Tagged: USA Supreme Court Toggle Comment Threads | Keyboard Shortcuts

  • ross1948 20:55 on July 1, 2022 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , Biden's emissions policy, USA Supreme Court   

    BBC Bias Ruins Morning Coffee! 


    A callow youth presented BBC World News at 8am Jakarta time today…spoiling my morning coffee…

    …but he’s clearly destined for promotion.

    That came after an introductory bias belch from a Beeb Blonde I’ve not noticed before, named Sarah Smith…who gas-bagged that ‘Future Generations May Not Thank’ the US Supreme Court for their carefully argued ruling….

    ….

    …against The Dotard’s preferred emissions policy.

    Nice one SS – who could have said ‘may or may not’  -but that would be objective reporting…

    .

     .

    …and we can’t have that, can we?

    UK Pravda proceeded to throw its loaded dice at us, a mention of Republican states who liked the verdict, but wow!

    ….

    ….

    A Triple Bias Whammy on behalf of the panic pack, not just one insolent UN meddler….

    .

    …’it is not our role to provide legal commentary..’  BUT..

    Then we got Ghastly Governor Gavin Newsom, a familiar figure to my readers…

    Nasty Newsom V The Rag-Tags? C’mon, BBC! 

    California Dream 2 – No More Noisome Newsome? 

    …..scolding the high court from amid trees in California.

    Newsom is entitled to be heard…

    …BUT…

    NO Republican governor brought on to dispute the leftist loon’s lamentable lecturing?

    And of course, one of BBC’s carefully chosen ‘experts,’ a ‘Climate Change Expert,’ the callow Beeb Boy insisted, and amazingly, Professor Noah Diffenbaugh came onto our screens, answering UK Pravda’s leading questions, eg.

    Why are we still arguing about coal in 2022?

    Indeed. BBC has taken its own policy decision, that dissenters be silenced, so how dare we argue?

     

     

     
  • ross1948 00:01 on November 6, 2020 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: ‘judges owing favours’, , , , USA Supreme Court   

    SCOTUS ‘Doing Favours?’ BBC’s Leftist Lucy Roams The Gutter! 


    UK Pravda’s Lefty Lucy Hockings is a piece of work – and that’s for sure!

    …….

    Lefty Lucy Hockings

    oooooooo

    We hadn’t really paid much attention to Lucy the Leftist till very recently.

    Bitter Twitter Bias – BBC’s Lefty Lucy Has Dirty Dorsey’s Back! 

    But this week, it’s fair to say, she sank pretty low…

    Pretty Nurse Faces Down BBC Inquisitors!

    ….anxious perhaps to keep up with The Preying Maitlis!

    But at 6.45pm Jakarta time, 5th November, she stunned me with a question she put to one of her anti-Trump guests.

    About the Supreme Court…” she sleazed.

    .

    The U.S. Supreme Court justices questioned how broadly a federal law targeting immigration advice could be used.

    The U.S. Supreme Court

    .

    Will Trump think like this, that I’ve put some judges there and they owe me some favours!?!”

    What the Hell?

    This is not just an insult to the President, but an insult to every judge on the Supreme Court, with its implication that they have given Donald Trump any reason to assume that’s how they make their decisions.

    It goes without saying that they don’t.

    They have no need to!

    Already one of his most recent appointees has cast a vote which deeply disappointed millions of Trump supporters.

    He complained about another SCOTUs ruling a week ago.

    These judges go their own way, left or  right or haywire, precisely because they are appointed for life.

    They don’t ‘do favours!’ 

    .

    .

    Whatever else Trump may be, he is not naive.

    Lefty Lucy surely knows that as well as you and I do, so she has NO excuse for spreading, WITHOUT EVIDENCE, this entirely UNFOUNDED insinuation.

     

     
    • Ken Kasic 16:20 on November 6, 2020 Permalink | Reply

      Thanks, Ross, you explained very well why she is out of line.
      That BBC is using the people’s taxes, without their consent, for this trash-talk.
      It is not an American problem but up to British people who have got to get it reined in.

      Like

    • Del Genet 00:37 on November 7, 2020 Permalink | Reply

      Arrogant woman, very insulting, but I have got the impression that is normal BBC style.

      Like

    • Ben Baniek 14:00 on November 7, 2020 Permalink | Reply

      That goes way too far.

      Like

  • ross1948 07:42 on October 12, 2020 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , , packing court, , USA Supreme Court, voters don't deserve to know   

    Is BBC Hiding Biden’s Court ‘ABC?’ 


    Sleepy Joe Biden quite recently displayed an arrogant, bloody-minded contempt ( hence my use of his ‘ABC‘ in my headline!) for the USA electorate…

    ….

    =

    …by saying that American voters ‘DON’T DESERVE‘ to know if he will seek to pack the Supreme Court with judges sympathetic to his ideological agenda.

    I have this morning inserted the words ‘Biden   don’t’ deserve‘ then ‘Biden court’ then ‘Biden packing‘ into the BBC’s own website search box, but nothing pops up.

    =

    =

    Can it really be the case that UK Pravda is hiding the most telling statement heard so far from the Democrat Party’s presidential candidate?

    Just curious.

    =

    So can any of you find anything?

     
    • Ken Kasic 08:56 on October 12, 2020 Permalink | Reply

      It’s hard to believe even the left-controlled BBC would hide a story as big as this.
      I will have a break later and dig into their recent news reports and confirm with you later.
      .

      Like

    • Jim ex Jakarta 10:09 on October 12, 2020 Permalink | Reply

      BBC today is too busy making hay with Dr. Fauzi complaining about being quoted in a Trump ad.
      Why would they give any time to Biden telling us he despises America’s right to know what he plans to do with a very important part of the constitution?

      Like

    • Lois Wadden 12:59 on October 12, 2020 Permalink | Reply

      I took a look but can see no BBC coverage of Biden’s words, though many other media have verified that’s what he said. Even non-conservative media reported this contempt for voters.

      Like

  • ross1948 04:09 on July 15, 2020 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: Daniel Lee, , , USA Supreme Court   

    At Last! First Federal Execution For HOW MANY Years? 


    After some very off-beat rulings recently, credit where credit is due to the Supreme Court in the USA, for a sensible decision, albeit a narrow one, which sent the beast below to Hell yesterday.

     oooooooooooo
    Daniel Lewis LeeTriple murderer Daniel Lewis Lee
    ….

    While the BBC reported the high court move, they do not appear to have given details of the brutal torture and slaughter of a harmless family for which Lee was sentenced.

    Yet those SCOTUS Justices certainly knew all about the horrible crime.

    .

    .
    Hard to understand how four of them could vote to spare the fiend. Have they no consciences at all?
    Hard to believe this was the first federal execution for 17 years. Justice delayed is justice ill-served.
    Hard to believe that a lower court judge held up justice yet again this week, on the grounds that there were ‘unresolved legal issues!’ https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada

    The slaughter took place TWENTY FOUR years ago!

    What possible legal technicalities could some simpering attorneys dredge up at this stage?

    Still, better late than never!

    Now keep the assembly line rolling…

    .

    ..

    ..there are many more caged beasts still waiting in line for those lethal injections!

     

     
  • ross1948 14:13 on April 2, 2019 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , Liar Blasey, russell Bucklew, , USA Supreme Court   

    Murderer? Rapist? Who Gives A Tinker’s Cuss If He Suffers Pain? 


    More good reasons to rejoice that only fools believed Liar Christine Blasey last year…

    Dodgy Doorways Into Blasey’s Blurry Brain 

    …because it was the fact that Justice Kavanaugh serves on the US Supreme Court that made sure the vote was 5-4 this week.

    A tight margin, and many more likely, until that ghastly old bat Bader Ginsburg drops out, but enough to send the killer-rapist to the fate he richly deserves.

    =

    Image result for bucklew death

    Bucklew was convicted of the 1996 murder in southeastern Missouri of Michael Sanders, who was living with Bucklew’s former girlfriend Stephanie Ray at the time. Bucklew fatally shot Sanders at his trailer home, kidnapped and raped Ray, shot at Sanders’ 6-year-old son and wounded a police officer before being apprehended, according to court papers….  https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-court-execution/death-row-inmates-not-guaranteed-a-painless-death-supreme-court-rules-

    So finally, after stalling over legalistic niceties for years, the brute gets a little bitty taste of the same nightmare he inflicted on his victims?

    Who cares?

     
    • Danny Jacomi 14:24 on April 2, 2019 Permalink | Reply

      I like what you say.
      We get so many liberals bleeding their hearts out for this rapist-murderer, and no compassion for the victims at all.
      That Sotomayr on the Supreme Court gives me the creeps, fancy lawyer safe in her fancy house, no care at all for poor people in projects or trailer parks who can get erased anytime because of people like Bucklew.
      Let him die and if he suffers, so be it!

      Like

    • Matt Vallian 14:33 on April 2, 2019 Permalink | Reply

      Ross, you are like a hangover cure.
      Whenever I get a headache listening to the news-liberals mouthing off like today about this lowlife Bucklew and what a shame he might feel pain, I reach for the computer and tune into your blog.
      Today it is just a totally refreshing experience.
      Thanks!
      We should all be celebrating the five good justices and hope just like you do that Trump has another chance soon to make it six.

      Like

    • Ian Broome 15:50 on April 2, 2019 Permalink | Reply

      Not American but wish I was when I hear their senior judges talk sense like this.
      What amuses me is how the rapist’s defenders say that it might be ‘cruel and unusal punishment’ if he is pained by the executiion.
      The very same people say that ANY death penalty even as painless as can be is also ‘cruel and unusual.’
      So they are just using the Bucklew case as an excuse to save every killer-rapist.
      Liberals are never satisfied. We should never try to satisfy them.
      I wish we had the death penalty back where I come from, in New Zealand, but the politicians will never give us a democratic vote on capital punishment.

      Like

    • Luis 17:21 on April 2, 2019 Permalink | Reply

      What I do not understand is why all the fuss? Why do all the media make big news of this?
      Your description of his crimes is enough to empty any rational person of pity for the man.

      Like

      • Diana 19:55 on April 2, 2019 Permalink | Reply

        Luis, most of the media are liberal, so they don’t like and probably don’t even understand, how ordinary working people think.

        Like

    • Mort 17:30 on April 2, 2019 Permalink | Reply

      You can add another feather to Kavanagh’s cap for another recent ruling which was also 5-4.

      I know you use that liberal Guardian as a source so I am surprised you never noticed that ‘immigrants awaiting deportation’ can now be held ‘after they have completed prison terms for criminal convictions.’
      https://www.theguardian.com/law/2019/mar/19/supreme-court-gives-trump-victory-immigration-detention-criminal-convictions

      A good Trump move, approved by the Supreme Court.

      Like

      • Lane Acart 01:22 on April 3, 2019 Permalink | Reply

        That’s right, Mort.
        Trump may get the wall built and I hope so but his greatest achievment will be turning the high court into a pro-American institution again.
        Still, 5/4 is fragile.
        We need another vacancy or better still two more.
        Bad Bader should go hole up in an old folks home and make way for some judge who understands the constitution a lot better,

        Like

  • ross1948 10:22 on June 28, 2018 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: 'American Progress, 'American Progress' far-left 'think-tank, , Ian Millhiser, Justice Anthony Kennedy, , , USA Supreme Court   

    Lousy Left Heaps Insults On Senior Cit – For Retiring At 81! 


    Most people retire when they’re in their sixties.

    So when somebody soldiers on till he reaches the age of 81, you’d think most other people would wish him well after carrying on that long.

    ooooooo

    Gambar terkait

    Anthony Kennedy

    =

    Yet the charmless American Left has been hurling abuse at Anthony Kennedy, abject ingratitude in view of his key, and appalling, role in legalising pervert weddings, and other opinons…

    Justice Kennedy And ‘An Affront’ To ‘The Angries!’ 

    …which have damaged the USA in various respects.

    I give you the link to an account of the level –  and multiplicity – of vilification this old man has been subjected to, the most explicit example perhaps this, from a foul-mouth pinko creep I’ve never heard of…

     Ian Millhiser-

    ‘F–ck. You. Justice. Kennedy.

     http://dailycaller.com/2018/06/27/liberal-meltdown-over-justice-kennedy-retirement/ – .

    …but who, on investigation, is not only ‘a senior fellow at American Progress,‘ but also – inexplicably,given his inarticulate gutter-gob – the ‘Justice Editor’ at that organisation…

    =

    Gambar terkait

    =

    …again, I’ve not previously heard of the agitprop outfit but can only disdain any gang that elevates such a sorry specimen to editorial status.

    I certainly found Kennedy’s bizarre rulings both offensive and obnoxious, but the Left have little to complain about if one examines his overall record.

    I’d say let him rest in peace and maybe reflect on his follies.

    Wouldn’t it be nice, however, if that ghastly old hag, Baba Yaga Bader Ginsburg, would emulate Kennedy, hop on her broomstick, and make way for President Trump to appoint an infinitely wiser person (wouldn’t be hard to find somebody better than the grisly witch!) to the Supreme Court.

    ===

    Baba Yaga Ginsburg

    ‘Regrets?’ No Way – Baba Yaga Ginsburg Must Go! 

    It would be fascinating to see if the Left heaped any insults worse than mine on her hideous old head.

    Old Bat Taking Flight? Bye-Bye to Bad Bader Bad-Ass? 

     

     
    • Vinnie 11:59 on June 28, 2018 Permalink | Reply

      The Left are very ungrateful.
      I hope Baba Yaga leaves the court soon, alive or otherwise.

      Like

  • ross1948 10:05 on June 5, 2018 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: Belfast bakery, , , , , , USA Supreme Court   

    A Glorious Victory Over The Gaystapo! 


    What a knock-out victory for liberty!

    America’s Supreme Court has UPHELD the right of Christians not to be bullied by queer agitators and state inquisitors…

    .

    ….in a famous case we have looked at more than once.

    =

    …Jack Phillips, the Christian baker involved, had gone out of his way NOT to affront homos. He is perfectly willing to sell them any of the confectionaries he makes…

    =

    Hasil gambar untuk https://Usa supreme zcourt Kennedy

    …he does not discriminate in his business and would happily sell gay customers any other cakes on offer in his bakery….

    …EXCEPT wedding cakes, because his Christian creed asserts that homo-marriage is not marriage at all, and that he has a constitutional right to stand by his religious beliefs.

    Justice Kennedy And ‘An Affront’ To ‘The Angries!’ 

    ===========

    I need not give all the details of this wise ruling – they’re here, in the PJ Media link, and I hope your day is as brightened as mine was when I read them.   ,

    https://pjmedia.com/trending/breaking-supreme-court-rules-in-favor-of-colorado-baker-in-gay-wedding-cake-case/

    So a great result in the USA -though there are other similar cases yet to be decided!

    Yet decent people in The Old Country are still waiting to see if Britannia is still the Mother of the Free.

    Or whether evil may triumph…

    Freedom On Trial, As Belfast ‘Cake Case’ Continues… 

    …the Supreme Court in Belfast has yet to release an opinion on a lower court ruling that found the owners of a bakery discriminated against a gay activist for refusing to bake a cake with the slogan “Support Gay Marriage.”

    .https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-44361162

     
    • Mort 11:35 on June 5, 2018 Permalink | Reply

      Not a knock-out, Ross, though a cause to celebrate.
      There are lots of other victims.

      Like

    • Lorne 12:48 on June 5, 2018 Permalink | Reply

      You showed true support from beyond the seas and it is truly appreciated but this is no knock-out.
      The court decision is only about giving the baker justice.
      All the many other good people getting bullied by these ‘gay’ mobsters are not included in this so we have to keep fighting the gaystapo.
      Keep up the good work.

      Like

c
Compose new post
j
Next post/Next comment
k
Previous post/Previous comment
r
Reply
e
Edit
o
Show/Hide comments
t
Go to top
l
Go to login
h
Show/Hide help
shift + esc
Cancel
%d bloggers like this: