Denmark’s ‘Crimmigrant Jewels’ Law – Working Well?

The Leftal, sorry, The Local, seems almost to be gloating when it claims that no jewellery has been confiscated from so-called ‘refugees’ since the law was overwhelmingly passed three years ago, to a chorus of pro-crimmigrant disapproval.

  

‘The Leftal’ – Pro-Crimmigrant Bias Against Danes! 

It got such great support because, obviously, there is no reason why aliens should get to soak up Danish welfare benefits if they’re loaded.

Far from saying that it was a waste of legislation because there’s been no big haul of alien gems, it seems to me that any treasure toted by ‘refugees’ has likely been left with kin or comrades in Germany…

=

…where Merkel doesn’t give a fig for what the uninvited undesirables do.

Or, as Minister for Immigration and Integration Inger Støjberg says, they have chosen to stay in Germany, with their gold, because Denmark’s overall alien intake has fallen. 

=

Inger Stolberg

====

Inger is usually a very smart lady, which is why I’m surprised she doesn’t want to take up the eminently sensible suggestion from the Danish People’s Party, whose immigration spokesman, Martin Henriksen, put forward recently.

The DPP want ‘the law to go further by checking whether asylum seekers have money in foreign bank accounts.’

https://www.thelocal.dk/20190124/three-years-after-denmarks-infamous-jewellery-law-hit-world-headlines-not-a-single-piece-has-been-confiscated

Even the Social Democrat spokesman is all for that, and said something commendable.

“I think it’s completely logical, regarding valuables worth over 10,000 kroner, that this should apply whether they are in your back pocket or in a German bank account,” .

But Inger disagrees. She thinks it isn’t ‘realistic.’

How so?

Don’t all European police forces cooperate in examination of suspicious bank accounts, regardless of borders, if there’s reason to believe the account-holders are up to no good?

People known to have violated Europe’s territorial integrity, oozing across the Aegean or the Med…

=

=========

….as nearly all the rabble colonising Denmark and other northern nations have done, are ipso facto lawless and should be ear-marked for investigation.

 

‘The Leftal’ – Pro-Crimmigrant Bias Against Danes!

A number of readers have asked me to justify my criticism recently…

 https://rossrightangle.wordpress.com/2016/08/29/media-bias-the-local-versus-france/

…of one part of the European media, namely ‘The Local.’

That wasn’t the first time it’s merited my attention.

 London’s Collaborateur Rally – ‘Ashamed To Be British?’ 

They argued that only one or two instances of bias don’t deserve my harsh condemnation. So I decided to flick back and see what else they’ve done that indicates a slanted approach to the news.  

Here’s the first sentence from a report in the Danish edition of ‘The Local,’ earlier this summer

For the first time since it came into effect in February, Danish police have confiscated cash from arriving migrants using the much-discussed ‘jewellery law.’

• http://www.thelocal.dk/20160630/danish-police-use-infamous-jewellery-law-for-first-time 

That’s the wise piece of legislation passed as the Danes faced a horde of alien parasites marching north across the German border.

–

–

It authorised Danish police to confiscate assets from wannabe welfare bums – a description which certainly fits many of the so-called ‘refugee’ rabble invited to invade Germany by Mama Stasi…

———-

——————

… who, ever since the tsunami built up, has been demanding other, more sensible governments take a ‘quota’ of the albatrosses she hung round Germany’s neck.

ooooooo

It was indeed much discussed, but there were few signs that normal Danish people disagreed with the parliamentary majority that approved what came to be called the ‘jewellery law.’ Most normal folk would agree it makes good sense.

Besides it has hardly been used at all, and that’s curious. Then last week Copenhagen Police caught five people trying to enter the country on falsified documents.

Five Iranians were nabbed at the airport and placed in detention for using fake documents.

 

Since the gang had a small fortune about their persons –  129,000 kroner – police used the ‘jewellery law’ provision to confiscate dollars and euros amounting to a total of 79,600 kroner.

——————-

Nothing amiss about that.

Caught, arrested, proper procedure applied…

000

—-

…but NOW get the headline that topped the story.

—————————————————-

 Danish police use infamous ‘jewellery law’ for first time

Infamous?

Dictionary definition – well-known for being bad : known for evil acts or crimes. : causing people to think you are bad or evil. Definition of Infamous by Merriam-Webster

In what imaginable way is a sensible, popular law, passed constitutionally, in a parliamentary democracy ‘INFAMOUS?’

Headlines are not usually created by the journos who write the story. Headlines are the job of editorial staff.

The pro-crimmigrant slob who plastered that biased drivel across the top of the article should be identified and dismissed.

But that’s unlikely.

 

Bias is par for the course with the leftist Local.