Tagged: voters Toggle Comment Threads | Keyboard Shortcuts

  • ross1948 09:00 on March 25, 2018 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: Anchorage Alaska, Proposition 1, , , , voters   

    Gaystapo Assault In Alaska – Fight Back! 


    We have a lot of readers in the USA but I don’t know how many of those are resident in Alaska.

    However, the decent people in one Alaskan city, Anchorage, are under attack by the gaystapo.

    And the key battle will be fought in less than two weeks.

    Gambar terkait

    The good guys need a helping hand.

    Here’s part of an appeal from Mass Resistance!

    The election is less than two weeks away, so please act today with the most generous gift you can afford to give….

    LGBT activists can’t come up with convincing arguments to persuade voters to endorse their position, so instead they resort to ugly attacks on opponents, labeling them bigots. We say, “baloney.” Preventing men from having access to women in intimate areas like showers and bathrooms isn’t about bigotry, it’s about biology.

    Gambar terkait

    ====

    Just like the Houston City Council did, local politicians in Anchorage, Alaska ignored the wishes of citizens and enacted an ordinance that allows men to force their way into intimate areas reserved for women and girls simply by claiming a female “gender identity.”

    And just like in Houston, citizens have risen up to say “enough” and put the issue on the ballot. It will be decided at the April 3rd municipal election…

    ——

     Looking through various news sources, I see the unpleasant far-left hate-group SPLC is weighing in, though it’s been discredited in the eyes of more and more people…

    Have A Look At This New Site – Excellently Exposing SPLC

    …and of course the ghastlies of the ACLU are hard at work on the side of the freakos.

    It’s almost always a given that something supported by that lot is unworthy of support by decent people.

    =

    Hasil gambar untuk anti-aclu

    Crucified by ACLU Gaystapo, Christian Gran Faces Easter Hell! 

    =

    Seeking respectability, the ACLU formed a front organisation with collaborationist business busybodies on board, and had the gall to call their front ‘Fair Anchorage.’ 

    =

    =

    Happily, the pro-perv outfit was shown up for its UNFAIR dirty tricks, shamelessly purporting to have the local top cop on their side.

    Exposed, they hastily back-tracked and had to offer a grovelling apology to the Anchorage Chief of Police.   http://mustreadalaska.com/fair-anchorage-weaponized-top-cop-in-bathroom-fight/

    =

    The gaystapo is mobilising against Proposition 1.

    =====

    ….PS — Here is a link to the campaign’s current TV ad; your donation to the campaign will help keep it on the air. Please give today.

    Let’s hope the forces of darkness are defeated!

     
    • Enid 14:13 on March 25, 2018 Permalink | Reply

      Dirty minds, dirty tricks, that’s the gaystapo style.
      You should name the businesses collaborating with them so a boycott can be started.

      Like

  • ross1948 10:06 on March 17, 2016 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , , , , , voters   

    Brexit and Expats – Court V Cur Cameron? 


    I see there’s a challenge in the High Court in London this week to one of Cameron’s many broken pledges, the (non)-restoration of voting rights to several million Brits.

    EU - referendum vote

    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/eureferendum/12194820/Ensuring-expats-vote-in-the-EU-referendum-could-guarantee-Brexit.html

    Posh Boy actually promised that the iniquitous ban on Brits who’ve lived abroad for 15 years or more, currently disenfranchised, would have that right if his party won the last election.

    ————

    • 0d8e4-kingcameronarrogant
    • ———–
    • But suddenly it’s not convenient to keep his word in time for them to have their say in the Brexit referendum in June.

    So we have the bizarre spectacle of hundreds of thousands of foreigners, Eire citizens…

    ———-

    leprech

    Happy St. Patrick’s Day, sir, but don’t vote in other people’s referenda!

    ———

    …wielding votes on an historic BRITISH decision – and no doubt paying heed to their own country’s hostility to the campaign to Get Britain Out Fear in the air as Irish firms worry about Brexit – while many more potential voters, loyal subjects of Her Majesty, are told to get lost.

    I don’t know if the Telegraph article linked above is correct in its assumption that the cause of deliverance from Brussels would benefit from the promise Cameron made and has so blithely broken. Some of the complainants seem to be motivated purely by individual economic circumstances, concerned that their sunny stays in Italy or France might be disrupted by Brexit.

    That kind of selfish perspective is regrettable – the recovery of a nation’s freedom ought to rank higher than any personal advantage or disadvantage.

    But nevertheless, there is a wrong to be righted.

    I frankly doubt the court will rule against Cur Cameron. It’s a matter of legislation and needs to be fought at Westminster.

    But there is still time.

    referndmlet peole vote

     
  • ross1948 17:05 on February 17, 2016 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , , , elections T, Hamza Tzortzis, , , PIE, Tom O'Connell, , , voters   

    Save the Children – From Labour Child-Sex Fans! 


    A notorious paedophile who once campaigned for sex with children to be legalised has been allowed to join the Labour party.

    ———–

    Tom O’Carroll

    ————

    Tom O’Carroll, former chairman of the Paedophile Information Exchange (Pie), is understood to have joined after the election of Jeremy Corbyn as leader in September…http://www.thetimes.co.uk/tto/news/politics/article4691418.ece

    Please note, one does not just declare oneself a member of the Labour Party! Applications have to be approved, so we are forced to conclude that this Dirty Old Man’s views and cravings are clearly NOT to the distaste of those Labour Party apparatchiks who welcomed him aboard.

    No doubt he’ll be nominated as a candidate in due course.

    After all, Corbyn wants hordes of primitives to be imported as ‘refugees’ and in due course given the vote.  And we know that an unknown but definite proportion of these unwelcome aliens are pedophiles.

    hands off

    ————

    Minors as young as 11yo already married when seeking asylum in Norway – govt data

    https://www.rt.com/news/331035-norway-refugees-underage-marriages/

    Up till recently, most Brits would suggest castration and/or execution as suitable treatment for slugs who are into sex with children – pedophile perverts would keep a low profile.

    ————–

    • Predators and Child Molestors
    • ——————–
    • But no longer – with alien creeps arriving in significant numbers from cess-pool countries where child-‘marriage’ is part of the so-called ‘culture,’ the Left will naturally proceed to find ‘cultural’ excuses for such bestial barbarism, because there will soon be a growing pool of alien-origin pedophile voters in Britain, looking for congenial candidates.

    And who more congenial than this sleazy swine O’Connell.

    And we should be asking ourselves which other unwholesome things will crawl out from under stones and be embraced by unscrupulous party hacks as electoral opportunity, as the Obamanisation of Labour – American soldiers in Afghanistan are now being instructed to ignore the sexual abuse of boys by Afghan allies – proceeds EVER SO gaily?  

    ——

    British Islamic speaker Hamza Tzortzis, who has previously defended child marriage, is one of 12 speakers who will address the United Muslims of Australia Quest for Success conference in Sydney in May Tzortzis

    ————-

    Maybe that British Islamic preacher who has previously condoned child paedophilia and rape in a public debate  http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3449979/Islamic-speaker-Hamza-Tzortzis-defended-child-marriage-speak-United-Muslims-Australia-conference.html

    Hamza Tzortzis is only ‘British’ in the sense that Anjem CHoudary is ‘British’- in other eords not British at all. Yet irrational ctiizenship laws mean he could well stand for Parliament.

    Meanwhile the pig who defended child marriage in a debate in Australia back in 2013, has been invited as one of 12 speakers coming to Australia to speak at a Muslim conference.

    Sickos who provoke ‘Islamophobia’ every time theyopen their mouths, but damn sure Turnbull’s mate the Grand Muti won’t condemn them! 

    Britain shouldn’t allow Tzortzis back, if Oz is ill-advised enough to accept his foul presence there.

    Civilised countries are no place for predators.

     

     

     

     
    • Pam Trevelyan 18:23 on February 17, 2016 Permalink | Reply

      You are very possibly correct about this as far as Labour lefts and ‘primitives’ will come together as natural allies for sexploitation of children but the Labour Party has been going this way for many years.

      It was the Labour insiders, though, not the grassroots. My neighbours as a child were staunch Labour voters and they were the best of people. They would turn in their graves if they saw Labour today.

      It probably started in the 1960s as did so many bad things but in the 1970s look up what Patricia Hewitt saidand did
      It goes a lot deeper than just going for migrant votes. This is a good link to follow, from last year. http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2015/09/21/heres-why-the-progressive-left-keeps-sticking-up-for-pedophiles/

      Like

    • David Craige 20:52 on February 17, 2016 Permalink | Reply

      No, not this tme, Ross, you are missing the background to all this although it’s true those child-wedding animals coming into Europe need attention with a pair of scissors. They will vote for socialists whatever country they get into because socialists give more free stuff
      The British disease is different. Even in the 1960s, Labour have always been dirty, and if you look back though your own blog you wrote about they had Tom Driberg as Labour national chairman who’s criminal behaviour was known to everyone who mattered in Westminster and Fleet Street. They colluded to cover it up from the rest of us.
      And the Tories are no better, Maggie’s Ministers, it was only after the buggers died off has the press been nibbling at it.
      ‘Lying press’ is nothing new. .

      Like

    • Vincent Southey 13:21 on February 19, 2016 Permalink | Reply

      You do well to warn of what is going on, with all the very nasty migrants bringing very nasty customs.
      You could even so have looked further into Labour’s very many pro-pervert figures.
      I’m emailing some newspaper links so you can see it’s not just the migrants.

      Like

  • ross1948 00:41 on December 24, 2015 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: 1975, , , campaign propaganda, , , free mailing, handbook, , , voters, Wilson   

    Cameron Planning Action Re-Play of 1975 Dirty Tricks? 


    Who needs a Christmas Pantomime, when we have Casty’s Flying Circus to entertain us?

    The blustering ‘Battling for Britain’ rhetoric surely has nobody fooled. Cameron abandoned most of the key demands ages hence, and is now down to waffling over how long can Euro-migrants hang about the UK before they get benefits.

    No border controls, no parliamentary control over Brussels diktats, no clipping of the ECJ’s wings…

    ————

    • 0d8e4-kingcameronarrogant
    • —————
    • …his emptiness goes on and on, yet somehow he expects us to think he’s Churchill Reincarnate.

    Meanwhile, revelations of more dirty tricks, an action replay of that propaganda blitz that surely skewed the outcome of the 1975 referendum. You will recall, if you’re old enough, that there were then, as now, official ‘yes’ and official ‘no’ campaign groups.

    00

    EU - referendum vote

    00

    Each was allotted mailing rights to give voters a balanced basis on which to make their decision. Both sides naturally bombarded the electorate with facts, figures and arguments to woo the undecideds and bolster commitment among any wavering supporters.

    Fair fight? Maybe, EXCEPT that the in-crowd feared fair play.

    The Government tilted the scales with an EXTRA pro-Brussels brochure – a final push which may well have made the difference.

    Forty years is no twinkling of an eye, so it occurred to me to check out that episode, and lo…Cameron’s dirty tricks move, reported as news this past week, was predicted SIX MONTHS ago, in the Guardian no less.!  

    —————

    He will be copying Wilson’s tactics in 1975 when a leaflet through every door greatly extended the yes vote’s clout, at least in the eyes of no campaigners like young Jack Straw, then adviser to dissident minister Barbara Castle.

    http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2015/jun/08/camerons-hard-man-tactics-over-eu-referendum-could-backfire

     

    ———————————–

    Whatever its impact, it was a scandalous move that demolished all pretensions to impartial administration of the democratic process.

    And here we go again! 

    Desperate Cameron to send ‘pro-EU document to EVERY British Family 

    The document will explain “why we need to stay in the EU” by outlining “the benefits” of David Cameron’s planned reforms…

    But fear not!

    HE DENIES IT!

    ——————————————————–

    • churchill
    • BTW, I see some lying toads are still seeking to adduce Winston as a Europhile, when he made it clear that his ideas on a ‘European union’ were predicated on that putative entity being a partner of the UK, not the UK being a part of it.

    Meanwhile, the Bruges Group has produced a useful little book for freedom fighters, those promoting the OUT cause in the referendum.

    ————-

     

     

     

     

     

    Research
    Tackling the EU Empire
    A handbook for Europe’s democrats, whether on the political Right, Left or Centre
    Basic critical facts on the EU/Eurozone

    Professor Anthony Coughlan of Trinity College Dublin and TEAM the international alliance of EU-critical movements

    Readers are invited to use or adapt this document for their own purposes, including changing its title if desired, and to circulate it to others without any need of reference to or acknowledgement of its source. People circulating it to others might consider adding an addendum outlining their own country’s experience of the EU/Eurozone.

    Click here to read the research online

    The glory of European civilisation has been the diversity of its national components – in culture, science, political institutions, economic actors, legal systems, education systems, tax codes, fashion. In classical Europe emulation and competition between nations, communities and individuals spurred creativity and innovation. The peak of Europe’s cultural achievements occurred when its political units were numerous and small – in Athenian Greece, Renaissance Italy, 17th century Netherlands, 18th century Germany. This classical Europe, which is synonymous with much of what is best in human civilization, is the opposite of the centralised “Europe” of the Brussels bureaucracy, with its mania for imposing uniformity and “harmonization” by means of its supranational laws.

    The EU is a Supranational political construct. Supranationalism is the opposite of internationalism, which is a benign and progressive concept. Internationalism – from Latin inter, “between” – implies the pre-existence of sovereign Nation States. It refers to relations of co-operation between the States that constitute the international community, but with each controlling and deciding its own domestic and external affairs in accordance with the wishes of its people. Recognition of States based on the right to self-determination of nations and peoples is a basic principle of modern democracy and international law.

    Supranationalism, in contrast to internationalism, implies a hierarchy, with the supranational level on top. Internationalism implies legal and political equality between the parties. Properly understood, internationalism is opposed to all forms of chauvinism and xenophobia. It implies coexistence among progressive “nationalisms” – that is, broad nationalisms rather than narrow, using the positive rather than the negative sense of that word in English. It implies patriotism and love of country, combined with respect for the many national communities into which humanity is divided and admiration for their varied cultural and other achievements.

    Internationalism delights in the diversity of nations. Supranationalism seeks to erode national differences and seeks the erosion of State sovereignty. Internationalism seeks to establish and maintain it. Supranationalism means rule by technocrats, supposed experts who are not elected, without democratic control. The EU Commission is a good example. Supranationalism leaves ordinary people cold. In the EU it means “Brussels talking to Brussels” as the elite groups concerned get ever more removed from citizens and voters in the different national communities they come from.

     

     
  • ross1948 00:14 on October 29, 2015 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , , , , , voters   

    Merkel's Manikin Manfred – 'Ignore What Voters Think!' 


    The arrogant elitism of the phoney ‘conservative’ faction in the Strasbourg ‘Parliament’ was on display in Spain last week, when the talking-shop toadies got together….

    ———–

    ——

    Their chairman, Manfred Weber MEP, belongs to the Bavarian wing of Mama Stasi Merkel’s CDU party, which calls itself the CSU. 

    But unlike many CSU activists, he toes the spineless line on crimmigrants and loathes straight-talking realists (aka ‘populists’)  who put up resistance to the undesirable alien influx.

    ===============

    Weber wants to distance himself from such populists and their “simple answers.”

    Since when do we ignore the old axiom that the simplest solution is usually the right one …

    ——-

    IMMIGRATION PROTESTS

    – prompt action to STOP THE INVASION – rather than asinine answers which pander to welfare parasites and endanger honest citizens by surrounding them with savages?

    But let’s pause and remind ourselves of the official name of the ‘conservative’ group in Strasbourg of which Weber’s the big boss ( under Merkel’s big thumb, of course)

    They style themselves the European People’s Party!

    But do they, does Weber, give a monkey’s what the ‘people’ – his people, or French people, or Dutch people – want done about the alien tsunami?

    Right now it would behoove us to ignore opinion polls, and just do what has to be done.

    http://www.dw.com/en/europes-conservatives-fight-over-merkels-refugee-speech/a-18800824

    In other words..

    =================

    nazi-eu-hitler

    elite arrogance-s,

    —————

    Old Adolf spawned his own anti-democratic Pan-Europe movement in Bavaria, and it sounds like there’s still fertile soil down that way, if Weber’s vapouring is anything to go by.

    After Turn-Coat Tusk’s demand last week for a shut-down of dissent to his Euro-Diktat…

    TurnCoat Tusk To Nation-States: ‘Don’t Argue – Do As We Say!’ 

     

    ….surely nobody thinks the EUSSR has the slightest concern for the peoples corralled in its cultural marxist collective.

     
  • ross1948 18:30 on April 13, 2015 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , , , , , , Springfield, , voters   

    Democracy – Thriving in Springfield, Dying in Dublin? 


    A wonderful result in Springfield, Missouri, where citizens voted down in a free and fair referendum one of those nonsense ‘anti-discrimination’ local laws, which their effete city councillors sought to impose on them.

    A slim but clear majority  –  51.4 percent of voters  – slapped down the arrogant left-lib council, which had added sexual orientation and gender identity to a nondiscrimination plan that already existed.   http://www.wnd.com/2015/04/backlash-voters-torpedo-lgbt-protection/

    My only concern? That the majority was not higher.

    But look at Eire. The equally effete elite in Dublin has run amok, fair play gone out the window, media overtly deploring the idea of providing an equal hearing to both sides in the imminent referendum on ‘gay’ so-called ‘marriage.

    Frankly, I hadn’t been paying much attention to that far-away fracas, but had been reasonably impressed by the fact that, unlike Craven Cur Cameron in the UK, the ruling class in Dublin had been obliged to consult the people.

    But after reading the article linked here – http://www.spiked-online.com/newsite/article/from-ireland-to-indiana-the-spread-of-gay-marriage-groupthink/ it becomes clear that the snob media has turned its back on democratic values.

     

    LIBERAL-MEDIA-e1315327567357-300x211

    The Irish Times openly abhors the very idea of balanced reporting, which, it claims, represents  ‘a skewed view of what balance is’, These media creeps reckon that allowing ‘Middle Ireland,’ ‘the mainstream,’or ‘the silent majority,’ a platform for their views is a bad idea.

    ooo

    elite arrogance-s

    oooo

    ‘The only consequence of such ‘polarised conversations’ is that ‘facts and reason are drowned out by emotional arguments and controversies.’

    And it ain’t just the gaystapo media, but a pack of shrill shrinks, who deem even allowing democratic debate is bad for the poor queers’ psyches!

    What a sick society, where democratic decision-making on key constitutional and moral decisions is transformed into a phoney war fought under unwritten rules based on pinko prejudice. 

     
c
Compose new post
j
Next post/Next comment
k
Previous post/Previous comment
r
Reply
e
Edit
o
Show/Hide comments
t
Go to top
l
Go to login
h
Show/Hide help
shift + esc
Cancel
%d bloggers like this: