicholas Sigsworth, 29;
    • Melanie Strickland, 35;
    • Alistair Tamlit, 30;
    • Edward Thacker, 29;
    • Emma Hughes, 38;
    • May McKeith, 33;
    • Ruth Potts, 44

     The BBC has not only their names but also their addresses  – but doesn’t provide the latter, which makes it impossible for patriotic citizens to locate them when they get out of jail and tell them what honest citizens think of their antics.

    An alternative would be their places of work, but then it’s entirely probable that a lot of them are welfare bums, leeching off their fellow-citizens’ taxes whilst adding to the tax-burden by causing police and prosecution services to be diverted from normal crime-busting work to handling malevolent obstruction.

    • Penny 21:00 on December 14, 2018 Permalink | Reply

      You’re getting better all the time, Ross.
      If I was stuck at Stansted that day, I would have said about the same as you have but with a few more four-letter words, and yes, ten years or more inside is what they deserve.


    • Noreen Paterson 21:58 on December 14, 2018 Permalink | Reply

      These people should be given ferocious sentences.
      They are enemies to their own country and that Amnesty woman is no better.
      How dare she equate vicious hooliganism with legitimate democratic protest?


    • Mack the Knife 23:34 on December 14, 2018 Permalink | Reply

      There are very few worse people than those who make life difficult for their own fellow countrymen in order to do favours for foreign criminals.
      Ten years?
      You are getting soft, Ross.
      They deserve a lot more than that.


  • ross1948 18:20 on June 7, 2017 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , Judge Tom Crowther, , UK court,   

    UK – Another Ingrate ‘Asylum’ Pig? And As For The Judge! 



    A man has been jailed for beating his wife with a hammer after she forgot to cook his dinner.

    So this disgusting pig, Mohsin Akram, aged 21, has shown ingratitude, not only to the country that insanely let such scum in, but also to the foolish woman who agreed to marry him purely to facilitate his asylum application. You can read about her misery by linking to the story.

    But while we should rage at the pig, it’s the pig-ignorant court that deserves our greatest indignation.



    The Pakistani ‘asylum-seeker’ got married so that he would get a visa, then battered his wife…


    …was told that he could stay in the UK when he is released.


    Pakistani asylum seeker jailed for attacking wife he married to get a visa

    Obviously the judge responsible for this grotesque and dismaying decision needs to be fired.

    His name is Tom Crowther, but despite my diligent search through Google etc. for a photograph, Crowther seems to have managed to keep his visual identity hidden from public inspection.



    It may be that he fears public reaction to his horribly offensive ruling might involve facing questions like that asked by his victim after the case.

    ‘He is an asylum seeker but actually went out of the country last year. He has the stamps on his passport, how can they let an asylum go there, come back and continue life as normal?’


    • Marie Simpson 18:32 on June 7, 2017 Permalink | Reply

      I was composing my other comment when this popped up so I will comment on this too.
      Yes, the alien is a real pig of a man.
      But the judge is a total ass.


  • ross1948 22:52 on April 3, 2017 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: Alice Horton, Canterbury Court, canterbuy court, , Judge Heather Norton, , UK court   

    Crimmigration Collaboratrix Walks Free – Are ALL UK Judges Clueless? 

    We’ve covered, and deplored  – the pitifully soft sentences meted out by British judges to the low-lifes caught illegally importing undesirable aliens.



    But this week so-called ‘British Justice’ hit a new nadir in this particular area of law, with a millenial agitprop ‘volunteer’ turned loose without ANY punishment at all.


    Well, she got 14 months  – but that’s ‘suspended,’ so the bitch won’t spend a day behind bars.

    Alice Horton, 25, admitted trying to bring three illegal immigrants – a 33-year-old Albanian woman and her two teenage sons – into Britain from France. 


    The jerk judge at Canterbury Crown (Clown?) Court, Judge Heather Norton, seems to have swallowed the defence plea that Horton was ‘naive.’


    • Judge Heather Norton

    ‘Judge’ Norton


    But in fact the same news report tells us that the guilty git is part and parcel of the Lewisham Refugee and Migrant Network, a ‘volunteer’ with that outfit, no less. 

    If that’s the case, the criminal bint must be well-acquainted with the sly lies crimmigrants use.

    And there’s something fishy about her attempts at self-exculpation, viz. she believed she was asked to take part because she had no criminal record and looked inconspicuous.

    How she looks, we don’t know, because unfortunately there’s no photo for us to show and shame her. But how did those who asked her to take part KNOW she had no criminal record?

    Did the judge not think this odd?

    The rest of her ‘sentence’ comprises merely 250 hours of unpaid work for the community.

    Maybe judges in England should tale a leaf out of the Indonesian book when it comes to illicit importation of aliens.


    Calls for 9 year sentence for people smuggler

    But, oh, Horton’s also been told to stay indoors between 9 pm and 6am for the next six months…

    That’s probably less a penalty than a boon, in that she’s indoors after dark, so she should be safe from rape by the predatory element among the thousands of so-called ‘asylum-seekers’ currently roaming Britain’s streets!



    Not so some other crimmigrant-sympathising females we’ve noticed in the news.

    …the alleged assault was “effectively covered up” by colleagues because they felt it would undermine their efforts to help refugees…

    Hasil gambar untuk pure filth


    How Many Evil ‘Aid Workers’ Covered Up Calais Rape? 

    And other questions arise.

    On this occasion the wannabe crimmigrants were apprehended in France? Have they been detained and charged with their attempted illegal incursion? 

    And how about those others we have previously noted?  

    Those crimmigrants previously caught with smugglers?


    – Something Akin to Treason Gets A Slap on the Wrist! 

    Were they deported back to the Continent?

    Or are they still in the UK, sponging off British tax-payers?


    Hasil gambar untuk punishment fit the crime


    If the latter, then, at the very least, those who brought them in should have their homes, cars, boats or whatever other property they may possess, CONFISCATED and sold to pay the cost of the crimmigrants’ keep, and, one sincerely hopes, their ultimate expulsion from the British Isles.


    • William Shepherd 13:24 on April 4, 2017 Permalink | Reply

      If the Indonesians know how to sentence people-smugglers, then why don’t our English judges?

      At least the smugglers in the overseas story were doing it for profit. This Alice Horton sounds like she’s acting in solidarity with the ‘asylum’ cause and that makes her a real enemy of our country.


    • Colin 14:07 on April 4, 2017 Permalink | Reply

      Agree 100% with what you say.


Compose new post
Next post/Next comment
Previous post/Previous comment
Show/Hide comments
Go to top
Go to login
Show/Hide help
shift + esc
%d bloggers like this: